3.

And that is only because I found him entertaining as part of APA. Other than that, he would have received a 2. Now he is descending into retard land with things like his rant against internet fans and his backstage bullshit. His gimmick sucks bigtime and he can't wrestle for shit. He is boring to watch. His finisher is a clothesline.

How he received a title push is incomprehensible to me.

On an unrelated note, the top 4 wrestlers are Canucks. :cool: And one time members of the Hart Foundation.

He gets a 2.

Honestly, all these people that're giving him 6's & 7's have the mentality of "ah well, he sucks, but Vince is high on him so I guess I'll just accept him & try to be nice. Not like that strap'll be off him anytime soon."

That's the story of your entire career, JBL.

Kurt Angle's wrestling career: Remembered for true greatness.
JBL's wrestling career: Grudging acceptance.

Pillman isn't Canadian. He's from Ohio.

Oh yeah.......

My mistake. :$

Yet all four came up out of Stu Hart's organization in Canada. That is still pretty noteworthy.

Indeed but he ows a lot to Canada in terms of his wrestling career.

3, and thats being very fucking generous

8

Since everyones on a downer bout him i'll explain.

I've seen Bradshaw come a long way over the years, from Justin "Hawk" Bradshaw, to Blackjack Bradshaw, to Bradshaw of the Acolytes, IMO the only bad part of his career was when the Acolytes became the APA, to JBL & I love this character.

If this gimmick is crap then why did a very similar gimmick work for Ted DiBiasi, he was a rich cowardly wrestler who hid behind Virgil as is JBL hiding behind OJ

So my JBL rating is 8

CAUSE TED DIBIASE WAS A QUALITY WRESTLER WHO PUT ON QUALITY MATCHES and MADE HIS OPPONENTS LOOK GOOD. Watch Wrestlemania 4 my freind. Dibiase is much better on the mic and is light years ahead of Bradshaw with pyscology. JBL is SHIT in the ring.

I don't know how the hell Bradshaw is getting higher then 5's.

9

On Bret Hart
Is this a joke?

Well, it's your opinion, but I just don't get it.

WTF are you talking about?!? :wtf:

The fact that he was part of APA is the only thing that is helping him in this ranking and is the only thing remotely entertaining that he was a part of.

:nono:

Some of you are being to harsh on Bradshaw.

6

Ok, Low-Ki is a 7.3, according to the general consensus of this board. Watch one of his matches (preferably the ones against American Dragon or Christopher Daniels), then watch anything over JBL's career. It doesn't match up at all. Bradshaw sucks in the ring.

Well Put Funky

Some people rate more for the entertainment factor than the technical skills.

EDIT -- I wonder if the Homer Simpson calibur lazyness of the writers'll start making him shove $100 Bills into his beaten opponents mouths.

He is still not that entertaining.

Watch any of the Million Dollar Man's promos, then watch any of JBL's.

Bradshaw doesn't match up in that respect either. :wave:

I'll agree 100% with that.

JBL has improved though...

Crap...

3.5

6, and that's complimentary.

Voting Closed