TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   video games forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   The Big XBox Coming Out Party Feat. Don Mattrick (now XBone Discussion) (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=123928)

Immortal Moose 06-07-2013 05:09 PM

lol

While this big brother-esque institution that has popped up should be alarming; to think that Sony of America and Nintendo of America wouldn't follow suit given, adequate, pressure is laughable.

Kalyx triaD 06-07-2013 05:16 PM

Gonna need more than a meme on that one. Seems pretty big.

Immortal Moose 06-07-2013 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kalyx triaD (Post 4220038)
Gonna need more than a meme on that one. Seems pretty big.

*See Triple A's posts from the last few days.

Requiem 06-07-2013 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Immortal Moose (Post 4220036)
lol

While this big brother-esque institution that has popped up should be alarming; to think that Sony of America and Nintendo of America wouldn't follow suit given, adequate, pressure is laughable.

The difference is that Sony doesn't have an always-on listening and watching device with facial recognition that requires an internet connection at least once every 24 hours.

Immortal Moose 06-07-2013 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Requiem (Post 4220046)
The difference is that Sony doesn't have an always-on listening and watching device with facial recognition that requires an internet connection at least once every 24 hours.

That you know of.

Edit: God I hope you don't have a cell phone.

Kalyx triaD 06-07-2013 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Immortal Moose (Post 4220040)
*See Triple A's posts from the last few days.

About what? In Casual? Any link? Name of thread?

No offense but what kind of answer was that?

Immortal Moose 06-07-2013 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kalyx triaD (Post 4220051)
About what? In Casual? Any link? Name of thread?

No offense but what kind of answer was that?

No offense taken. It was in casual, he has taken issue with Obama's invasions of privacy.

Here's an example:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Triple A (Post 4219436)
y'all

the govt is viewing all our emails/chats/photos/files/everything from every internet company

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013...iants-nsa-data

from verified official document:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv...sm-slide-4.jpg

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv...sm-slide-5.jpg

Better?

Kalyx triaD 06-07-2013 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Microsoft
We provide customer data only when we receive a legally binding order or subpoena to do so*, and never on a voluntary basis. In addition we only ever comply with orders for requests about specific accounts or identifiers. If the government has a broader voluntary national security program to gather customer data we don’t participate in it.

*Like every company ever, essentially what Immortal alluded to.

Requiem 06-07-2013 05:46 PM

http://gizmodo.com/what-is-prism-511875267

Kalyx triaD 06-07-2013 05:47 PM

And it certainly seems like every relevant company was in it for a while.

Immortal Moose 06-07-2013 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kalyx triaD (Post 4220053)
*Like every company ever, essentially what Immortal alluded to.

Yep :D

Requiem 06-07-2013 06:06 PM

I'm not saying the government doesn't have access already to any number of private facts about my life.

But it's practically inviting it to purchase a product thats defining feature is a mandatory peripheral that is always on, always listening for voice input, always looking for faces to recognize. Let's not forget that it -remembers- voices and faces, meaning it records information. And it requires an internet connection once every 24 hours to retain access to your games. Meaning it will always be connected, always available to upload data to Microsoft. Available to stream live if needed.


The possibilities are terrifying. Yeah, the NSA could be spying on any of us through our phones, emails, and computers. Sure. That's hardly our fault for purchasing or using technology that is almost a necessity if you live in a 1st world country. They could be doing it now for all I know.


It would be our fault however, to buy something we know is risky to begin with. Something we don't necessarily need, when there is an alternative product right across the aisle that DOESN'T claim to have these features.


Saying "You don't know that it doesn't" about the PS4 is dumb. People can buy the fucking things when they're out, open them up, and say "Hey guys, there's a camera here. And a microphone, holy shit." and the cat is out of the bag. Xbox is ADVERTISING it. Saying "Hey look what this does" while people keep saying "Um, I don't want it to do that. I want it to play games." which it doesn't even do well, if it requires an internet connection AND a peripheral just to work.

Requiem 06-07-2013 06:13 PM

I'm really not trying to treat this like the console war of last generation either. I don't favor 360 or PS3 over one another. I own both, and a PC, and I like them all for different reasons. For different games. For playing with different people.

Microsoft is making this an easy choice for gamers though if this is what they've come up with this generation.

Immortal Moose 06-07-2013 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Requiem (Post 4220060)
Saying "You don't know that it doesn't" about the PS4 is dumb. People can buy the fucking things when they're out, open them up, and say "Hey guys, there's a camera here. And a microphone, holy shit." and the cat is out of the bag. Xbox is ADVERTISING it. Saying "Hey look what this does" while people keep saying "Um, I don't want it to do that. I want it to play games." which it doesn't even do well, if it requires an internet connection AND a peripheral just to work.

So what happens when they open up a PS4 and there's a camera? They haven't show the console

And how in the the hell do you know that the XBone doesn't play games well?

Immortal Moose 06-07-2013 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Requiem (Post 4220063)
I'm really not trying to treat this like the console war of last generation either. I don't favor 360 or PS3 over one another. I own both, and a PC, and I like them all for different reasons. For different games. For playing with different people.

Microsoft is making this an easy choice for gamers though if this is what they've come up with this generation.

Nor I, if I could buy both I definitely would. But that said I will probably end up buying the XBone. While continuing to invest more in the pc.

Immortal Moose 06-07-2013 06:17 PM

How about we just say fuck consoles and all move to computer games?
/kinda serious

Kane Knight 06-07-2013 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Immortal Moose (Post 4220036)
lol

While this big brother-esque institution that has popped up should be alarming; to think that Sony of America and Nintendo of America wouldn't follow suit given, adequate, pressure is laughable.

Retarded people are retarded.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Immortal Moose (Post 4220065)
And how in the the hell do you know that the XBone doesn't play games well?

Pure fanboyism?

Kane Knight 06-07-2013 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Immortal Moose (Post 4220069)
How about we just say fuck consoles and all move to computer games?
/kinda serious

Are you mad? Do you know who makes Windows?

THEY'RE EVERYWHERE!

Immortal Moose 06-07-2013 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight (Post 4220071)
Are you mad? Do you know who makes Windows?

THEY'RE EVERYWHERE!

OH GOD, YOU'RE RIGHT!

Inadequacy 06-07-2013 06:32 PM

Just wanted to point out that he was referring to a feature that will cause the XBone to not play games when he said it wouldn't play games well.

Thought that was pretty obvious.

Kalyx triaD 06-07-2013 06:34 PM

Well... don't buy it.

Immortal Moose 06-07-2013 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inadequacy (Post 4220075)
Just wanted to point out that he was referring to a feature that will cause the XBone to not play games when he said it wouldn't play games well.

Thought that was pretty obvious.

I realize that but well is subjective. It will still play game just as well except you have to have the Kinect connected. Put it in a cabinet if you're that concerned while it's still plugged in. Also playing porn at a lower volume so that the Kinect can't hear probably isn't a bad thing.

Kane Knight 06-07-2013 06:46 PM

Shit man, you have to plug in ALL the parts of a game system for it to work? What a rip!

Requiem 06-07-2013 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Immortal Moose (Post 4220065)
So what happens when they open up a PS4 and there's a camera? They haven't show the console

And how in the the hell do you know that the XBone doesn't play games well?

1. I'll repeat that I think that is a dumb hypothetical. What would you do if you opened up your wallet and found a microphone stitched into it in such a way that if you removed it, your wallet fell apart and stopped working? You'd buy a different fucking wallet wouldn't you. If the PS4 has a camera and a microphone secretly built into it, I'd be just as outraged. I'm not trying to just bash the Xbox and praise Sony here. But it's dumb to use a question like "what if the other was just like it?" when there's no reason to think it is so far.


2. Requires a peripheral in order to work. A dumb gimmicky peripheral at that, that didn't catch on last generation and isn't going to catch on this generation at the rate they're going. Requires an internet connection once per 24 hours or will not work. Checks for an internet connection once every hour if you're on a different console. Was discovered today that part of their patent was for the camera, stating the kinect won't work if the face of the person playing is not visible when it checks. If this feature is included, there goes the idea of taping over the camera that some people had. Their anti-used games crusade is basically geared toward keeping people from playing games unless they buy them brand new.


There's basically a slew of features that will PREVENT people from playing games. These are not consumer friendly features. These are corporate-friendly features. If the challenge is "Which console is better for playing games on?" then PS4 wins hands down based on the current evidence. You mean I can just plug the fucking thing in and play? Deal.

Requiem 06-07-2013 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inadequacy (Post 4220075)
Just wanted to point out that he was referring to a feature that will cause the XBone to not play games when he said it wouldn't play games well.

Thought that was pretty obvious.

Yeah. Not talking about the hardware. As far as graphical and processing potential goes, the hardware of both systems is more than adequate and I don't place one over the other in that regard.

Immortal Moose 06-07-2013 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Requiem (Post 4220089)
1. I'll repeat that I think that is a dumb hypothetical. What would you do if you opened up your wallet and found a microphone stitched into it in such a way that if you removed it, your wallet fell apart and stopped working? You'd buy a different fucking wallet wouldn't you. If the PS4 has a camera and a microphone secretly built into it, I'd be just as outraged. I'm not trying to just bash the Xbox and praise Sony here. But it's dumb to use a question like "what if the other was just like it?" when there's no reason to think it is so far.


2. Requires a peripheral in order to work. A dumb gimmicky peripheral at that, that didn't catch on last generation and isn't going to catch on this generation at the rate they're going. Requires an internet connection once per 24 hours or will not work. Checks for an internet connection once every hour if you're on a different console. Was discovered today that part of their patent was for a camera that won't work if the face of the person playing is not visible when it checks. If this feature is included, there goes the idea of taping over the camera that some people had. Their anti-used games crusade is basically geared toward keeping people from playing games unless they buy them brand new.


There's basically a slew of features that will PREVENT people from playing games. These are not consumer friendly features. These are corporate-friendly features. If the challenge is "Which console is better for playing games on?" then PS4 wins hands down based on the current evidence. You mean I can just plug the fucking thing in and play? Deal.

1. First off until all features are revealed we cannot rely on anything except hyptheticals, even dumb ones. Continuing who says it's just a secret and they're not just letting Microsoft take the hit until they bandwagon. There's no reason to think it isn't like the other thus far either.

2. Say hi to the immensely successful Wii, or any other console that requires a peripheral to play it i.e. a controller. Also, the 24 hour thing is nothing but spout from Phil Harrison.

Based on current evidence, I don't have enough evidence.

Kane Knight 06-07-2013 06:59 PM

You need a controller to play the Wii? That shit'll never sell.

Never.

Kalyx triaD 06-07-2013 07:00 PM

I wouldn't count a controller as a peripheral, that's like counting the plug as an extra.

The Kinect is an extra that's pretending to be necessary.

Kane Knight 06-07-2013 07:01 PM

You need a plug now?

Immortal Moose 06-07-2013 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kalyx triaD (Post 4220102)
I wouldn't count a controller as a peripheral, that's like counting the plug as an extra.

The Kinect is an extra that's pretending to be necessary.

If we had a Holodeck you wouldn't dispute a camera.

Kane Knight 06-07-2013 07:03 PM

The definition of "necessary" seems kind of arbitrary here, if I'm being serious. The Wii largely relied on an IR sensor. Probably wasn't necessary unless they wanted games to play a certain way.

Kalyx triaD 06-07-2013 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight (Post 4220106)
The definition of "necessary" seems kind of arbitrary here, if I'm being serious. The Wii largely relied on an IR sensor. Probably wasn't necessary unless they wanted games to play a certain way.

Well the waggle waggle thing was a key feature of the Wii. So in that case it was very important. The Kinect doesn't do anything you can't do with a controller, remote, or phone (via smartglass). Of all these input methods the controller is the one to be most used, with Kinect only partially supported in core games and housing a pathetic games library of its own.

Imagine Smartglass being required on Xbox One, when it adds absolutely nothing really. If every X1 game required the Kinect for some reason, congrads Microsoft made the damn thing a necessity. But I don't see that happening.

I can care less about the Big Brother shit people pretend to be angry about. Far as I know the government is well aware of my porn preferences and has been for years. Whatever. What bothers me is watching some piece of shit camera, however hi tech it honestly is, get promoted like it 'changed the game' last time around. It's... annoying.

Immortal Moose 06-07-2013 07:17 PM

Kinect, for me, means more achievements and sitting at 217,545 gs leaves me wanting more.

Kalyx triaD 06-07-2013 07:18 PM

Makes no sense but do what you gotta do.

Immortal Moose 06-07-2013 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kalyx triaD (Post 4220113)
Makes no sense but do what you gotta do.

Nothing about achievements makes sense.

Kalyx triaD 06-07-2013 09:16 PM

True.

Kane Knight 06-07-2013 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kalyx triaD (Post 4220110)
Well the waggle waggle thing was a key feature of the Wii. So in that case it was very important. The Kinect doesn't do anything you can't do with a controller, remote, or phone (via smartglass). Of all these input methods the controller is the one to be most used, with Kinect only partially supported in core games and housing a pathetic games library of its own.

Imagine Smartglass being required on Xbox One, when it adds absolutely nothing really. If every X1 game required the Kinect for some reason, congrads Microsoft made the damn thing a necessity. But I don't see that happening.

I can care less about the Big Brother shit people pretend to be angry about. Far as I know the government is well aware of my porn preferences and has been for years. Whatever. What bothers me is watching some piece of shit camera, however hi tech it honestly is, get promoted like it 'changed the game' last time around. It's... annoying.

Again, this seems like an ass-backwards justification for why one is okay and one is not.

Kane Knight 06-07-2013 11:45 PM

I'd probably respond to the smartglass thing as I did with the Wii U thing. Meh.

Kalyx triaD 06-08-2013 12:13 AM

I dont think any of this shit is okay. Its all pretty gay.

Tom Guycott 06-08-2013 01:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kalyx triaD (Post 4220102)
I wouldn't count a controller as a peripheral, that's like counting the plug as an extra.

The Kinect is an extra that's pretending to be necessary.

Exactly. You buy a DVD player, you NEED the remote. You could just use the face buttons, but usually only for basic functions like on/off, play and eject.

However, you shouldn't need an external, usb powered popcorn popper. Sounds like a quaint idea, but not having this should not prevent you from using the device/media/TV combination.

The "privacy invasion" stuff always happens in waves, and will fade to the background. The major issue is bogging the product down with "features" nobody gives a fuck about. "XBOX ON" sounds all well and good, but what if you're mute? I shouldn't NEED to have my face scanned like I'm entering C.O.N.T.R.O.L. just to play a single player game of Pac-Man to kill 15 minutes or so. And, what if the Xbone Kinnect has the same issues of the current gen Kinnect as it pertains to sometimes having issues with not always detecting darker skinned people? If I want to jump into a game of Halo, I have to hope the system doesn't freak out like a neglected puppy unless I have every light in the room on and standing in direct sunlight.

I've already voiced.. er... typed my displeasure in having to cart my current 360 over somone elses house to connect to the internet so I can update permissions on my system to be able to play single player games I've downloaded offline, so imagine what I must think about making more hoops to jump through for even physical copy. Having you check in once a day like Microsoft is your PO to use anything seems like a slap in the face. Even if this is spposedly conjecture, it is conjecture that hasn't been shot down.

Any and every thing the EXTRA peripheral is "needed" for isn't really "needed" in the first place.

Blitz 06-08-2013 01:49 AM

Remember the days when debates about consoles didn't begin till after people had seem them actually playing games?

Tom Guycott 06-08-2013 02:17 AM

Those days ended when the companies decided they wanted to get as much money out of people before they even delivered.

Also, "seeing them playing games" is even suspect anymore with pre-rendered, pre-scripted mock ups of supposed gameplay that may or may not even use the actual game engine.

This is supposed to be a game system used for playing games, but we're being sold on everything else it's supposedly capable of with a noticable absence of substance on said games.

Kalyx triaD 06-08-2013 04:59 AM

This isn't even about the games anyway. Halo 5 could be the most badass shooter ever but I'm still gonna wonder why some fancy webcam needs to be connected to the console. It's a pretty good guess that whatever the Kinect is there for we could do with a controller. It's not something we need to 'play first' to know.

Kalyx triaD 06-08-2013 05:00 AM

Now that I think about it, what are you actually responding to, Blitz? Don't think any of us complained about the games.

#BROKEN Hasney 06-08-2013 05:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Immortal Moose (Post 4220098)
Also, the 24 hour thing is nothing but spout from Phil Harrison.

Nah, they clarified the 24 hour thing officially. You do have to sign in.


http://news.xbox.com/2013/06/connected

Kalyx triaD 06-08-2013 05:55 AM

Totally making sure I have all three consoles next gen. Gaming on one doesn't look like it'll work out like it did. Feels oldschool really.

The Rogerer 06-08-2013 06:16 AM

What?

Kane Knight 06-08-2013 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blitz (Post 4220412)
Remember the days when debates about consoles didn't begin till after people had seem them actually playing games?

Remember when game consoles were actually treated as game consoles by the console manufacturers?

...Now that I think of it, there miiiiiight be a connection hurrr.

Fignuts 06-08-2013 01:56 PM

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/vide...n-Buyers-Guide

Kane Knight 06-08-2013 02:09 PM

<div style='width:650px;font-size: 12px;'><embed src="http://cdn2.escapistmagazine.com/media/global/movies/player/flowplayer.commercial-3.2.12.swf" flashvars="config=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/config/7417-1d609631065e7aa49ec8b7f53870887c.js%3Fplayer_version%3D2.5%26embed%3D1%26autoplay%3D0" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" quality="high" bgcolor="#000000" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" width="650" height="391" wmode="opaque"></embed><div><a href='http://www.escapistmagazine.com'>The Escapist</a> : <a href='http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/zero-punctuation'>Zero Punctuation</a> : <a href='/videos/view/zero-punctuation/7417-Next-Gen-Buyers-Guide'>Next Gen Buyer's Guide</a></div></div>

Kalyx triaD 06-11-2013 03:49 AM

http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18qf...g/k-bigpic.jpg

The Rogerer 06-11-2013 04:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight (Post 4220597)
<a href='http://www.escapistmagazine.com'>The Escapist</a> : <a href='http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/zero-punctuation'>Zero Punctuation</a> : <a href='/videos/view/zero-punctuation/7417-Next-Gen-Buyers-Guide'>Next Gen Buyer's Guide</a></div></div>

Thanks for posting something now rendered obselete

The Rogerer 06-11-2013 05:28 AM

I can do that too
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/j0fK4JKPvE4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Kane Knight 06-11-2013 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Rogerer (Post 4222981)
Thanks for posting something now rendered obselete

You're seriously whining about me embedding something Fignuts posted?

SlickyTrickyDamon 06-11-2013 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James Steele (Post 4218309)
What were the complaints about Fable III? I loved all the Fable games.

My only problem with Fable 3 was obnoxious assholes in online-game chat which is normal for all games. Fable 3 was pure awesomeness.

SlickyTrickyDamon 06-11-2013 11:49 AM

$500 for the Xbox One.

Fignuts 06-11-2013 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight (Post 4223089)
You're seriously whining about me embedding something Fignuts posted?

Yeah, but I'm lovable, so no one's gonna call out me.

Emperor Smeat 06-11-2013 01:02 PM

Square Enix announced the Xbox One will also get Final Fantasy XV and Kingdom Hearts III.

http://www.destructoid.com/kingdom-h...e-256037.phtml
http://www.destructoid.com/final-fan...1-256036.phtml

Kalyx triaD 06-11-2013 01:14 PM

Oh cool.

Curtis 06-11-2013 01:19 PM

Okay Sony wont have horrible spying DRM in PS4 and wont ban used games and actually shows off indie games.
Now we know what company is about GAMERS next gen.

Kane Knight 06-11-2013 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fignuts (Post 4223118)
Yeah, but I'm lovable, so no one's gonna call out me.

It's more Rog will look for any excuse to bitch about me, but either way.

Ultra Mantis 06-12-2013 08:55 AM

The Don has addressed any consumers worried about internet connectivity issues.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/BiUzaqOU06M" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Oh dear.

Kane Knight 06-12-2013 09:17 AM

It's like they actively don't want gamers to buy the One.

#BROKEN Hasney 06-12-2013 10:10 AM

This is why Dead Rising 3 looked shit:

http://www.destructoid.com/dead-risi...s-256136.phtml

Quote:

In a GameSpot report, Capcom demonstrated exactly how terminally bloody stupid the mainstream game industry truly is, confessing that Dead Rising 3 is planning to appeal to Call of Duty fans. Because of course, following the leader is exactly how you lead!

In a bid to, yes, "appeal to a wider audience," Dead Rising 3 has been given a brown color scheme, a serious tone, and a "realistic" approach. As if going down a checklist of bullshit PR phrases, Capcom also promises the violence will be "more visceral."

It would appear the publisher learned nothing from Resident Evil 6, a game that also ignored everything its series was founded on in a desperate, blind, pathetic attempt to grasp for an audience that was too busy playing Call of Duty to notice a poor attempting at aping Call of Duty. This is a lesson major publishers seem to refuse to accept, as they perpetuate the same cycle of failure they're been spinning on for the past few years.

As I'm always frigging saying, companies will shoot themselves in the foot if they keep insanely believing they can photocopy Call of Duty's success by scraping pitifully in its shadow. They need to start leading their own markets, rather than grab slices of a market already conquered.

But no, that requires too much thought. Better to just smash existing games with their own unique appeal, and reconstruct them into some bastard mutant that is everything and nothing at once.

Kane Knight 06-12-2013 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hollywood Hasney (Post 4223682)
This is why Dead Rising 3 looked shit:

http://www.destructoid.com/dead-risi...s-256136.phtml

Feels like this needs repeating:

<div style='width:650px;font-size: 12px;'><embed src="http://cdn2.escapistmagazine.com/media/global/movies/player/flowplayer.commercial-3.2.12.swf" flashvars="config=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/config/7161-81ece6628d6fb8cb8629eb0330b8133e.js%3Fplayer_version%3D2.5%26embed%3D1%26autoplay%3D0" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" quality="high" bgcolor="#000000" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" width="650" height="391" wmode="opaque"></embed><div><a href='http://www.escapistmagazine.com'>The Escapist</a> : <a href='http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/jimquisition'>Jimquisition</a> : <a href='/videos/view/jimquisition/7161-Perfect-Pasta-Sauce'>Perfect Pasta Sauce</a></div></div>

(Plus, it'll give Team Gormless another reason to whine about me!)

The Rogerer 06-12-2013 10:50 AM

Why would I complain about that?

Kane Knight 06-12-2013 10:57 AM

It meets the criteria on your flowchart.

The Rogerer 06-12-2013 11:19 AM

It absolutely does not. Don't pretend to understand.

Kane Knight 06-12-2013 12:01 PM

It's a two step chart. It's not exactly difficult to follow.

Disturbed316 06-12-2013 07:14 PM

Dead Rising has always been about the bright colours and humour, I cant see anyone running around in some of the previous outfits in the third one.

Oh and that announcement about getting a 360 if you don't have the internet is the dumbest thing they could have said and certainly not going to help things.

Kalyx triaD 06-12-2013 07:15 PM

Which wouldn't happen unless you get the DLC anyway.

Tom Guycott 06-17-2013 01:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Mantis (Post 4223662)
The Don has addressed any consumers worried about internet connectivity issues.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/BiUzaqOU06M" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Oh dear.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight (Post 4223670)
It's like they actively don't want gamers to buy the One.



Also, unless it is based on another M$ decision, seems like GS is kinda being passive-aggressive about this particular machine... the preorder price is $100 instead of the usual $50 down for a new launching system. PS4 follows the standard $50 price point. Hm.

Kane Knight 06-17-2013 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Guycott (Post 4226886)



Barrowman!


Quote:

Also, unless it is based on another M$ decision, seems like GS is kinda being passive-aggressive about this particular machine... the preorder price is $100 instead of the usual $50 down for a new launching system. PS4 follows the standard $50 price point. Hm.
I have trouble believing this will be a bad thing for Gamestop. "Participating retailers" will almost certainly be them, and they're suich a force in the market they're almost certain to get a bigger and better deal.

Kane Knight 06-17-2013 09:39 AM

Just a side note, I really do wish Microsoft would get its shit together. Angry Jew did an interview with Major Nelson, and the Major was once again contradicting the talking points of other folks from Microsoft.

Given Larry's typical function as spokesman and promoter for the company, I'm inclined to believe his version of things is more accurate. But I don't know how accurate "more accurate" is, and it still indicates a core problem here: people who don't know what the fuck they're on about saying things they have no business saying.

VSG 06-19-2013 01:10 PM

http://www.cinemablend.com/games/www...rds-56737.html

Wow

Kalyx triaD 06-19-2013 02:26 PM

Thought that was the norm for most of E3.

Emperor Smeat 06-19-2013 02:35 PM

From what I've read about that situation, its mainly because those dev kits and games were being developed well before Windows 8 was available.

Microsoft didn't have the Windows 8 dev kits finished in time to make the switch be possible for their E3 plans. Those kits have the actual card and porting tools needed to finish development.

Kalyx triaD 06-19-2013 02:38 PM

You'd think they would be ahead of that.

VSG 06-19-2013 03:05 PM

I was referring to the part where MS defended using Win 7 w/Nvidia GTX 780 (most likely) as a "comparable" kit to the XBOX One using an AMD APU with its ~7790 GPU. The GTX 700 series cards are waaaaaaaaaay more powerful than the AMD 7790.

Emperor Smeat 06-19-2013 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kalyx triaD (Post 4228729)
You'd think they would be ahead of that.


Maybe if Windows 8 was released earlier in 2012 and not around last October.

Between the time needed to create that major version of the dev kit and the time needed for porting as well as testing probably didn't leave enough time to guarantee all the projects would be ready for E3.

Kalyx triaD 06-19-2013 03:12 PM

Well they need to tighten the fuck up. They can't be a company that big trying to stuff crap down people's throats while secretly winging it behind the scenes. It's... unprofessional.

Emperor Smeat 06-19-2013 04:05 PM

Quote:

Report: Microsoft To Drop Used Game Restrictions, Online Requirements

In what might be the most dramatic reversal in the gaming industry, Microsoft is reportedly changing course on many of the concerns related to the Xbox One. These include a 180 degree shift on used games and online requirements.

According to a report published on Giant Bomb, Microsoft will be dropping the 24-hour license renewal "check ins" we were told the system requires. Additionally, retail discs will be handled identically to what we experience now on the Xbox 360. This includes trading in and loaning to friends. An internet connection will only be required when setting up the console, and region locks will be disabled.

This news follows our interview with Microsoft Studios corporate vice president Phil Spencer, who assured us that Microsoft is listening to community feedback. We've reached out to the company for comment.
http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/a...uirements.aspx

Kalyx triaD 06-19-2013 04:07 PM

Interesting...

Disturbed316 06-19-2013 04:52 PM

Interesting indeed. If they get rid of the check in's, current used game policies and the heavy reliance on Kinect, I may consider it. I'm still leaning towards the PS4 though.

RoXer 06-19-2013 04:58 PM

http://news.xbox.com/2013/06/update



Last week at E3, the excitement, creativity and future of our industry was on display for a global audience.

For us, the future comes in the form of Xbox One, a system designed to be the best place to play games this year and for many years to come. As is our heritage with Xbox, we designed a system that could take full advantage of advances in technology in order to deliver a breakthrough in game play and entertainment. We imagined a new set of benefits such as easier roaming, family sharing, and new ways to try and buy games. We believe in the benefits of a connected, digital future.

Since unveiling our plans for Xbox One, my team and I have heard directly from many of you, read your comments and listened to your feedback. I would like to take the opportunity today to thank you for your assistance in helping us to reshape the future of Xbox One.

You told us how much you loved the flexibility you have today with games delivered on disc. The ability to lend, share, and resell these games at your discretion is of incredible importance to you. Also important to you is the freedom to play offline, for any length of time, anywhere in the world.

So, today I am announcing the following changes to Xbox One and how you can play, share, lend, and resell your games exactly as you do today on Xbox 360. Here is what that means:

  • An internet connection will not be required to play offline Xbox One games – After a one-time system set-up with a new Xbox One, you can play any disc based game without ever connecting online again. There is no 24 hour connection requirement and you can take your Xbox One anywhere you want and play your games, just like on Xbox 360.
  • Trade-in, lend, resell, gift, and rent disc based games just like you do today – There will be no limitations to using and sharing games, it will work just as it does today on Xbox 360.
In addition to buying a disc from a retailer, you can also download games from Xbox Live on day of release. If you choose to download your games, you will be able to play them offline just like you do today. Xbox One games will be playable on any Xbox One console -- there will be no regional restrictions.


These changes will impact some of the scenarios we previously announced for Xbox One. The sharing of games will work as it does today, you will simply share the disc. Downloaded titles cannot be shared or resold. Also, similar to today, playing disc based games will require that the disc be in the tray.


We appreciate your passion, support and willingness to challenge the assumptions of digital licensing and connectivity. While we believe that the majority of people will play games online and access the cloud for both games and entertainment, we will give consumers the choice of both physical and digital content. We have listened and we have heard loud and clear from your feedback that you want the best of both worlds.


Thank you again for your candid feedback. Our team remains committed to listening, taking feedback and delivering a great product for you later this year.

alvarado52 06-19-2013 05:13 PM

Beautiful. That is a BIG deal.

ClockShot 06-19-2013 05:40 PM

Big news, but too little too late.

Now just ditch the Kinect and drop the price, and you might convince me to buy one.

alvarado52 06-19-2013 05:46 PM

The Xbox One is dead...


LONG LIVE THE XBOX 180

LoDownM 06-19-2013 06:44 PM

Like Clockshot said, they need to drop the Kinect requirement and price. 100 bucks is a big deal still.

alvarado52 06-19-2013 06:56 PM

Cmon, no rep for that Xbox 180 thing? I thought it was pretty clever...

edit: Smelly Meatball :love:

ClockShot 06-19-2013 06:58 PM

I'll give ya some Al, even though about a few thousand people beat ya to it on a bunch of other sites.

Kane Knight 06-19-2013 07:21 PM

It's a shame they were still telling us to fuck off just yesterday.

Kane Knight 06-19-2013 07:21 PM

I'm glad that they reversed course, but I think it's too little, too late.

At least, for me.

Though I won't outright refuse to get one.

alvarado52 06-19-2013 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClockShot (Post 4228800)
I'll give ya some Al, even though about a few thousand people beat ya to it on a bunch of other sites.

:\

alvarado52 06-19-2013 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight (Post 4228806)
I'm glad that they reversed course, but I think it's too little, too late.


I've heard this a few times now, and still dont get it.

The consoles arent even out yet, but some how it's "too little too late". Like you've somehow invested into the PS4.

Kane Knight 06-19-2013 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alvarado52 (Post 4228814)
I've heard this a few times now, and still dont get it.

The consoles arent even out yet, but some how it's "too little too late". Like you've somehow invested into the PS4.

I'm not invested in the PS4, and that's not generally what people mean when they say "too little, too late." To the non-mouth breathers in the room, it refers to the damage done in terms of consumer confidence and the like.

In my case, I'm not exactly likely to reward people who were telling us to fuck off even as they were planning to backtrack.

Don't be that guy, dude. You're not that stupid.

Kalyx triaD 06-19-2013 07:53 PM

That doesn't make sense, KK. Shouldn't this kind of radical back-step instill confidence in consumers?

So what; Microsoft is hated for doing and then... not doing? It's no-win for them over restrictions nobody ever actually experienced (and never will)? And if gamers always had this 'one strike and you're out' mentality, how in the holy shit would they consider a Sony console after a pathetic PS3 launch and a historic month-long network outage?

Like Alva, I fail to see how this is consistent, and not just fanboys shifting the goal post. Perhaps a mouthbreather could explain it to me.

Kane Knight 06-19-2013 07:55 PM

Is this a Triad thing? Like you guys are taking an intentionally narrow view of statements to come up with the stupidest possible arguments?

Okay, then. Moving on.

Kane Knight 06-19-2013 07:55 PM

And yeah, it always was kind of a no-win deal once they went down that path. So what.

Kalyx triaD 06-19-2013 07:57 PM

LOL "So what"? Are you fucking serious right now?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®