TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Tables, Ladders, & Podcast - Current episode: #74 (October 22, 2014) (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=112210)

Afterlife 06-06-2013 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Vic (Post 4219205)
I never said it would be worse, I just said that wouldn't be clean.

:|

:|

:|

*facepalm*

Big Vic 06-06-2013 01:56 PM

SMH, How is that clean?

Pretend its UFC (which yes, I know you don't like it) When Jon Jones faced Chael Sonnen for the title, how clean would the title defense be if Anderson Silva got on stage grabbed a mic and started screaming "Hey Chael look over here at me!" causing Chael to look over?

Nark Order 06-06-2013 02:01 PM

It isn't "clean" per say, but it is a legitimate pinfall victory. It does a whole lot more than a countout does. Pinning the world champion, whatever the circumstances, is a big deal and he would've been a much bigger deal had it gone down that way.

Big Vic 06-06-2013 02:03 PM

I don't disagree, what started this discussion was AL saying Curtis should have won clean.

Nark Order 06-06-2013 02:05 PM

Well, I think he meant "by pinfall." Technically if Cena loses via distraction, he loses "cleanly," there's just more to the context of the situation.

Big Vic 06-06-2013 02:11 PM

Granted losing by distraction is probably one of the cleanest dirty ways win you can get, but it still isn't clean.

Nark Order 06-06-2013 02:35 PM

Well, now we're arguing semantics. I'm pretty sure we all understand what he meant now

Mr. Nerfect 06-06-2013 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoJabbaNoBogRoll (Post 4219133)
If you've perfected a move to the point that it pretty much always puts your opponent down for three, then you should probably be looking to hit it whenever the opportunity arises.

However, your opponent also knows this, so it shouldn't be possible to successfully hit your finisher in every match, when your opponent is looking out for it.

This is why I have a problem with the whole "I'm heading up top, uncharacteristically, so that I can dive towards Randy Orton, neck first" thing.

The first time I ever saw someone do a dive into a wrestler's standard finisher was when Shelton Benjamin did a springboard into Shawn Michaels' Sweet Chin Music in the opening round of the Gold Rush Tournament in 2004. I think it may have been the first time Shawn Michaels wore his baggy pants, as an added bit of trivia.

That spot was amazing and made everyone stand up because Shelton was going for his springboard clothesline, which he regularly did. It was believable that he was going for that move on HBK to try and finish him off, that HBK knew it was coming, and that the kick could lead to the finish.

Since then, we've seen the spot repeated, and it often does make me wonder why someone would try lunging head-first at Orton for the first time in their career. There have been moments where Orton has hit awesome RKOs from guys flying at him. Seth Rollins and CM Punk at WrestleMania XXVI and WrestleMania XXIX both come to mind, because they both hit springboard moves from time-to-time.

I'm not sure where they had their second match, but Shawn Michaels defeated Kurt Angle with Sweet Chin Music after Angle came off the top rope with an axe handle attempt, which is something Angle almost never does. Those are two of the best ever. So maybe my pet peeve with this is merely that -- my own. I will suggest that when something uncharacteristic like this happens, that should be the job of the commentators to convey to the audiences.

"Angle is going to the top rope because HBK has kicked out of everything else Angle has."

Suddenly, as an audience, we have a reason to believe that Angle, who does go for moonsaults occasionally, would be flying in with an axe handle on HBK. A lot of the time the commentators just go "Look at this! Whoa!" I think even referees could help sell these sort of moments by looking a bit confused as to what this wrestler is doing, since they normally don't act in that manner.

I guess what I am trying to say is: This bothers me too, but there is a certain psychology behind a guy trying out something new in a tough match -- especially if his opponent knows him so well and is so resourceful. This should be where the commentators, who should be immersed in the product, are able to convey that story. I'm not taking pot-shots at any commentator in particular -- Michael Cole, for example, actually does this far more than he's given credit for -- but that is why they are there and that is a way that good announcing can raise a match.

Mr. Nerfect 06-06-2013 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narcissus (Post 4219197)
What is your definition of clean? If Ryback cause a distraction and Curt capitalizes then Cena loses nothing. If Triple H's head explodes and Curt capitalizes then Triple H loses nothing. These count out victories just don't mean anything.

I don't think the victories mean nothing, but Axel would have looked far more impressive if he had gone after Triple H when he began to falter, beat him around ringside and looked like a hungry shark that smelled blood. I still think that Axel beating Triple H with the Pedigree would have been the ultimate insult to injury and would have added more reason to want to see an Axel vs. Triple H rematch.

The only problem with Axel beating Cena by countout was that it sends the message that Cena didn't care if he lost to Axel. The roll-up finish would have been perfect. Cena wouldn't leave the ring, but his attention would be turned away from Axel, who would capitalise when he saw the opportunity.

Axel vs. Cena II could have ended almost exactly the same way, except after Ryback puts Cena through the table, Axel just laughs, knowing he has Cena where he wants him. He pulls Cena back into the ring and hits him with a Perfect Plex to get the pin.

None of the wins are "clean," but they show Axel to be opportunistic, vicious and talented. On the flip side of the coin: There is a certain psychology behind Axel just taking victories however he can. It doesn't make him much of a heel, though. He's just doing his job. I think the ball just needs to stop spinning on the type of character Axel is going to be.

Mr. Nerfect 06-06-2013 07:10 PM

And the semantics of the word "clean" frustrate me. Basically, I think if a wrestler wins their match because they have done something proactive -- it is something clean enough. By heel standards, especially. If a heel yells at the audience for too long and then a babyface rolls him up -- is that a clean victory? The heel was distracted and not paying attention. The good guy clearly took advantage of a moment of opportunity. It's just about how you look at it, of course.

I ran into opposition from Tedious when I suggested Axel beat Triple H "clean." What I meant was that Triple H's mounting injuries would get to him, Axel would jump on them, and people would be concerned about Triple H. To me, a heel seeing weakness and jumping on it is "clean" by their standards. The only thing cleaner would be if they had caused the injury themselves. But they can't help that faces are stupid and enter situations they probably shouldn't.

Mr. Nerfect 06-06-2013 07:12 PM

Fair points. Man, I'd love a Basham Brothers return to help put over some newer teams.

On the topic of ring psychology, I think one of the most underrated guys on the roster is Heath Slater. I know that will piss of wwf-fan in a thread where there has been criticisms launched at Randy Orton's ring psychology. But if you actually watch a Heath Slater match and think about why he does what he does, he pretty much nails it every time. It's probably why he's been given the role of enhancing a lot of guys like he is a heel Val Venis.

#1-norm-fan 06-06-2013 08:40 PM

Heath Slater's fine in the ring...

He's been given the role of enhancing guys because he's not natural on the mic and is terrible at playing a character and can't actually work as anything more than jobber material. Not because he's just so amazing at what he does. lol

Afterlife 06-07-2013 01:20 AM

Good grief. Pinfall, and without personally cheating, Savior. Come on, man.

James Steele 06-07-2013 01:22 AM

To me, a clean win is when you win without anything for your opponent to use as an excuse. Cheating, Distractions, Interference, etc. all make a win unclean.

Mr. Nerfect 06-07-2013 01:26 AM

Heath Slater is perfect at being an annoying heel that everyone wants to see get his ass handed to him. And he sells like a champion.

SlickyTrickyDamon 06-07-2013 01:33 AM

JTG never won a tag team title.

Afterlife 06-07-2013 04:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan (Post 4219418)
Heath Slater's fine in the ring...

He's been given the role of enhancing guys because he's not natural on the mic and is terrible at playing a character and can't actually work as anything more than jobber material. Not because he's just so amazing at what he does. lol

Oofah.

#1-norm-fan 06-07-2013 05:49 AM

Well now it all makes sense.

NoJabbaNoBogRoll 06-07-2013 05:53 AM

Lucky he was only being used as an example.

CSL 06-07-2013 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Afterlife (Post 4219070)
I wasn't complaining strictly about Sheamus using two back-to-back finishers, I was complaining about the practice in general.

it's like a lot of other things in wrestling, it's one of those moments where you have to suspend your disbelief a little bit for the sake of why he's doing it. When HBK would come off the top with the elbow, do his little fire up dance schtick and go to the corner to start "tuning up the band", the crowd come up. If he goes straight to a nearfall after the elbow, he loses that "momentum" going to his finish/you bring them down. It's like a "oh shit, we know what's coming now" once it's been done, like Hogan hitting the big boot. I personally can't say that I'd even noticed that Sheamus does this, don't watch anywhere near enough of the current product and theoretically/ideally, it'd be the other way round (the boot then the White Curse) but when you've gotten something over in that sense/people are expecting to see something, you don't mess with it :-\

Quote:

Originally Posted by Afterlife (Post 4219077)
Looking to hit a finisher is not the opposite of using them when necessary. That kind of goes right back to Sheamus doing two definitive finishers back to back for no reason, as well as Whereman's take on "psychology" as a whole.

I didn't strictly mean "the direct opposite", just pointing out the gulf between the two. The babyface always teasing/building towards/getting stopped from hitting his finish until he finally gets it is one of the more important parts of structuring a match, especially if it's a "commodity"/people are looking to see that move

CSL 06-07-2013 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoJabbaNoBogRoll (Post 4219133)
If you've perfected a move to the point that it pretty much always puts your opponent down for three, then you should probably be looking to hit it whenever the opportunity arises.

However, your opponent also knows this, so it shouldn't be possible to successfully hit your finisher in every match, when your opponent is looking out for it.

This is why I have a problem with the whole "I'm heading up top, uncharacteristically, so that I can dive towards Randy Orton, neck first" thing.

I agree with the "your opponent knows this" part but people are paying to see these things, you can't send them home empty handed. In an ideal world, that'd be great. Although that could be a nice addition to some variety of feud somewhere, the heel knows the babyface so well that he always manages to avoid finish, have the announcers play on that and so forth and once he finally hits it in "the blowoff match", done properly with the right person, it could get whatever that move is over huge.

Completely with you on the last part however, I think I was the only person that wasn't at all a fan of Bourne's SSP into the RKO for example and that one even made sense given it was Bourne's finish, I just don't think it looked very good/required a little bit too much "suspension of disbelief" although some are great, Punk's springboard into the RKO for example) I understand why they do it however, people eat that stuff up and the name of the game is "make them yell loudest for longest". Misguided/warped takes on that are the reason so much indy wrestling is just horrific

CSL 06-07-2013 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan (Post 4218284)
CSL has also been unfairly lumped into this. The poor fuck.

keep reading this as a Heath Slatering of my sexual performance, my poor Ike Turner-battered ego

Mr. Nerfect 06-07-2013 09:49 PM

The only thing I find awkard about Sheamus' set-up for the Brogue Kick with the White Noise is that the White Noise is such a "heavy" move that his opponent should probably be down and out. As CSL says, it works so don't fuck with it, but it just seems like his opponent should be sort of dead after that. :-\

Mr. Nerfect 06-07-2013 09:56 PM

To me it kind of seems like Taker setting up the Chokeslam with the Tombstone. The Brogue Kick should probably be Sheamus' "out of nowhere" finish, while he sets up for head and neck region for White Noise. When he goes after the back of his opponents, it should be The Irish Curse and the Texas Cloverleaf.

Ha! Look at me. I'm telling a fucking pro like Sheamus how he should wrestle. This is why we are frowned upon. The dude knows what he is doing. I'm not complaining about it (Sheamus is a bigger dude who can wrestle about as well as anybody his size ever has), but I do get how it looks awkward. All the pros do something like that. Eg. Christian using a Spear.

NoJabbaNoBogRoll 06-13-2013 11:34 AM

TPWW Tables, Ladders, & Podcast (June 13, 2013) (Special Guest: Poit)
 
Covering a news item, Impact, Smackdown, and Raw.

Orton lovers beware.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/1uZuJImNniA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Yep, I realise it says "EPISODE 2" on the screen, but that is a lie. I would go in and fix it, but we're moving to audio only very soon, so there's no point.

Big Vic 06-13-2013 11:37 AM

I don't love Orton but I do like his position on the card. I think they are going to go for a Triple Threat with him and hell no, after that I hope he puts over Dolph in a world title match.

Afterlife 06-13-2013 01:43 PM

I'd prefer his position be off the card. :p

Afterlife 06-13-2013 02:38 PM

Also, it fucking KILLS me that my internet cut out last night.

Poit 06-13-2013 03:35 PM

Yeah, it just *happened* to go out right before we discussed the Kaitlyn/Big E segment.

Afterlife 06-13-2013 05:15 PM

I wanted to SHRED that bullshit.

owenbrown 06-14-2013 02:05 AM

Tell us how you really feel, Afterlife :lol:

Innovator 06-14-2013 07:38 AM

I can't wait for you guys to review the show where Hogan puts on the gear brother and fights Bully Ray

Nark Order 06-14-2013 12:25 PM

I might not be able to talk if that happens. My face will probably melt away from my body.

Innovator 06-14-2013 12:27 PM

If? I hereby present this tweet, hereto "Exhibit A":

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Perfect timing to start serious training again,last time around the block for me so this is gonna be really intense,transformation time. HH</p>&mdash; Hulk Hogan (@HulkHogan) <a href="https://twitter.com/HulkHogan/statuses/344080422562590720">June 10, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<script async="" src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><iframe id="rufous-sandbox" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" style="display: none;"></iframe>

NoJabbaNoBogRoll 06-14-2013 12:51 PM

So the guy who has been an authority figure on TV for the last three years might have one match?

TIME FOR MELTDOWN, LADS.

Innovator 06-14-2013 01:15 PM

When the baddest guy on the roster, your biggest heel, leader of the big heel faction, is going to stand there and wait 10 seconds in between Hogan punches...that isn't a good thing. It makes Bully look like shit.

Afterlife 06-14-2013 02:28 PM

Let's judge the idea of a confrontation before we even guarantee it'll happen.

Big Vic 06-14-2013 02:29 PM

Maybe Hogan will wrestle brooke?

NoJabbaNoBogRoll 06-14-2013 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Innovator (Post 4224996)
When the baddest guy on the roster, your biggest heel, leader of the big heel faction, is going to stand there and wait 10 seconds in between Hogan punches...that isn't a good thing. It makes Bully look like shit.

Oh, I get it. Like the way CM Punk was getting his ass handed to him by a crippled 67 year old Vince McMahon?

Innovator 06-14-2013 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoJabbaNoBogRoll (Post 4225055)
Oh, I get it. Like the way CM Punk was getting his ass handed to him by a crippled 67 year old Vince McMahon?

Yes, that was also horrible, stupid, and idiotic.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®