View Full Version : The WWE should have someone who is undefated at Backlash or something like UT at WM
See that nice abbreviation job I did there at the end?
Get someone like, I don't know, anybody. And each year have them win at Backlash or Vengeance or one of those pay per views. Ten years down the road they are 10-0 at Backlash, then 11-0, then 12-0. For some reason they are just really good when they are wrestling at Backlash, and every year at Backlash people would watch in suspense, wondering if this wrestler will be able to keep his undefeated streak at Backlash going.
Ruien
04-14-2009, 08:03 AM
I am sick of the Undertaker storyline already, lets not have another one.
Nicky Fives
04-14-2009, 10:03 AM
kinda makes sense..... don't see it happening though
What Would Kevin Do?
04-14-2009, 10:15 AM
Nah, it'd have to be a big PPV, like Summerslam or Survivor Series. It wouldn't be a bad idea to have someone who is undefeated in ladder matches, or cage matches, or no DQ matches though.
Savio
04-14-2009, 11:02 AM
I liked when Randy Orton was always the Sole Survivor for Survivor Series
The Gold Standard
04-14-2009, 11:27 AM
Nah, it'd have to be a big PPV, like Summerslam or Survivor Series.
This seems to be the best way to do it. No one cares about the other PPVs as much as the big 4
Jordan
04-14-2009, 11:31 AM
Ok now come with me.... thats not really the best idea for booking however, try this.... The new WWE Superstars show, its tri-branded, have one superstar, lets say Kane, who dominates on that show. But it up for over a year how he has never been defeated on WWE Superstars, so he tries to get Teddy Long to make a Wolrd Title match on Superstars again'st whoever the champion is. Make a month or two feud and storyline of it, have them wrestle a few matches Kane always wins but never wins the title until, its a cage match and he finally wins the title and pumps up the value of WWE Superstars.
No, it would have to be at one of those pay per views no one cares about. That would be the point. For some reason this wrestler is really good at a pay per view no one cares about in the first place.
I'm sure someone has a streak on one of them, just no one gives two shits to check.
Jeritron
04-14-2009, 12:56 PM
I jokingly suggested Kane should have remained undefeated at Summerslams.
For a while, HHH had never won at a survivor series. They even promoted the fact.
Loose Cannon
04-14-2009, 12:59 PM
I'm pretty sure Val Venis has not lost at Backlash
Shh, you don't want to attract any wild Noids, do you?
Mr. Nerfect
04-14-2009, 10:30 PM
I'm sure someone has a streak on one of them, just no one gives two shits to check.
Exactly this. For some reason, Batista and Survivor Series comes to mind. Can't be fucked checking, though.
Mr. Nerfect
04-14-2009, 10:31 PM
I'd rather see a wrestler win championships at a PPV continuously. Not just regular wins.
Mr. Nerfect
04-14-2009, 10:31 PM
I'm pretty sure Val Venis has not lost at Backlash
Val Venis wrestled on Backlash?!? :shifty:
LOL, Chris Benoit is undefeated at Armageddon (4 wins).
Just searching random names on random PPVs here: http://www.100megsfree4.com/wiawrestling/pages/wwf/wwfppv.htm
Kane Knight
04-15-2009, 04:41 PM
I'm sure someone has a streak on one of them, just no one gives two shits to check.
Weren't they hyping someone in a Summerslam streak or summat? I know it's not Backlash or some event no-one cares about...
Kane Knight
04-15-2009, 04:43 PM
LOL, Chris Benoit is undefeated at Armageddon (4 wins).
Just searching random names on random PPVs here: http://www.100megsfree4.com/wiawrestling/pages/wwf/wwfppv.htm
Yeah, but do you think he'll remain undefeated? :shifty"
I'd rather see a wrestler win championships at a PPV continuously. Not just regular wins.
Sting + Bound For Glory = World Title win = :n:
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.