PDA

View Full Version : I have a question...


Xero
04-19-2009, 01:27 PM
From a logic standpoint, what's the difference between the IC title and a world title? "Intercontinental Championship" suggests the entire world, as does the "World Heavyweight Championship". I fail to see the difference here.

So, is the IC title really just a world title with a fancy name?

Loose Cannon
04-19-2009, 01:37 PM
well the Title came to be when the North American and South American belts were unified. Thus the name "Inter-Continent," but it was only between 2 continents. So yea, take it for what you will

Xero
04-19-2009, 01:40 PM
Ah, I did not know that. Thank you for enlightening me.

You shall receive a greeting of thanks in 3-5 days.

Sting Fan
04-20-2009, 02:41 AM
well the Title came to be when the North American and South American belts were unified. Thus the name "Inter-Continent," but it was only between 2 continents. So yea, take it for what you will

Very cool fact, I had enver heard that before.

Jon Kano
04-20-2009, 04:41 AM
Intercontinental, across the continent, how confusing is that?

.44 Magdalene
04-20-2009, 04:54 AM
Because intercontinental doesn't explicitly suggest landlocking. In fact, "across the continent" isn't what that means at all. It just means two or more continents, possibly all of them.

And if it's every continent... why, we're just an ocean short of the world.

.44 Magdalene
04-20-2009, 04:55 AM
The Ocean Championship

Xero
04-20-2009, 09:27 AM
Under Da Sea!

OverTaker
04-20-2009, 09:27 AM
Completely off topic but do they still have the European Title or was that retired?

Xero
04-20-2009, 09:28 AM
It was merged with the IC belt years ago.

OverTaker
04-20-2009, 09:31 AM
OK Well, I guess sorta on topic.

Destor
04-20-2009, 09:56 AM
well the Title came to be when the North American and South American belts were unified. Thus the name "Inter-Continent," but it was only between 2 continents. So yea, take it for what you will
Another fun fact, there was no south american title or match at all. They just made it up to change the name. Said Pat Patterson went to Rio had a match won belt, blah blah blah. None of it happend.

Lock Jaw
04-20-2009, 03:18 PM
It was merged with the IC belt years ago.

So I guess the IC title represents the continents of North and South America and Europe. While the world titles represent everything.

Sovereigntywillpr
04-20-2009, 05:33 PM
I posted this in the WCW title forum, and how it would make a cool angle...

It was first North and South America, and than they added the Euro in the 21st century... The IC Champ should win a New Japan/All Japan/Fake Japan and maybe even a fake African championship next time their in south Africa and Australia.... Make a feud

I also wouldn't mind another feud with 2 people having belts and claiming to be champ ala razor and Shawn.

Mr. Nerfect
05-09-2009, 04:32 AM
So I guess the IC title represents the continents of North and South America and Europe. While the world titles represent everything.

This is pretty much the only thing logically separating it from a "World Title."

Destor
05-09-2009, 05:03 AM
The IC title should be called the "screw Asia" title

parkmania
05-09-2009, 03:45 PM
I still want to see any "World" title defended on Antactica.

Lock Jaw
05-09-2009, 05:16 PM
That would be awesome. Like the opposite of an Inferno Match.

KIRA
05-09-2009, 11:54 PM
That would be awesome. Like the opposite of an Inferno Match. So to win this match your opponent has to succumb to hypothermia and/or show signs of the beginning of frostbite (I can already hear JRs commentary:fans my collegue and I are hold up in this nice insulated bunker watching this match via moniter....and it.. HIS TOES HIS TOES ARE TURNING BLACK BY GAWD THEY ARE TURNIN BLACK!

Lock Jaw
05-10-2009, 02:51 AM
Nah, it'd be like an empty arena match too. No commentators, no fans. They just drop two wrestlers (and a camera crew) off in Antarctica. Possibly with some sort of "demonic structure" made of ice.

XL
05-10-2009, 08:48 AM
Kinda like an igloo version of the Elimination Chamber?

Xero
05-10-2009, 12:01 PM
Of course, they'd say it was in Antarctica but they'd just film it somewhere in Canada during the winter.

Theo Dious
05-10-2009, 11:32 PM
Nah, it'd be like an empty arena match too. No commentators, no fans. They just drop two wrestlers (and a camera crew) off in Antarctica. Possibly with some sort of "demonic structure" made of ice.

And penguins, ass.

Theo Dious
05-10-2009, 11:33 PM
Of course, they'd say it was in Antarctica but they'd just film it somewhere in Canada during the winter.

Like there's a difference.

Xero
05-11-2009, 10:45 AM
Antarctica doesn't have whiny Canadians.

Sovereigntywillpr
05-13-2009, 05:21 AM
so was the WCW International Heavyweight Championship supposed to be a mid-card title and was stuck to be the only title in wcw so acted as the world title?

or it a new world title they created because of the Flair thing.....

that would have been a better idea instead of the North-American or United States title for WCW, to match up to the IC title.

GD
05-13-2009, 07:53 AM
Man I would so mark the fuck out if the WWE title would be defended in Antartica. The IC title has been defended in Japan, not on tv that is.

Mr. Nerfect
05-19-2009, 11:13 AM
so was the WCW International Heavyweight Championship supposed to be a mid-card title and was stuck to be the only title in wcw so acted as the world title?

or it a new world title they created because of the Flair thing.....

that would have been a better idea instead of the North-American or United States title for WCW, to match up to the IC title.

I think it was a World Title they had when they didn't have the WCW Title belt they wanted.