TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   WOW... (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=106783)

St. Jimmy 09-16-2010 03:58 PM

Kane is terrible and needs to go home. Taker is alright because of his "Legendary" status. Sheamus is fantastic and I would definately love it to be him vs. Taker with a Title Uni at stake. The titles need to be unified and this "brand division" needs to end.

Londoner 09-16-2010 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Innovator (Post 3247055)
Jesus, some of you need to make up your mind. Do you want change and new superstars or not?

There are other ways to make new superstars, Sheamus i don't think is deserving of ending the streak anyway. Plus Cena/Taker would be more entertaining, and i rarely say that about cena.

Volare 09-16-2010 04:07 PM

I think it needs to be the future of WWE. Biggest show of the year with a match that important needs to be done by people with credibility, but will also be around for awhile.

Sheamus is great don't get me wrong, but is still a little green. (no pun intended)

XL 09-16-2010 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowden (Post 3246821)
Why would they do Sheamus/Taker for the title? The streak match is always a huge draw, and I don't see any reason to use two big bullets (along with the title unification) in the same match.

Sheamus/Taker can book itself, so can the unification. Keep em separate.

This. I hate when they throw the title into a fued that is hot enough without it.

Fox 09-16-2010 06:03 PM

Sheamus would not be seen as any kind of a threat to the Undertaker's WM undefeated streak, and therefore would not pose any kind of threat to Undertaker's Undisputed Title victory. The idea of both of those things should be that there is at least a question of who is going to walk out with the Undisputed Title/Taker's streak - this match would eliminate both of those things.

They'll probably do it.

Droford 09-16-2010 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fox (Post 3247349)
Sheamus would not be seen as any kind of a threat to the Undertaker's WM undefeated streak, and therefore would not pose any kind of threat to Undertaker's Undisputed Title victory. The idea of both of those things should be that there is at least a question of who is going to walk out with the Undisputed Title/Taker's streak - this match would eliminate both of those things.

They'll probably do it.

If Sheamus can hold on to the Belt until Wrestlemania, he will have held the belt for 11 out of 15 months (and 9 months straight since Fatal 4 Way) since he first won at TLC back in 2009. They could totally hype him as being the most dominant champion in recent WWE history. He will have beaten Cena/Orton/Jericho/Edge and possibly (and most importantly) HHH and whoever else they can come up with. So you obviously have Sheamus beating everyone RAW has to offer and wanting a challenge, what better than vs Taker at Wrestlemania?

They should totally eliminate the predictability factor by having both champions wrestle twice like WM X and Vengance 2001, especially since the Winner of the Royal Rumble needs to get a title match. So it ends up being a mini 1 night tourney. Sheamus beats, lets say HHH and Taker beats..um..whoever..most people would probably figure on HHH would beat Sheamus like he did last year. Sheamus winning would instantly get the "OMG could he be the one?" reaction from the crowd. Taker also has to win two matches in the same night which would be even more epic for his streak.


Of course they'll fuck this up and have HHH beat Sheamus when he comes back.

Nark Order 09-17-2010 02:55 PM

Cena/Taker pretty much HAS to happen at Wrestlemania, and who knows how many UT has left in him. It's the only match I can think of off the top of my head where I legitimately couldn't pick the winner, despite the streak. Maybe Trips/UT also.

Dark-Slicer Diago 09-17-2010 04:19 PM

Triple H and Undertaker was at X7, I don't think they'll make Taker fight 3 different people at 2 Wrestlemania's, they already did that with Kane and Shawn Michaels.

crusnik 09-18-2010 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowden (Post 3246821)
Why would they do Sheamus/Taker for the title? The streak match is always a huge draw, and I don't see any reason to use two big bullets (along with the title unification) in the same match.

Sheamus/Taker can book itself, so can the unification. Keep em separate.

agreed :y:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®