Explain how "money in the bank" is good for wrestling
 

...

LOL

Dude, WHAT?!

Here we go...

Is this guy for real?

Brother.

<font color=goldenrod>Hi Gertner.</font> :wave:

I have no idea whatsoever this guy is trying to talk about.

New new new new new world order...

Every two child did, I will.

VSG is the only one to ruminate a rational thought so far.

But what the heck do I know; when you're nWo, you're nWo for life brother.

Oh, you have a gimmick. That's adorable

The Money in the Bank winner should just be able to take the belt away from the current champion at any point they wish. The hook to this stipulation is that they have to defend it immediately against the former champion in a match and if they lose the title back they're not allowed another title shot for 1 year.

It's not really a gimmick. More like a slogan. And I should tell you, I didn't come up with it ;)
but thanks for answering my question, Juan!

thanks for your feedback. :y:

A wise man told me "don't argue with fools 'cause people from a distance can't tell who is who"

where's my banhammer at? I always lose the damn thing

Juan, this isn't a personal attack on you or anything. It will be ok! :)

Ok, well now I feel better

two indy shmucks didn't so bad

LoL Razza you're right.

I am this thread and chris benoit murdered his family.

Who the fuck are you to question anything Triple H does? You are a human dried piece of shit stuck to the hair on a dog's ass and your opinion doesn't fucking matter to anyone but your blowup doll and pet rock.

...

I think it was initially a great idea. It was like a mini Royal Rumble and it added an element of surprise when it first started which was during a time of long title reigns and a feeling of no surprises (this is 2005-2007 which was not too far removed from the Attitude Era which was full of surprises). But over time they started doing the same thing and now its become repetitive and lost its charm.

money in the sperm bank business.

I had a great response typed out but after re-reading the topic I can't be bothered playing along.

Sadly, I read these back to back posts in Booker T's voice. Also added "Cole" somewhere in there.

Explain how ending all your posts like this is good for anyone who has to read it.

Did you know Kevin Nash tore his quad while he was walking to the ring last night? :shifty:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-iVcb6gcpB1...orld-order.jpg
Apparently Pope Benedict is NWO 4-Life.

Good grief guys can we actually have a thread that discusses something anymore? I can barely bring myself to post here anymore because every time I read a thread it's filled with moronic, trollish replies. What the heck happened to this place? And another thing, I'm sick to death of the IWC swinging from the indy guys' nutsacks. Here's reality...THEY AREN'T THAT GOOD!!! Both of your current champions in WWE look as though they can be broken in half by a decent size high school football player for gawd sakes.

To answer the OP's question, I don't think it makes a whole lot of sense either except for the fact that the champ just went through a match right then and may not have the strength to defend again. However, there should be a rematch clause absolutely.

Is a rematch clause like a Santa Clause?

http://dustysdemotivationals.yolasit...motiv_nash.jpg

I think this thread became a joke the moment the tread was started...
Because when you're nWo, you're nWo for life brother.

http://www.kaboommagazine.com/userfi...hty_Thor_6.jpg

Blind leading the blind.

Then fucking leave you self-righteous mutant twat.

You know TPWW is going downhill when Steveviscious89, who has posted here a whole
326 times, can barely bring himself to post here anymore. We should all be ashamed of
ourselves.

Just how stevilicious is this Guy?

All I know about him is that he can barely bring himself to post here anymore because every time he reads a thread it's filled with moronic, trollish replies.

Oh, and in case anyone cares, he's sick to death of the IWC swinging from the indy guys' nutsacks.

Fuckin' muties

Chris Harvard made my day. I was just going to drink my sorrows away, but this thread was enough to make me lose enough brain cells for one day. Thanks!

And WCW is dead. Deal with it.

FYI, Your 96 date for that match is horribly off. By several years.

Clash 16 was in 1991.

Marcus Bagwell and Too COld beat Roma and Wonderful in 1994. At Clash 26.

See, we can have "serious" posts here.

That said, OP is either a fucking sock or Mutie, either way he should be dispatched with extreme prejudice.

Burn him at the stake.

Poe's law. It applies to wrestling freaks, too.

BTW Too Cold Scorpio Paul Roma weren't employed by WCW in 1996. Roma was fired in 1995 for not putting over Alex Wright and Scorpio was released in 1994.

So you must be a fan of Marcus Bagwell because of:

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/TyCwJ10QrHA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

THE AMERICAN MALES!

\O/ /O\ \O/ /O\ \O/ /O\

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7KoCdmA3sGM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

We gonna step!

I remember watching Stone Cold fight Vince McMahon when I was young back in 1985.

So how many posts does it take for my whole rant to actually mean something? I've been reading stuff here a heck of a lot more than I've posted over the years. I don't know if the majority of posters here are just young and stupid or old and...stupid. Either way, there's no other way to describe it except to say that it is pathetic. You're not contributing to anything except the continuing idea that people who watch wrestling are retarded, which we all know isn't true. But if you came to this forum, it would be hard to make an argument against it. Maybe you could all quit being dickheads and actually make yourselves sound intelligent for once. As for me, I suppose I don't need to post here anymore. Sorry to anyone here who actually does provide real contributions.

Wrestling is serious fucking business.

that is too true. It is very very very very serious. But its not art. The only thing though, its RASSLIN' bro. RASSLIN!

I miss the days when the RASSLIN was about the RASSLIN

Rasslin was so cool, everyone had a dumb gimmick and the Shockmaster was the most electrifying rassler ever not the Rock. But now there are so many fartknockers who are WWE fans, with all the twitter crap and all that garbage. Give me cheatum the midget any day over Hornswoggle. Thats rasslin!

Jesus titties, calm down.

TPWW is about half serious wrestling discussion, and half screwing around.

Part of that means ripping into new guys who are clearly trying too hard, like our friend Mr. Harvard over there.

You should also keep in mind that it is all in good fun. You make too much of a fuss over it, like you seem to be doing, and you'll just paint a target on yourself.

Mr. of fun is right you know. Sometimes not taking things seriously is serious business

Serious talk is for Lara Emily and the Discussion forum! Sometimes I stumble in there by mistake when I'm trying to go to Casual....confuses the shit out of me until I realize where I am.

his real name is Larry Emilio

How people don't know Frankenstein's name is amazing to me.

he choppy choppy, his pee pee!!

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/HESwCwUhO1E" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

that's pretty much how larry's surgery went down!

It's not that I didn't know the correct name, but in the serious business that is pro rasslin, we call each other by our rasslin screen names! Plus, Larry is a horrible name reserved for child molesters..

Aside from getting the WCW references wr

Aside from getting the WCW references wrong (Hogan pushed Wight off the building brooooo), he's not THAT wrong.

Were you stuttering Supreme?

Supreme seems to be malfunctioning.

Except he never really bothered to go into detail as to why it's bad either.

Saying it's unacceptable, as if it were a real sport or something.

Surprised nobody made a concussion joke yet with the guy's screename being Chris Harvard.

I think you mean artistic combat.

Orrrr....

Lara Emily...Autistic combat.


Never thought I'd see "Captain of Fun" being the one to break the fourth wall.

Because nobody remembers who Chris Nowinski even was.

That's true. You're so smart.

that probably came off as condescending but it wasn't

Maybe you should have used [not condescending] tags.

Or just #notcondescending.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/wV-i-H-Vbew" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

http://www.allwwewrestlers.com/Lance_Storm.jpg
DAMN RIGHT.

Great joke Providence Pete.

It lets u make a credible title win without doing any work to build up a guy to world title status

money in the bank is fun. it's a swerve and a pop at the same time. these are things i enjoy.

this is the same thing it is now. you just want to call the other guy the champion before the match. and the one year thing is unnecessary. did i miss a joke or something?

Without doing any work? They had to book him in the ladder match and have him win it. That's work for Daniel Bryan and the faith WWE showed in him. Smackdown only gets one briefcase. Now both briefcases have been cashed in there is no "what if he cashes in" moments until next July.

They have been building Daniel Bryan around the World title before this anyways. He competed for the World Heavyweight Championship on Smackdown two weeks ago.

Yeah, saying it's lazy on creative's part isn't really accurate, because it's not like winning MITB makes that person a main eventer.

Jack Swagger, anybody?

They still have to build the person up to the win, as well as afterwords. Something they didn't do with the Swag, and that's why a lot of people forget he was ever champ.

Kind of makes a persuasive argument that it is lazy, since creative thought they could do that (and did that) without anything.

Saying it's not lazy because if they do other stuff it can work is kind of ridiculous.

Yeah but they knew they had TWO more Money In the Bank's that year already set up. So they thought they'd take a bit of a risk on it. Hell they didn't even plan on having Money in the Bank at WrestleMania that year until a few weeks before.

You're trying to backdoor justify things. I will not stand for these backdoor shenanigans.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/MFZG8KQJni8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

this is to the mark who started this thread, how the hell can you call your self a fan, at first yes show couldnt wrestle, e.b. saw a hugh man to throw at hogan to get buyrates but his dedication to learn the art of the big man is only matches by "in my opinion" Andre, Bam Bam Bigalow, and honestly kevin nash. Mark Henry as well i can say has erned his one title reign in a decade and a half. i think u sir are a high spot monkey that watches sports entertainment instead of pro wrestling.

To answer the MITB ?, it serves as a built in swerve because in most cases u are somewhat suprised at the time they are cashed in. again my opinion.

Yes, Kane I was trying to use logic to explain things. I see where I went wrong now. :shifty:

Yeah, but do you remember the birth of Hulkamania when Hulk Hogan beat The Iron Sheik for the WWF Championship at Madison Square Garden in 1996?

u heard me lol

But you were typing gibberish and I have no idea what you wrote.

Money in the bank is gay as fuck now. It makes the champ even LESS credible than not winning the title at all

It's better to never be WWE or World Champion than to win it with MITB

That's right, show him his post was retarded by making an even more retarded one!

Using logic that completely undercuts the whole reason it was up for discussion in the first place, really. Kinda a Pyrrhic victory, really.

You're also using more assumption than actual logic. There's using logic to come to a conclusion, and there's distorting it to justify why it's okay that your husband beats you.

I wasn't born yet. :'(

Well, yes. We heard some petulant child screaming at the internet via flailing his hands at the keyboard. Words even came out. Sometimes.

The level of posters on this site has never been worse.

It's been going downhill since the internet got popular.

Does that mean a stoner's mentality is now higher than the new generation of posters?

By and large, yes. Nothing wrong with that though V.

I'm not going to lie, I mark out like a bitch when a MITB winner cashes in and wins either of the two World Titles.

Some more than others (Alberto Del Rio, Miz), but still.

http://me.khpop.com/sites/default/fi...ggonewrong.jpg

Explain how this is good for wrestling.

Well, a red "x" is NEVER good or wrestling...or anything else.

:y:

I know you TPWW guys have earned your stripes here on the forums; here on the internet.



Steve Viscious has less than 500 posts, how dare that asshole post here at TPWW.




The QUALITY OF POSTING HAS GONE WAY DOWN OVER THE YEARS. JUST LOOK IN THIS THREAD, IF ONLY STEVE COULD POST LIKE THESE OTHER GUYS. :p




But he's absolutely correct in stating this whole place is full of trolls that can't have an intelligent conversation. Rip me for saying I'm nWo for life, they didn't even have that big of impact on wrestling-- DX..... HHH revolutionized wrestling, not the nWo :lol:


but it's all fun! Wrestling is fun. I'm cool with the Christopher Nowinski jokes, too. It's all in good fun, but I'd like to get a few superior responses compared to the worthless trolls, here. I don't know what some of your guy's problem is. I asked a question: explain how money in the bank is good for wrestling? and most of you had some really lame fukking comments such as, "WCW is dead, get over it", "Burn him at the stake', and "Wrestling is serious business". God, you guys are assholes!




My business here was to discuss how PIN THE CHAMPION AFTER the match is good for wrestling. :roll:


Thanks for the few quality answers I got from some of you guys :y:

Can you explain how it's bad for wrestling?

And to let us know that when you're nWo, you're nWo for life, brother. :nono:
Now, explain how you doing THIS is good for wrestling.