TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   entertainment forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Teaser Poster For Abrams' STAR TREK Relaunch Revealed!! (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=48536)

ct2k 09-15-2006 06:26 AM

I've not actually seen Nemesis come to think of it

jcmoorehead 09-15-2006 08:03 AM

The Enterprise E was nearly destroyed in First Contact but Data deactivated the self destruct. In Insurection they had to eject the warp core and in Nemesis they lost most of it when they rammed the Reman ship.

I don't really like the idea of them going back to Kirks era i'd rather them focus on after Voyager.

D Mac 09-15-2006 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ct2k
I've not actually seen Nemesis come to think of it

Don't waste your time. :n:

YOUR Hero 09-16-2006 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diesel Mac
Don't waste your time. :n:

What?

are you kidding? It was pretty damned good.

D Mac 09-16-2006 08:08 PM

No not really.

Kane Knight 09-16-2006 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tb1
I'd much rather they pass it to the DS9 crew. That's the best series since TNG, and it's gone fairly unnoticed.

Probably because it was shit on, even by Trekkies, until like Season 3, when it started totally ripping off B5.

Yeah, I really would prefer to make the flagship of my franchise some shitty ripoff of JMS' work.

LoDownM 09-16-2006 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diesel Mac
No not really.

I disagree with you on this subject Mr. Mac.

Kane Knight 09-16-2006 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tb1
Actually, they only destroyed the original Enterprise in "Search for Spock", and the Enterprise-D in "Generations"

It's called hyperbole. The Enterprise or other ship is in dire jeopardy so much it's become boring.

The original set of movies managed to avoid destroying the Enterprise or necessarily putting it in self destruct/blowing it up/crippling it at every opportunity. Sure, it did happen (Star Treks 2,3 and possibly Undiscovered Country depending...Pardon me for not remembering the title...), but it seemed to be hardly as prevalent.

The same's an issue with Voyager, where the Self Destruct was armed like every 3 episodes. At least with Enterprise, the dire jeopardy made sense: We were using infancy technology against established technology. As bad as the show was, and it was bad, it fit better. It's just that, eventually, it gets repetitive, boring, and every day is the end of the world. They managed to make threats seem impressive in the past without resorting to this shit.

Tb1 09-17-2006 03:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcmoorehead
The Enterprise E was nearly destroyed in First Contact but Data deactivated the self destruct. In Insurection they had to eject the warp core and in Nemesis they lost most of it when they rammed the Reman ship.

I don't really like the idea of them going back to Kirks era i'd rather them focus on after Voyager.


Agreed. Completelly

Tb1 09-17-2006 03:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YOUR Hero
What?

are you kidding? It was pretty damned good.


It was an okay movie, but a bad send-off for the TNG crew.

YOUR Hero 09-17-2006 06:46 PM

Yes it was a poor way to end this line, if that is the case (it does seem to be) When the movie was made, I don't think however that was the intention, so it's not like it was poor execution on their part.

ct2k 10-04-2006 08:50 AM

Hmmm, Matt Damon is no longer listed on the IMDB entry for this, it seems like it could've been hearsay that got out of hand. I'm sure he's a candidate but its obviously not finalised yet.

D Mac 12-09-2006 01:22 AM

http://videoeta.com/news/2180

J.J. Abrams confirmed as 'Star Trek' director
Posted December 7, 2006 at 10:28 AM Central Time

By John Couture

In one of the industry's worst kept secrets, Viacom CEO Philippe Dauman confirmed this week that J.J. Abrams will indeed be at the helm of Star Trek XI. In case you've been living in on a not-so-deserted island these past few years, Abrams is the brains behind the hit TV shows Lost and Alias. J.J. also made his feature-length directing debut earlier this year on Tom Cruise's Mission: Impossible III.

The long-rumored storyline of Star Trek XI centers on original Starfleet officers Kirk and Spock's first meeting at the Starfleet academy. Summer 2008 is still being pegged as the possible release date.

ct2k 10-15-2007 04:09 PM

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0796366/


Eric Bana has been added as the villain 'Nero'.

Gotta be honest, Eric Bana is the man. Also Zoe Saldana set to play Uhura looks damn hot:y:

D Mac 10-16-2007 05:09 AM

LOL Simon Pegg as Scotty.

Nemoy reprises his role as Spock in this? Cool

ct2k 10-16-2007 06:39 AM

As 'old spock' looking back perhaps or (and god forbid) as some sort of narrator

YOUR Hero 10-16-2007 09:47 AM

Sylar from Heroes will be Spock.

ct2k 10-18-2007 06:19 AM

Chris Pine has been confirmed as Kirk apparently

D Mac 10-18-2007 07:04 AM

Never heard of him

Lara Emily 10-18-2007 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ct2k
Chris Pine has been confirmed as Kirk apparently

Ugh.

ct2k 10-18-2007 09:54 AM

Dunno, he was pretty good in Smokin Aces, I have faith that casting a character as pivotal as Kirk wouldn't be done lightly by Abrams.

Kane Knight 10-18-2007 04:08 PM

He was only rumored last I checked.

Anyway, my father mentioned that he'd read something about them recasting Scotty and someone else to play elder versions of themselves in this movie.

There's a decent chance they show up at the end, or the beginning or something.

D Mac 10-19-2007 04:35 AM

Simon Pegg is English right? I thought Scotty was supposed to be Scottish.

Lara Emily 10-19-2007 05:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight
He was only rumored last I checked.

Anyway, my father mentioned that he'd read something about them recasting Scotty and someone else to play elder versions of themselves in this movie.

There's a decent chance they show up at the end, or the beginning or something.

Ugh again. I understand SPock cause Nemoy is still alive but casting new people to play the TOS characters when their older is just not an appealing idea.

Then again I'm almost certain this whole project is just going to suck anyway.

ct2k 10-19-2007 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diesel Mac
Simon Pegg is English right? I thought Scotty was supposed to be Scottish.


It is a possibility (only a possibility I admit) that Pegg can do a Scottish accent, James Doohan wasn't Scottish either afterall.

Kane Knight 10-19-2007 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diesel Mac
Simon Pegg is English right? I thought Scotty was supposed to be Scottish.

Show of hands: How many Americans can tell the difference?

:wave:

Be honest.

ct2k 10-19-2007 02:08 PM

Kane Knight used to be a member of a Scottish street gang, true story

Kane Knight 10-19-2007 02:52 PM

Oddly enough, we were STILL blacker than Colin Powell

ct2k 10-19-2007 02:54 PM

Did you just call me a n*gger?

BigDaddyCool 10-19-2007 04:53 PM

My question is, are the klingons going to look like the klingons of the original star trek, just kinda ugly, or will they look like klingons of the Next Gen and afterwards, the really ugly ones. BTW, I'm marking out a little. I just hope the don't fuck it up like Voyager.

Boondock Saint 10-20-2007 04:01 AM

Karl Urban is McCoy.

Jon Kano 10-20-2007 04:06 AM

This is gonna suck

Lara Emily 10-20-2007 04:34 AM

This is going to suck a whole lot.

D Mac 10-20-2007 05:35 AM

You don't know that.

Anathema 10-20-2007 08:56 AM

I always wondered why they cancelled enterprise. Then I saw an episode the other day with the big show in and understood completly :roll: The thing is with enterprise they starting doing shit, like reintroducing the borg which just was fucking stupid. The first couple of seasons were good then in just turned gay. Hopefully they dont do similar stupid things with this movie where they try to add a significant plot which is nether mentioned in the original.

Kane Knight 10-20-2007 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anathema
I always wondered why they cancelled enterprise. Then I saw an episode the other day with the big show in and understood completly :roll: The thing is with enterprise they starting doing shit, like reintroducing the borg which just was fucking stupid. The first couple of seasons were good then in just turned gay. Hopefully they dont do similar stupid things with this movie where they try to add a significant plot which is nether mentioned in the original.

You needed to see the Big Show to figure out why?

YOUR Hero 10-20-2007 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool
My question is, are the klingons going to look like the klingons of the original star trek, just kinda ugly, or will they look like klingons of the Next Gen and afterwards, the really ugly ones. BTW, I'm marking out a little. I just hope the don't fuck it up like Voyager.

bigger budget than the old TV series makes me believe 100% that they'll be the Klingons of the 'afterwards' version. Afterall they brushed the whole klingons looking like humans bit with the fact they were super Klingons from a Klingon eugenics program.

Kane Knight 10-20-2007 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YOUR Hero
bigger budget than the old TV series makes me believe 100% that they'll be the Klingons of the 'afterwards' version. Afterall they brushed the whole klingons looking like humans bit with the fact they were super Klingons from a Klingon eugenics program.

lol what?

Jon Kano 10-20-2007 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diesel Mac
You don't know that.

Yes I do.

RP 10-20-2007 10:05 PM

Quinto looks like Spock for sure


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®