TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   video games forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Nintendo Revolution controller (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=35906)

Jonster 09-16-2005 05:31 PM

G beat me to new.

DS 09-16-2005 05:43 PM

I think your best arguement in that whole post was the fact you corrected my grammer. I'm sorry the mistake was unable to get my point across, and I have fixed the mistake. You're right, the analogy sounds ridiculous, but so does the thought of having to have seperate controllers for different games.

How has Sony's EyeToy done? Not so well. So who is to say this is innovating. It's the same thing right? You use your movements to play the games.

The thing I don't understand is why you are taking this so personal. I stated in the first post that I haven't held one so I am not going to say it won't work, but my first impressions are unwanting. Sorry if I offended you. I also took extra precaution to have proper grammer in this post, as we all know the internet is not a place for mistakes.

Jason Cage 09-16-2005 05:49 PM

[QUOTE=Jonster]And you do?

If you're just using the remote, you have easy acess to two buttons. What's that, a big A button on the front, and a big B button on the back. Why that's two buttons right there, oh my.
Who's to say you'll even need a button to jump, when you could just lift the controller, then you only need one button (for kick - in your example).
The joystick, which doesn't have to be used, has two extra buttons on the front of it as well.


My point was that for certain games, such as wrestling, results may vary.

because for games such as wrestling, you need access to all buttons, yes? And holding the controller like a cock is not a very comfortable way.

Also, on the "jump and kick" example...controls for games like Devil May cry are crucial. You start blasting them with Triangle, then jump and keep blasting with triangle, then press R1 to change weapon and keep blasting.

You see for such games you need to be fast with handling, and having 2 buttons like 3 feet away form the A button is not gonna help.

DS 09-16-2005 05:53 PM

Also, what about carpal tunnel syndrome? Do they have that in Japan or are they in for a surprise when it's released?

I wonder if they gave this to a focus group as well and if it actually passed. I hope there isn't a website that answers all these common questions, that I just happen to have as well, that I'm missing.

Jonster 09-16-2005 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DS
I think your best arguement in that whole post was the fact you corrected my grammer. I'm sorry the mistake was unable to get my point across, and I have fixed the mistake. You're right, the analogy sounds ridiculous, but so does the thought of having to have seperate controllers for different games.

How has Sony's EyeToy done? Not so well. So who is to say this is innovating. It's the same thing right? You use your movements to play the games.

The thing I don't understand is why you are taking this so personal. I stated in the first post that I haven't held one so I am not going to say it won't work, but my first impressions are unwanting. Sorry if I offended you. I also took extra precaution to have proper grammer in this post, as we all know the internet is not a place for mistakes.

I'm suprised you thought I took it personally, I didn't, you just put my name in the last post so I replied. Not offended in the slightest, just annoys me when people say things without all the facts (that have been put out there).

If the console comes with the traditional controller, the remote and the analogue expansion, then that's all you'll need right there. The traditional controller will have an analogue stick on it and the remote fits into it, so could still be used for anything that needs it.
Anything that needs more would be released with the game if need be. The Eyetoy was still a standard price game, even with the extra hardware needed to use it.

You're right that it's similiar to the Eyetoy in that it uses movement to play games, but the eyetoy only recognises movement and was a pain to use if you weren't against a plainish background, the Revolution controller recognises position and movement in 3D. And I can instantly think that the latter will have more uses than jumping around in front of a camera.


Oh and it's grammar ;)
Sorry :$

Jonster 09-16-2005 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DS
Also, what about carpal tunnel syndrome? Do they have that in Japan or are they in for a surprise when it's released?

I wonder if they gave this to a focus group as well and if it actually passed. I hope there isn't a website that answers all these common questions, that I just happen to have as well, that I'm missing.

It's my understanding that people with carpal tunnel syndrome may have trouble playing video games anyway.

Jonster 09-16-2005 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jason Cage
My point was that for certain games, such as wrestling, results may vary.

because for games such as wrestling, you need access to all buttons, yes? And holding the controller like a cock is not a very comfortable way.

Also, on the "jump and kick" example...controls for games like Devil May cry are crucial. You start blasting them with Triangle, then jump and keep blasting with triangle, then press R1 to change weapon and keep blasting.

You see for such games you need to be fast with handling, and having 2 buttons like 3 feet away form the A button is not gonna help.

See, and I'm gonna use an analogy here, it's kind of like the DS.
There are games that use the touch screen for main control, but not every game uses the touch screen this way, nor do they have to, which is like the Revolution controller. The remote controller is there, but doesn't have to be used.

At the end of the day it's going to come down to how well the games use the devices and how well their imaginations work when coming up with ideas.

DS 09-16-2005 06:08 PM

I didn't say anything about spelling. :p

I meant that this could cause carpal tunnel with the constant wrist flicking and movement. After watching the conference and the video they played, I believe they are going to be using the controller for the next Mario game and we all know how much you have to jump in a Mario game.

Again, I haven't tried it so I don't know how it will feel, but there seems to be a lot of concern from all types of gamers.

packt up 09-16-2005 07:56 PM

It seems to me like this is a truly terrible idea. I bet no-one has ever picked up their remote and gone "wow if this was a controller it would be great". If anyone has been on one of those airplanes with games in the headsets then you'll also have some experience. Basically its a phone (practically same shape as a remote) and a controller in one. And its shit. But you know you're stuck on a 12hr flight and its free so you don't care.

Also all this "movement is great" idea is a bit rubbish. Eyetoys as mentioned have proven to be temperamental at best. EVEN IF movement is improved why go down such a shitty shaped route. The technology could have been put into a conventional shaped controller. WIN WIN. Why does it NEED to be this awful shape.

G 09-16-2005 08:21 PM

I can't wait until the Revolution comes out. :love:

Jason Cage 09-16-2005 08:23 PM

when DOES it come out? All this controller talk and the thought never even occured to me.

DS 09-16-2005 08:30 PM

Not for a while. They said that if you go to E3 and you don't play a Revolution game then it's they would be surprised. So they will at least have playable versions by summer next year. Maybe around this time next year or so.

G 09-16-2005 08:33 PM

It's definantly going to be the last one released. Sucks I know. :(

road doggy dogg 09-16-2005 09:29 PM

http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/8...lutioncont.jpg

*jumps back on Nintendo bandwagon*

G 09-16-2005 09:33 PM

:drool:



Nintendo 4 life

G 09-16-2005 09:34 PM

Of all the controllers of this gen, I love the Gamecube's 141354325x more than the others.

Boomer 09-16-2005 09:48 PM

Besides the fact that it looks pretty stupid just shoved in there, I guess you get the best of both worlds.

Funky Fly 09-16-2005 09:52 PM

Now that's more like it. They better make that D-pad bigger, though. It's retardedly small on the GC pad.

Loose Cannon 09-16-2005 09:59 PM

AHHHHHH, There we go!!

Refreshed.

Vietnamese Crippler 09-16-2005 10:29 PM

I just saw that on IGNCube, too bad it's not the real thing though because that would be awesome :(

But there will be a controller cradle, so it's all good :drool:

Buzzkill 09-16-2005 11:22 PM

http://nintyrevcontroller.ytmnd.com/

Jason Cage 09-16-2005 11:46 PM

rofl

Shadow 09-17-2005 12:10 AM

And we thought Nintendo would let us down.

Kane Knight 09-17-2005 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonster
Because it's just a tilt sensor they've added :roll:

I'm sorry, it's obviously Jesus in a can, because you're creaming yourself over it.

Wonder if you'll still have your cock out when the onvelty wears off.

Kane Knight 09-17-2005 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DS
I think your best arguement in that whole post was the fact you corrected my grammer. I'm sorry the mistake was unable to get my point across, and I have fixed the mistake. You're right, the analogy sounds ridiculous, but so does the thought of having to have seperate controllers for different games.

How has Sony's EyeToy done? Not so well. So who is to say this is innovating. It's the same thing right? You use your movements to play the games.

The thing I don't understand is why you are taking this so personal. I stated in the first post that I haven't held one so I am not going to say it won't work, but my first impressions are unwanting. Sorry if I offended you. I also took extra precaution to have proper grammer in this post, as we all know the internet is not a place for mistakes.

In the interest of fairness...

Don't we have "light guns?" DDR mats (Which started iwth the NES)? Headsets? Keyboards? Don't we already have "separate controllers?"

Jalapeņo 09-17-2005 12:23 AM

Allz we need now is a SUPA DUPA WANKING game.

Kane Knight 09-17-2005 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Funky Fly
Now that's more like it. They better make that D-pad bigger, though. It's retardedly small on the GC pad.

Doesn't look liek they're going for practicality.

Drakul 09-17-2005 12:25 AM

http://content.ytmnd.com//153000/153371/image.jpg
Look kinda odd but I'd MUCH prefer to use this.

DS 09-17-2005 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight
In the interest of fairness...

Don't we have "light guns?" DDR mats (Which started iwth the NES)? Headsets? Keyboards? Don't we already have "separate controllers?"

I give you the DDR mats but the others aren't needed. But you're right. The docking case will be nice, I just don't see why they wouldn't go straight to that and put the sensors on it.

Kapoutman 09-17-2005 12:50 AM

Seems like my vascillating fanboyism is back in full strength.

Kane Knight 09-17-2005 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DS
I give you the DDR mats but the others aren't needed. But you're right. The docking case will be nice, I just don't see why they wouldn't go straight to that and put the sensors on it.

None of them are "needed," unless you want to play specific games. The thign is, there's a history of this stuff (I forgot a few, such as the SNES' mouse), whether it's necessary or not. Or even if we like 'em.

I think the idea of sliding the remote into the Rev controller is dumb, but it's better than nothing.

I just hope they support this better than the NDS. Hate to say it, but the only bad thing I can say about the DS is the lack of fucking GAMES.

Jonster 09-17-2005 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight
I'm sorry, it's obviously Jesus in a can, because you're creaming yourself over it.

Wonder if you'll still have your cock out when the onvelty wears off.

How about you see the full picture before you start to say stupid fucking things like that in the first place.

Not creaming myself over it, but I can see the potential of it and you were obviously not seeing the whole fucking picture. So fuck off with your personal attacks when you haven't even got all the facts straight, or are just so stupid as to ignore them.

Tornado 09-17-2005 08:07 AM

Oh My.
On first look, I thought, "what the fuck is that thing". The I watched the commercial-style promo for it, and it won me over. Could be very, well, "revolutionary" which I suppose is what Nintendo are going for. This could cement Nintendo as THE games company, but it could also be the final nail in the coffin...i'm hoping that doesn't happen, but I really don't see this controller appealing to the mainstream....:meh:

Mike the Metal Ed 09-17-2005 08:28 AM

I'm starting to like the idea, but its a shame the third party developers will be too lazy to use the technology properly.

Jalapeņo 09-17-2005 09:41 AM

Wait, tilt your head to the right when looking at the first pic.

ZOMG!

Jalapeņo 09-17-2005 09:41 AM

Note: I haven't read any articles, seen any promos, or whatever.

Kane Knight 09-17-2005 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonster
How about you see the full picture before you start to say stupid fucking things like that in the first place.

Howabout this. Stop being an idiot fanboy, and I'll stop taking the opposing side.

I don't know how you fucktards don't notice this, but I've actually taken both sides on this issue in relation to the extremists. So sit down, shut up, stop being part of the problem, and I'll have less to react to. Sweet Jesus, y'all are fucking dense.

Kane Knight 09-17-2005 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tornado
Oh My.
On first look, I thought, "what the fuck is that thing". The I watched the commercial-style promo for it, and it won me over. Could be very, well, "revolutionary" which I suppose is what Nintendo are going for. This could cement Nintendo as THE games company, but it could also be the final nail in the coffin...i'm hoping that doesn't happen, but I really don't see this controller appealing to the mainstream....:meh:

This wasn't the first nail. Nintendo's made some bad decisions over time. People will forget the shit, but remember the "innovation."

They've damaged their rep over the years, and still come out of the box strong normally. The thing that worries me is that most of their "advances" have happened in the form of peripherals or side projects. For example, they didn't stop making for the Game Boy because the new "Virtual Boy" came out, and the actual GBA's successor isn't out yet (Meaning the DS isn't it). Other advances were less heavy-handed, such as peripherals, or analog sticks that were largely optional early on.

This one, however, is a core system.

...Until they announce it's the new "fourth pillar," and sell us the Gamecube Micro which will be 50% smaller and have faceplates, but no new technology or ports for the GBA player or LANpipe.

Jason Cage 09-17-2005 07:40 PM

so like...there's two available controllers now?

or like, you shove the remote in the controller and you get more buttons or something for certain games...like...hm? :confused:

G 09-17-2005 08:08 PM

The remote one with joystick I believe will be for 1st party games. The one that looks like a Gamecube one will be for 3rd party games and multi-platform games that do not support the remote controller.


I think.

Kane Knight 09-17-2005 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jason Cage
so like...there's two available controllers now?

or like, you shove the remote in the controller and you get more buttons or something for certain games...like...hm? :confused:

Instead of a second controller, they sell a shell which you drop the remote into.

Jalapeņo 09-17-2005 11:40 PM

Tilt your head to the fucking right when looking at the pictures.

Vietnamese Crippler 09-17-2005 11:50 PM

Yes, yes, it flips on its side to become an old-school Nintendo controller :roll:

Jalapeņo 09-17-2005 11:53 PM

ZOMG

road doggy dogg 09-18-2005 03:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by G
The remote one with joystick I believe will be for 1st party games. The one that looks like a Gamecube one will be for 3rd party games and multi-platform games that do not support the remote controller.


I think.

See, now if that's the case then that rules. It gives them the whole "revolutionary" aspect with their controller ish, while still giving the option to retain a more traditional controller. Much better :mad:

Mr. Monday Morning 09-18-2005 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vietnamese Crippler
Yes, yes, it flips on its side to become an old-school Nintendo controller :roll:

Isn't that going to be horribly awkward considering the motion sensor (unless I've missed something) is at the top of the remote? What are you supposed to do, play sitting side-on?

Savio 09-18-2005 11:30 AM

The Game cube one is an Idea of what IGN thinks the shell will look like......If Nintendo doesn't sell the shell with the Revolution then they are dumbasses.

Jalapeņo 09-18-2005 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Monday Morning
Isn't that going to be horribly awkward considering the motion sensor (unless I've missed something) is at the top of the remote? What are you supposed to do, play sitting side-on?

Unless of course, you're playing the old school NES games that are going to be available for download. :roll:

Vietnamese Crippler 09-18-2005 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Monday Morning
Isn't that going to be horribly awkward considering the motion sensor (unless I've missed something) is at the top of the remote? What are you supposed to do, play sitting side-on?

I figure the sensors would be disabled for the NES games :-\

Jalapeņo 09-18-2005 04:54 PM

:roll:

Kane Knight 09-18-2005 07:40 PM

Really? You mean they won't be analog controlled and mostion sensitive?

Vietnamese Crippler 09-18-2005 08:48 PM

I'll go out on a limb and say yes :o

AareDub 09-19-2005 12:10 AM

Yea, too bad the IGN wavebird looking thing is just a photoshop thing.

One thing I haven't seen mention of yet, is what if I start playing a motion sensor game sitting up straight. Then, after playing a while, I lean back or maybe even lean forward. What if I tilt my body over to one side to get more comfortable. What if I pause it, get up and go to the bathroom, then come back and do not sit in the same position I was in before. In other words, if it calibrates itself based on the starting position, what happens when you change positions. Will you have to sit perfectly still to play? Will you contstantly have to pause and recalibrate? It is built to not only sense up, down, left, and right, but also back, forwards, etc. So it will definitly notice when I lean back in my chair. Is Samus going to tilt her head back when I do that?

I'd be very interested to try it out, but it's not looking so promising at this point.

Kane Knight 09-19-2005 11:55 AM

Depends on how you change positions, I suppose.

I do the same thing though. Idoubt you'll have to be perfectly straight to play.

Innovator 09-19-2005 12:21 PM

Nintendo say hello to Sega

AareDub 09-19-2005 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight
Depends on how you change positions, I suppose.

I do the same thing though. Idoubt you'll have to be perfectly straight to play.

I agree that it doesn't sound like a logical problem when talking about a game controller, but I can't imagine how they'll get around it.

Boomer 09-19-2005 12:48 PM

If it is anything like having to deal with a Guncon, I don't want to be a part of it.

The Mackem 09-19-2005 02:05 PM

Personal attacks, whatever your brand persuasion, will not be tolerated in the VG forum. It's a VG controller not the last toilet roll fellas, it aint worth it.

Mike the Metal Ed 09-19-2005 02:09 PM

<TABLE cellPadding=5 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD bgColor=#003252>VGCats.com don't seem to be too thrilled over it.

Monday, September 19, 2005 - Walked into a doorknob.


New comic. Now before you get your e-trigger finger on that send button, just hear me out.

I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a little bit excited to see what games come out for the new controller. Still it's an iffy idea at best. I always feel like a battered wife with Nintendo. As much as they beat the shit out of me, I still love them.

The first thought that crossed my mind when I looked at it was, "How the fuck do I play smash brothers on that?!". Enter the peripherals. Which I am sure to be a first in a long line. Here are just a few ideas floating around. Money grab? Golly no.

As well the one thing this device isn't, is revolutionary. If you've ever been to an arcade you can see stuff like this all over the place. Sword simulators, gun games, tennis, soccer, fire hoses, etc.. It's not breaking any new ground. Hell, there are even peripherals just like this.

The fact is Nintendo is on very shaky ground with the Gamecube. Awesome in handhelds but wow, trouble in consoles. Some of the games this systems has are fantastic. However they are few and FAR between.

Now you might call this a risk Nintendo is willing to make. Wind Waker was a risk. This is near suicide. I loved Wind Waker but many people were turned off by it . The same way people are being turned off by the new controller. If you're looking to pull in new customers this just isn't the way to do it. So there's the mantra that they're "Focused on making games". Which is why I wouldn't be surprised if they pulled out of consoles.

This is all speculation of course. Might end up liking the damn thing. God knows I've been wrong before. These are my views and I'm probably not going to change them until I try the Rev. Make your own decisions.

Just one last thing. This is the silliest promo video ever. There's such a thing as too excited. Direct hate mail over here.


</TD></TR><TR><TD bgColor=#003252>Thursday, September 15, 2005 11:18 PM - Nintendo just died

Nintendo's new controller is out. Congratulations Nintendo, you've created what looks like a sex toy. Complete with rumble pack. Well, it was a fun company while it lasted.


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Mike the Metal Ed 09-19-2005 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Mackem
Personal attacks, whatever your brand persuasion, will not be tolerated in the VG forum. It's a VG controller not the last toilet roll fellas, it aint worth it.

Mackem lays down the law. :love:

Kane Knight 09-19-2005 04:08 PM

Mackem, this IS life or death. If the controller requires too much movement, I won't be able to whack off later.

The Mackem 09-19-2005 04:16 PM

Take it to the masturbation forum Kane Knight, you know your penis doesn't sit well with me :shifty:

Kane Knight 09-19-2005 05:40 PM

It doesn't sit at all...With you...:shifty:

Kalyx triaD 09-21-2005 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by road doggy dogg
http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/8...lutioncont.jpg

*jumps back on Nintendo bandwagon*

Well slap my ass and call me Katie Marie, that's actually a nifty little thingy there. I take back all my previous taunts. And for the record, I'm also reformed on:

Precision Passing, Madden 06 is nice. Still stick a middle finger to EAssholes.

Vietnamese Crippler 09-21-2005 10:09 PM

Please take not that that's NOT REAL ;)

The cradle will be made, but that's just a design thrown together by the guy at IGNCube

Joey Slugs 09-21-2005 10:36 PM

From Penny Arcade

We're obviously late to the Revolution Party, but so many people asked us what we thought of the controller announcement.


The first thing we thought of is what the Fruit Fucker would look like were he released today. If you don't have any white plastic on your consumer device, apparently you are some kind of retarded. Get some white plastic on there. That is the impression one would get. Sony grudgingly recognized it with the original PSP - glossy black machine, yes, but white strap and headphones. Ultimately, concession would make way to something like redaction.


The wireless at the hotel would never deliver unto me the full teaser video, so until we got back I was never able to see how far the thinking had gotten over there. They had, as I suggested, earned a little bit of optimism from me by making the DS - which I thought of as Exhibit A in Nintendo vs. Sanity - something I've come to consider kind of necessary. So looking at the video made me see that they were already thinking about what you could do with two positional controllers at the very least. The counterexample I keep hearing about the peripheral has to do with third parties, and how scary the controller is, but for a couple generations now their systems have been (at least, outside of Japan) a kind of dedicated shrine to their own games, games that shame the rest of the industry with their polish, their palette, and their playability. They forge unique deals with companies like Capcom and SquareEnix to bring sometimes extraordinary exclusive content. I can live with that.


There were initial cries and lamentations regarding the announcement, but I think we need to just accept the fact that they are no longer playing the linear game their competitors are. The control looks like a remote, yes, but we've talked about this before - playing games with pens, drums, and now remote controls draws the artifacts of ordinary life into the increasingly byzantine realm of electronic entertainment. Excuse me, I forgot. It's not innovation unless it involves another texture pass.


This is outside the ordinary either/or propositions that define our passtime. The either/or proposition is the PS3 or the 360, digital entertainment hubs that represent beachheads in some war for the living room.


We won't know until E3 the extent to which Nintendo is prepared to realize the promise of their strange excursion - it took them a year to prove their DS. The final word on why they would do something like this can be found over at Lost Garden. That is probably the most interesting article I've ever read.

Kane Knight 09-22-2005 12:40 AM

It's taken them over a year. Most of the games that will prove the DS are still just promises.

Requiem 09-22-2005 03:36 AM

LOL

http://www.vgcats.com/comics/images/050919.gif

Vietnamese Crippler 09-22-2005 03:38 AM

:rofl:

Silent 09-22-2005 04:19 AM

(followed link from the VGcats post)

http://www.monstergecko.com/products.html

That gun looks really cool. :o

Jason Cage 09-22-2005 04:53 PM

lol @ nunchuku contorller

James Steele 09-25-2005 08:01 PM

It looks like a tampon or possibly some sort of vibrator. Maybe they are marketing more to teen girls or something.

:shifty:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®