TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   WWE WrestleMania XXVIII Match of the Night (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=118224)

Rammsteinmad 04-06-2012 08:05 AM

Punk and Jericho. Two of my favourites in the WWE title match at Wrestlemania. :yes:

The Hell in a Cell was awesome though, and I have no problems with it getting the most votes.

Jaded-Dragon 04-07-2012 09:27 PM

Best as far as excitement was no doubt HHH vs Taker. Best as far as a good wrestling match was Punk/Jericho.

Gotta go with Taker and HHH overall because after the SCM/Pedigree combo, I actually thought for a second that the streak was over.

Anybody Thrilla 04-08-2012 02:31 PM

I really wanted to say Punk/Jericho, but Taker/HHH took me for a ride that I haven't been on in a looooooooooong time. Great stuff.

Fox 04-10-2012 08:56 PM

I'm gonna be really unpopular saying this, but I think that HIAC match is extremely overrated. Yes, it was good, but was it GREAT? I don't think it was better than Taker's matches against HBK - I don't even think it's that much better than Taker and Triple H's match at X7.

There was a lot of overblown melodrama in the ring. There was lots of "acting." A lot of it felt very contrived to me. I would have liked a more straight forward match instead of the crap with all the chair shots and HBK's "struggling referee" stuff. It didn't feel dramatic to me - it felt forced and fake. And I guess for me the main thing was that at no point did I think Undertaker was going to lose. Not even after the SCM/Pedigree combo.

Whatever. To each their own.

Anybody Thrilla 04-11-2012 07:25 PM

It's a real shame when professional wrestling feels over-dramatic and fake, isn't it?

CSL 04-11-2012 07:30 PM

Fox - not a fan of film or television shows

XCaliber 04-11-2012 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fox (Post 3822944)
I'm gonna be really unpopular saying this, but I think that HIAC match is extremely overrated. Yes, it was good, but was it GREAT? I don't think it was better than Taker's matches against HBK - I don't even think it's that much better than Taker and Triple H's match at X7.

There was a lot of overblown melodrama in the ring. There was lots of "acting." A lot of it felt very contrived to me. I would have liked a more straight forward match instead of the crap with all the chair shots and HBK's "struggling referee" stuff. It didn't feel dramatic to me - it felt forced and fake. And I guess for me the main thing was that at no point did I think Undertaker was going to lose. Not even after the SCM/Pedigree combo.

Whatever. To each their own.

Personally i'd rate it better than Taker vs HBK @ WM26 but i'd have to agree that it doesn't hold a candle to WM25's stellar match.

Jordan 04-12-2012 02:07 PM

I think Triple H's matches with Undertaker were better than Shawn's.

Fox 04-22-2012 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anybody Thrilla (Post 3823938)
It's a real shame when professional wrestling feels over-dramatic and fake, isn't it?

Austin vs Bret Hart was an incredible match, and it wasn't over-dramatic or "fake" feeling. They put on a great match that told a story, whereas I felt that Undertaker, Triple H and HBK told a story that just happened to be a match. I know that's really abstract, but that's how I feel about the match, and I've watched it a few times since WrestleMania.


And CSL, I love films and TV when they are done right. Chris Nolan took a comic-book story of a billionaire who dresses up like a bat to fight crime and made it into a cinematic masterpiece. Joel Schumaucher took the same story and turned it into Batman & Robin. It's all in the presentation.

CSL 04-22-2012 03:44 PM

and arguably the best character in those Christopher Nolan Batman films was Heath Ledger's Joker, who was quite ridiculous and over the top in his look, mannerisms, actions and story arc. It's all about suspending your disbelief.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®