![]() |
I will say this; I feel the -target audience- of these games' multiplayer feature are the types of players who play this game for skill and competition. They are the majority, and I feel the game designers realize this. These are the people who discuss their games the loudest, and have the biggest opinion on them. These players flood forums with opinions, and companies depend on them to sell games. There is a SERIOUS skill-gap between those players, and casual players in-game. They create them with this 'majority' in mind, and they half-assedly try to throw in some things to appeal to casual players WITHOUT thinking of their majority.
So with the target audience in mind, I feel that is why a weapon such as a tube, is unfair and -gamebreaking-. Because it kills the game for the target audience. It kills the flow. It creates unintended rifts between the different 'castes' of players the game was intended for. I mean, it earned the name noobtube. You don't see people calling it the skilltube. There's obviously reasons people act derogatory toward the weapon. I really doubt it was the intention of the developers for this weapon to end up being used like it is. And again - it's gamebreaking when it leads someone to leave a game. Not just when a game is 'unplayable' due to glitches. But when a feature is used in an unintended way and causes someone to stop playing. When a single erroneously created weapon can lead people to talk THIS much shit on a game, that's gamebreaking. |
Quote:
|
Noobtoob is not gamebreaking, just super-annoying. Infinite Care package is game breaking.
|
You have to be joking about the hardcore being the majority. Have you spoken to the average wanker on these games? It's the biggest game series in the world right now, of course the majority is the casual player and there is nothing wrong with that.
The reason that the hardcore are the most vocal is because they are the hardcore, they've come online to discuss the game which is how they get to coin the phrase, probably spazz out about something while the majority are just chillin and having fun (not that you'd notice, they're probably calling you a gay fag nigger that gargles your mothers cum, or something). |
Nah, i described a certain type of player, who plays these games in a competitive manner (ie; to win, not just sit there and play a game because it's a game) and enjoys a skill-based game. Players who play the games to get better at them because they enjoy shooters specifically, and CoD/BF appeal directly to. I wouldn't classify myself as 'hardcore'. That means a totally different thing to me. I would say I'm a part of a majority though, because I experience a LOT of people JUST LIKE ME in these games. There are more casual players than me, and there are more hardcore players than me. But the vast majority, tend to be people who play them semi-seriously and really enjoy the competitive nature created by these games. Those are the people I see this style of game appealing DIRECTLY to. I know it's the most popular series at the moment, but how many of those sales ACTUALLY went online? That's why I say there is a serious skill-gap between a lot of players. If you're a casual player and you go online, odds are you're going to hate it, because everyone is better than you. Because the people that play all the time are who the game is meant to appeal to.
Hardcore players, live and breath games like this. That's not who I'm talking about. Alright, perhaps the forum-warriors are hardcore, and those aren't a majority. But as far as the type of people like myself who play these games for the reasons I mentioned, I feel they are DEFINITELY the majority. |
All CoD players are casual players.
|
Also, it's simple logic that says that casual gamers are not going to make up the majority of online players. Because they're -casual- gamers. They're not online all the time. The people who are on all the time are the people that play a few hours a day (and I wouldn't call them hardcore), and their friends play a few hours a day, etc. Still wouldn't consider them hardcore. I'd just consider them -gamers-.
TPWW had what I would consider a few people who were pretty competitive with the CoD series. I had a list of people I played with regularly on my friend's list, and several RL friends who played regularly. To those types of people, I don't know a single one who would agree that the tube deserved to be in the game. And those are who the game's core mechanics were designed for, IMO. |
I mean, the game's core mechanics are designed around coordination, precision, and staying alive to get killstreaks. The goal is to complete objectives before the other team does. They have a leveling system with challenges for very specific things, and stat tracking so you can compare to other people. It breeds competition.
To me, that says a very specific audience they had in mind when creating it. A 'casual' player will likely never be good at much of that. They might keep playing it for whatever reason, but the game rewards people who ARE good at its core mechanics. So who else is it designed for, but the people who focus on that type of competitive gameplay? |
I see it as, they pay to keep servers up 24/7 because there are very specific people who will play this game long-term. Regular players who will be the FIRST to buy new content when it comes out, and will tell their friends to buy it, and even tell their CASUAL player friends to buy it.
Any feature which angers that portion of your playerbase, is counterproductive. |
Like lvl3 xf Dark Phoenix?
|
Ok, after thinking about this, perhaps majority isn't the right term in some cases. I still feel that in CoD style games, competitive players probably put in 10x more hours in the games than all the casual players combined. Money-makers, however, is a more productive term.
ie; I play TF2 several times a day. I probably put in anywhere from 1-5 hours on any given day. I wouldn't consider myself hardcore. Just a gamer. But I'd say I'm definitely the audience Valve is trying to appeal to. MOST companies try and appeal to this audience. There are much smaller groups of people that play a lot more than me, and people who play a lot less. But I'm the group of players who periodically buys items, and spends money here and there on content. Tells their friends about the game, and how cool X new item is. With such a large group of players making up that category, those are the players who make them the most money. Those are the people who will complain the loudest about broken things. Now, I'm sure with the addition of f2p, Valve has seen an influx of casual players. They may even be a 'majority'. However, THOSE are not the people who make them money. The middle-group of players like myself, are the ones who will make a company money. We buy the content first, and convince other people to as well. |
I wouldn't say we are the majority anymore Req, we were what the series built on but now its about the fact anyone can pick up and play the game.
We agree there are many things used by the less skilled players that upset the balance of the gamebecause its far easier to get kills with a tube then to precisely aim and get a kill. People who exploit glitches I will never understand. Either they do it to piss people off or they do it for the stats to make themselves appear skilled. Many times after the care package glitch I saw players who had consistently negative k/d ratios but their combat record show a ratio of 2.5/1 or higher. Its blatantly obvious a player cheated before if they have a lifetime k/d that high but cannot sustain it once a glitch gets fixed. |
Look, obviously I play to win the game as well. There's no point in playing a game if you're not trying to. Of course it's no fun if you're constantly losing. I just don't get mad if I lose because someone is glitching or "being cheap", because there's really nothing at stake other than some virtual stats. And I know if it's a glitch, it'll get patched. If it's part of the game, it's part of the game. I encounter far more people who don't tube than those who do, even back in MW2.
Tubes take a very specific setup to be that annoying. A setup which is gone from Black Ops, and Robert Bowling has gone on record saying that tubes in MW3 are going to be severely nerfed (knife lunging too, for that matter). But I'm sure glitches will happen, and some new weapon or perk setup will be found to be broken. And the circle of life will continue. |
Quote:
No nothing is at stake beyond stats, but hear me out. F you take away the meaning of a win, of a good k/d ratio or stats you gained by taking the time practice and being skillfull and equate it evenly with someone who used exploits to appear the same. Give me a reason to continue playing. is a 4.0 k/d radio impressive? Well yeah. is it still impressive if you used glitches to attain it? No, most would say no. So having said yourself, the only thing you are playing for is stats and when that's gone there really isn't a good reason to play. Ill give an example on something, Medal of Honor for PS1. I spent hours playing and perfecting my game. To this day none of my friends have been able to beat me in back t back games. However if they cheated to do so it would be meaningless to brag about a you didn't earn the win or any respect. As for the tubes, thank fuck. Tubes would be fine if the blast radius was lessened. I'm going into this without an opinion, I just hope nothing stupid like what happens in ME2 takes place. |
Quote:
|
preordered the hardened for both ps3 and 360. we'll see which one i get. :-\
|
PC version.
|
You are getting the PC version FA? Can't wait to see you bitch about "all the cheaters on the pc version"
|
Way to jump to conclusion.
I was referring to G's post so kindly get off my ass. |
Quote:
|
Anyways, getting this thread back on track, here's a bunch of news and tidbits.
Twitter roundup from Robert Bowling regarding a whole bunch of stuff, including the Prestige Shop: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Some good stuff in there.
|
Yeah, seems to be pretty good.
|
Though I am going to say it now, I can see people sitting in corners and boosting up that perk killstreak thing by killing friends aways before they start playing.
|
Assholes are inevitable, can't fault a developer for them.
|
It would make sense to start with the Double XP when you prestige. Or do you lose them when you prestige again?
|
PC version on Steam will come with Modern Warfare 1 for free if MW 3 is pre-ordered. If you already own MW 1 on PC then the game can still be gifted to someone else as an option with the pre-order.
http://www.screwattack.com/news/g1lu...eive-cod4-free |
Achievement list for the Xbox 360 version was leaked with the biggest surprises being more achievements focused on the campaign (1 just for starting a new campaign). Also leaked was the lack of online multiplayer achievements done in an attempt to combat boosting and cheating from previous games.
SPOILER: show http://www.screwattack.com/news/spoi...nt-list-leaked |
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/5l6FAiE5xCc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
one big clusterfuck
|
Probably the most focused I ever seen CoD gameplay.
|
Why is that
|
It takes the K/D-centric system of past CoD's (with the infamous Nuke killstreak that rewarded that mentality - even during objective games) and spreads it out for more people of different playstyles. Splitting the CoD make-up into three main trees that (I assume) will further splinter into various customized playstyles (guns, perks, actual streak rewards).
Then by making certain abilities exclusive to their branch, it also adds a sense of limitation that I feel is required for team games to work. You choose a role suited to you and play your position, adjusting it at your leisure. It's not so much a fiesta of perks and killstreaks anymore, which was just unattractive to me. I couldn't even be arsed to play BlackOps past 2 weeks and that was an improvement over MW2. Now I may play for at least 2 months. |
Looks pretty good to me.
|
I pre-ordered it incase I want to pick it up on launch. Still unsure.
Also, Kalyx you are assuming people who play this game have a clue about tactics, team play or any idea of strategy. Silly you. |
Well damn... you play this game. And I wouldn't set out without a set party anyway, and my boys are on point as far teamwork goes - that's any game. In any case I'll play B3 more often anyway.
|
Quote:
MW is like any shooter. You go in with randoms and yeah, 9 times out of ten you won't get great teamwork. Grab some buds and play with them if it's that big a deal to you. |
I'm a Mercenary for hire and play Mercenary.
|
Officially midnight here, so officially 1 week to go!
|
Quote:
My problem and what I was referring to, is how so very rarely anyone I randomly play with has any idea how to be tactical. More often then not, its just run and shoot and that's it. Chances are it comes down to game breaking players, ones that can lead their team to victory when outmatched. I can be that player at times but not always. Lastly, you don't always have a group to play with either. |
That is something that plagues me: Even if we're not a unit, I expect some semblance of common sense. There were times when I'd click with a bunch of randoms and magic happens. But usually, I yell "What the hell are they doing!"
Did that a few times on Battlefield yesterday. |
Black Ops had double xp over the weekend and if you prestiged during it you unlocked something from the MW3 prestige store or whatever they are calling it. Not sure on the details since someone else told me about it and I didn't try because I haven't played Black Ops since the first week of September.
|
Anybody here drinking massive amounts of Mountain Dew and banking double xp time?
|
Copies of the game I leaked. Most interesting thing I saw was that there is apparently a
SPOILER: show |
Great. :|
I see massive amounts of match quitting when that shit happens. |
Doesn't seem to make sense. What kills them? Wouldn't they stray away from anything like the infamous Nuke killstreak? Most perks and killstreaks were revealed openly, why hide this one?
Reeks of bullshit. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
saw it though, and seemed to confirm it. The thread in question. |
Well fuck. Just when the game got me interested.
|
Quote:
|
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/jRA0cjr02OA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
Quote:
|
They should have Captain America edition riot shield DLC. Complete with boomerang toss. 1200msp.
|
I'm serious.
|
If this MOAB stuff is true, I don't know why they would make it give off an EMP, it's just a really really really big normal bomb.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Is everyone in this thread serious right now.
|
And I gotta give Roxer mad props at playing CTF.
|
Quote:
|
Serious. Not going to press the right trigger once.
|
fallen angel will be playing this within 1 month of release. would say 1 week but a month is enough time for him to feel really lonely because everyone is playing this
|
Quote:
Seriously. Focus on that last line. 25 kills, not counting killstreaks. How many people do you suppose got a nuke in MW2 via 25 honest-to-God kills, without using harriers/hinds/chopper gunner/whatever? It could be match ending, but only because if you let the other team actually get it, they'll have about 7000 points to your 1200. Yes, yes, you're worried about boosters. Always a problem. IW is supposed to be watching them more this time around. And btw, everything I just said, and everything that's been posted is based on sketchy info from leaks. For all we know, it could only be available in custom gametypes or private matches or something. Just saying, I wish people would wait for a little more info before they go off on "MOAR NUKES IW I HATE YOU MOST BROKEN GAME EVARRRRRRRRRRR~!!" tirades |
I agree with everything you said there Blitz.
I just want to say one thing, IW has done nothing to earn my trust. |
I'm not even worried about the MOAB, I got nuked once in MW2.
|
I'm still buying on release. So I guess I'll have to find another clan or some shit since Blitz is the only other TPWWer getting this.
|
I'm probably the only one that's also interested in the single player campaign. It looks badass.
|
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/1dI_4Eww94M" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
7:25 (Start) - IGN editors and Infinity Ward bring you all new gameplay from Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3! Get your questions answered, win prizes, and see the game in action. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Soooo from that IGN video they played a lot of Spec Ops Survival and it looks like mad fun. I can easily get into it way more then I could zombies.
|
This game has single player???!!!
|
Quote:
Saved a bunch of money today buying a winter coat. Got hooked up enough where I can buy Modern Warfare at launch, and still get Saints Row. Well not at launch, but on the 10th. You me and Blitz will tear it up. Maybe Funky's bro too. |
I am invisible I guess
or just a given |
given
|
sweet
|
IGN:
Quote:
|
People waste money on anything..hope that person goes bankrupt
|
IW showed off how the whole CoD Elite and social features actually work in the game.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/BFZQoQct--U" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Halo Waypoint/Bnet essentially. Not complaining, just seemed obvious. Hope more games do that.
|
Walmart holding a launch tournament for MW 3 at 2700 stores starting at 8pm on November 7.
Walmart is also giving away the choice of a free CoD Elite t-shirt or MW 3 patch for all copies bought at the store. http://www.screwattack.com/news/wal-...2700-locations CoD Elite was also delayed for the PC with the main problem of Activision calling the platform "insecure" in terms of hacking for stats. No date on when it will actually arrive on the PC but the console versions of Elite will launch on time. Quote:
|
Alot? You mean the vast majority?
|
My copy is bought and paid for, all I have to do is pick it up at Gamestop at Midnight launch. :cool:
|
I want to see how the Kill Confirmed mode works out as well as the customization of local matches. Who's getting this on launch date?
|
Getting it on the 10th so don't look for me til then.
|
I'll have it on launch.
|
The PS3 version will be in my house at launch, I probably won't get anytime on it till Tuesday night tho. Will probably be to tired, plus have stuff to do Tuesday.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Grabbing this after work tomorrow afternoon.
Probably won't be doing some serious playing until friday. |
got no work tomorrow, so i have all day to "kill these bitches"
|
You know it's bad when your entire staff decides to troll the CoD fanboys.
Working the midnight launch tonight for CoD, in a mall store mind you, and the 8 of us working tonight are all wearing Battlefield 3 shirts to the launch of this game. It's likely going to cause a major bitchfest, but my boss is all for and so are we. |
Nice.
|
Install sizes revealed with the non-mandatory sizes being just 50 MB on the PS3 and 4.7 GB for a full install on the Xbox 360.
The actual mandatory size for the PS3 version wasn't revealed though. http://www.gamezone.com/news/modern-...-size-revealed |
Quote:
I'm over in the States just now - saw like 20 people queuing outside a pretty small Gamestop at around 6:30pm, presumably for this. Seems a bit sad, really. |
Can't believe I seriously thought about waiting 11 hours in line for a Wii.
|
Decided I won't be getting this, at least right away.
|
Having second thoughts as well. The time I have to play online isn't what it used to be. Dunno if It'd be worth it. Might be better off using the money toward something else.
|
My boss worked out a trade with the guys at GameStop a couple doors down from us. They claimed other stores had "donated" pizza to other GameStops in the city but he refused to just hand over free food. So instead they paid for 6 pizzas and got 16, and he got MW3 at 8pm. Didn't see him again after the pizzas were delivered.
|
Had some people BBQing it up at one Game Stop. Walked by around the shopping center at 8:30 and GameStop displayed their TV w/ the PS3 console outside and witness a few 1v1 gaming of MW3...looks identical to MW2
|
Here is the reason I am not going to pick up this game for the first bit at least.
As you probably know if you ever seen me in a CoD thread, you know I play MP competitively and to test my skill and see where I place against other people who play. But when the leaderboards are hacked and the a lot of the ones who didn't hack their stats used glitches and cheats you really can't measure yourself properly. So I guess you play for a good K/D ratio or Win/Loss record (yeah, there might be 3-4 people out there who try for this) Blitz or someone will quote this message saying I am flipping out when I am only stating the reasons I do not wish to purchase it. A large argument will ensue telling me to not buy and how the person never sees any cheating at all. The problem with this is, if I wanted to put my K/D over 5.0 at the start, it would only be as simple as starting a domination game and spamming a capture point for kills by camping and killing anymore who comes along or at least that was the way in MW2. About the only real measure is Win/Loss ratio and K/D ratio together but the problem with that is, you can still be a wretched player who plays on good teams and look good because of it. So with no real concrete measure of how good you are at the game, really I would only be playing it to pass the time as the end goal of hitting the end of prestige is not much of a goal but an indication of how much time you spent playing (Or in most cases, where you found the hack) I love playing online with people, it is fun but I really do not see the point in spending $70 on a game which given past history will be broken and full of cheating and glitches given that its Activision. |
Quote:
And not just about call of duty. Video games in general. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®