| captaincharismark |
06-30-2011 11:42 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by XL
(Post 3567164)
80%? O.....k.
I agree, most week's there is too much Bischoff, some weeks too much Hogan. Last week, where this story kicked into gear, it seemed about right.
|
Maybe the 80% was a slight exaggeration, but the point remains the same. Hogan/Bishchoff/Sting remains the top focus of Impact Wrestling. My whole beef with that is the catchphrase "wrestling matters". And to me, none of those names is synonamous with wrestling in any true sense of the word. Sting was good at one time, but now he's doing 9-10 minute main events b/c he's not the wrestler he was. How can "wrestling matter" if the TNA World Champion is only in the show ten minutes or less a week?
Quote:
Why must Hogan turn face to be "defended" by a younger guy? Couldn't one of Immortal step up?
|
Does it not make more sense for a face to defend Hogan when and if he turns? A heel defending a heel to me isn't logical. If say an Immortal guy did that, he'd wind up being cheered more than booed. Kinda seems to defeat the purpose...
Quote:
I by no means think that will happen, nor do I want it to especially. But it seems a little bit early to write this off. Granted, that's what "we" do here.
|
Like I said above, I doubt a heel would come to the aid of another heel. Nobody's writing this off as far as I can tell. It's all opinion and speculation, which is what "we" do on every internet wrestling site. I personally think the Sting storyline is compelling. He's very entertaining and is a major player for TNA. I'm simply saying if "wrestling matters", then the main focus of the shows shouldn't be on two veterans who can't work as well as the younger guys. More especially considering the champion(Mr. Anderson) seems to be playing second fiddle to them. What's wrong with that picture??? |
