Quote:
Originally Posted by Loose Cannon
(Post 2939340)
fuck, it might be a huge epic fail, but I like thier boldness here. come on, I know a lot of you have asked for a Monday Night War again and here it is. yea, it may be one sided right now, but let TNA worry about the business part of things. Obviously, they have to have some business sense. They must of done thier reserach and homework if they are about to go head to head with WWE. TNA has lasted longer than most of us expected them to. I expected them to fold within the first five years and here they are about to put a wreslting show on at the biggest wrestling timeslot you could have.
I am behind them on this. they are going for it and I applaud them. If they put on shit, I'm going to stop watching and I'M sure fans will to. They've worked for this since 2002 and they've got it. Now the ball is in thier court. they can make a lot of money or go down in flames. Wrestling is not in 1998 anymore, so they have a lot of work to do. But then again WCW went live in 95 and wrestling was in one of the shittiest periods ever.
I wish them luck
|
I agree with this. It may not be Hogan or Bischoff's money, but you know they want to succeed with this. If they fail, they will look pretty fucking stupid for taking on Vince in the first place. I don't think TNA is instantly expecting to slaughter the WWE or anything. If they can keep their ratings consistent, and Spike TV is happy, then they have got the time to gradually close the gap.
The alternating live/taped thing is a bit weird -- and I could see that sort of floundering for them. I can understand why they would do it, but iMPACT! is one of those shows that plays better than it sounds. The tapings might turn a lot of people off. But then again, there is a live iMPACT! the next week, and I guess TNA is counting on the IWC to shit on them anyway, and to please fans that only see "live" as a buzz word.
The timeslot is a double-edged sword. On one hand, starting an hour earlier could be see as advantageous, but when iMPACT! finishes, people will just flick over to RAW and see the main event stuff -- which is where the WWE puts most of their (stale) efforts. On the other hand, TNA actually needs to get viewers in, but I guess they are hoping for people to flick over when they seem something they aren't interested in on RAW (like a crappy "comedy" segment) and stick with TNA, which does have far more momentum going through their shows start-to-finish than the WWE does.
I'm interested. Especially if TNA ups their game a little more, or if it makes Vince do the same thing. I mean, Vinnie Mac once sweated
Carlito signing with TNA. You can also see some TNA-influenced stuff in the WWE recently. We got heel vs. heel at the Royal Rumble, as well as face vs. face (both are much rarer in the WWE than in TNA), and we've seen some guys that the WWE has "lost hope in" sort of get renewed focus (MVP, Jack Swagger, Dolph Ziggler and even Evan Bourne come to mind).
And then you've got the guys that apparently aren't happy in TNA. Christopher Daniels is reportedly not happy; I don't know what's going on with that. Alissa Flash left the company recently, and Kong gave them a scare. You could see some shifts in talent that would be interesting.
If this just makes Vince up his game, and use some mid-card guys a little better, stop doing the same main events over and over, and actually let a few wrestling matches onto RAW; as well as putting forth some compelling storylines, this can only be a good thing for a wrestling fan. I seriously doubt that either product will be getting worse.