Same is true of No Mercy, the rumoured HALO remakes, Metal Gear Solid 4 going multi, and dozens of other things.

"They would make a lot of money" doesn't equal it happening, or even it being possible.

"I can see it happening" doesn't mean it actually will happen, or that it is possible.

I heavily suspect my post will get Noided; that is, someone will take these statements and come to the completely false notion that I'm saying it will "never happen."

I wonder if Darkpower thinks it's unfair that Mass Effect won't be an axclusive anymore. I mean "SOMEONE GOT SONY'S MONIES!!!!!"

Also, I would totally buy a FFVII remake on whichever system it came out on.

Didn't say that the way you're saying I did, actually. Only said that the way that guy explained his reasoning, it was that he could go one way with that logic, but not the other. The way he went about answering those question was what brought me to think THAT, not the FF13 going multi thing. If the logic to bring FF13 works as a reason to bring that game to the 360, then it should work the same way for the Star Ocean 4 game.

And if ME becomes multiplat, it would be some poetic justice. Sony keeps losing 3rd party exclusives but MS isn't ever allowed to lose one of its own?

Problem being, you were still ranting about being fair to the console wars and such shit. You can try and retcon it all you want, but at the core of all this was the notion that they had done wrong in multiple fashions.

Again, not necessarily so, but you ignored that the last couple of times it came up...Let nothing stop you from drawing the conclusion you want.

Especially hypocritical given your little rant.

Anyway, how is it poetic justice? That just screams fanboy. It's one thing if you really don't care; I, for one, don't. I'll get the next two games when they come out, and I'd buy them on PS3 if they were exclusive, but really, poetic justice? The term implies not only that Sony has been wronged, but that they have been rewarded for virtue. Even if you take it at its most liberal, it still kind of means that Sony was "wronged," and this sets things right.

Sony's been sniping exclusives since the PS1...So I'm not sure what's poetic. At best and at worse, it's businesses doing business.

But again, I'm not the one who got butthurt when cut one way and not the other.

Well, I may concede to a point that I think I may have said that somewhere else and forgot I did. Ah well.

And I should've said that in Sony's mind it would be poetic justice, at least to the current console wars.

Yeah, I have a PS3 (plan on getting a 360, too), and yeah, I am happy with my purchase. I don't consider myself a fanboy, but seeing on other boards how immature some X360 fanboys are like, it would make you WANT to become a fanboy for the other systems so you can tell them how much you want them to SHUT THE FUCK UP!! I don't act like the people that I'm sure if you saw, you'd think the same way. They seem to never want to agree to disagree.

Well not exactly the same because none of those have been shown on tech demos. Not sure what No mercy is so...

Surely posting that in a Video Games section of a wrestling forum is a bannable offense?

Oh right! No mercy for N64! lol oops. Was instantly thinking of violence

http://www.penny-arcade.com/images/2008/20080716.jpg

Pretty much sums it up.

Next year's E3 will be in July and there's alot of buzz saying it will hearken back to the days of lore, when you had to open GamePro for pics of the event and you'd walk on glass for a chance to head out to what looked like the greatest show on Earth. If E3 2009 could do that we're in for a treat.