![]() |
I like Braun because he is the only character that wins matches besides Roman Reigns.
|
Quote:
But having him eliminate a good amount then to be elimated by, I dunno, The New Day, would be alright. Maybe then he could go on to face The New Day in a 3-on-1 Handicap Match at WrestleMania. |
Sammy will be Brauns Kryptonite at the rumble
|
Dirtsheets sponsored by TPWW's Sheety Awards "Best Wrestler of the Year" Winner:
http://i.imgur.com/jznfmKN.gif Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Some other sheet news includes:
|
Quote:
|
What role do you see Hogan playing if he came back? If I had to pick a role for him, I can see him raising American Alpha's arms in victory if they win the SmackDown Tag Team Championship at WrestleMania. I know Vince probably does have a serious hard-on for Jason Jordan, but the team is good for him at the moment -- he was going nowhere without it. Hell, he's arguably going nowhere with it now. Let them have a decent run together and get used to negotiating the main roster style before you split them off and give each a singles push (hopefully).
|
Quote:
These are pretty big numbers for the Hardy's still. All things considered. |
Quote:
|
Haven't heard him cut a promo but from a wrestling stand-point, from a look standpoint and from a "showing emotion/personality in the ring" standpoint, Jordan is fucking fantastic.
|
I just wish WWE would learn to get behind tag teams. American Alpha have all the tools to be a top tag team for years to come.
|
Is Shelton Benjamin meant to be coming back to WWE once he recovers from injury? If so, American Alpha vs. The World's Greatest Tag Team needs to happen once. Have Kurt Angle do a run-in or something. I'd mark out.
|
Charlie Haas is supposedly "retired" but it looks like he still takes spot bookings now and then. I doubt he'd turn down a couple of decent WWE pay dates to put over Alpha.
|
Is Roman ROIDS really the right person to tell John Cena to power clean in the gym...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'd actually be fine with Haas & Benjamin getting a run with the Tag Titles as crafty veterans who still have a thing or two left to teach Alpha before dropping the belts back to them. |
Agree about Jordan. He's displayed a lot more charisma and intesnity since teaming with gable.
|
One day Jason Jordan vs. Chad Gable will be a major match at WrestleMania. I hope.
|
Major breaking news: I'm returning to 411mania.com to write my Mr.Dufour's Wayback Machine reviews.
Some weirdo was harassing me about sending him copies of shows to the point he was trying to get my home and work phone number. He'd leave me like 5-10 messages, emails a day. It was REALLY weird. |
Sorry.
|
Dirtsheets sponsored by #BeatUpHBKDay:
https://giant.gfycat.com/WholePopularCarpenterant.gif SPOILER: show Spoiler tags used since its related to this year's WWE Hall of Fame class. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Some other sheet news includes:
|
Dirtsheets sponsored by Wrestle Kingdom 11:
http://i.imgur.com/5hXvWQx.gif Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Some other sheet news includes:
|
Smackdown rating in?
|
Dirtsheets sponsored by Bliss Appreciation Day:
http://i.imgur.com/5OLBY7Y.gif Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Some other sheet news includes:
|
ADAM COLE BAY BAY!
|
Lol, 6 stars? That sounds a bit ridiculous. Would love to see Maria and Mike Bennett in the WWE. War Machine would be a good addition too. They're kind of like a more polished Authors of Pain at this point, aren't they?
|
War Machine would wipe the floor with AoP, at least in the ring presence department. Those young big boys in Pain wonder down to the ring like they were just let out of a cage and don't know why they are in the building.
|
Cole and War Machine will be great additions. Hate O'Reilly though, but they probably see him as a Daniel Bryan type or something. Really think k War Machine could go straight to the main roster but a run in NXT wouldn't be bad. Cole is obviously going to be the headliner of that group and I expect he'll be in the NXT title picture quickly.
|
Quote:
Unfortunately the match has been talked up so much that I think people who've not had a chance to see it are going to go into it skeptical and automatically assuming it can't be as good as people are saying. Any match, movie, etc. if the baseline set for it before you've ever seen it is "definitely the best thing ever". |
What would WWE realistically do with the Hardys?
|
Nothing even remotely close to as entertaining as they have been this past year with the Broken gimmick.
|
Quote:
|
Wouldn't mind seeing another Jeff Hardy run at the top. Hardy vs. Lesnar would be money.
|
can't he fucking overdose already?
|
Lesnar vs Hardy in a drugs on a pole match could be good
|
Quote:
NeoGAF's wrestling board found the match he gave an unofficial 6 star rating while supposedly there is a women's match from Japan that got rated even higher unofficially from him (5++ stars). Kawada vs. Misawa, 1997 AJPW Triple Crown Championship match - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1KqryNFCFg |
His cancelled podcasts are gonna catch up to his divorces.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Matt Hardy would be filler on his own. I think it would be better to bring back Jeff and leave Matt to do his shtick on the indies, but given how they are all about bulk, bulk, bulk and more is better, Matt would probably get signed if he wanted to and would probably make a pretty decent mid-card babyface for heels on the rise to kick the shit out of. They'd probably try to turn him heel out of jealousy for Jeff one more time and he'd get a failed run near the top because he actually can't talk well, and the sort of push Matt needs, contrary to Jeff, is one that requires him to be able to explain his motivations. As a tag team they'd move a ton of merchandise and be an exciting act for a while. Kevin Owens & Chris Jericho vs. The Hardy Boyz would be a WrestleMania worthy match. They'd probably put out a DVD on their life and times. I do think that there is more money and fun in Jeff Hardy singles star, provided that he is in the frame of mind to be reliable -- but they are running out of part-timers to come and have short burst runs that get more over than the full-time stuff, so Jeff could be one of those. Something more optimistic for Matt is that I could see him doing something more along the lines of his Broken Matt shtick in NXT, since it's the Hunter project and the WWE doesn't seem to mind it being a money pit in order to keep those Network subscribers high. Matt's a veteran talent who does have something to offer, and I could very easily see a serious Kassius Ohno vs. goofy Matt feud over the NXT Title. The NXT fanbase -- the hardcores -- would eat that shit right up. |
Quote:
|
Were Future Shock any good as a tag team?
|
Quote:
Its why whenever anyone asks him about his ratings, he usually says or implies to not take those ratings seriously. Also those ratings are always based on how he felt right after watching a match. |
Dirtsheets sponsored by Evil Emma feeding a bear:
http://i.imgur.com/Ly5GzKU.jpg Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Rock "Its not real! That shit is fake!" <a href="https://t.co/uFAgkrYrvP">pic.twitter.com/uFAgkrYrvP</a></p>— Wrestling LAD (@WrestlingLAD) <a href="https://twitter.com/WrestlingLAD/status/817405089207947269">January 6, 2017</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> Some other sheet news includes:
|
Isn't Lesnar's contract up at WM as well? Would be funny is both Goldberg and Lesnar wrestled one another and left the company again at a WrestleMania.
|
I'm still hoping for Adrian Neville vs. Kota Ibushi for the Cruiserweight Title at WrestleMania, dammit. Nothing else will touch it as far as quality and drama goes. Ibushi has, in a way, earmarked himself as the star of the division by not signing right away and teething issues are worked out. Neville works as the spoiler right now and again, it's a different gimmick from the NXT presentation that works main roster. Well, it might be a bit premature to call Neville's heel run a success right away.
But yeah, I'm all-in for Neville vs. Ibushi in a 6-star classic at WrestleMania. Let Ibushi work limited dates. Fuck it. I've accepted Cena vs. Undertaker as the main event of WrestleMania, and I don't think any amount of Okada/Omega is going to change Vince's mind on that. I just hope my pipe-dream of AJ Styles losing the belt and calling out HBK comes to fruition. |
@Noid Cena/Taker isn't quite as set in stone as you would think...
|
Quote:
Once Owens loses the Universal Title, I think the cracks between him and Jericho will continue. I don't really see how you create something with actual drama between the two, and I don't know who you turn, since both are such heels (with no real heat), but I don't think that stops the WWE. I'd rather see them as a proper team against The New Day or something, but whatever. It's possible that Sami Zayn ends up in the match as a Triple Threat? Can Owens & Jericho put their issues aside to stomp out Sami Zayn, or will they destroy each other allowing Zayn to jet to victory? I think Brock will re-sign, but will get paid more money to do even less work. |
Quote:
If they wanted to do the match they could have done it a lot earlier when it would have meant more. I personally don't think Taker really wants to do the match and would rather face someone else. You'd think if anyone has earned the right to choose his opponent, it'd be Taker. |
Styles vs Cena is the only way to go if they want something like WK.
|
Dirty grittiness and Iron Mike Sharpe does not compute. He was the cleanest wrestler ever with his OCD.. Once got locked into the Boston Garden and had to stay there overnight because they locked up the building while he was still showering.
|
Quote:
|
Hmm. I think you can build Roman Reigns by having him squash Goldberg or something. I'd go balls-in with heel Reigns, but even as an ironic babyface that is really your heel, you don't need to go with Reigns/Taker.
By the way, when I said "What do you know?" I am meant it in a sly "tell me your secrets" sort of way, and not in a dismissive "Pfft, what do you know?" kind of way. I just realized how that could have been misconstrued. |
Taker should beat anyone he faces.
|
Roman squashing Goldberg in 5 minutes is how I would book that match as well. Gives Goldberg time to hit his signature moves, maybe they briefly brawl outside the ring, spot involving the barrier or table or something of the sort, Roman eventually gets the upper hand and BOOM match over. Vince finally accomplishes his dream of making Roman look strong since they've built up that Goldberg destroyed Lesnar with ease in short time. Also better for the fans because we aren't stuck with a 20 minute clunker. Each gets a big entrance, match is about 5 minutes, wham bam thank you mam' done.
|
I actually like the idea of Reigns beating and retiring Taker. Reigns needs that signature win.
|
Quote:
|
Kurt Angle signing some sort of Legends deal to stop himself from wrestling -- or at least get his dates approved by the company -- and a spot in the video game and maybe a non-wrestling role he can occasionally fill (WWE Ambassador, etc.) seems logical at this point, provided Angle is willing to abide by the WWE's rules.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Goldberg is popular enough that people will care that he loses. I think you can wring way more out of him, but there's "redemption" there for him. That's never been a particularly appealing part of the Goldberg persona (him being a sure thing was always his attraction), but this is 2017 and you've only got a handful of guys with that star potential. You can have Goldberg pin Sheamus or something at another PPV to get some energy back. Another way to go about it is to have The Usos get involved by attacking Goldberg during the course of the match, they get the Goldberg specials to pop the crowd, but Goldie turns into a Spear from Reigns and gets pinned. It's a bit bullshitty, but if you want to go with Reigns as a heel and protect Goldberg, there are ways to do it. I can also see Reigns with a plate in his vest, so Goldberg knocks himself out on his own Spear. But it might just be better to have Reigns just kick Goldberg's ass. |
Quote:
|
The Bloodline as an entitled yet brutal heel faction would be pretty great I think. Similarities to Legacy aside.
|
The Usos need something if they are going to be sticking around. I felt at the time that the heel turn was premature and should have been done more organically after a run as SmackDown Tag Champs. They've pretty much disappeared since their heel turn and being, like, fourth priority team. At least they're still higher than The Ascension and Vaudevillains.
|
I think they want to make something of Alpha vs. Usos and know that in order to do that they have to keep one/both of those teams "on ice" until the time is right to pull the trigger on the feud. That might've changed with The Hype Bros being knocked out of contention.
|
I think that is ultimately the plan too, but I think by keeping one/both "on ice" it's just going to be cold. I didn't really think they should have gone with Slater & Rhyno as first champs at the time, and I still think they should have gone with The Usos as babyface champions until they dropped the belts to American Alpha and then turned heel. It's just preference, but I think it would make things feel more "heavyweight" between the two teams.
At this stage, I'm expecting American Alpha vs. The Usos vs. The Revival vs. a fourth team on the Kickoff show, and that is exactly where The Usos have been forever. |
Quote:
|
Both brands have enough tag teams to make it work if they try. If they went the way of one set of belts it should be open to all brands with the traveling NWA champion motif.
|
Vaudevillian puppets is one of the best things going.
Cracked me up with Sasha's husband. |
I do kind of wish they just kept one World Title and maybe upped the prestige of the IC & United States titles by making them the top titles of their respective brands. Roman Reigns holding the US Title might mean something then, probably not, but maybe.
I liked how they did it at the beginning of the first brand split when the undisputed champ would defend against Raw on a PPV then SmackDown! the next PPV. |
I guess they have enough teams. But do they have enough legitimate teams? New Day, Gallows and Anderson, American Alpha and the Usos are the only legit teams I can think of that didn't come after the brand split.
Orton and the Wyatts, Slater and Rhyno, Cesaro and Sheamus were all thrown together after the split, IIRC. Hype Bros I guess you could count as a pre brand split team, but I was thinking of teams that have a shot at being the focus of the division. If one division on one show was a thing, you'd have New Day on top, Alpha as the secondary face team, Gallows and Anderson as the top heel team, and even the Usos as the next heel team. Then you add in the other guys who came together after the split and now you have this deep roster of tags to run stories with. I think one world title, one tag title and one women's belt is best. Two mid card belts get elevated by getting put on guys who could main event but are pushed out because there's only one top spot. World champ tours brand to brand depending on story and opponent. |
Have one ppv per brand every other month. Champ doesn't need to wrestle every month depending on the story.
Use the IC or US belt to main event the brand exclusive shows when the champ is feuding on the opposite show. |
Quote:
Vince and/or management not wanting their "flagship" show to be seen as weaker whenever the WWE champ wasn't around was the same reason why the original brand split also quickly had 2 main belts as well. |
Quote:
If the tag team division competition dies down they can unify them. The Revival for instance could win Money In the Bank and then win tag team titles on either brand. They would then come out on the other show to cash in and win. One guy would carry the Red Belt around and the Other Would Carry the Blue. |
I do kind of like STDs tag unification idea. Agree with everyone else about only having one set of World, Tag, and Womens titles. Would make being g champion mean a lot more.
|
Perfect time to bring back the championship scramble.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Russo even booked a ladder match in TNA where the keys to Mick Foley's office were placed upon a pole. |
The Roman Empire could defeat Goldberg, Undertaker, John Cena, Prince Albert, Mojo Rawley, Braun Strowman and Jushin Liger at the same time. Book it and find out.
|
What about The Great Muta?
|
Roman Reigns vs The Great Muta in the next "Best Wrestler" contest, please.
|
The one title thing doesn't work. Say there's one world champ going between shows, say it's Cena. He starts a program on RAW with say Kevin Owens. The finish wasn't decisive and Owens attacked Cena after the match. Instead of settling the score, Cena hops over to SDL to start a brand new program with Baron Corbin. In the meantime, Owens is waiting on RAW with a thumb up his ass. He's gotta do something for a month, so he gets into a program with someone else. Oh wait, now Cena is back, but that new program on hold, and remind the audience what happened six weeks ago. It just feel disjointed.
Plus from a house show booking and scheduling POV, it's very difficult to constantly changes guys schedules. It's much easier to just have each tour with their own set of championships. The other benefit is it allows more guys to be elevated. Taking about the tag teams, on SDL, you get to see upwards of six teams getting TV time. On RAW its more like four. Still, combined, that's ten teams. If it's all one division, you won't see that many teams featured. Same with the girls. On SDL you go down to girls like Natty, Naomi, and Carmella. If Charlotte was going between shows, she would take up a segment every week, and you wouldn't see as many girls total. |
Quote:
I think they'll take that. |
The brand split itself was an impulsive idea. They probably should have tried to make SmackDown good before they tried to make it "unique." There are real problems with having two World Titles. If the WWE want their fans to watch both RAW and SmackDown (which they clearly do), then having a "World Champion" and #1 Contender on each show means that at the very most you can say a guy is fighting for #3 position in the company as a certainty. Well, even that may be a stretch. The World Champion on SmackDown isn't necessarily better than a mid-carder on RAW.
You can create a Global Championship, Planetary Championship and Earth Championship while you are at it and call the guys who help it "World Champions" all you want. When you ask someone "Who is the best wrestler in the world?", a question that a World Heavyweight Championship is supposed to answer, you cannot answer it in WWE. By having two "World Champions" you literally have no World Champion. I think there are similar problems with the Tag Team Championships and Women's Championships too. Who is the best women's wrestler in WWE -- Charlotte or Alexa Bliss? In fact, you can probably widen them up to the immediate challengers too. Who is the best women's wrestler in WWE -- Charlotte, Bayley, Sasha, Alexa, Becky or Nikki? See how it becomes really murky? When you put both Women's Championships on, say, a WrestleMania card, Joe Fan is going to watch and think "Hang on, why are there two Women's Championships?" The idea that the Women's Championship is the answer to a question is thrown out the window and as a result neither belt really matters as a tool to get someone over as anything resembling any sort of star. If you want to go beyond the literal sense of what a World Champion is, and instead focus on who the biggest star and most credible wrestler in WWE -- the answer to "Who is the best wrestler in the world?" -- you have to go with either The Rock or Goldberg. John Cena, Brock Lesnar and The Undertaker are also in contention. The World Championship divisions aren't really the elite class of wrestler. Your real World Champion has an invisible belt that they can't exactly take off and hand to another wrestler. They're also part-time and, in at least one of those cases, not even signed to the company. Having two separate "brands" isn't really an effective storytelling device for WWE at this point. It's exciting at first, because people associate it with change, movement, classification, and conflict. Is a guy going to be RAW or SmackDown? Who are their peers going to be and who are they going to be kept away from? It's build in a larger sense akin to what building to a match would be. But it doesn't actually create more opportunities for guys. Curt Hawkins and Jinder Mahal are just "there." Kevin Owens could have done his shit with Seth Rollins without a belt. Go back to SummerSlam -- the main event doesn't even have a belt involved (exactly what I mean about an invisible World Championship being there anyway). Nothing is really different except that SmackDown is now better than RAW because RAW is even more tedious than it was six months ago. |
The Monday Night Wars was a fairly successful time in the history of the business, each group had their own set of champion. Football leagues is Europe are each wildly successful and have their own champions, while still participating in joint events. Nobody gets confused that say Man City is the champion of England while Barca is the champion of Spain. Those respective countries leagues still do pretty well I would say. I didn't hear a lot of complaints when Pride had world champions while UFC had their own. All these things do is create water cooler talk about who is better. The nature of WWE allows them to create this type of talk but then deliver on "dream matches" as they see fit.
I don't think having multiple world champions is an issue. To me if you have a brand split, each brand needs champions. The going back and forth just doesn't work from a storytelling point of view our a scheduling point of view. It's easy to say oh just have John work Friday to Monday one month, and then Saturday to Tuesday the next. But for those talents, and for the people who need to advertise them ahead of time, it's a nightmare. At best what they could do is say each champ is on a brand six months at a time. This would give them a chance to start and finish storylines, and scheduling would be easier. But that's a long time for one brand to go without a champion. If anything, maybe they consider doing something at Mania where its champion vs champion for all the titles. The winner either gets an additional belt, or just some type of trophy. And it just becomes another accolade to brag about. But each respective title stays with their brand. That gives it a little more of a sports feel, where its like Mania is the Super Bowl where the NFC champ battles the AFC champ. Problem there is it hurts The Rumble, because if it's champ vs champ at Mania, how do you get the Rumble winner in the championship match? Maybe one solution would be to rotate SDL and RAW title has to be defended at the Rumble, like what Roman had to do. |
Quote:
wow l just saw his post after writing this and to think I was being sarcastic. |
Quote:
I will say the main event scene on SDL is a little short in terms of depth, but it's giving guys like Corbin the opportunity to step up. Even a guy like AJ is able to carry the brand, whereas with one title, I don't think his run would have big as long. And what's great, is as a fan, I'm getting more PPVs for the same price as pre split. It's hard to complain IMO. |
Quote:
|
Always think of the worst thing, then take it one step further.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There is the one off chance of Alicia wrestling thats really the only good thing I can say about RAW. |
Quote:
Lots to enjoy on RAW. |
Dirtsheets sponsored by The Conqueror of the US Roman Empire ... Chris Jericho:
https://68.media.tumblr.com/527a242e...ykaxo1_400.gif Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Some other sheet news includes:
|
Dirtsheets sponsored by The Return of the Queen of Craziness:
https://media.giphy.com/media/RhqAwMkpIE9Da/200.gif SPOILER: show Spoiler tags used since its related to the rumored list of WWE Hall of Famers for this year's class. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/XZC8Cct61Rk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> Some other sheet news includes:
|
Where does that erroneous 's' come from when they report about Rolling Stone magazine? Every time they refer to it as Rolling Stones.
|
From the band.
|
Alicia Fauuuuuuuuuuuuuux is amazing lol
|
Good god Alica that was some really really bad acting
|
Quote:
|
The Observer is all but confirming that Hogan is coming back.
On what I'm sure is a TOTALLY UNRELATED NOTE, Vince tweeted this yesterday: <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">My hero. <a href="https://t.co/0oTT6DVcQG">pic.twitter.com/0oTT6DVcQG</a></p>— Vince McMahon (@VinceMcMahon) <a href="https://twitter.com/VinceMcMahon/status/819290460053241856">January 11, 2017</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> Good job The New Day look to be recruiting. |
Look for American Alpha to be rebranded "Real American Alpha" and wear red and yellow from now on. You heard it here first.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®