Log in

View Full Version : Do you think there is "any room" for more crusierweights in WWE?


Rollermacka
10-08-2009, 10:23 PM
Simple question (and of course another poll :wave:) would you like to see more crusierweights added to the current WWE roster, or do you think it's fine how it is now (smaller, more agile heavyweights and a couple of superheavys on each show)?

Fignuts
10-08-2009, 10:26 PM
Without a crusierweight title, they are useless.

Triple Naitch
10-08-2009, 10:31 PM
Just misses the Poll of the Week deadline.

Tazz Dan
10-08-2009, 10:32 PM
Good thing for you. It would've voted higher. :D

Afterlife
10-08-2009, 10:37 PM
Cruiserweights are half the roster.

Xero
10-08-2009, 10:38 PM
Cruiserweights are half the roster.

Yeah, the half that isn't pushed.

Afterlife
10-08-2009, 10:44 PM
Yeah, the half that isn't pushed.

Sure. Like half the roster gets pushed.

KYR
10-08-2009, 10:49 PM
Still trying to figure out what a 'crusierweight' is?

Is that like an easier weight division, less work, less travel sort of deal?

Fignuts
10-08-2009, 10:50 PM
Don't know how wwe screwed this division up so many times. All you need to do is put two of them in the ring every ppv and give them 20 minutes. You don't even need a storyline.

Fignuts
10-08-2009, 10:51 PM
KYR are you serious rite nowww

Triple Naitch
10-08-2009, 10:53 PM
Good thing for you. It would've voted higher. :D

Hey. Hey, you.

:foc:

legendkillerRKO
10-08-2009, 11:19 PM
mysterio winning the "heavyweight" title fucked it up

CWK
10-08-2009, 11:42 PM
Wish WWE put an emphasis on cruiserweight wrestling like WCW did back in the mid 1990's.

Phenomenal 1
10-08-2009, 11:57 PM
Cruiserweight/Lightweight wrestlers are defined as usually any competitor who weigh at or below the 225 lb mark....Granted that the actual weight of most of the wrestlers is exxaggerated in their billed at weight and most are probably lighter or heavier than the weight to convince fans to believe they could be that weight and get them over as face or heel.

Because of that, there are alot of wrestlers that compete in the Heavyweight Title Division....that would mean guys like CM Punk, HBK, and Chrisitian for example....could not be or should not be WWE Champion or World Heavyweight Champion.....granted the ECW Title has always been about the promotion...not the size or attributes of a particular wrestler. These wrestlers and many more have been Heavyweight Champions.... so they should be Cruiserweight Champion...not heavyweight champion.

WWE being the really only BIG promotion (sorry I will not count TNA or ROH), there is not enough depth in the roster nor the ability to book the roster for a cruiserweight division. WWE has enough titles as it is...although a Women's title could be dissolved and the US and IC titles could be unified.....but I think WWE made the right move in retiring the championship and eliminating the division.

Cruiserweights are great in Mexico and Japan....and if you want to wrestle as a cruiserweight/light heavyweight exclusively....go there or go to an indy promotion in the states....but WWE isn't gonna have it anytime soon and I say its for the better.

Gertner
10-09-2009, 12:32 AM
The WWE needs more Big daddy V.

Kami Raki
10-09-2009, 12:48 AM
Still trying to figure out what a 'crusierweight' is?

Is that like an easier weight division, less work, less travel sort of deal?
Nah, it's the division that puts over the bigger stars.

DAMN iNATOR
10-09-2009, 04:42 AM
There's no need for any more cruiserweights without the WWE Cruiserweight Championship ("OF THE WORLD!", as they were so fond of saying)...

Waylander
10-09-2009, 06:41 AM
Don't see any reason for them not to have a cruiserweight division, although I do think the 225 number is much to high for reasons already stated.

The Jayman
10-09-2009, 08:09 AM
it doesn't matter

kareru
10-09-2009, 09:02 AM
dean malenko being the cruiser weight booker/champion for a million years really killed the wwf/e cruiser weight division