TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Swish's Very Own Wrestling Thread! (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=119370)

Streamer 05-24-2012 06:07 PM

De-X was a funny stable u know?

Wehttam 05-24-2012 06:07 PM

because you cannot forget their antics

Streamer 05-24-2012 06:09 PM

I remember that time they sex them we're going to split and they dont split butt they fooled every 1 rembember that? TheY good

Wehttam 05-24-2012 06:10 PM

you aren't.

Gertner 05-24-2012 06:22 PM

I'll give you a used Salt N Pepa "Very Necessary" CD for your ticket stub.

Savio 05-24-2012 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by K.Smoke (Post 3868248)
Main Event Mafia catapulted TNA along with the Xdivision

Nothing catapulted TNA ever.

Mr. Nerfect 05-24-2012 06:48 PM

There are about three stables, at least, that are above The Hart Foundation.

Also -- while stable rehashes very rarely work -- a Fortune reunion consisting of Bobby Roode, Christopher Daniels & Kazarian would actually work pretty well right now.

E.Carmen86 05-24-2012 08:08 PM

I would have to say NWO was the best Stable because they had a lot of wrestlers within the stable. To top it off they had two separate NWO factions. It was like 65-80% of WCW were a part of the two NWO factions.

#1-norm-fan 05-24-2012 08:43 PM

I will give you two full salt and pepper shakers I stole from Denny's.

Gone Mad 05-25-2012 06:31 AM

Owen was my favorite wrestler back then, and I still consider him one of the best. He's the reason I got into and stayed into wrestling, back when he was high flying with Koko B. Ware. His matches with Bret were 5 star in my book.

I was watching Over the Edge that night and the one moment I had to step away, it happened. It hurt so much, truly devastating when I heard the news. The tribute show definitely showed how much he loved the business and all those around him and how thankful everyone was to have him in their lives. That says alot.

R.I.P Rocket.

K.Smoke 05-25-2012 07:20 AM

I was watching when this all happened. I member thinking what a gimmick it was. The screen went black for some time and then they came back out. The whole show must go on thing made me think it wasn't real.
I also remember arguing over weather or not he was the blue blazer and this was a bad way to prove that i was correct.

he is missed

Keith 05-25-2012 07:34 AM

http://i.imgur.com/Ko0rz.jpg


Owen's kids:

http://i.imgur.com/7vhYB.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/Q2cga.jpg

Zeeboe 05-25-2012 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fignuts (Post 3852753)
I guess the rock, austin, and triple h were never any good since hogan and michaels had to come back.

Hogan only came back a few times, and Michaels was gone for four years before he came back. He was around the same age of those guys you named too. He also changed with the times. He was hardly an old-timer.

Fuck this cliche "young guys" crap. Been reading that for over ten years. What's so great about a bunch of baby-face wrestlers who can't cut a damn promo? Why are some of you guys sooo hard for young guys? I don't think a guy should be put on TV JUST because he happens to be young.

Fuck the new generation. I desire the best, and these youngin's ain't that. They need to earn their way to the top and not just be given it. That's why WWE wrestling sucks ass. Let's not it even more sucky.

Gertner 05-25-2012 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seth82 (Post 3868134)
IMHO he was a better worker then Bret

perhaps the best of all the Hart brothers in the ring

Owen was definitely better. Bret had the same match over and over again, plus Owen was better on the mic.

Shisen Kopf 05-25-2012 09:57 PM

Bret was better than Owen. He is the greatest Canadian ever. And I should know bc unused to drink in Windsor when I was 19!

Road Warrior 05-26-2012 03:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DLVH84 (Post 3843458)
Dolph Ziggler should lead the new generation.

As soon as he learns to cut a promo or how to get heat without Vicki then okay.

Mr. Nerfect 05-26-2012 09:35 PM

Dolph Ziggler is getting better on the mic all the time, and I truly believe he could get heat without Vickie. I think if he got rid of Vickie, the dude would need to be a babyface, however.

Swish 05-31-2012 02:53 AM

Swish's Very Own Wrestling Thread!
 
So many idea's but we all know it will more than likely end up being
Brock vs Taker, when Taker said to Brock "Wanna, Do it." meaning Mania 29.

Taker needs to retire, 20-0 is a hell of a legacy to keep.

SlickyTrickyDamon 05-31-2012 03:13 AM

Swish vs. Swiss, Deathtothe

Tazz Dan 05-31-2012 08:58 AM

HOT THREAD

Volare 05-31-2012 10:10 AM

TOTY!!

Swish 05-31-2012 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tazz Dan (Post 3875439)
HOT THREAD

I thought the exact same thing, and all this Swish
vs Brock hype is legit as hell.

Swish 05-31-2012 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shisen Kopf (Post 3869735)
Bret was better than Owen. He is the greatest Canadian ever. And I should know bc unused to drink in Windsor when I was 19!

I beg to differ, Owen was better than Bret,
despite him never holding the Championship.

All though the brother vs brother cage match was amazing.

Shisen Kopf 05-31-2012 11:33 AM

Well I respect your opinion even if it is wrong. Bret is the best there is and all that. Also, if Owen hadn't fallen at Over The Edge he most likely woulda been killed by a drunk driver leaving the arena bc of some final destination shit. It was his time. So yeah Bret is betta.

whiteyford 05-31-2012 12:15 PM

If its a shoot then Brock vs Swish otherwise Brock vs Taker.

blak23 06-01-2012 01:55 AM

swish?

Eklipse 06-01-2012 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blak23 (Post 3876613)
swish?

It's like a tornado coming at you.

Volare 06-01-2012 04:03 PM

Already blew by you didn't even notice it!

KaosDarksol 06-01-2012 05:44 PM

Would rather see rock/Brock then Brock and taker

Mr. Nerfect 06-01-2012 10:14 PM

I would rather see Brock Lesnar vs. Undertaker, with Brock vs. Austin as a runner-up. Put Heyman in Lesnar's corner and Mike Tyson in Austin's corner, and you could have the set-up to a huge blockbuster at Mania. If you did Austin vs. Brock, then you would also probably run Cena vs. Undertaker and CM Punk vs. The Rock.

I think that Punk vs. Rock is something the WWE should very strongly consider doing. Punk vs. Austin is something that people want to see, but a lot of that was because of the dynamic between Austin and Punk's characters. With Punk as a bit more of a babyface, I couldn't really get into Punk and Austin telling each other that they respect the other's lifestyle choices. I think that Punk would need to turn heel for a feud, or that there would need to be some sort of magic build.

Rock and Punk are more likely to clash on an appropriate level right now. It'd be very similar to Cena vs. Rock, with Punk cutting promos on how Rock uses the WWE to pad his wallet instead of being here for the fans, while The Rock does his usual stuff targeted at Punk. With Rock holding a victory over John Cena, he could very credibly come back and challenge for the WWE Title.

K.Smoke 06-01-2012 10:18 PM

I'll go with Swish as long as i do not have to see the Rock again. Except for in this new GI Joe movie... Go Joe!

Rock Bottom 06-01-2012 10:57 PM

Rock is gonna be going with whoever has the strap in '13. Probably "surprise" entrant to the Royal Rumble to win it.

Rock Bottom 06-01-2012 11:00 PM

Wrestlemania is still so far away though, not gonna try to book it that far. That's what I think will happen though. Rock's last promo, he mentioned the title, that was obviously some type of bullet point to get out in the open before he left for however long again. Think it's pretty likely. And it will make sense.

He's either going to win the belt and have it for a long time (the WWE experimenting on a celebrity giving their title publicity, making title shots a "big deal" again), and if not, obviously put somebody over. Either thing makes sense to me. Don't think anyone else but Lesnar has any business taking the title off Punk right now.

K.Smoke 06-02-2012 12:57 AM

never been a Rock fan, he messed up wrestling in my personal opinion. Made it so trying to recapture the title became the objective when reigning for a long time use to be the order of the day. Consider hogan only being 3x champion. Consider Savage holding the title for a year. So I vote Brock vs Swish but we'll end up with Brock vs Rock.

Swish 06-02-2012 05:18 AM

Help get #Swish trending on twitter ;)

Shisen Kopf 06-02-2012 08:49 AM

I wanna see foley and Rock come back and team up with Brock and have Don Muraco manage them in the awesomest stable ever: The Brock and Rock and Sock and other Rock connection. This would be the greatest stable of all time. Book that.

Keith 06-02-2012 09:53 AM

The thing I don't like about Brock and Undertaker facing each other at WM is that we'll probably get stuck with Rock/Cena 2.

Swish 06-02-2012 10:30 AM

In all seriousness I would prefer Brock vs Taker;.

Taker hasn't really had a decent Mania match since the first HBK one.
This would make Taker stronger, if he beat Brock.. I think that's the way it would go down.

Keith 06-02-2012 10:36 AM

^^^^
Are you serious? HBK/Taker 2 wasn't good? The one with Triple H at WM27 didn't do anything for you?

This year's HIAC was shit?

Savio 06-02-2012 10:41 AM

Taker vs Zack Ryder

Mr. Nerfect 06-02-2012 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith (Post 3877686)
The thing I don't like about Brock and Undertaker facing each other at WM is that we'll probably get stuck with Rock/Cena 2.

I think we could very easily be given Taker vs. Brock, Rock vs. Punk and Austin vs. Cena.

K.Smoke 06-02-2012 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith (Post 3877686)
The thing I don't like about Brock and Undertaker facing each other at WM is that we'll probably get stuck with Rock/Cena 2.

Never b4 and never again thank god. And though I really really really loved the match they had at wrestlemania the suspense was great it was unpredictable and all but nah I'll pass.

Oh yeah Swish ur crazy
the last... I don't know how many taker streak matches have been unbelievable they have sold the possibilty of this being the year every year. And I was not sure who would win each time until the final 3 count. i would have to say that the one that just past would rank in 4th place of the past 4 and it was one of Undertakers most unpredictable matches. The HBK additive was great. The final DX chop was historical and the match was just classic.

Mercenary 06-02-2012 05:04 PM

... the hell?

Swish 06-03-2012 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith (Post 3877695)
^^^^
Are you serious? HBK/Taker 2 wasn't good? The one with Triple H at WM27 didn't do anything for you?

This year's HIAC was shit?

Chill ya beans, HBK/TAKER 2 was shit, the first one was better.
am entitled to my own opinion don't like it, kindly fuck off out of this thread.

WWE Sucked after Wrestlemania X7

Swish 06-03-2012 11:42 AM

Austins Heel Turn? Did it shock you?
 
The night at Wrestlemania when Austin turned heel and joined forces
with Mr McMahon and then later on HHH to become the Power Trip (probably the greatest tag team in history). Did this shock you? Was you expecting Austin to stay face?.

In my eyes the whole Heel angle ruined Austin,
He should have stayed the way he was. Hell raising beer drinking, mcmahon hating, sob. Instead he goes to the on guy to win the title.

The Birth of the PowerTrip though was probably the greatest
thing to ever happen. in WWE. Period.

Nicky Fives 06-03-2012 01:11 PM

Heel Austin was quite entertaining..... although unlikely, Vince may have been concerned with the fans getting sick of his routine, a la Hulk Hogan initial WCW run.....

Fox 06-03-2012 01:26 PM

I definitely remember sitting and watching WM X-7 live. At the time I was doing PPV write ups for a now closed down wrestling website. I sat there with my pen in my hand, staring in awe at the screen as Austin clobbered Rock in the back with that steel chair over and over again. For them to turn the biggest face in the company heel, in his own hometown, on the biggest stage of them all, was a very ballsy and risky move. In the end, I don't think it paid off quite the way that McMahon had in mind - the breakup of the Power Trip due to Triple H's injury was a major blow to the angle, and then the failure of the InVasion angle pretty much set in stone Austin's return to facedom. I can only imagine how the year would have gone had Triple H not torn his quad.

Still, we got some incredible matches out of it with Austin vs Benoit (anyone remember the 10 consecutive German suplexes on Smackdown?) and Austin vs Angle.

Fox 06-03-2012 01:32 PM

The WrestleMania I would like to see would like something like this:

- John Cena vs The Rock for the WWE Championship: Cena wins
- CM Punk (heel) vs Stone Cold Steve Austin (face, duh): Punk wins via Anaconda Vice
- Brock Lesnar vs. Undertaker: Taker wins, Lesnar goes back to UFC
- Triple H vs. Daniel Bryan for the World Heavyweight Championship: Bryan wins and gets the lifelong push that Benoit was supposed to get

Lock Jaw 06-03-2012 01:35 PM

Didn't "shock" me because I did not have enough interest in Austin to really care about anything he did.

I must say that I enjoyed the result though. Heel Austin is about the only time I enjoyed him in the WWF/E. That and his feud with Bret.

#BROKEN Hasney 06-03-2012 01:37 PM

No. The whole build-up was a carbon copy of a 1992 AJPW angle so I knew what was happening.

[/DLVH]

Wolfpack423 06-03-2012 03:02 PM

To be honest, my favorite time period for Stone Cold was 2001. That's definitely his best title reign. He was always on top of his game, but I thought he worked extra hard during this time period for the audience.

Bazooka 06-03-2012 03:16 PM

I agree, Austin was the best during his 2001 world championship reign. He was the best part of that year in wrestling. He did seem to work harder to please the fans, wasn't afraid to embarrass himself and was always entertaining/funny. I didn't find all of this with the face Austin.

I also remember going to a Smackdown taping in Toronto, and Austin let Sgt. Slaughter punch him down at the end of the show, he seemed drunk. Austin was off the charts during this time.

DLVH84 06-03-2012 03:21 PM

As a longtime fan, I say no.

BollywoodSingh 06-03-2012 04:30 PM

Austin himself put on a great performance as a heel up until the Invasion angle started. But then he became a comedy character.

The heel didn't work, but it's not Austin's fault. He reached a point where fans just didn't want to boo him. They probably shouldn't have turned him. It's not like his babyface character was getting stale. Also, there was no shortage of top heels in WWE at the time (Triple H, Angle, Jericho would have eventually turned).

K.Smoke 06-03-2012 04:47 PM

Can't lie I would not pay to see Fox's wrestlemania.
I wanna see


Uso brothers defeat Primo and Epico for the tag titles
Kofi Kingston defeats Tyson Kidd for the US title
Cody Rhodes vs Dolph Ziggler. IC title on the line. Can't pick it.
Daniel Bryan vs Sheamus vs The Miz for WHC. Can't pick it.
CM Punk vs The Rock for WWE title. CM Punk wins
Undertaker vs Randy Orton in Legend vs Legend killer match.

this would be a good order for the fights to happen in also.

Corporate CockSnogger 06-03-2012 05:02 PM

Pretty confident that would get about 10% of the buyrates Fox's card would. You don't even have Cena there.

dronepool 06-03-2012 05:12 PM

Was this it?

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/K5YRNbelm5U" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

#BROKEN Hasney 06-03-2012 05:13 PM

First line says "at Wrestlemania"

That's at InVasion.

dronepool 06-03-2012 05:28 PM

Wasn't paying attention. Ops.


Either way, the OP would have been better with a video as a reminder.

Wolfpack423 06-03-2012 05:36 PM

the heel Austin going against a fresh bad ass face Kurt Angle is one of my favorite feuds. The whole thing was new as roles were reversed and the matches were top notch. I loved Angle's face run in 2001. It's still one of my favorite parts of his career.

Ol Dirty Dastard 06-03-2012 06:56 PM

It was all over the dirtsheets so no. He was amazing, but unfortunately the product dipped and the kept making bad decisions so all his dance partners got their legs cut out from under them and his title loss kind of faded into obscurity when it could have been an epic passing of the torch. It's when Vince lost focus because he bought WCW.

I would say he had his best matches during this time because guys like Benoit, Jericho, Angle and HHH had upped the workrate (along with the Rock to be honest, he was "sloppy" in the sense that he wasn't technical, but still athletic as fuck, quick and hard working) in WWE main events and Steve adapted REALLY well and was an absolute machine in '01. It also coincides when he came back from neck surgery, so he was definitely refreshed.

K.Smoke 06-03-2012 07:20 PM

To be honest the WWE can sell without Cena. A show like this will be exciting which I think is more important. Wrestling fans will watch with or without Cena. In my line up every match will be interesting

Damndirty 06-03-2012 07:32 PM

1998 was my favorite Austin year. He was the biggest thing going on around that time, and it was really hard to find a reason not to like him. When he turned heel, it looked like it was going good (despite how upset I was at the time) but then he was totally degraded when that Invasion of the WCW mid-carder shit (and ECW) came about. Seriously... Austin playing folk songs to Mcmahon while being a manbitch for him, complaining about Debra's cookies!!!??? The only thing that really stuck from that time was,"WHAT!?" Pre-Invasion heel turn, okay but still confusing the reason for it. During Invasion... went to complete crap.

St. Jimmy 06-03-2012 07:56 PM

No. It was about as telegraphed as receiving a telegraph after the telegraph man has knocked on your door clearly stating "TELEGRAPH" as loud as possible.

Emperor Smeat 06-03-2012 08:01 PM

Didn't like it at first since it made little sense why he suddenly would side with Vince after raising hell on him the previous years and Vince wanting to destroy Austin. The heel run ended up being great though in the long run.

The one a while later during the Invasion was pretty stupid overall even if the real reason was due to the WCW/ECW side lacking the big names due to forces outside of WWE's control.

James Steele 06-03-2012 08:25 PM

It surprised me and I loved it. Obviously, WCW being bought and the InVasion angle along with HHH's injury changed the entire initial heel run but the Power Trip run was an awesome few weeks.

Eklipse 06-03-2012 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by K.Smoke (Post 3878997)
Can't lie I would not pay to see Fox's wrestlemania.
I wanna see


Uso brothers defeat Primo and Epico for the tag titles
Kofi Kingston defeats Tyson Kidd for the US title
Cody Rhodes vs Dolph Ziggler. IC title on the line. Can't pick it.
Daniel Bryan vs Sheamus vs The Miz for WHC. Can't pick it.
CM Punk vs The Rock for WWE title. CM Punk wins
Undertaker vs Randy Orton in Legend vs Legend killer match.

this would be a good order for the fights to happen in also.

Fox's was much better. Yours sounds a lot like a Raw combined with SummerSlam. You have quality matches combined with crap matches. And whether you or anyone wants to admit it, Cena is a top draw for WWE. Cena's ringwork has improved a lot over the past couple years, and I find his promos a lot more enjoyable. His feuds are much better since they no longer have him as "supercena."

Also, I don't see Miz, Kidd, Kingston, Usos, or Epico/Primo in any matches, unless it's MITB.

Bazooka 06-03-2012 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommy Gunn (Post 3879127)
The failure of his heel turn is probably a good reason why they will never do the same with John Cena.

He was cheered as a heel, that doesn't make his turn a failure. He became more interesting and he made others around him better (Angle, RVD)... Not Taz.

I like those kind of heel's, the one's who are so good at what they do, that you can't hate them, no matter how hard they try.

Fox 06-03-2012 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by K.Smoke (Post 3878997)
Can't lie I would not pay to see Fox's wrestlemania.
I wanna see


Uso brothers defeat Primo and Epico for the tag titles
Kofi Kingston defeats Tyson Kidd for the US title
Cody Rhodes vs Dolph Ziggler. IC title on the line. Can't pick it.
Daniel Bryan vs Sheamus vs The Miz for WHC. Can't pick it.
CM Punk vs The Rock for WWE title. CM Punk wins
Undertaker vs Randy Orton in Legend vs Legend killer match.

this would be a good order for the fights to happen in also.

No Lesnar? No Austin? No CENA?

Congratulations. I have been here since TPWW was born, and I think you are a fucking idiot. :wave:

Fox 06-03-2012 10:38 PM

Just my opinion, no offense intended.

Fox 06-03-2012 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommy Gunn (Post 3879127)
The failure of his heel turn is probably a good reason why they will never do the same with John Cena.

Totally different situations. Austin was never getting half-booes/half-cheers in every arena in the country (including his home town) when he was a face. Cena has been in that place for years and years.

Austin's heel turn didn't mean losing "the guy." They had The Rock, who had proven himself to be just as big, if not a bigger draw than Austin. WWE does not have that guy right now.

At the time, WWE was not a publicly traded entity the way that it is now. They didn't have stock or shareholders to answer to. This was also pre-9/11 and pre-Benoit murders, so they didn't have to worry about being so sensitive and getting "good PR" by having their top guy (Austin) do publicity work like Make a Wish, Be A Star, etc. All he had to do was guest star on Walker: Texas Ranger.


These are the reasons they won't turn Cena heel. I highly doubt Austin's "failed heel turn" has ANYTHING to do with their decision to keep John face.

Fox 06-03-2012 10:48 PM

If anything, Hulk Hogan's situation in WCW in 1996 is much more similar to John Cena's current situation: the unstoppable, bland, eat your vitamins, say your prayers, don't be a bully main eventer face of the company getting mixed reactions everywhere he goes - a sign of the changing of the times in our culture.

And if I recall, Hulk Hogan's heel turn was fairly successful for WCW.

Crimson 06-03-2012 11:39 PM

I remember a sunday night heat where he had bearly turned heel. He got into it with Scotty 2 hotty and he was talking down on him with his new "what" schtick. It was funny as hell back then but I cant find it on youtube

Bazooka 06-03-2012 11:42 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjvCERRZ21g

that's what you're looking for. Stone Cold invitational. Stone Cold pretends Scotty is Kurt Angle. It is funny.

Crimson 06-04-2012 12:07 AM

lol @ Taz at 5:50

Damndirty 06-04-2012 02:20 AM

I wanna see Brock vs. Batista, or.... wait for it.... waaaaait for it.....ryback! THERE, I said it, time to finish this thread with Ryback posts.

Rammsteinmad 06-04-2012 03:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swish (Post 3878810)
and then later on HHH to become the Power Trip (probably the greatest tag team in history).

Come on, now. :|

Keith 06-04-2012 07:03 AM

It didn't shock me. Heel Austin was very entertaining, and they should've kept him like that for a bit longer.

His heel theme was awesome, too.

Mr. Nerfect 06-04-2012 07:06 AM

Watching some heel Austin videos, I realise just how great a heel Austin was. I think that his actual turn, whilst shocking and somewhat exciting, did do damage to the business. A large part of that was that there were no real top faces to really stand up to Austin at that point in time. I personally feel that the Two-Man Power Trip was a bad idea, and that Triple H should have turned face to challenge Austin.

Keith 06-04-2012 07:11 AM

Go back and watch Austin's beating on Michael Cole and JR. He was great.

K.Smoke 06-04-2012 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fox (Post 3879188)
No Lesnar? No Austin? No CENA?

Congratulations. I have been here since TPWW was born, and I think you are a fucking idiot. :wave:

TPWW is the greatest, such honesty amongst the participants.

Ok I'll give u all the fact that Cena is "the" major draw in wrestling.

But lets keep in mind that Austin is not returning and Brock signed a 1 yr contract.

CENA NEEDS A TIME OUT!

Lets be honest if people are tired of seeing Cena win how does it help by just making him lose more. It kinds of defeat the purpose of his character build. He's suppose to be a person that rises to the occaision. The best thing for him is a hiatus and the WWE needs to broadcast more of their talented wrestlers. I agree Cena's Move-set has improved over the last year. But his dropkick looks silly coming from him. As a wrestling fan I like wrestling and Cena is not wrestling and his promos just plain sux now. They use to be interesting but since the Rock um i guess we can say 2 match return Cena has become more predictable then ever. And If Cena left wrestling today it would not hurt the WWE. Just as it didn't hurt when the Rock left. His return would help though.

K.Smoke 06-04-2012 08:29 AM

In Fox's card the matches are so uneven that they can't be fun to watch.

Ok Rock vs Cena was good the first time but never b4 and never again remember. But it is the only worth while watching match on the card unless every1 else finds the fountain of youth. Stone Cold was wearing knee braces while he was on top of the WWE and he has already had his neck broken so at his age a match against CM Punk doesn't even make sense. How slow would CM Punk have to move to keep up with Stone Cold.
Brock Lesnar vs Undertaker another such match. Brock pace is constantly flash fast. Undertaker would have to carry the whole match by pretty much dominating Brock Lesnar. D. Bryan and Triple H would be action wise the second most interesting match of the night. But at the end of the day Fox's card would be predictable which is probably why u guys voted for it. You love the predictability.

Mr. Pierre 06-04-2012 11:13 AM

Cena missing WrestleMania 29 would probably be WWE's worst nightmare. He's the only thing close to an actual "celebrity" that the WWE has created in the past decade, and a large percentage of fans at the gate pay just to see him, like it or not.

With that, my top Mania matches would consist of:

Brock Lesnar (c) vs. The Rock
Steve Austin vs. CM Punk
The Undertaker vs. John Cena
Triple H vs. Dolph Ziggler
Daniel Bryan (c) vs. Randy Orton
Rey Mysterio vs. Sin Cara

whiteyford 06-04-2012 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by K.Smoke (Post 3879431)
And If Cena left wrestling today it would not hurt the WWE.

:rofl:

Damndirty 06-04-2012 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noid (Post 3879412)
Watching some heel Austin videos, I realise just how great a heel Austin was. I think that his actual turn, whilst shocking and somewhat exciting, did do damage to the business. A large part of that was that there were no real top faces to really stand up to Austin at that point in time. I personally feel that the Two-Man Power Trip was a bad idea, and that Triple H should have turned face to challenge Austin.

I disagree about the Two Man Power Trip being a bad idea, though I do the storyline reason they formed. Their feud with the Brothers of Destruction was, though short, intriguing.

Damndirty 06-04-2012 01:42 PM

Cena leaving would hurt for a while, but WWE can make another top superstar as popular, if not more to replace him and heal the hurt. Despite what we think about him, WWE's proud to have him there, but they can adapt without him too.

Big Vic 06-04-2012 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommy Gunn (Post 3879127)
The failure of his heel turn is probably a good reason why they will never do the same with John Cena.

I agree.
===========================
They should have had Austin stunner vince the next night after he won the title.

XL 06-04-2012 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fox (Post 3879194)
Totally different situations. Austin was never getting half-booes/half-cheers in every arena in the country (including his home town) when he was a face. Cena has been in that place for years and years.

Austin's heel turn didn't mean losing "the guy." They had The Rock, who had proven himself to be just as big, if not a bigger draw than Austin. WWE does not have that guy right now.

At the time, WWE was not a publicly traded entity the way that it is now. They didn't have stock or shareholders to answer to. This was also pre-9/11 and pre-Benoit murders, so they didn't have to worry about being so sensitive and getting "good PR" by having their top guy (Austin) do publicity work like Make a Wish, Be A Star, etc. All he had to do was guest star on Walker: Texas Ranger.


These are the reasons they won't turn Cena heel. I highly doubt Austin's "failed heel turn" has ANYTHING to do with their decision to keep John face.

Wasn't Rock written out when the Two Man Power Trip formed so that he could go film The Mummy Returns?

They elevated Angle, RVD, Benoit, Jericho, etc. Which is what they would have to do today.

K.Smoke 06-04-2012 06:56 PM

absence makes the heart grow fonder. Cena leaving could help. In fact I believe this is building up to Cena quitting. He needs to leave so that people can miss him.

Keith 06-05-2012 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crimson (Post 3879247)
lol @ Taz at 5:50

I remember when Taz confronted heel Austin after he beat up Michael Cole. Austin was calling out Booker T, and Taz just got into the ring and Austin turned around and was like "Unless Booker T got real short and real fat real fast, you're not Booker T" haha.

Damndirty 06-05-2012 12:57 AM

I despise the PG Era just as much as anybody else, but they were doomed to dropping ratings just before Cena too. Cena's first movie was not exactly hailed by Roger and Ebert, and the second one he was in was even worse, so I don't see him quitting to go into movies like the Rock did, not for a while at least. Personally, I prefer thuganomics Cena over PG Cena, but I guess there's certain factors in WWE old school fans don't have a say in nowadays.
I figured Zack Ryder would gain far more popularity because of his Youtube channel's popularity and the reception of Jersey Shore, a show I also despise, but their most drawing fans get into I suppose. TNA is more for us (hardcore wrestling male fans) than it is their's (women and children), while WWE has become more for their's.

Damndirty 06-05-2012 01:43 AM

I wish Taz in his prime could have fought Austin. I don't think Austin would be standing.

Swish 06-05-2012 10:58 AM

Raw got boring ever since they fired Vince Russo
 
It just seems to be getting boring, the only thing interesting
is watching the commercials? anyone agree.

whiteyford 06-05-2012 11:00 AM

Then don't watch. Pretty simple stuff.

Swish 06-05-2012 11:00 AM

A Time Travel Angle/Gimmick?
 
One thing I've not seen WWE do/use yet, is a Time Travel gimmick/angle.
Of course in many tv shows/movies it has been used. But imagine if this happened on WWE. Have a sort of Undertaker like gimmick but with the angle
that he has the ability to travel through time?. But all the time travel shit
happens on the titan tron.. Just to keep the fans happy?,

VSG 06-05-2012 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swish (Post 3881125)
anyone agree.

no

loopydate 06-05-2012 11:02 AM

WCW already did this.

whiteyford 06-05-2012 11:02 AM

Drugs are bad.

whiteyford 06-05-2012 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loopydate (Post 3881130)
WCW already did this.

Really?

Swish 06-05-2012 11:03 AM

Seriously? It's a repeat. All the top guy's are being fired
due to not being able to keep them self clean. Cena will be the next one to leave
due to being almost bankrupt and with his marriage issue. This is the reason

They plan on bringing back Austin and McMahon it's a quest for ratings

What happens when Austin leaves? or retires? then Taker is now done.
HHH is also done, yet once a year returns with HBK as DX. which is also getting stale.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®