TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   entertainment forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Ben Moody is a ****ing asshole. (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=495)

Lamuella 01-08-2004 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by everyhourdylan
ra dosent have a good singer. tori amos plays piano. therefore she is much more than just a singer.

you might as well say 'tori amos sings, therefore she is much more than just a pianist'

her songs 'me and a gun' and 'wampum prayer' are a capella. They are amongst the best things she has ever done.

Yes, she is a truly excellent piano player, but she is also a truly, truly EXCELLENT singer. She has an incredible, well trained voice with an astonishing range, tone and quality. THis is not invalidated by the fact that she happens to play the piano.

Lamuella 01-08-2004 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by everyhourdylan
what play bad guitar parts?
im looking at the drumming when i judge a band.

pah. Drummers aren't musicians. They just hit things.

Kane Knight 01-08-2004 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by everyhourdylan
what play bad guitar parts?
im looking at the drumming when i judge a band.

yes, I'm sure you do. I'm sure that's the only part of a band that counts as "music," too.

Seriously, when your band learns to play, I'll take your criticism of other music a little more seriously. Til then. :lol:

Sephiroth 01-08-2004 02:32 PM

Dude i think your right, i saw it somewhere Evanescene is on the 3rd place with their cd in the charts :y:, they where on 10th place and now they are on the 3rd :D

Kane Knight 01-08-2004 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benoittic
Dude i think your right, i saw it somewhere Evanescene is on the 3rd place with their cd in the charts :y:, they where on 10th place and now they are on the 3rd :D

Wouldn't be surprised. Take some poppy metal, throw in a pair of tits, and you've got a Smash Hit.

Sephiroth 01-08-2004 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight
Wouldn't be surprised. Take some poppy metal, throw in a pair of tits, and you've got a Smash Hit.

Your right look at Britney (slut) Spears and Christina (X) Aguilera

Kane Knight 01-08-2004 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benoittic
Your right look at Britney (slut) Spears and Christina (X) Aguilera

now cross them with Linkin Park, and BAM! You have Evanescence's success.

everyhourdylan 01-08-2004 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lamuella
you might as well say 'tori amos sings, therefore she is much more than just a pianist'

her songs 'me and a gun' and 'wampum prayer' are a capella. They are amongst the best things she has ever done.

Yes, she is a truly excellent piano player, but she is also a truly, truly EXCELLENT singer. She has an incredible, well trained voice with an astonishing range, tone and quality. THis is not invalidated by the fact that she happens to play the piano.

and this brings us back to harmoney.

everyhourdylan 01-08-2004 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight
yes, I'm sure you do. I'm sure that's the only part of a band that counts as "music," too.

Seriously, when your band learns to play, I'll take your criticism of other music a little more seriously. Til then. :lol:

ive yet to see your bitch ass post your music. therefore **** off and i dont care. anything you say will never be taken into account as far as im concerned.

Kane Knight 01-08-2004 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by everyhourdylan
ive yet to see your bitch ass post your music. therefore **** off and i dont care. anything you say will never be taken into account as far as im concerned.

Because I'd rather not post half-assed demos, I don't post music on here. Is it that hard a concept to grasp? To you, it must be. Your music is absolute shit and you cry when people don't call you God. Those of us who don't want to sound as pathetic and talentless as you don't bother unless we have something professional worth putting up.

Lamuella 01-08-2004 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by everyhourdylan
and this brings us back to harmoney.

how does it bring us back to harmony when she's a solo artist who performs without backup singers?

everyhourdylan 01-08-2004 05:43 PM

she can harmonise with herself. hitting the proper notes

Lamuella 01-08-2004 05:46 PM

she can harmonize with herself?

unless she can sing two notes at the same time (and the human throat isn't capable of such a feat) I don't know how she could harmonize with herself

everyhourdylan 01-08-2004 05:47 PM

this is quite possible with the right equitment

Lamuella 01-08-2004 05:49 PM

you could RECORD yourself harmonizing with yourself (and indeed Tori does on most of the songs in Boys For Pele), but I still fail to see how you could sing more than one note at the same time.

everyhourdylan 01-08-2004 05:49 PM

vocal processors

Lamuella 01-08-2004 05:51 PM

I have no idea what you're talking about right now.

everyhourdylan 01-08-2004 05:52 PM

i dont even sing and ive used one. come on. you dont know what a voice processor is?

Kane Knight 01-08-2004 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by everyhourdylan
vocal processors

Except that vocal effects processors are setting up a computer to perform harmonically with you. You're still not singing more than one note at a time.

everyhourdylan 01-08-2004 06:01 PM

actually you could be when used right.

Kane Knight 01-08-2004 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by everyhourdylan
actually you could be when used right.

No, because your vocal chords only produce one note at a time. You can SIMULATE harmony through recordings or synthesis, but you're only singing one note.

If you're still having trouble with the concept, I can speak slower and with smaller words.

everyhourdylan 01-08-2004 08:28 PM

please do...jackass.

everyhourdylan 01-08-2004 08:28 PM

you do realize this only goes on because i love being a prick to your bitchass

Kane Knight 01-08-2004 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by everyhourdylan
you do realize this only goes on because i love being a prick to your bitchass

More like because you're too stupid to know when to quit.

everyhourdylan 01-09-2004 03:25 AM

actually thats quite untrue

Kenny 01-09-2004 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by everyhourdylan
actually thats quite untrue

For the sake of the bandwidth of TPWW, please don't start an arguement with Kane Knight. It's like trying to tell a 5 year old there is no Santa.

everyhourdylan 01-09-2004 05:48 AM

kanes a ****ing douche. ive been comming to this messageboard under various names for years...

DaveWadding 01-09-2004 08:54 AM

The last two posters in this thread are both douches :naughty:

Kenny 01-09-2004 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveWadding
The last two posters in this thread are both douches :naughty:


You know I almost felt sorry for you when people made fun of your chubby little ass.

*Grabs your boobs*

everyhourdylan 01-09-2004 09:17 AM

i liked it...

Lamuella 01-09-2004 10:51 AM

I know what a vocal processor is. I don't have any idea what that has to do with the inability of the human throat to sing two notes at the same time.

Trying to think of what you COULD mean, I've only been able to come across two ways you could simulate the effect of solo harmonization live.

1) pre-record one vocal track. Bad idea because you could get out of time with yourself. Some people still do it though.
2) artificially raise or lower the pitch of the voice singing, and play the doctored and original vocals at the same time. Usually sounds really horrible. The only time I can think of that I've heard it working really well live was Jarvis Cocker of Pulp performing 'party hard' at Glastonbury 1998.

don't get me wrong, for more than one vocalist, good harmony is essential. However, for a quality solo artist, synthesized harmony sounds bloody awful.

Kane Knight 01-09-2004 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by everyhourdylan
actually thats quite untrue

Yes, I believe you. Simply because you said it's not so, means it's not so. :lol:

Kane Knight 01-09-2004 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lamuella
I know what a vocal processor is. I don't have any idea what that has to do with the inability of the human throat to sing two notes at the same time.

Trying to think of what you COULD mean, I've only been able to come across two ways you could simulate the effect of solo harmonization live.

1) pre-record one vocal track. Bad idea because you could get out of time with yourself. Some people still do it though.
2) artificially raise or lower the pitch of the voice singing, and play the doctored and original vocals at the same time. Usually sounds really horrible. The only time I can think of that I've heard it working really well live was Jarvis Cocker of Pulp performing 'party hard' at Glastonbury 1998.

don't get me wrong, for more than one vocalist, good harmony is essential. However, for a quality solo artist, synthesized harmony sounds bloody awful.

If you spend enough money, you can get a machine that will harmonize with everything you do, and it'll sound like 4 of you in perfect harmony. In fact, people who know how to sing harmony without a machine dislike the synthetics.

Granted, everyhourdylan's shown that he has no concept of what a good vocalist by giving us a link to his band. It's pretty obvious that he doesn't really understand a vocal processor beyond "It maekz k3w1 n0YZ."

The worst part is that most vocal processors, whether purchased for effects or synthetic harmony, blow. I use bass pedals for my vocal effects, personally. Nothing like Chorus, but I use Fuzz and Flange.

A lot of big groups that do vocal processing live have a couple laptops backstage doing the processing. This includes most form of vocal processing, except the standards, like reverb.

They've got some really cool programs for effectively altering vocals and pitch, but it's still mostly for people who want 4-part vocals and lack an ear for harmony.

everyhourdylan 01-09-2004 01:48 PM

i know much more than you think i know...hate to break it to you...ive been doing this for years.

Kane Knight 01-09-2004 01:56 PM

I'm sure you have. And you're proving how much you know by offering up erroneous, false, and stupid information.

Good plan, chief.

Crying when someone calls you a moron when you demonstrate yourself as one.

All that knowledge of vocal processors, and you can't even use one to make your vocalist sound like he knows how to sing. Good demo. :y:

everyhourdylan 01-09-2004 02:09 PM

um yeah what ever you say.

Lamuella 01-09-2004 02:43 PM

if you've been working with vocal processors for years, then surely you know that a great voice sounds MUCH better unprocessed than processed. You'd also know that all the technical wizardry in the world means nothing if there isn't a voice to work with.

You'd also know that a singer is as much a musician as someone who makes their music with an instrument.

Kane Knight 01-09-2004 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lamuella
if you've been working with vocal processors for years, then surely you know that a great voice sounds MUCH better unprocessed than processed. You'd also know that all the technical wizardry in the world means nothing if there isn't a voice to work with.

You'd also know that a singer is as much a musician as someone who makes their music with an instrument.

Oh, but he knows more than you think. :lol:

Kane Knight 01-09-2004 02:49 PM

Of course, it would require he had some understanding of the human voice, and listening to his demos, he's pretty clearly clueless...

everyhourdylan 01-09-2004 03:11 PM

yeah because your always right!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®