TPWW Forums - Chairshot to the head? That's a finin'...

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)

- wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)

- - Chairshot to the head? That's a finin'... (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=100721)

ahahahahaha, you're such a troll. Wont even tell me what i've changed position on, ffs get a life.

So this is hapenning because linda wants to get into politics. And if she hadn't been more than likely it would have never been brought up. Amazing how the wrestlers welfare is a concern when it a mcmahon wants to get their foot into something else.

It's been an issue for years, with Nowinski bringing it to light especially and pushing it to WWE. I think it would have happened either way, maybe it was just pushed in a little early.

Just think if The Rock came back and guest hosted RAW. There would be no more "turn that sum-bitch sideways, ans stick it straight up your candy ass!" No more talking about "pie" (well maybe) But pretty much Rock is gonna be cut down to nothing, at least without his origional punch lines.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984747)

What a fucking joke. WWE just gets worse and worse, fuck linda.

You're a knob.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984747)

What a fucking joke. WWE just gets worse and worse, fuck linda.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984753)

The thing is, whats next to go then? The list could go on and on till the whole point of whats good about wrestling is lost.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984758)

especially in a ladder match, thats just too dangerous!

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984761)

I fucking hate politics.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984766)

There's alot worse things that can do more damage in wwe than a bloody chair shot to the head.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984769)

Watch any match involving stuff like chairs, ladders etc and you get your answer, its just aload of bollocks imo, this decision.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984776)

Any other cases in wrestling other than Benoit, though?

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984780)

Wont somebody please think of the children!

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984802)

That isn't the only reason i hate politics, but seeing it mentioned when invovled with wrestling gets to me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984876)

The point is when does the banning stop? Bit funny they are having all these high risk matches every ppv now yet banning chair shots to the head.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984882)

We might aswell just ban wrestling altogether.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984886)

Part of it, part of the 'edgy' side of it, anyway.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984914)

Again missing the point. Notice i said 'part of the edgy side of it'?

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984939)

Not dodged anything, just accepted that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984957)

Funny you say i'm not debating properly yet look what you've contributed so far eh?

As i said, not dodged anything, explained my point. I was discussing chair shots to the head, not all chair shots. How long before all chair shots are banned to though?

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984964)

If you check one of my posts recently you'll see what my favourite aspects of wrestling are, chair shots wasn't one of them, i'm just making my feelings known about this subject, sorry you can't accept that, but that's your problem.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984967)

I have changed nothing, tell me what you mean by that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984973)

ahahahahaha, you're such a troll. Wont even tell me what i've changed position on, ffs get a life.

You never explained your point. You keep dodging. You go from "chair shots never hurt annoy" to "when will the banning of dangerous moves stop" to "I never really like chair shots in the first place, but I don't think they should get rid of them."

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xero (Post 2984980)

It's been an issue for years, with Nowinski bringing it to light especially and pushing it to WWE. I think it would have happened either way, maybe it was just pushed in a little early.

Ive read about the Nowinski thing and the report on benoit, last i read though wwe had yet to see any evidence that benoits brain dmage was anywhere as severe as the tests had made out. if it was as bad as the quote below states you'd think it would have got more coverage on the news. Then again the news was riding the "roid rage" bandwagon for all it was worth at the time.

Quote:

Benoit's brain was so severely damaged it resembled the brain of an 85-year-old Alzheimer's patient

Never said i didn't like them just they weren't my favourite aspects, but ofcourse like anyone else i enjoy that side of it too. I'm just abit worried wwe will go too 'safe' and ban more things in future.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2984989)

Yeah, I would hate for the wrestler's average life span to go from 35 to 50, that would be awful.

You wanted my opinion, you got it. Now you're just trying to provoke an argument.

Yeah, like you weren't doing that to start with.

I hate chairshots to the head. I'm glad it's banned.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2984993)

Yeah, like you weren't doing that to start with.

When was i doing that? I was merely making fun of the decision, never personally targetted anyone for an argument like you have.

Do I need to quote all your posts again?

Whatever, its clear you've just misinterpreted my posting style/what i was doing.

What? There is another way to interprete how you were being a rude asshole that is more concerned about a cheap thrill of watching someone get hit in the head than the health and welfare of wrestlers/preformers.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2985006)

lol, so its wrong now to enjoy someone being hit with something in wrestling? So in the MITB match, is everyone meant to not enjoy any 'risky' moves because that would mean they're a 'rude asshole'?

There you go with that slippery slope crap again.

Really can't be bothered with people like you. Wont in future.

You can't be bother with people who don't let you argue unfairly and make you stick to real points instead of incidentals? Well you are dumb, so I can see why.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2985014)

You can't be bother with people who don't let you argue unfairly and make you stick to real points instead of incidentals? Well you are dumb, so I can see why.

I wasn't 'arguing unfairly', just cause you disagree with something doesn't make it an 'unreal point'. Anyway, i'm done with you. :)

For someone who has been done with me 5 posts ago, you certainally seem to keep coming back.

My whole problem with the banning of moves / blood / chair shots is that the WWE continues to book matches that will normally include these things.

They book ladders matches and expect no one to bleed, they book chair matches (look it up) but now you can't hit your oponent in the head.

If you are going to go the 'PG' route, then DON'T FUCKING BOOK GIMMICK MATCHES.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Testicle (Post 2985036)

Wow, someone who understood the point.

You never made that point.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2985038)

You never made that point.

Didn't i say 'bit funny they're banning chair shots to the head yet having high risk matches every ppv now'.

If you did, it was no where near as clear.

Like i said, you misinterpreted my posting style.

What, of being an inconstant tool? You can't even keep to your pledge of never talking to me. I think you just enjoy arguing. Lord knows I do.

Bye bye to this.

<object width="500" height="405"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ejpBMwSQxm8&hl=en_US&fs=1&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ejpBMwSQxm8&hl=en_US&fs=1&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="405"></embed></object>

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2985044)

If you did, it was no where near as clear.

Nevermind can't find the post, thought i sent it. Those words i said are what i would've posted anyhow. Lets just agree to disagree here cause i am not trying to provoke anything. Insult me all you wish, but i've made myself as clear as i can.

That fine with that statement was about the Lesnar video.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2985058)

If you just said that to begin with I wouldn't have had a problem. If you notice I'm agreeing with you in the TNA needs time thread.

Hold on, wrestling banned headshots

before hockey....

I didnt see that coming.

Chairshots to the head being gone is understandable, bit of a shame and I can't see the odd one being too dangerous.

As long as chairs aren't altogether banned it's ok with me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoRoolz (Post 2985073)

Chairshots to the head being gone is understandable, bit of a shame and I can't see the odd one being too dangerous.

As long as chairs aren't altogether banned it's ok with me.

Yeah, i'lld be ok with this sort of thinking.

Saying that, the 'safety' thing has to stop somewhere. They'll be wrestling on trampolines soon enough.

"It ain't ballet.."

Didn't excessive chair shots to the head contribute to Benoit's insanity?