Who's more imposing Ezekiel or Mark Henry?

[Rollermacka]

I was watching Rocky IV and it reminded me of something I wanted to ask, who do you find more imposing in wrestling big man a bodybuilder type (Eziekiel Jackson, Rob Terry, or Scott Stiener) or a strongman type (Mark Henry, Scott Norton, Vader)? I personally find the strongman type more imposing. The 350 to 400 lb former football player or power lifter seems like someone I'd not want to mess with, even compared to a 250 to 300 lb pure muscle guy.

[Innovator]

Powerlifter

[Innovator]

Bodybuilders defintely can't split wigs

[roach21]

The big black man

[Hanso Amore]

I would never want to find myself in an alley with Norton or Henry

They would rip my asshole apart.

[Innovator]

And Vader, 80s and 90s Vader, not the one who fell on his ass a couple years ago

[Testicle]

Stongman, but I belive that Jackson would fall under both categories.

[Hanso Amore]

Word, Vader is the single most dominant heel ever. I loved 1994 Vader

[Testicle]

Check out his work in Japan from 1998-2000, it will freak your mind.

[Hanso Amore]

I refuse to watch vader in japan prior to his WWE run, it will never live up

[Verbose Minch]

Mark Henry all the way.

[Hanso Amore]

I mean post his WWE run

[Hanso Amore]

Because his early Japan work was awesome

[Theo Dious]

I'd go for the strongman. Bodybuilders are about looking good, strongmen are about being able to really DO shit.

[FourFifty]

I'd rather see a smaller hired gun. If built right, a guy like Tajiri could be more imposing than either one.

[Theo Dious]

Agreed.

[Theo Dious]

"He's like a damn buzzsaw cutting down a giant redwood!" [/JR]

[FourFifty]

And don't forget the mist.

[Hanso Amore]

I miss Asian Mercenaries

[The Jayman]

had to go with the strongman