Wait...aren’t you the guy who constantly reposts two quotes of mine (which are true by the way) to try and “get me” because I’m under your skin so much? :lol:

I just want to make sure everyone understands that you are talking out of your ass.

I'm drunk and thought i made this thread. I didnt. Bye.

I understand where you're coming from but it's not conducive to a positive outcome. If his condition were to be real, you come across as insensitive for mocking him. Let him derive his pleasure from wrestling discourse. It's all he has.

Except I’m not. I stand by all those statements. It’s very weird you have latched onto them so personally.

You admit you don't watch the product, but go on incessantly about how terrible a product you refuse to watch is. You said you refuse to watch Omega/Danielson. I didn't enjoy AEW initially and didn't watch, but they have brought in Punk and Danielson and that got me to watch again and I've liked some of the changes they have made. There is still some stuff I roll my eyes at, but I was willing to give it another chance and see the positive changes they have made. I don't watch WWE much anymore, so I don't go in WWE threads and go on long winded diatribes about storylines, ratings, etc. when I don't really watch the product. I find it extremely peculiar and slapdickish that you do that for a product that you openly admit you do not watch.

Okay? I don’t know why you think your metrics are so much better than everyone else’s. Especially to the extent that you go out of your way to essentially agree with me, but then make some weird turn to talk about how *you* gave it another chance, and *you* now enjoy it, like this is supposed to be compelling. Good for *you.* I am not as easily impressed. And I don’t feel that the JamesSteele method for appreciation is a universal enough model. Soz.

k, now go say this in a mirror!

?

I mean, I try to back up my opinions with evidence where I can. And I don’t care if people do/don’t like shit. I tend to focus on what does and doesn’t work. There is a difference there.

If JamesSteele wanted to explain to me why Danielson vs. Omega and AEW are so great, instead of just asserting they are and insulting me for not agreeing, I’d love to hear it. I’ve explained why AEW has not endeared itself to me and why I cannot bring myself to care about Danielson in AEW. I also HAVEN’T critiqued the specifics of the Omega/Danielson match, because I haven’t seen it. I’ve criticised a promo between the two I saw on YouTube that I didn’t like and that the company hasn’t enticed me enough to give them further chances, which is a shame because I love Danielson.

The response? “You don’t even watch. It’s actually good now and you can trust me because I used to actually agree with your points.” Okay, cool.

Will you do one thing for me (us?); watch that match. Come back and critique it/rip it apart if you like. I think that would actually be a good read/contribution. What do you have to lose by watching it? Hate it and it’s more evidence that AEW isn’t for you. Love it and you can write it off as “even a stopped clock is right two times a day” and the rest of the stuff they do is shite.

I could do that. I’m not vehemently opposed, I just haven’t “wanted to.” A lot of New Japan and ROH falls into this basket for me. I’ll let you know if I do.

That'd be lovely.

Tremendous wrestling discourse.