TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   entertainment forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   To Catch a Predator (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=92144)

Heyman 12-31-2009 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeeboe (Post 2879869)
He's a good looking kid, and it's a shame he was wasting his looks and time trying to woe who he thought was a 13-year old. That's why he gets my pity. :)

The older guys however do not. They should have known better. :y:

Dear Zeeboe,

Where art thou?

Sincerely,

Logic

Buzzkill 12-31-2009 04:04 PM

What there is no way Zeeboe is 27, definitely thought he was a 12 year old with massive ADD.

My Final Heaven 12-31-2009 05:56 PM

http://fc01.deviantart.net/fs37/f/20..._by_Whynne.png

Zeeboe 12-31-2009 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzzkill (Post 2880141)
What there is no way Zeeboe is 27, definitely thought he was a 12 year old with massive ADD.

Haha. I am a 27-year old manchild is what I am.

Swiss Ultimate 01-01-2010 11:32 AM

They need to make a To Catch a Predator movie.

At the very least they need to release the episodes on DVD.

Xero 01-01-2010 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeathtotheSwiss (Post 2880688)
They need to make a To Catch a Predator movie.

"In a world..."

Zeeboe 01-01-2010 07:15 PM

A "To Catch a Predator" musical would be cool too.

thedamndest 01-01-2010 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeathtotheSwiss (Post 2880688)
They need to make a To Catch a Predator movie.

At the very least they need to release the episodes on DVD.

Starring Tom Hanks:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_GugQ9aesH4...if_you_can.jpg

+

http://dietrichthrall.files.wordpres...4/predator.jpg

Kane86 01-01-2010 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeeboe (Post 2879869)
Technically, he's not a pedophile. None of the men on "To Catch a Predator" are. Pedophiles target little children. The men on "To Catch a Predator" are going after young teens, and are consider "Computer Predators".

Richer is the only one I've ever felt bad for, and not made fun of. It's because he's only 19, and I see him as a kid too. It's disturbing seeing a young kid's whole life being ruined all for being stupid, which is something a lot of kids that age are guilty of. There are plenty of hot 18 and 19-year old college girls he could have tried to date. He's a good looking kid, and it's a shame he was wasting his looks and time trying to woe who he thought was a 13-year old. That's why he gets my pity. :)

The older guys however do not. They should have known better. :y:

So you feel sorry for a 19 year old boy that was breaking the law and knew what he was doing was wrong. Zeeboe you are an idiot for thinkign like that. He knew what could happen his ignorance does not get my pity. Unlike you take up for child molesters and also say that Admiring is not stalking.


Just like you say about the older ones The dumb bastard should have known better.

Swiss Ultimate 01-01-2010 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane86 (Post 2881275)
So you feel sorry for a 19 year old boy that was breaking the law and knew what he was doing was wrong. Zeeboe you are an idiot for thinkign like that. He knew what could happen his ignorance does not get my pity. Unlike you take up for child molesters and also say that Admiring is not stalking.


Just like you say about the older ones The dumb bastard should have known better.

Whoa...

Swiss Ultimate 01-01-2010 09:09 PM

Does anybody know if Gertner's been on lately?

Kane86 01-01-2010 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeathtotheSwiss (Post 2881455)
Does anybody know if Gertner's been on lately?

no he is off shooting meth god only knows when he will be back. Last we heard about him he said he was going to take his Tv apart and make a new car out of it.

Kane86 01-01-2010 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeathtotheSwiss (Post 2880688)
They need to make a To Catch a Predator movie.

At the very least they need to release the episodes on DVD.

To Catch a Predator blooper reel.

Swiss Ultimate 01-01-2010 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane86 (Post 2881499)
To Catch a Predator blooper reel.

Like the one where the guy killed himself?

Kane86 01-01-2010 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeathtotheSwiss (Post 2881501)
Like the one where the guy killed himself?

Yeah dude that is comedy gold.

Swiss Ultimate 01-01-2010 09:44 PM

I wonder if anybody ever pranked the house by ordering pizza or if the host ever busted out laughing.

"Your screen name is HotDude27NYC4Lyfe? Really?"

Kane86 01-01-2010 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeathtotheSwiss (Post 2881511)
I wonder if anybody ever pranked the house by ordering pizza or if the host ever busted out laughing.

"Your screen name is HotDude27NYC4Lyfe? Really?"

I wanna know if any of Zeeboes people ever showed up at the house shit faced drunk or anything.

Zeeboe 01-01-2010 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane86 (Post 2881275)
So you feel sorry for a 19 year old boy that was breaking the law and knew what he was doing was wrong. Zeeboe you are an idiot for thinkign like that. He knew what could happen his ignorance does not get my pity. Unlike you take up for child molesters and also say that Admiring is not stalking.


Just like you say about the older ones The dumb bastard should have known better.

The kid wouldn't have done anything if the decoy hadn't egged him on. He wasn't following a 13-year old home from school for Pete's sake. So now the tax payers have to pay tens of thousands of dollars to keep a generally harmless boy in jail? Insane. Let's stick to what really matters.

Richer is no "computer predator" or "pedophile". I love "To Catch a Predator", but the show sometimes did messed up stuff for the sake of ratings, including ruining the life of a student.

I bet you anything those cops wouldn't be acting like it was a deranged serial killer coming out of the house if those cameras weren't on. They did it for the sake of entertainment. (The screaming, and the tackling, with tazers out.)

Richer was living at home with his parents, he was a freshmen in college, and he wasn't even old enough to buy booze. I don't consider people fully grown adults until they are at least 21. 19 is stll a teenager.

Does that Richer kid need some help? Yes, and I hope he's getting it. But is he worthy of being locked away in prison, having his life ruined, and being branded a sex offender for the rest of his life? No, not in my book. Obviously in yours. But I'd rather have my tax dollars go to placing real criminals behind bars, not lonely internet geek's or bored young men.

Kane86 01-01-2010 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeeboe (Post 2881655)
The kid wouldn't have done anything if the decoy hadn't egged him on. He wasn't following a 13-year old home from school for Pete's sake. So now the tax payers have to pay tens of thousands of dollars to keep a generally harmless boy in jail? Insane. Let's stick to what really matters.

Richer is no "computer predator" or "pedophile". I love "To Catch a Predator", but the show sometimes did messed up stuff for the sake of ratings, including ruining the life of a student.

I bet you anything those cops wouldn't be acting like it was a deranged serial killer coming out of the house if those cameras weren't on. They did it for the sake of entertainment. (The screaming, and the tackling, with tazers out.)

Richer was living at home with his parents, he was a freshmen in college, and he wasn't even old enough to buy booze. I don't consider people fully grown adults until they are at least 21. 19 is stll a teenager.

Does that Richer kid need some help? Yes, and I hope he's getting it. But is he worthy of being locked away in prison, having his life ruined, and being branded a sex offender for the rest of his life? No, not in my book. Obviously in yours. But I'd rather have my tax dollars go to placing real criminals behind bars, not lonely internet geek's or bored young men.

Yeah well by law he is 18 what he was doing is wrong. He was going to meet a 13 year old girl for sex. He made the choose to ruin his life. Chris Hansen didn't stick a gun to his head and make him go. HE CHOOSE TO GO!!! He ruined his life not the internet or To Catch a Predator. He choose to ruin his own life.

If you can't see anything wrong with that then you are a fucking moron.

Zeeboe 01-01-2010 11:54 PM

I just think a hard slap on the wrist would be better then jail time. I'm glad the folks at NBC decided not to air his interview. Sure, it's on the net, but it never made the final cut on the show. I think they even knew seeing a kid's life getting ruined would upset people. His interview also makes me able to see why some people protested the show, and believed the whole thing was entrapment.

Kane86 01-02-2010 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeeboe (Post 2881709)
I just think a hard slap on the wrist would be better then jail time. I'm glad the folks at NBC decided not to air his interview. Sure, it's on the net, but it never made the final cut on the show. I think they even knew seeing a kid's life getting ruined would upset people. His interview also makes me able to see why some people protested the show, and believed the whole thing was entrapment.

A slap on the wrsit just means he is going to go out and do it again. Jail should teach him the gravity of his situation he put himself in. Second he mad the choice to come and he thought crying was going to get him out of it. Sorry it doesn't work like that he was going to meet a 13 year old girl so he really wasn't thinking of the implications of what could happen. He has sociopathic tendenices and he needs to be punished for it. Had he not gotten Jail time he would have kept on doing the same thing over and over again. I have seen his interview on To Catch a Predator Raw so it did make it. So he can relieve that moment he put himself in. He choose to ruin his life not in anyway was he forced to come.


So you feel sorry for a perv and weirdo that says alot about your character.

Zeeboe 01-02-2010 12:32 AM

I make fun of most of these guys. That 19-year old is the only one I've ever felt bad for. I just honestly don't see how it doesn't damage a 13-year old to bang a 15-year old, but it does if the guy is 19? Give me a break.

Requiem 01-02-2010 12:35 AM

How about you actually read the chats. Kid deserved what he got.

http://www.perverted-justice.com/?archive=jack_doh12

Kane86 01-02-2010 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeeboe (Post 2881751)
I make fun of most of these guys. That 19-year old is the only one I've ever felt bad for. I just honestly don't see how it doesn't damage a 13-year old to bang a 15-year old, but it does if the guy is 19? Give me a break.

Its because you are fucked in the head, All your beliefs are wrong and all your opinions mean nothing.Everything you do and say is wrong. You will never be right. ALSO HE IS 19 YEARS OLD HE SHOULD BE DATING WOMEN HIS FUCKING AGE!!!!!!!! NOT PATROLLING CHAT ROOMS FOR SEX WITH MINORS!!!!!!!!!!!


Look at it froma fathers perspective woudl you want your 13 year old daughter fucking some strang 19 year old she met in a chat room?

You will probably say yes because lets face it everything that is wrong in the world you think is ok.

Zeeboe 01-02-2010 12:59 AM

You're pretty sexy when you're angry. ;) Anyhow, that 19-year old would not have tried to meet her if she had not egged him on. And I remember being that age, and middle schoolers are not exactly innocent. Why doesn't anyone ever talk about punishing the middle schoolers for acting like little sluts?

Requiem 01-02-2010 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeeboe (Post 2881768)
You're pretty sexy when you're angry. ;) Anyhow, that 19-year old would not have tried to meet her if she had not egged him on. And I remember being that age, and middle schoolers are not exactly innocent. Why doesn't anyone ever talk about punishing the middle schoolers for acting like little sluts?

What? Read the chats. Part of the stipulation is that they can't -initiate- the contact, or the offer of sex. The kid was CONSTANTLY asking for it. Yeah he felt 'iffy', but he kept doing it anyways, even though he knew he would get in trouble if he got caught (he said that multiple times in the chat)

Zeeboe 01-02-2010 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Requiem (Post 2881769)
What? Read the chats. Part of the stipulation is that they can't -initiate- the contact, or the offer of sex. The kid was CONSTANTLY asking for it. Yeah he felt 'iffy', but he kept doing it anyways, even though he knew he would get in trouble if he got caught (he said that multiple times in the chat)

Well, I have not read the full chat, but the decoy could have said something like...."Okay, well, don't worry about us meeting then."

I've read other chat logs before where the decoys NEVER do that. They just keep egging the guys on to come over cause all they care about is screwing up someone's life to make themselves feel better. Heck, I could get into that myself.....but they should have had mercy on the kid. He's not a grown-up. He's just a kid too.

Again, why aren't the middle schoolers ever punished for acting like sluts? See, that's the problem with society....we baby our kids, and spoil them, and make them think they can get away with anything, then they grow up, and still think they can get away with stuff, expect others to baby and spoil them, and mentally, still think and act like children.

But the second those kids turn 18, society just throws them to the wolves, and expects them to behave like adults after wiping their noses for them their whole lives.

I think that may have been the case with Richer. Physcially, he may have been a man, but mentally, he was like a 13-year old.

The above logic only applies to men by the way. Just another example of sexism against men. Women can pretty much always be spoiled, and treated like children forever, and not be damaged later as a result. HOT women that is..... funny how most of those pretty women probably don't realize men are only nice to them cause they wanna fuck em'....and if they weren't fuckable looking, no man would waste his time being a "gentleman". But some women probably know that, and probably enjoy that thought. Anyhow, that's another topic.

Buzzkill 01-02-2010 01:18 AM

I feel bad for these guys because it is obvious that they live a life of endless torment. They're fully aware of the implications and gravity of their actions yet still they cannot stop from doing it.

Don't you think the urge must be unbearable?

I dunno, definitely not saying it's acceptable behavior, but you gotta understand where people are coming from, in all situations. Otherwise, you get blind hatred.

Something I've been thinking about a lot lately

Kane86 01-02-2010 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeeboe (Post 2881768)
You're pretty sexy when you're angry. ;) Anyhow, that 19-year old would not have tried to meet her if she had not egged him on. And I remember being that age, and middle schoolers are not exactly innocent. Why doesn't anyone ever talk about punishing the middle schoolers for acting like little sluts?

She didn't egg him on he brought it up the fucking pedo brought it up like mostly do. Maybe you should also think that Perverted Justice was made by people who were victimized my predators. This is not for some sick desire what your sayign is that its ok to be a predator.

You know people like Zeeboe are why i watch Lock Up......

Requiem 01-02-2010 01:37 AM

How was he anything like a 13 year old mentally? He was a fucking perv. READ THE CHAT LOGS. He talked about fucking her in the ass, and at one point even talked about wanting to fuck a 14 year old boy. At no point in that entire log does he act like a 13 year old. He acted like a horny 19 year old who KNEW she was underaged and flat out stated that he KNEW he would get in trouble if they got caught.

She didn't egg him on. She answered his questions. Everything was initiated by him, and she just responded to what he asked or said.

Buzzkill 01-02-2010 02:31 AM

Basically, what I'm saying is that they are ill. Not evil

Requiem 01-02-2010 02:58 AM

See I don't think of that guy as necessarily a pedophile. Just an idiot. I don't know if he had a thing for young girls or not, but he was fucking stupid to say the shit he did to a '13 year old'. He claimed to only go for older girls usually, so who knows. At 19, I really don't think he had developed a thing for underaged kids or anything, but was probably just some horny stupid 19 year old who obviously got off on the risk and the fact that it was 'dangerous'.

Swiss Ultimate 01-02-2010 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzzkill (Post 2881840)
Basically, what I'm saying is that they are ill. Not evil

They're ill because they want to have sex with children. They're evil because they do.

Zeeboe 01-02-2010 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane86 (Post 2881795)
She didn't egg him on he brought it up the fucking pedo brought it up like mostly do. Maybe you should also think that Perverted Justice was made by people who were victimized my predators. This is not for some sick desire what your sayign is that its ok to be a predator.

You know people like Zeeboe are why i watch Lock Up......

The 80's movie with Stallone?

Seth82 01-02-2010 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeeboe (Post 2882011)
The 80's movie with Stallone?

Lock Up is a documentary tv program on MSNBC about prisons

Zeeboe 01-02-2010 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzzkill (Post 2881840)
Basically, what I'm saying is that they are ill. Not evil

I can agree with that, and I think some are worst then others. There are guys that are just straight up evil, and will hurt kids, and even kill them so they won't rat on em'. But then there are guys who don't go after children....they go after young teens, and just want love and lust with them like they were their age, and would never hurt them.

And again, I think some of these guys just never grew up mentally in some parts of their brain. It's like everywhere else, they are an adult, but in this one little spot in their head, the part of their brain that should be telling them to date women or girls their age tells them to target middle-school girls, cause they're mentally stuck in the middle school years. That section of their head sadly never aged, and it's all messed up. Litreally.

Some pedophiles have admitted before that they can remember as children being attracted to little kids. That may have been the case with Richer, but again, I really don't see him that way. I think the internet kinda messes up your judgment, and doesn't make you realize (especially in the case of talking to a minor) what you're doing, and again, like Requiem brought up, I think he was just horny, and maybe did enjoy the thrill of doing something illegal, and who knows, he may have talked that way with anyone who was female and just as horny, because he was in the mood.

I also need to add that if this was anyone older then 19, I might not be defending them so much, but 19 is a border line kid in my vew.

Zeeboe 01-02-2010 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seth82 (Post 2882013)
Lock Up is a documentary tv program on MSNBC about prisons

Oh! Okay. Sounds very cool. I was a big Oz and Prison Break fan, so I may need to check that show out. I'm sure I've seen some episodes.

Anyhow, the dude that appeared on the Steve Wilkos show back in 2007 is what I consider to be a real pedophile.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KJONFnhI_cc&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KJONFnhI_cc&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

I know posting a clip from a day time TV show may be a silly example, and I may get ribbed for it, but I can assure you Jack McClellan is NOT an actor, and is very real. If you google and/or youtube his name, you'll find he is legit as scary and sick as that is.

And that Richer kid is nothing like Jack McClellan. That's why I don't see him as a threat.

Reavant 01-02-2010 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeeboe (Post 2881655)
The kid wouldn't have done anything if the decoy hadn't egged him on. He wasn't following a 13-year old home from school for Pete's sake. So now the tax payers have to pay tens of thousands of dollars to keep a generally harmless boy in jail? Insane. Let's stick to what really matters.

Richer is no "computer predator" or "pedophile". I love "To Catch a Predator", but the show sometimes did messed up stuff for the sake of ratings, including ruining the life of a student.

I bet you anything those cops wouldn't be acting like it was a deranged serial killer coming out of the house if those cameras weren't on. They did it for the sake of entertainment. (The screaming, and the tackling, with tazers out.)

Richer was living at home with his parents, he was a freshmen in college, and he wasn't even old enough to buy booze. I don't consider people fully grown adults until they are at least 21. 19 is stll a teenager.

Does that Richer kid need some help? Yes, and I hope he's getting it. But is he worthy of being locked away in prison, having his life ruined, and being branded a sex offender for the rest of his life? No, not in my book. Obviously in yours. But I'd rather have my tax dollars go to placing real criminals behind bars, not lonely internet geek's or bored young men.

First of all, more often than not these cases dont end up in prison/jail time.

I guess youve never seen a cop do his thing before... they come running out like that with tasers drawn when a drunk guy is kicked out of a bar and is yelling.

Just because you need to be 21 to drink doesnt mean your not an adult. The LAW says you are an adult at 18 so just because you still sonsider him a teenager, your consideration is meaningless.

Zeeboe 01-02-2010 03:22 PM

Nine-TEEN.....the word says he's a teenager. And in the case of Richer, he did end up behind bars. Six months to be exact, with three years probation. He got off REALLY, REALLY easy compared to some other guys, but still, a very rough punishment. I just really and truly hope he learned his lesson, won't ever do anything like that again, and that his life won't be ruined, and that he'll still able to reach his dreams, and do what he wants.

I also hope that no psychopath, high and mighty, do-gooder, whackjob vigilante bullies won't harass and/or bully him.

Kane86 01-02-2010 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeeboe (Post 2882238)
Nine-TEEN.....the word says he's a teenager. And in the case of Richer, he did end up behind bars. Six months to be exact, with three years probation. He got off REALLY, REALLY easy compared to some other guys, but still, a very rough punishment. I just really and truly hope he learned his lesson, won't ever do anything like that again, and that his life won't be ruined, and that he'll still able to reach his dreams, and do what he wants.

I also hope that no psychopath, high and mighty, do-gooder, whackjob vigilante bullies won't harass and/or bully him.

Maybe he deserves it...............


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®