TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   sports forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   NBA finals prediction thread!!! (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=7202)

The Outlaw 05-23-2004 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packt up
I like the Lakers :$ even went to one game cos all my relatives live out there. They are gonna win now I reckon though I have no idea whats gonna happen next year as they don't have much news about that out here :(.

Wish I could watch the games too :( - Fisher's shot over Spurs must have been a great thing to watch.

It was my friend. I wet my panties when he hit that shot. :love:

Ninti the Mad 05-23-2004 06:02 PM

That shot should've been redone because they had so much extra time - its unbelieveable.

PureHatred 05-23-2004 08:33 PM

"Redone"?

This is so ridiculous. Even if you say that the clock started even a tenth of a second late, then by the same token, the clock was obviously stopped late after Duncan's make. But no time was added on because human reaction is taken into acount in the rules. And by the definition of the NBA rules, anything more than .3 on the clock means a player can catch and shoot. Period. Within the confines of the NBA, there was nothing about that shot that could be argued or overturned.

And that really doesn't take away form the fact that the Lakers were up big going into the 4th and thoroughly outplayed the Spurs in the other three victories.That one shot, controversy or no controversy, doesn't remove the fact that the Lakers were clearly the better team. And I'm sure no one on the Spurs would use Fisher's shot as an excuse for having a 2-0 lead in the series and then gettng their asses handed to them for 15 out of the next 16 quarters.

BCWWF 05-23-2004 09:57 PM

I agree with Pure, sure human error can burn sometimes, but I would rather have human error in a game than it being mechanically judged. That is one of the reasons baseball is such a great sport. Also, its almost 100% that the Lakers had huge advantage and weren't going to lose that series.

BCWWF 05-24-2004 12:14 AM

LOL @ Lakers fans everywhere.

The old men were SHUT DOWN, S-H-U-T D-O-W-N.

Hey Shaq, "Air Ball!" I wonder why Malone hasn't been able to win a championship, he can't keep his cool when dealing with a third string point guard. It was also funny when Payton tried talking shit to World and Wally wasn't even paying attention to him.

To do this without Alien, wow, its coming back to Minnesota.

The Outlaw 05-24-2004 12:14 AM

Question to anyone that watched the game: Thoughts on Malone's ejection?

The Outlaw 05-24-2004 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCWWF
LOL @ Lakers fans everywhere.

The old men were SHUT DOWN, S-H-U-T D-O-W-N.

Hey Shaq, "Air Ball!" I wonder why Malone hasn't been able to win a championship, he can't keep his cool when dealing with a third string point guard. It was also funny when Payton tried talking shit to World and Wally wasn't even paying attention to him.

To do this without Alien, wow, its coming back to Minnesota.

:nono:

PureHatred 05-24-2004 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCWWF
LOL @ Lakers fans everywhere.

The old men were SHUT DOWN, S-H-U-T D-O-W-N.

Hey Shaq, "Air Ball!" I wonder why Malone hasn't been able to win a championship, he can't keep his cool when dealing with a third string point guard. It was also funny when Payton tried talking shit to World and Wally wasn't even paying attention to him.

To do this without Alien, wow, its coming back to Minnesota.

This is exactly why the Lakers didn't celebrate after Game 1.

What exactly did you accomplish tonight besides avoiding a sweep? You've lost homecourt and unless you win in L.A., the Lakers can win this series w/o winning again in Minnesota. All this bravado makes you sound ignorant. Tonight, the Wolves did their job and it won't be a series again unless its 2-2 after Game 4.

At least the players had enough sense to try to act like they've been there, even if the fans can't.

The Outlaw 05-24-2004 12:24 AM

Yeah word. But like I previously mentioned, Minnesota has obviously never been where they are so let them have a hard-on for a win.

On a serious topic, Malone's ejection. Was that not EXACTLY what KG did to Peeler? If not less contact? And Malone was actually fighting through a screen, not just taking a shot at the guy. That might have been the biggest flop I've seen, and I've seen a lot with Vlade playing.

Big props to GP for taking up for your teamate. Moving screen + an elbow = A pissed off Glove

PureHatred 05-24-2004 12:32 AM

Yeah, good move. Piss them off. The Lakers were going to do this business as usual and you go and make them mad. And embarass Shaq. It wasn't more than a couple months ago that the TWolves went to L.A. and got waxed. Down by 30 at one point and were never really in it.

If you TWolves fans think that can't happen again, you're kidding yourselves.

The Outlaw 05-24-2004 12:35 AM

Yeah that's what me and a friend (who is more of a Wolves fan) were discussing. He went on a rant about not pissing Shaq off right before they did. I mean come on, you gotta have some common sense to you not to piss guys off when you're winning by 20.

BCWWF 05-24-2004 12:42 AM

Everyone brings up that "The Timberwolves have never been here before," well Gary Payton and Karl Malone are in the exact same boat as most of the Wolves. If anything they should be worried right now, this is their last chance to make the finals, and despite what you all thought the Timberwolves will not be walked past.

And thats just funny that you guys attempt to get offended when a team celebrates. Someone decided that the Lakers were going to walk into the finals, and it became popular opinion, and now we blow them out with Cassell on the bench and Trenton Hassell barely playing, yeah I have quite a bit to be happy about. I would rather have a Kevin Garnett with heart than a Karl Malone with professionalism. And don't try to pretend like the Lakers are the definition of professional, anybody remember the whole Sacramento "Queens?" I think that is the definition of lighting a fire under another team, Sacramento just happened to be chokes. Don't try to act smug and above me by acting like you don't care that your team just lost, this isn't going to be a walk in the park, partner. Yeah, I talk shit just like Gary Payton, Senior Professional.

The hit between World and Fisher was barely even a hit, and they are both equally guilty.

Malone was ejected because he got two technicals. When you get two technicals you are automatically ejected. Both of his technicals were justified.

BCWWF 05-24-2004 12:44 AM

How did they piss Shaq off? He was the one dropping air balls from the free throw line.

BCWWF 05-24-2004 12:47 AM

Oh of course the Lakers are capable of blowing us out again, but did we not blow them out tonight? The same day Shaq was quoted saying the Lakers were "starting their peak?"

BCWWF 05-24-2004 12:49 AM

And don't get me wrong, I don't predict the Wolves take the next three games, but I surely don't predict the Lakers do either. This will at least go into a game 6, probably 7.

The Icon of Elisim 05-24-2004 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCWWF
Everyone brings up that "The Timberwolves have never been here before," well Gary Payton and Karl Malone are in the exact same boat as most of the Wolves.

LOL

Malone has been to the conference finals in 1998, 1997, 1996, 1994 and 1992

Payton has been in 1996 and 1993

Yeah, exact same situation

BCWWF 05-24-2004 12:57 AM

If they want to brag about the Conference Finals, then go ahead and brag. I don't think anyone out there is looking for a Conference final, (And I am pretty sure you are talking about NBA Finals appearances). What they want, Malone, Payton, Garnett, Sprewell, none of them have it.

PureHatred 05-24-2004 12:59 AM

Not to mention that Gary and Maone have both been to the NBA Finals. :nono:

No one's gettng offended, but you sound like a total fool going off about winning one game when you lost homecourt two days ago.

The Outlaw 05-24-2004 01:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCWWF
Everyone brings up that "The Timberwolves have never been here before," well Gary Payton and Karl Malone are in the exact same boat as most of the Wolves. If anything they should be worried right now, this is their last chance to make the finals, and despite what you all thought the Timberwolves will not be walked past.

And thats just funny that you guys attempt to get offended when a team celebrates. Someone decided that the Lakers were going to walk into the finals, and it became popular opinion, and now we blow them out with Cassell on the bench and Trenton Hassell barely playing, yeah I have quite a bit to be happy about. I would rather have a Kevin Garnett with heart than a Karl Malone with professionalism. And don't try to pretend like the Lakers are the definition of professional, anybody remember the whole Sacramento "Queens?" I think that is the definition of lighting a fire under another team, Sacramento just happened to be chokes. Don't try to act smug and above me by acting like you don't care that your team just lost, this isn't going to be a walk in the park, partner. Yeah, I talk shit just like Gary Payton, Senior Professional.

The hit between World and Fisher was barely even a hit, and they are both equally guilty.

Malone was ejected because he got two technicals. When you get two technicals you are automatically ejected. Both of his technicals were justified.

Hey go back and check my posts, as you can see I never said it would be a walk in the park. YOU said the lakers would win chief, I said it would be a closer series than what everyone (INCLUDING you and the other TWolves "fans") thought. I stress "fans" because noone from Minnesota has any faith in their team. That first game, like the announcers touched on, was pathetic. The fans never got into the game even though it was a close game. It's the western conference finals for crying out loud.

My point was that the Wolves' franchise has never been past the first round. Malone was in the conference finals in 96-98 , 94, and 92 I think? Payton in 93 and...96? My memory is being a bitch right now but I think that's right.

But Yeah, they are in the same situation :yes:

LOL Fisher was guilty for being screened illegally and taking an elbow? :?:

I don't care that you celebrated. If you want to piss Shaq off, go ahead, fine by me. :y: How am I trying to act above you? Elaborate.

Ok, Malone got ejected because he got two technicals. Fair enough. Both technicals were justified, fair enough.

Answer me this, was what Malone did to Martin not exactly what KG did to Peeler, possibly even less contact/less flagrant?

The Outlaw 05-24-2004 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCWWF
If they want to brag about the Conference Finals, then go ahead and brag. I don't think anyone out there is looking for a Conference final, (And I am pretty sure you are talking about NBA Finals appearances). What they want, Malone, Payton, Garnett, Sprewell, none of them have it.

Jesus Christ.

*bangs head on the table*

PureHatred 05-24-2004 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCWWF
If they want to brag about the Conference Finals, then go ahead and brag. I don't think anyone out there is looking for a Conference final, (And I am pretty sure you are talking about NBA Finals appearances). What they want, Malone, Payton, Garnett, Sprewell, none of them have it.

He's clearly talking about Conference Finals. Look at the dates...

When the announcers talk abou the T-Wolves not being here before, that are talking about this point in the playoffs. Outside of Sprewell and Sam I Am, that's true about the T-Wolve. Outside of the rookies, everyone on the Lakers has been to this point in the playoffs and beyond.

BCWWF 05-24-2004 01:03 AM

I didn't see Malone's hit, I was driving home at the time, but from how the announcer described it Martin was knocked over? Peeler was barely hit, but faught back in the heat of the moment. But since I didn't see it I can't compare. All that matters is that Malone was ejected because he got two technicals, KG wasn't because he only had one. What else are you looking for?

The Outlaw 05-24-2004 01:04 AM

You know, I'm not even going to bother.

This is like talking to a brick wall.

The Icon of Elisim 05-24-2004 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCWWF
If they want to brag about the Conference Finals, then go ahead and brag. I don't think anyone out there is looking for a Conference final, (And I am pretty sure you are talking about NBA Finals appearances). What they want, Malone, Payton, Garnett, Sprewell, none of them have it.

No one is bragging about conference finals. I'm just commenting on your statement that Malone and Payton are in the same boat experience wise as the Timberwolves, who've never gotten out of the first round before this year.

And those are the conference finals, not the NBA finals

The Outlaw 05-24-2004 01:07 AM

Yeah TIOE beat me with the dates

That sneaky rascal

BCWWF 05-24-2004 01:07 AM

I don't get why you keep whining, are you saying it shouldn't have been a technical? Or are you saying the NBA should have changed its rules so that if Malone gets 2 T's he doesn't have to get ejected? Honestly.

The Outlaw 05-24-2004 01:09 AM

:|

I asked a simple question. Was what Malone did not exactly what KG did? This isn't brain surgery, it's not too hard to follow.

Kid Robb 05-24-2004 01:10 AM

Does an ejection mean automatically missing the next game, a la Peeler in the Sacto-Wolves series?

According to the NBA Malone only had one tech just quietly.

BCWWF 05-24-2004 01:12 AM

OK, say it was the exact same thing KG did to Peeler, what point are you trying to make?

Crimson 05-24-2004 01:12 AM

Lakers in 5. I look for a blowout in game 3, closer game in 4, and the Wolves get finished in Minnesota. I can't see Derek Martin coming up big consistently, without Cassell, their PG situation will be a big burden. KG was the man tonite though, lucky Malone got in foul trouble.

BCWWF 05-24-2004 01:13 AM

I think Peeler was suspended because he hit KG in the face, I don't think an ejection automatically calls for a suspension, and I would think it would be highly unlikely for Malone to even have a fine.

PureHatred 05-24-2004 01:15 AM

Der. He's saying that if it was the same thing, then why did KG stay in the game and Malon didn't.

simple answer: different officiating crew, different standards.

Plus, I'm sure Malone and the Lakers will use this as motivation in Game 3. The Lakers got beat bad, but realistically this was a must for the T-Wolves. The Lakers needed to leave Minnesota with at least a split, and the did.

The Outlaw 05-24-2004 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCWWF
OK, say it was the exact same thing KG did to Peeler, what point are you trying to make?

The point was Malone received a technical and KG did not. I thought I pointed that out, but maybe I didn't? :$

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kid Robb
Does an ejection mean automatically missing the next game, a la Peeler in the Sacto-Wolves series?

According to the NBA Malone only had one tech just quietly.


Well, not exactly. This was why I brought up the rules of the NBA in a couple of past posts KR, I was inquiring for someone to explain to me how he was suspended for two games but to no avail. Malone got one technical on a double technical with Ervin Johnson with one second left on the shot clock for something silly, and then one for fighting across a screen set by Martin. Remember the shoulder KG gave to Peeler which insinuated the elbow? Well Malone gave Martin something similar and he went flying, so he got a technical and was ejected.

The Outlaw 05-24-2004 01:16 AM

Also, 8 technicals in the game I think. Crazy. All in the fourth quarter to I think.

BCWWF 05-24-2004 01:19 AM

I'm going to bed, I won't be so hot/stupid tomorrow. Bye guys

AlphaBean 05-24-2004 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Outlaw
You know, I'm not even going to bother.

This is like talking to a brick wall.

Calm down, chief. :lol:

Oh and I'm sorry I missed the "debate." :-\

The Outlaw 05-25-2004 12:06 AM

Tayshaun Prince says get that out of my house.

Best defensive play of the year right there :love:

AlphaBean 05-25-2004 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Outlaw
The point was Malone received a technical and KG did not. I thought I pointed that out, but maybe I didn't? :$




Well, not exactly. This was why I brought up the rules of the NBA in a couple of past posts KR, I was inquiring for someone to explain to me how he was suspended for two games but to no avail. Malone got one technical on a double technical with Ervin Johnson with one second left on the shot clock for something silly, and then one for fighting across a screen set by Martin. Remember the shoulder KG gave to Peeler which insinuated the elbow? Well Malone gave Martin something similar and he went flying, so he got a technical and was ejected.

By the way, KG received a T for his screen on Peeler, and it was a shoulder to the chest, not the face; Peeler did not even come close to falling down, and then he retaliated. There's the difference. And Malone's was the 2nd T of the night for him.

And the funny thing is... after being called for a double Tech (KG and AP) the Kings took two Technical shots. They had a distinct FT advantage the entire series due to oversight. Nobody kept track of the foul limit, and gave them random "freebies." :nono:

The Outlaw 05-25-2004 12:31 AM

Those were not technical shots, those were regular free throws as they were in the penalty.

KG did not receive a technical, he received a regular foul.

The Outlaw 05-25-2004 12:35 AM

Watching ESPN, Malone reports he was "getting back" for the hard screen set on Fisher which knocked him down by Spree. Compared it to you hit my batter I hit yours.

Also, he was fined $7500. Hmm.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®