TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Linda McMahon loses Senate Race!!! (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=108240)

DLVH84 11-02-2010 08:50 PM

Linda McMahon loses Senate Race!!!
 
Linda McMahon loses to Dick Blumenthal in the Connecticut Senate Race...yes, victory is ours!!! Here's something for Linda McMahon...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIvxqUCu41Q

Savio 11-02-2010 09:03 PM

Tomorrow night on C-span she will demand a rematch....No DQ

Cool King 11-02-2010 09:06 PM

She had no chance in hell in winning anyway.






























What? :shifty:

Savio 11-02-2010 09:08 PM

50 million down the tubes

DLVH84 11-02-2010 09:09 PM

Hopefully, this will end the PG bullshit.

VSG 11-02-2010 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savior (Post 3306236)
50 million down the tubes

Not necessarily, she did a lot more than just use her near unlimited cash. She should contest for the junior Senator seat when it next opens though and start from there.

But ya- Screw PG!

Aguakate 11-02-2010 09:11 PM

Someone in WWE will get "future endeavored" this week. Vince has got to be pissed.

I actually want to see if they continue the "Stand Up for WWE" campaign. If they don't, it will be obvious that it was all made just to help Linda.

Also...what if, for no other reason than to gain publicity for WWE, Linda is revealed to be the RAW GM?

Chavo Classic 11-02-2010 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DLVH84 (Post 3306239)
Hopefully, this will end the PG bullshit.

Yeah, like just overnight. :shifty:

The PG thing is here to stay. It wasn't all about Linda's campaign y'know.

CSL 11-02-2010 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juan (Post 3302897)
Hooray for failure


Aguakate 11-02-2010 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chavo Classic (Post 3306248)
Yeah, like just overnight. :shifty:

The PG thing is here to stay. It wasn't all about Linda's campaign y'know.

WWE has been PG since, what...2006? It has nothing to do with Linda running for Senate...for the MILLIONTH TIME.

Calamondin 11-02-2010 09:20 PM

Gonna be interesting to see Vince act like a crazy dick on the next raw.

Savio 11-02-2010 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chavo Classic (Post 3306248)
Yeah, like just overnight. :shifty:

The PG thing is here to stay. It wasn't all about Linda's campaign y'know.

It'll be funny if they start off next weeks Raw with HLA

Executioner 11-02-2010 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cool King (Post 3306231)
She had no chance in hell in winning anyway.






























What? :shifty:

:yes:

SlickyTrickyDamon 11-02-2010 09:27 PM

So, She's the GM now?

Gerard 11-02-2010 09:28 PM

Be nice to have $50 millions odds to piss away like that....

BizarroKing 11-02-2010 09:36 PM

Vince: SOMEBODY KISS MY ASS! GET COLE IN THE RING!

Savio 11-02-2010 09:39 PM

Vince: Triple H.....Linda lost.

HHH: Yeah I know.

Vince: ..............Do you still have the Katie Vick doll?

MoFo 11-02-2010 09:39 PM

Shes the XFL of politics.

nrt4 11-02-2010 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MoFo (Post 3306285)
Shes the XFL of politics.

Does that mean Vince is gonna auction her off soon?

Supreme Olajuwon 11-02-2010 09:44 PM

YAY! They can say ass on tv now! Everything is going to be ok you guys! Balls! Boobies!

ron the dial 11-02-2010 09:45 PM

AND THEY CAN BLEED AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!! yes

RatedGSuperstar 11-02-2010 09:46 PM

I'm sure $50 million was totally worth the ass-wiping schtick on Raw.

BizarroKing 11-02-2010 09:50 PM

Get PG-13 or get out! gotta fly! *jumps out the window*

DLVH84 11-02-2010 09:53 PM

THE GREATEST DAY!!!

SlickyTrickyDamon 11-02-2010 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DLVH84 (Post 3306302)
THE GREATEST DAY!!!

Not so much. The Dems will probably lose control of the HOP, but at least Christine O'Donnell and Linda lost.

Christine's concession speech was the highlight of my night. Good thing I was already three beers deep when it happened or I would have been yelling at the TV screaming "you lost", "shut the fuck up you crazy witch" and "don't tell the person who beat you what to do" and "it's the called the estate tax you c-word," I actually said the last thing to the TV, but I didn't say C-word. :shifty::lol:

RatedGSuperstar 11-02-2010 09:59 PM

If anything, the money lost on this campaign probably ensures WWE stays PG even longer to make it up.

Savio 11-02-2010 09:59 PM

I kinda wish Linda won

Juan 11-02-2010 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Supreme Olajuwon (Post 3306292)
YAY! They can say ass on tv now! Everything is going to be ok you guys! Balls! Boobies!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Weapon X (Post 3306293)
AND THEY CAN BLEED AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!! yes


BigCrippyZ 11-02-2010 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aguakate (Post 3306252)
WWE has been PG since, what...2006? It has nothing to do with Linda running for Senate...for the MILLIONTH TIME.

FOR THE MILLIONTH TIME...

Actually the PG format began in 2008.

Linda "officially" launched her campaign in 2009, which means she probably had been planning and fund raising for her campaign since at least 2007-08.

And for the record, as of 2010, 60% of the WWE's audience are men 17+, while only 40% of the WWE's audience consists of women and young children. The whole younger target demographic just doesn't hold water.

I'm not saying that Linda's campaign was the ONLY reason for the PG switch, but it likely was a major factor and influence, considering she was CEO for almost the whole first year of the PG era and the previous 11 years prior to resigning to run for senate.

Think critically and connect the dots folks.

Juan 11-02-2010 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCrippyZ (Post 3306321)
FOR THE MILLIONTH TIME...

Actually the PG format began in 2008.

Linda "officially" launched her campaign in 2009, which means she probably had been planning and fund raising for her campaign since at least 2007-08.

And for the record, as of 2010, 60% of the WWE's audience are men 17+, while only 40% of the WWE's audience consists of women and young children. The whole younger target demographic just doesn't hold water.

I'm not saying that Linda's campaign was the ONLY reason for the PG switch, but it likely was a major factor and influence, considering she was CEO for almost the whole first year of the PG era and the previous 11 years prior to resigning to run for senate.

Think critically and connect the dots folks.

lol

Aguakate 11-02-2010 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCrippyZ (Post 3306321)
FOR THE MILLIONTH TIME...

Actually the PG format began in 2008.

Linda "officially" launched her campaign in 2009, which means she probably had been planning and fund raising for her campaign since at least 2007-08.

And for the record, as of 2010, 60% of the WWE's audience are men 17+, while only 40% of the WWE's audience consists of women and young children. The whole younger target demographic just doesn't hold water.

I'm not saying that Linda's campaign was the ONLY reason for the PG switch, but it likely was a major factor and influence, considering she was CEO for almost the whole first year of the PG era and the previous 11 years prior to resigning to run for senate.

Think critically and connect the dots folks.

Connecting the dots, I come to the conclusion that you have been watching too much "Conspiracy Theories".

thedamndest 11-02-2010 10:16 PM

Don't mock the critical analysis of BigCrippyZ, Juan.

BigCrippyZ 11-02-2010 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aguakate (Post 3306325)
Connecting the dots, I come to the conclusion that you have been watching too much "Conspiracy Theories".

And I've come to the conclusion that you don't believe in factual arguments.

VSG 11-02-2010 10:21 PM

BigCrippyZ is Big Creepy Zeeboe *Conspiracy theory*

The Pope 11-02-2010 10:22 PM

Damn, I thought our country was going to change and have storylines in real life. :nono:

Ermaximus 11-02-2010 11:07 PM

BREAKING NEWS

WWE has come to terms with the release of Jimmy and Jey Uso, Vance Archer, The Great Khali, Bret Hart, Finlay, Jillian Hall, Ranjin Singh, Chris Masters, Val Venis, Jim Ross, Joey Styles, Ezekiel Jackson, Vladimir Kozlov, Curt Hawkins, Rosa Mendes, Nikki and Brie Bella, and Hornswoggle. The WWE would like to wish them all the best in their future endeavors.

...

loopydate 11-02-2010 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCrippyZ (Post 3306321)
FOR THE MILLIONTH TIME...

Actually the PG format began in 2008.

Linda "officially" launched her campaign in 2009, which means she probably had been planning and fund raising for her campaign since at least 2007-08.

And for the record, as of 2010, 60% of the WWE's audience are men 17+, while only 40% of the WWE's audience consists of women and young children. The whole younger target demographic just doesn't hold water.

I'm not saying that Linda's campaign was the ONLY reason for the PG switch, but it likely was a major factor and influence, considering she was CEO for almost the whole first year of the PG era and the previous 11 years prior to resigning to run for senate.

Think critically and connect the dots folks.

I'm thinking critically and connecting the dots and noticing that most of the people wearing the merch is that 40%. WWE doesn't make its money on ticket sales. They make their money on merch. The kids buy the merch, and mom buys the merch for the kids. As a company whose purpose is making money, they're going to market to the segment that's giving them the money. Hence, PG. The senate campaign definitely contributed, but I would say - at best - it is maybe 1/4 of the reason WWE is PG.

SlickyTrickyDamon 11-02-2010 11:09 PM

NOT HORNSWOGGLE :foc: :)

Ermaximus 11-02-2010 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loopydate (Post 3306395)
I'm thinking critically and connecting the dots and noticing that most of the people wearing the merch is that 40%. WWE doesn't make its money on ticket sales. They make their money on merch. The kids buy the merch, and mom buys the merch for the kids. As a company whose purpose is making money, they're going to market to the segment that's giving them the money. Hence, PG. The senate campaign definitely contributed, but I would say - at best - it is maybe 1/4 of the reason WWE is PG.

For what it's worth, I buy my share of The Miz, CM Punk, and Christian gear. I just wish Zack Ryder had some stuff to buy.

loopydate 11-02-2010 11:13 PM

I buy the DVDs and games and stuff, too. There's definitely a large market for the 18+ collectors.

But then look at all the kids in Rey Mysterio masks and Cena hats/t-shirts/wristbands, and you can definitely see who's paying the bills.

VSG 11-02-2010 11:18 PM

Former WWE CEO Linda McMahon was just joined by Vince McMahon, Stephanie McMahon, Shane McMahon, Triple H and Marissa McMahon as she officially conceded her Senate race for the State of Connecticut to Richard Blumenthal.

Linda described the experience as one of the “most unbelievable” years of her life. She smiled and thanked everyone for all their hard work on her campaign. She said: “no matter what, I consider this a victory.”

VSG 11-02-2010 11:19 PM

So Shane's wife is still with WWE (and a MILF at that). An image, albeit old:

http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__...px-Marissa.jpg

voncouch 11-02-2010 11:24 PM

...and there was much rejoicing.

Yaaaaaaaaaaay

James Steele 11-02-2010 11:34 PM

Why are you all rejoicing? All this means is Linda is going to turn heel again like in 2006...

VSG 11-02-2010 11:37 PM

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UCROcH7SMkQ?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UCROcH7SMkQ?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

A shame really that the women voted against her. Also, :heart: Steph.

Aguakate 11-02-2010 11:41 PM

You've got to hand it to Linda, she didn't just stand by on the sidelines critizicing the government, she actually took a step forward and tried to do something about it. So, she should be proud of herself. It took balls to do what she did. She could've stayed comfortably as CEO of WWE, not getting into a race that she knew would be tough, but she actually got into it and won a primary to become the party's nominee. So, it's definitely not an embarrassment or anything like that. It's not like she lied about being a veteran or something.

Razzamajazz 11-02-2010 11:42 PM

big fucking surprise.

Aguakate 11-02-2010 11:51 PM

Triple H cutting a promo at 1:04:


<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-EEEF7zcGBI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-EEEF7zcGBI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>


...also, the guy at 0:25 wants to vote for Linda because she believes in the Constitution.

jskinnyg 11-02-2010 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chavo Classic (Post 3306248)
Yeah, like just overnight. :shifty:

The PG thing is here to stay. It wasn't all about Linda's campaign y'know.

Unfortunately so...

Aguakate 11-02-2010 11:56 PM

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/buhQz7MfTGU?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/buhQz7MfTGU?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

thedamndest 11-03-2010 12:07 AM

Richard Blumenthal and Sheamus v. Linda McMahon and Triple H

thedamndest 11-03-2010 12:10 AM

Shane and Stephanie have put on a few.

SlickyTrickyDamon 11-03-2010 12:12 AM

Linda was the only concession speech that I have seen so far where the loser actually conceded.

Good speech for Mrs. McMahon.

VSG 11-03-2010 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thedamndest (Post 3306494)
Shane and Stephanie have put on a few.

Shane's in that video? Ok saw him now. Wow, almost didn't recognise him.

Aguakate 11-03-2010 12:21 AM

Shane obviously doesn't tag along with Triple H and Vince when they go to the gym.

BigCrippyZ 11-03-2010 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aguakate (Post 3306513)
Shane obviously doesn't tag along with Triple H and Vince when they go to the gym.

Well, at least we both agree on that man. I almost didn't recognize him.

Jeritron 11-03-2010 12:58 AM

I'm disappointed the old Wrestlemania theme wasn't Linda's campaign anthem

Jeritron 11-03-2010 12:59 AM

<object width="640" height="390"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aEV6tMo1yN0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aEV6tMo1yN0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></embed></object>

Jeritron 11-03-2010 01:00 AM

My hat's off to Linda, but in my opinion if you can't sell a stunner, you can't be a Senator.

Tom Guycott 11-03-2010 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by voncouch (Post 3306425)
...and there was much rejoicing.

Yaaaaaaaaaaay

And the midcarders ate the Usos, and there was much rejoicing.

Yaaaaaaaaaaay

SlickyTrickyDamon 11-03-2010 01:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeritron (Post 3306543)
My hat's off to Linda, but in my opinion if you can't sell a stunner, you can't be a Senator.

Senator Vince McMahon? :shifty:

Lock Jaw 11-03-2010 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VSG (Post 3306498)
Shane's in that video? Ok saw him now. Wow, almost didn't recognise him.

Still don't see him. Unless that dude who I'm seeing and thinking "That looks nothing like him" is actually him. Looks more like Dean Malenko or something.

Aguakate 11-03-2010 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lock Jaw (Post 3306562)
Still don't see him. Unless that dude who I'm seeing and thinking "That looks nothing like him" is actually him. Looks more like Dean Malenko or something.

He's right behind Linda during the whole video, dude.

Lock Jaw 11-03-2010 01:50 AM

Looks nothing like him though. Like, not just that he put on weight and has graying hair... his very face does not resemble Shane McMahon at all.

RGWhat316 11-03-2010 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aguakate (Post 3306466)
Triple H cutting a promo at 1:04:


<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-EEEF7zcGBI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-EEEF7zcGBI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>


...also, the guy at 0:25 wants to vote for Linda because she believes in the Constitution.

LOL@Steph using the "each and everyone of you" line.

KIRA 11-03-2010 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thedamndest (Post 3306494)
Shane and Stephanie have put on a few.

For Shane,a few hours in a gym couldn't hurt

For Stephine she looks ok for what I think is like three kids.

Shadrick 11-03-2010 02:02 AM

That's obviously Shane.

Aguakate 11-03-2010 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RGWhat316 (Post 3306580)
LOL@Steph using the "each and everyone of you" line.

And she tried to cry.

Lock Jaw 11-03-2010 02:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadrick (Post 3306582)
That's obviously Shane.

Obviously Dean Malenko. :shifty:

Jeritron 11-03-2010 02:18 AM

I think you're watching the wrong vid, Lock Jaw. Shane's in the first one behind Linda, not the second where Stephanie is holding the microphone

Aguakate 11-03-2010 02:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeritron (Post 3306592)
I think you're watching the wrong vid, Lock Jaw. Shane's in the first one behind Linda, not the second where Stephanie is holding the microphone

Hahaha just noticed that. And the guy DOES look like Malenko. And obviously looks nothing like Shane.

But yeah, it's the concession speech.

Lock Jaw 11-03-2010 02:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeritron (Post 3306592)
I think you're watching the wrong vid, Lock Jaw. Shane's in the first one behind Linda, not the second where Stephanie is holding the microphone

Well, now I feel silly.

Aguakate 11-03-2010 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lock Jaw (Post 3306606)
Well, now I feel silly.

LoL, I imagine the mental headache you must've been going through, trying to find some kind of a resemblance between that guy and Shane.

Thunder Savage Go 11-03-2010 03:21 AM

you have to stop getting your facts from WWE's DYK commercials

Cool King 11-03-2010 03:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aguakate (Post 3306466)
Triple H cutting a promo at 1:04:


<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-EEEF7zcGBI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-EEEF7zcGBI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>


...also, the guy at 0:25 wants to vote for Linda because she believes in the Constitution.

0:46 - "She came from a company that was down and out...."

I've never known the WWE to be down and out, ever. :wtf:

Aguakate 11-03-2010 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cool King (Post 3306617)
0:46 - "She came from a company that was down and out...."

I've never known the WWE to be down and out, ever. :wtf:

In the early 80's, maybe.

The Naitch 11-04-2010 05:01 PM

I knew she wouldn't win. People look down on these carnies and don't take them seriously. Seriously

Xero 11-04-2010 05:03 PM

Fucking hell Shane looks old.

Xero 11-04-2010 05:04 PM

Also, Linda should have left the stage to this:

<object style="height: 390px; width: 640px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/p964a3tq-JY?version=3"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/p964a3tq-JY?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></object>

Fox 11-06-2010 02:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCrippyZ (Post 3306321)

Actually the PG format began in 2008.

Linda "officially" launched her campaign in 2009, which means she probably had been planning and fund raising for her campaign since at least 2007-08.

And for the record, as of 2010, 60% of the WWE's audience are men 17+, while only 40% of the WWE's audience consists of women and young children. The whole younger target demographic just doesn't hold water.

I'm not saying that Linda's campaign was the ONLY reason for the PG switch, but it likely was a major factor and influence, considering she was CEO for almost the whole first year of the PG era and the previous 11 years prior to resigning to run for senate.

Think critically and connect the dots folks.

:y:

SOCCER LEGS 11-06-2010 03:37 AM

can't wait til they start using this as a plot device.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®