TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   video games forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Buy an EA Sports game second-hand, pay for online. (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=102626)

Kane Knight 05-11-2010 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kalyx triaD (Post 3063452)
I made my argument

nothing of substance.

Quote:

Just more "big business = evil" rhetoric
False. Come on, I'd expect you to at least not make up my argument.

Quote:

Where was this bravado when the same EA shut down their NFL competitors?
I don't think you meant "bravado."

Quote:

Oh yeah, you don't play football games so "I got mine, fuck you."
Again, false.

I don't play football games so it slipped under my radar, yes. to claim any more, to claim, for example, "I got mine, so fuck you" is to misrepresent.

Of course, you're full of that, aren't you?

Quote:

I've played watchdog before while you people either told me to calm the fuck down or played my thought off as ridiculous.
Examples? Were "us people" actually involved? Like say, me? BDC?

Quote:

Now I'm the corporate mouthpiece. Funny how the switch occurs in a case where people are coerced into buying games new.
Actually, coercion seems to be a big thing there. Notice how I didn't complain about Rock Band 2 or the Export codes for the Guitar Hero series or Mass Effect 2--all games I've purchased, by the way.

I'm betting you didn't mean to use the word coerce. However, it's gone from incentive to coersion, and there's the problem. As it was, there was no problem. And then the terms changed.

Quote:

I seem to recall mass bitching over a certain thread covering game piracy. Hmmm....................
Now you're trying to artificially correlate the two.

Quote:

Fact: The average price-cut for games are 5$ - 10$. EA aims to get that money one way or another.

Fact: You can just wait for the price to drop again in the future, whereas the 'DLC' may not drop, you could subtract the price via time.

Fact: Because of fact two, gamers still have a choice in the matter. It's not terribly convenient, but nobody is forcing you.
Pretty weak "facts." Those arguments don't hold much water in favor of whether or not this is right. They do sound like specious reasoning from a corporate apologist though, in the same post you get offended by such a claim.

Quote:

These events don't hold a candle to past actions by EA, Activision, Microsoft, Ubisoft, fucking SONY
Once again, arguing others have done worse doesn't make this correct.

Quote:

Don't bitch because you have to pony up or wait.
I'm not, you moron. I've clearly demonstrated it doesn't affect me. You've even cited that yourself. No wonder you spazzed out and are saying "Good-Bye." Your whole argument hinges on things you know I'm not saying.

Kane Knight 05-11-2010 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 3063463)
Apartment over the seperate garage, don't get the greatest reception there.

*insert Kano joke*

Funky Fly 05-11-2010 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight (Post 3063422)
It was well-received, but I'd hardly call it good.

Unless it's in the "60s Batman, so terrible it's charming" sense, in which case I still think it's shitty, but I can at least see that.

Storyline was so reminiscent of 60s Batman cheese that I was sure I saw a "Biff!" and "Zang!" from time to time. Gameplay was pretty fun tho.

As long as they keep the vouchers in the new copies (something I can see them doing away with, sadly) there isn't a problem here. While I've stated time and again that sports titles should be every other year, the trade off has been that most of them have been generally cheaper than non-sports titles.

.44 Magdalene 05-11-2010 07:53 PM

To jump on this a bit better, the funny part about it is that only the consumer is really suffering at all. If Gamestop has trouble pushing as many used sports titles because of this, they can make the money up by giving less for trades on said titles, or by charging more for the used titles when they hit the shelves. Gamestop could easily avoid losing a dime from this if they balance the books right.

Meanwhile, there's plenty of people who only get their sports title of choice off the Pre-Owned rack, many of which aren't going to research ahead of time just how fucked they are by doing so. Gamestop still makes its money, EA makes its money from new and used alike now, and Johnny Buysused across the street gets the shaft while both corporations laugh it up.

Johnny McNasty 05-11-2010 08:00 PM

The big problem I have with this is the big fuck you to people who like to rent games. Why should I shill out ten bucks for a code that allows me to play online, when I have no plans of keeping the game past the return date. I don't play many sports games anyways so no biggie really, but I don't like the way this could affect other titles.

Then again my local rental place are pretty stupid. They never check the game cases for any free promotional codes or what not. Like when GTA IV came out with the free monthly, me and a buddy cleaned up at our local rent shop. We walked away with a free year of X box live for the both of us.

.44 Magdalene 05-11-2010 08:02 PM

Hell, nevermind renting it--if I let my roommate borrow my game (let's say for 360 so it's funnier) and he puts it in his god damn system that he god damn paid for a god damn XBox Live Gold account for, he still has to pay another ten fucking dollars to take it online.

It's fucking silly.

.44 Magdalene 05-11-2010 08:04 PM

Past that seven day mark, that is. Assuming I didn't let a friend borrow it or something already, totally blowing that "free trial."

Kane Knight 05-11-2010 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by .44 Magdalene (Post 3063682)
To jump on this a bit better, the funny part about it is that only the consumer is really suffering at all.

Agreed. Though I already said it, I can't imagine Gamestop actually taking a loss off of this. People are arguing that it hurts the used market, but I'm having trouble seeing Gamestop just smiling and taking it on the chin. This will be passed on to the consumers in same way, and again, I think that's why Gamestop is openly supporting it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by .44 Magdalene (Post 3063699)
Hell, nevermind renting it--if I let my roommate borrow my game (let's say for 360 so it's funnier) and he puts it in his god damn system that he god damn paid for a god damn XBox Live Gold account for, he still has to pay another ten fucking dollars to take it online.

It's fucking silly.

It is, but they've wanted to stop game swapping, lending, etc. for years, so I don't think they care. You want to lend it to your friend, he pays ten bucks for the "right" to use the online service for more than 7 days. So I'm pretty sure they feel they've won. Assuming, of course, people buy it.

Kalyx triaD 05-11-2010 10:32 PM

http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets...500x_uu4ke.jpg

D Mac 05-12-2010 03:42 AM

Man I wish NFL 2k would come back. :(


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®