View Full Version : Would you you give the title?
Savio
04-05-2004, 09:15 PM
lets say eddie or benoit get injured and have to go out for a month or 2. they vacte the title. and there some match to see who gets it, ______ vs Holly or some other mid card jobber. Who would you pick?
Kane he's underrated and only held the title once. RVD he is also underrated
HHHsucks929
04-05-2004, 09:21 PM
If Benoit went down I'd give the title to Jericho. If Eddie went down I'd give it to Rob Van Dam.
jasonvoorhees
04-05-2004, 09:40 PM
I would give it to John Cena.
loopydate
04-05-2004, 11:05 PM
If Benoit went down I'd give the title to Jericho. If Eddie went down I'd give it to Rob Van Dam.
OssMan
04-06-2004, 12:53 AM
Probably Book.
Rock Bottom
04-06-2004, 12:54 AM
I would give RVD a shot. Basically the same as above, Jericho/RVD.
Corkscrewed
04-06-2004, 01:20 AM
RAW: Jericho
SD!: Booker T or Cena
The Show Off
04-06-2004, 02:07 AM
Raw
Triple H, who would then drop the belt to Chris Jericho
Smackdown
The Undertaker, and turn him heel.
Mr. Nerfect
04-06-2004, 02:32 AM
RAW
Kane/Matt Hardy/Val Venis/Shelton Benjamin. Anyone of these two could really benfeit from it. Kane would be more of a decisive Champ, while Matt Hardy would sort of do a 2000 Kurt Angle and win the title, and looking lucky as he does so. Both would be good for RAW. Val Venis or Shelton Benjamin would use the tite to grasp onto main event level (as well as being a surprise Champ).
SmackDown!
Hardcore Holly/Billy Gunn/Rene Dupree. I know it may sound strange, but I am a big fan of both these guys. People give them too much rubbish, even though both work hard, are entertaining in the ring and get huge crowd reactions. I would put the title on just one of them to sort of commend them on their work, and maybe finally make a star out of them. Dupree has been the man lately. :y:
Goldbird
04-06-2004, 07:00 AM
RAW
Kane/Matt Hardy/Val Venis/Shelton Benjamin. Anyone of these two could really benfeit from it. Kane would be more of a decisive Champ, while Matt Hardy would sort of do a 2000 Kurt Angle and win the title, and looking lucky as he does so. Both would be good for RAW. Val Venis or Shelton Benjamin would use the tite to grasp onto main event level (as well as being a surprise Champ).
SmackDown!
Hardcore Holly/Billy Gunn/Rene Dupree. I know it may sound strange, but I am a big fan of both these guys. People give them too much rubbish, even though both work hard, are entertaining in the ring and get huge crowd reactions. I would put the title on just one of them to sort of commend them on their work, and maybe finally make a star out of them. Dupree has been the man lately. :y:
Are my eyes seeing something? Holly is entertaining?!
blueskies
04-06-2004, 08:25 AM
Raw. Triple H.. and keep him Champion for another 10 years.. without losing once.
Smackdown!. Have Triple H go there and take that championship too.. and keep him champ for 10 years.. without losing it.
asphyXy
04-06-2004, 08:39 AM
<font color=969696>Raw - Jericho
Smackdown - Taz</font>
Shaggy
04-06-2004, 10:20 AM
Raw: Jericho or maybe Orton
Smackdown: Rene Dupree deserves a shot but I would probably give the title to Cena
blake639raw
04-06-2004, 12:43 PM
RAW - Jericho
SD - Booker T
Lamuella
04-06-2004, 12:46 PM
right now?
RAW: Chris Jericho is probably the most deserving, and as safe pairs of hands go, there are few safer.
SD: Booker T has momentum, and crowds are really starting to dislike him (in a good way). Either him or, if a face is required, elevate Cena or RVD. Probably RVD.
Deceit
04-06-2004, 12:56 PM
Depending on the title situation with the IC belt/US belt..
RAW: I'd like to see Orton or Jericho, but knowing Trips, either Trips or HBK.
SD: Bookah man.
Mister Sinister
04-06-2004, 12:59 PM
*Enters Loose Cannon Mode Again*
Unifly the Titles and give them to Randy Orton!
okay, I really think the Smackdown Title should go to Funaki and the Raw Title to Jericho
MAdoubleT
04-06-2004, 01:21 PM
I'd give the title back to HHH on Raw and Booker T. would receive the WWE title.
BLaZeR-
04-06-2004, 01:42 PM
For Raw I would give the title to Kane(the 2nd most deserving in the WWE) or Jericho
For Smackdown Booker T (The number 1 most deserving).
The CyNick
04-06-2004, 01:56 PM
On Smackdown, what the hell why not give it to Bradshaw. Make him seem dominant for a while, and then go to Cena very quickly.
On RAW, I would put the title back on HHH, he's the only heel over enough to win the title at this point.
Moongoose Mcqueen
04-06-2004, 02:27 PM
On Raw I def want Jericho to get the title. Its time to give him a title reign as a face that they should have opted for long ago!
On Smackdown, I'd say Cena or RVD, for a heel Booker.
tucsonspeed6
04-06-2004, 04:05 PM
For Raw: Jericho or Christian. I almost thought that Shelton Benjamin was worthy of it until last night when I noticed that he didn't have too much charisma on the mic. Maybe a upper midcard push for him because he does have talent in the ring. Kane needs some wins first before he can get the title. Same goes for V1. Orton would be a good candidate too, but being young and fairly green, I'd rather see him in some nice feuds...kinda like building up credit before you go out to get a car loan.
Smackdown: Best bet would be Cena, but not until we see a heel take it first. Going straight from Eddie to Cena may not prove to be such a good idea. Maybe Bigshow, to help the duo of Cena and Bigshow grow into a lifelong feud.
Sephiroth
04-06-2004, 04:51 PM
RAW: Jericho
SD!: Booker T or Cena
Hardkore Kidd J
04-06-2004, 07:33 PM
Raw: Ortan or Jericho or Shelton
Smackdown: RVD or Cena
tucsonspeed6
04-06-2004, 10:03 PM
(Can you imagine if Vince decided that Hosses are old news and little guys are the wave of the future?)
Raw: Hurricane
SD: Spike
Raw: Orton or Jericho or Shelton
Smackdown: RVD or Cena
John la Rock
04-07-2004, 12:17 AM
Raw - Jericho
Smackdown - Booker T
Raw - Kane (Come on, give this guy a break...)
Smackdown: Either Booker or RVD
KingofOldSchool
04-07-2004, 02:30 PM
Smackdown: Booker T
Raw: Triple H
Mr. Nerfect
04-10-2004, 03:11 AM
Are my eyes seeing something? Holly is entertaining?!
Yes he is, IMO. You may not like him, but face it, the guy is over. He may not be Mr. Technical or the nicest guy in the world, but he gets the job done (if he doesn't get his neck broken) and the fans like how realistic he is in the ring. I seriously doubt that every single person here hates Hardcore Holly or Triple, etc. and that they just goes along with the crowd. People can like who they like, I wish people would stop going sarcastically about bashing certain wrestlers and people who like them.
He's obviously good enough to have a job after so many years, so please stp mindlessely bashing him (and others) just because you (and others) don't like him. You don't have to like him, or even watch him, but there is no need to be a jackass about it.
John la Rock
04-10-2004, 03:48 AM
Yes he is, IMO. You may not like him, but face it, the guy is over. He may not be Mr. Technical or the nicest guy in the world, but he gets the job done (if he doesn't get his neck broken) and the fans like how realistic he is in the ring. I seriously doubt that every single person here hates Hardcore Holly or Triple, etc. and that they just goes along with the crowd. People can like who they like, I wish people would stop going sarcastically about bashing certain wrestlers and people who like them.
He's obviously good enough to have a job after so many years, so please stp mindlessely bashing him (and others) just because you (and others) don't like him. You don't have to like him, or even watch him, but there is no need to be a jackass about it.
First off, the guy is not over what so ever. If he was over he'd be on Smackdown everyweek and not on Velocity. He was given a shot to prove himself when he feuded with Brock but failed. He's not good enough to be a main-eventer or a mid-carder for that matter. He should be jobbing to the Brooklyn Brawler on Velocity full-time if anything.
I dunno I just can't stand wrestlers who have no talent.
Stickman
04-10-2004, 01:54 PM
Yes he is, IMO. You may not like him, but face it, the guy is over. He may not be Mr. Technical or the nicest guy in the world, but he gets the job done (if he doesn't get his neck broken) and the fans like how realistic he is in the ring. I seriously doubt that every single person here hates Hardcore Holly or Triple, etc. and that they just goes along with the crowd. People can like who they like, I wish people would stop going sarcastically about bashing certain wrestlers and people who like them.
He's obviously good enough to have a job after so many years, so please stp mindlessely bashing him (and others) just because you (and others) don't like him. You don't have to like him, or even watch him, but there is no need to be a jackass about it.
You're allowed to like him, but you're one of the few. A couple weeks ago he wrestled Booker T on Smackdown! and holy crap, what a snoozefest. The crowd was just sitting there not in the match at all. You could tell that they edited in crowd noise. I don't find him entertaining at all. I turn the channel every single time he's on. (Sadly, I turn the channel a lot when I watch Smackdown! because it bores me). Holly did have the title shot but did you honestly find his feud with Brock entertaining?
Savio
04-10-2004, 04:12 PM
He's not good enough to be a main-eventer or a mid-carder for that matter.
He's also not good enough to be able to kick out of the book end.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.