2010 WWE Royal Rumble - Rate it

[Juan]

I don't know who was the one doing these, but I liked the concept, so RATE IT

[Spaff]

I don't know who was the one doing these, but I liked the concept, so RATE IT
good idea
:yes:

[Evil Vito]

<font color=goldenrod>I give it a solid 4 stars. Initially, I HATED how quickly the Rumble match flew by and how so few guys lasted even one full interval. But after watching it a second time and comparing it to many previous years when there were like 10+ guys in the ring most of the time with absolutely nothing exciting going on.......I realized the 2010 Rumble was really good.</font>

[The Pope]

Royal Rumble went to quickly.

[CSL]

2. Completely unremarkable barring Punk and Edgester.

[Jordan]

The event itself I would give a four star rating, the match was a solid three stars. Really good Rumble, not overly amazing however. Nothing spectacular.

[thedamndest]

I think all of the matches on the card were good. The Rumble itself wasn't really memorable. There were some fun spots (Punk spot, Beth/Khali, the HBK flip-out, and Edge's return/win, but beyond that it didn't seem to have any kind of classic Rumble feel. Guys just went out too quickly for that to happen.

[VSG]

I gave it 4 stars because of the development of WM angles as well as the event itself.

[jskinnyg]

Would've gotten 5 stars if it wasn't for the Women's title match...

[Lock Jaw]

The Rumble, as mentioned was pretty yawn aside from Punk, Edge, and Angry HBK.

The only other match on the card that I thoroughly enjoyed was Christian/Zeke. So 2 stars.

[Verbose Minch]

Best part was HBM superkicking Edge back into the ring. I lol'd pretty hard at that.

[Cuzziebro]

I gave it 2 but really I wanted to give it 2.5!
The rumble match was pretty awesome mainly because of HBK, Punk and Edge, Oh and Beth Phoenix. The rest of the matches on the card were okay.