Star Trek: Into Darkness
 

http://l.yimg.com/os/251/2012/12/03/...jpg_155636.jpg


BAM

I am more excited for this movie than anything coming up in 2013.


Anyone else see Dark Knight movie poster in this?

Just about every commentary so far has.

Well this is my first time seeing the poster. Didn't think I'd be alone in that.

It's pretty damn obvious.

Captain Kirk Rises



Anyways.... I am glad this is finally coming. Seems like it has been way too long.

The similarities are pretty generic, really.

Either way it's still a pretty epic poster. I'd love to see what other movies new or old would look like with this style of poster. Could be some pretty great/funny/epic ones.

I'm getting off topic.

I'm excited for this movie.

Is there anything anywhere mentioning the plot/story outline?

The title is actually "Star Trek Into Darkness", with no subtitle.

Star Trek Faggots

I grew up watching The Next Generation but I was simply a casual fan. The movie released in 2009 really peaked my interest and now I am watching everything that Netflix has to offer. I am slowly becoming a Trekkie. Not so much the faggot part unless that is Klingon for super awesome guy. :cool:

Nobody cares.

Well, you will become a faggot.

It's part of the conversion process.

I can take or leave most of Star Trek, but I kind of grew up on the movies, so they have a certain level of sentimental value to me.

I said in some other thread that I can't find a long time ago about who I would want to write/direct a new Star Wars trilogy. This was before the announcement obviously. I figured this would take place 15-20 years from now. I would have liked Abrams to direct, Lindelof, Orci, and Kurtzman to have a hand in the writing, and Michael Giachinno to replace the probably dead John Williams.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_into_Darkness
... and they both have the word "Star" in the title.

... and they're both about space.

Eh, close enough.

HOW DARE YOU START THIS THREAD

<iframe width="1280" height="720" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/diP-o_JxysA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

BAM SUCK IT BOOM FUCK

Gary Mitchell? Khan? Trelane? Garth of Izar? I think it's Garth Of Izar.

Gary Mitchell, with the Starfleet uniform and all. Also, FUCK SHIT LORDY GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So is it Khan? Sounds like Khan.

Benedict Cumberbatch = awesomeness

Why? Khan is Indian not British. Garth of Izar.

http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Garth_of_Izar

Makes the most sense. Former Starfleet Fleet Commander who goes nuts and now wants revenge on the system who kicked him out. He fits the tone of the poster which echoed the Batman posters. A fallen hero like Harvey Dent. Garth trying to destroy what he helped built: Starfleet and the Federation.

Gary Mitchell was already dealt with in the canon-tie in comic book to the first movie.

<iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/BrHlQUXFzfw?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Slightly more footage in the Japanese trailer.

This looks really awesome.

I hope this series goes for longer than a trilogy. The Star Trek universe is so rich, there's almost limitless stories to tell.

Then again, a long running film series with the same cast just doesn't happen anymore.

I'd say it looks sick but I really hope it's not Khan and where's The Batman?

Benedict is Batman.

Note the way he took down Klingons, despite their superiority.

Only Batman could do that.

Batman would have beat the Kobiyashi Maru scenario without cheating.

After watching this a few times I couldn't help but notice there's no Checkov yet everyone else is featured including Alicia Eve who's likely to be going by her uniform is Nurse Christine Chapel hmmmm.

Then again it could be Elizabeth Dehner which supports that Benedict Cumerbatch is playing Gary Mitchell but then again the Japanese Trailer has a scene that parallels a bit Wrath of Khan too fascinating.

There are breakdowns on the web, and I'm surprised none of them I've seen have suggested she was Nurse Chapel. Seemed like a fit.

Batman would have beaten Locutus with ant-Borg Bat-repellent.

Even if Cumberbatch isn't Khan, that scene with Kirk and Spock putting their hands on the glass is very clearly a callback to Spock's death scene from Wrath of Khan. So it looks like they're at the very least doing some kind of parallel to it.

I really wish I could sound like Benedict Cumberbatch.

movie #2, Spock dies.

SPOILERS...
http://37prime.com/news/wp-content/u...01-480x360.jpg
GAAAWW!;)

Hopefully, for the 3rd and 4th one, whoever plays Spock on the new film series, stars and directs, just like Nimoy.

Or it's a swerve.

I mean, I agree that it looks very much like there will be parallels. I'm just saying that people have predicted Khan to be in this movie since before the first one came out, so maybe they're toying with us on the parallels.

Or maybe it is Khan.

Just saying.

...Could be a new villain altogether, or perhaps a mix of two iconic villains. This is an alternate timeline after all.

Good point.

Personally I am rooting for someone new. Screw "paying homage" with a "new twist" on an "old villain".

Screw "originality."

It was revealed several months ago by the writers that it would be one of five classic villians that had already been used in TOS and I recall one of them was Gary Mitchell. The only thing is that he was apparently used in the IDW comic which links the 2 films and dies but not sure under what cicumstances though. That would be a good enough reason for him wanting revenge and as for that final clip it appears to be the reverse angle meaning Spock is on the outside looking in.

My favorite comment that I saw online...

"When the Enterprise is ashes... you have my permission to set phasers to kill."

I'm just hoping that the "bad guy" does not turn out to be Khan. I hope that there is absolutely nothing to do with Khan in this film. The writers and Abrams had a reletively clean slate and could have done anything they wanted for this 2nd film. It would be such a shame to "reboot" or "reimagine" Star Trek II.

From seeing this teaser trailer, I'm happy to believe that this film has nothing to do with Khan, despite some comments online of people still believing that due to dialog in the trailer that this looks like Khan.

The most fundamental piece of evidence, Cumberbatch doesn't seem like he would be an east indian dude named Khan.

I don't know. Sulu's Asian in this one.

Also keep in mind that orignally Benicio Del To Ro was originally cast to play the role but ended turning down for some reason probly due to it conflicting with another project he was in.

They had someone new in the last one. They have already said it was a call-back character from TOS.

Him wearing a starfleet uniform could narrow it down to Garth of Izar, Gary Mitchell (Alice Eve could be Denhar, but could be just a red herring and she's Chapel), or maybe Finnegan Kirk's old nemesis/bully from the Academy days, or Finn from Court Martial episode.

I won't consider the final scene from that Japan trailer until it is seen on American screens. Probably means they cut it from the film and they screwed up.

Totally came into this thread wandering what Tb1 would think of the trailer.

exactly
but some things are inevitable
like Spock's destiny to die.

...type thing...

Or, apparently, Kirk and Spock becoming friends.

So the villain's name is supposedly John Harrison but it's likely just a code name and Alica Eve has been revealed to be playing Carol Marcus might have to go see that nine minute preview so I can get my fix till May.

John Harrison? Why, that's the name of the Tribble Commander!

Alice Eve playing Carol Marcus doesn't make sense. Kirk would have to be gay to let Alice Eve get away.

BOOM POW

<iframe width="1280" height="720" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/mdgRx94W5ko" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Not really more informative than the prior teaser.

Not a whole lot it just makes us ask more questions and that is very much typical of Abrams and Lindelof they clearly like to mess with the fanboys.

The preview before the Hobbit was better than the whole of that film.

Sexy sex sex Star Trek:

<object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1x-ATlpqo1M?version=3&amp;hl=en_GB"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1x-ATlpqo1M?version=3&amp;hl=en_GB" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="360" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>

Damn good bloody good damn good job.

Punch it Chewie! :shifty:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/yWWr2wE5Myg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

that wasn't a good trailer imo

Get with the times, old man!

Not enough Cumberbatch.

Hero is gay for Cumberbatch, but then again, who isn't?

Women. They tend to be straight for Cumberbatch.

Damn this is looking more and more epic.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/yhz4A5BCMAA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

going to wet myself

Daaaaaaaaamn

Yeah, the only thing that's throwing me off is the lack of space. Like, where is it. Where is space

While I don't dislike the trailers, I have a feeling the crash and rise of the Enterprise from the water were placed in the trailers so audiences would know when to clap like fucking seals.

Besides, a sea liftoff here still looks less terrible than Voyager landing.

that was a much better trailer

If you quickly pause it at 1:53 as the ship is about to fall into the atmosphere you can easily the registry is NCC-1701 what a pity. :(

As Xcaliber pointed out, it's definitely the Enterprise that crashes. At least, it's what's shot down. I don't know about the nacelles being smaller either. They look the right size to me, though I don't have any precise nacelle-measuring technique.

I did presume the water liftoff was from the same circumstances because of the bitching that everything happens on Earth and there's no space or whatever. If that's not the case, that's not the case. But the Enterprise does appear to be going down at some point in this movie.

Sweetie, we weren't talking about you:

I've seen similar comments elsewhere, for the record.

Um?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/dWBmaKk32fE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

alright, here's me unnecessarily dissecting a scene from a movie that hasn't come out yet

OK

"new" enterprise

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y20...niverse_HD.jpg

notice how close, and large, the necelles on the new Enterprise are in comparison to the smaller, and further apart nacelles of the one on the left. Now, I'm not denying that's a shot of the Enterprise falling to Earth, it certainly is. Just judging from the few shots I've seen, it doesn't look like the Enterprise. See nacelles:

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y23...ps830cf288.png

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y23...ps45340108.png

in comparison to

http://trekazoid.files.wordpress.com...rise_new_b.jpg

check out those tiny nacelles that are years apart in comparison to those big, close honkers of the Enterprise.

IN MY OPINION BOYS, not the Enterprise

Fu Mallards

:heart:

For the new page

Remember when the monster from Cloverfield took the head off the statue of liberty and people laughed because it was like, four feet tall?

Look, the Enterprise already looks quite different depending on the viewing angle. You can argue that the Enterprise isn't the one crashing, and there's no way to defintively prove you wrong, but I am curious as to what end this would serve, considering the shots of a damaged Enterprise going down and ejecting escape pods.

Incidentally, a quick google search indicates people believe the ship rising is not the Enterprise for similar reasons, though you say yourself it is, from another point in the movie. There could be any number of reasons for inconsistencies, from placeholder graphics to design failure.

I mean, from the appearance of the crash frames, that ship looks kind of transparent.

TIS A GHOST SHIP LADS, TIS MY OPINION.

Now i'd say there's reasonable doubt that it may not be Enterprise as the warp nacelles appear less bulky although that could be due to atmospheric burn off. Upon closer review I noticed that even the pitch of the arms that support them appear further apart plus the deflector portion seems to be almost compressed. Going by the footage it's hard to determine if Harrison is controlling another Starship could he possible have stolen an older model somehow? He certainly seemed to have a lot of followers so it wouldn't be a stretch by any means and given his occupation it's possible he already had special access. If the segments are completely unrelated then I would go as far to say that first part we see is from Kirk having a nightmare cuz afterall we all know it's his ship and crew.

the ship crashing is most definitely the Enterprise.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/U_IWKaoN6hg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Based on what JimmyMess

It's clearly a red herring. Showing the Enterprise is a crippled state and then showing another ship crashing. There's no evidence to suggest its "Khan/Gary Mitchell/Ben Finney/Finnegan's" ship or the Enterprise. Although it's probably the bad guy's ship.

The ship is on fire and falling into the atmosphere before the shot of the ship crashing into the ocean in that trailer.

It could be a red herring as STD said... but I highly doubt it.... they blow up Enterprise ships all the time haha.

Will pay everyone in this thread $20 if it's the Enterprise

Cool.

There was a new sneak peak yesterday.

http://scifanatic.wpengine.netdna-cd...-mtvclip-1.jpg

http://scifanatic.wpengine.netdna-cd...-mtvclip-3.jpg

http://trekmovie.com/2013/04/15/mtv-...ther-starship/

Just posting to potentially earn $20 from Mr Croatia

Looks like I'm keeping my buckaroonis if those .jpgs are any indication

THE NACELLES BOYS, THE NACELLES

Final domestic trailer.

<iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/2nRI4fftGB4?list=FLmepNnYN40Yf7Cxnh5cX_Ag" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Looking darn tasty. I think it is the only film I am looking forward to this year, except maybe the Great Gatsby. But other than that, nothing else is interesting me.

JJJJJOOOOOHHHHHNNNNN!

♥