TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   RAW 4.24 - CM Punk removed by security/Vince tears up screw remotely (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=139615)

slik 04-24-2023 07:27 PM

RAW 4.24 - CM Punk removed by security/Vince tears up screw remotely
 
So eventful news day in general...adding to that

CM Punk was backstage at RAW, was asked to leave by security
Vince tore up the RAW script via remote from his home

slik 04-24-2023 07:35 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">CM Punk did, in fact, show up backstage at Raw, and was eventually asked to leave by security.</p>&mdash; Bryan Alvarez (@bryanalvarez) <a href="https://twitter.com/bryanalvarez/status/1650631484037005312?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 24, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">CM Punk showed up at Raw. What is going on? <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/wweraw?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#wweraw</a> <a href="https://t.co/VN5HAPUU10">pic.twitter.com/VN5HAPUU10</a></p>&mdash; Wrestling News (@WrestlingNewsCo) <a href="https://twitter.com/WrestlingNewsCo/status/1650632075123277826?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 24, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

GD 04-24-2023 07:46 PM

<iframe width="806" height="453" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/31EAOmQK1ts" title="The CM Punk Gratuitous Ass Shot Video" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>

slik 04-24-2023 08:04 PM

Smilin' Cody Rhodes kicking off RAW

slik 04-24-2023 08:14 PM

lol Block Lesnar

xrodmuc316 04-24-2023 08:16 PM

Man Tiny Khan is melting down hearing Punk was at Raw :rofl:

xrodmuc316 04-24-2023 08:23 PM

LWO having "Viva La Raza" at the start of their entrance music just triggered Chavo.

Fignuts 04-24-2023 08:35 PM

Just use the WCW theme for fuck's sake

Fignuts 04-24-2023 08:36 PM

Or at least remake it

GD 04-24-2023 08:40 PM

https://i.imgur.com/RhdXdOb.gif

Triple A 04-24-2023 08:48 PM

Oh thought the draft was tonight

slik 04-24-2023 08:55 PM

it start friday @ triple A but triple H has a HUGE announcement coming up next on wwe monday night raw

Sepholio 04-24-2023 09:00 PM

oh shit is he gonna take a title off roman :o

Sepholio 04-24-2023 09:03 PM

YES BIG GOLDDDDDDD

Fenix122 04-24-2023 09:03 PM

Oh shit...new belt

Sepholio 04-24-2023 09:03 PM

unifying romans titles and bringing back the WHC, noice.

Sepholio 04-24-2023 09:04 PM

now thats a title belt

slik 04-24-2023 09:05 PM

World's heavyweight champion

xrodmuc316 04-24-2023 09:06 PM

They are trolling Tiny Khan hard, huge groundbreaking announcement, new game charger title. I love it

xrodmuc316 04-24-2023 09:07 PM

Ok that was funny, Cathy ignoring Finn, Finn asking if he is invisible without looking at Cathy. IYKYK

slik 04-24-2023 09:16 PM

new belt will feel like a consolation prize since wwe refused to have anyone cut a promo about how they only lost due to bloodline interference and instead everyone comes out and cuts a 'roman was the better man' promo

Supreme Olajuwon 04-24-2023 09:42 PM

Bobby Lashley just asked Austin Theory if he knew who asked for a triple threat match and his response was not “It was me Austin!” and I don’t know why we even have writers.

slik 04-24-2023 09:42 PM

WWE, of course, already is selling the new title



https://shop.wwe.com/en/wwe-world-ch...-98-3429328932

Sting Fan 04-24-2023 09:44 PM

Jesus the new belts ugly. Side note… do the two brands now have three world title belts?

slik 04-24-2023 09:48 PM

based on draft rumors, they will need to build up heels for the brand that belt will be staying on

Evil Vito 04-24-2023 09:48 PM

So they just invented a title for Cody instead of giving him the real thing?

Fucking lol

Evil Vito 04-24-2023 09:50 PM

This means multiple “World champions” again too

When given the choice between having anything mean anything and not doing that, WWE has again gone for option two.

xrodmuc316 04-24-2023 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slik (Post 5611410)
WWE, of course, already is selling the new title



https://shop.wwe.com/en/wwe-world-ch...-98-3429328932

Thats not even what the title looks like on TV lol

https://images.footballfanatics.com/...pg?_hv=2&w=900


slik 04-24-2023 10:24 PM

seth rollins cutting a promo about 'this industry' and 'this business'

Sepholio 04-24-2023 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evil Vito (Post 5611414)
This means multiple “World champions” again too

When given the choice between having anything mean anything and not doing that, WWE has again gone for option two.

Don't worry. You'll get to cheer soon when TK adds another 4 titles because of Collision.

xrodmuc316 04-24-2023 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sepholio (Post 5611425)
Don't worry. You'll get to cheer soon when TK adds another 4 titles because of Collision.

:rofl::rofl:

4 different shows with GAME CHANGING announcements!

Sepholio 04-24-2023 10:57 PM

bad bunny

Sepholio 04-24-2023 10:58 PM

dont get me wrong, I enjoyed bad bunnies previous matches, but why are we pretending he's some kind of badass now?

Lock Jaw 04-24-2023 11:13 PM

Wait, so this new belt is not just replacing Reigns' two belts? Sucks big time that they are splitting up the belts again..... and not even doing it by splitting up the actual belts but by just introducing a new one....

If they were just gonna dilute the importance of the championship right away they might as well have just let Cody win at WM. Really craps all over Roman Reigns and his historic reign and the eventual story that dethrones him.

GD 04-24-2023 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xrodmuc316 (Post 5611415)
Thats not even what the title looks like on TV lol

https://images.footballfanatics.com/...pg?_hv=2&w=900


Probably because that's a render and not the actual belt.

weather vane 04-24-2023 11:20 PM

lol WWE

Mr. Nerfect 04-24-2023 11:26 PM

This is a real LolAEW move from WWE. It would have been tricky splitting the belts, but yuck at them just making a new one.

Mr. Nerfect 04-24-2023 11:30 PM

I just saw the Triple H promo. Why is he angry at Roman Reigns? He was just repping him a few weeks ago.

Trips kept saying “World Heavyweight Champion,” but the belt says “World Champion.”

This is like when the AEW All-Atlantic Title had the flag of Japan and shit on it.

Mr. Nerfect 04-24-2023 11:31 PM

I guess we know what the Money in the Bank Winner is going to do too.

Mr. Nerfect 04-24-2023 11:33 PM

Actually could be a good story if LA Knight or someone wins MITB and aligns with The Bloodline. They help him cash in on whoever is the World Champ to get the briefcase out of play and that causes friction between the World Title scene and the Universal Title scene. But I doubt they have that much planned.

Mr. Nerfect 04-24-2023 11:34 PM

CM Punk always the biggest story in wrestling.

Tom Guycott 04-24-2023 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slik (Post 5611374)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">CM Punk did, in fact, show up backstage at Raw, and was eventually asked to leave by security.</p>&mdash; Bryan Alvarez (@bryanalvarez) <a href="https://twitter.com/bryanalvarez/status/1650631484037005312?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 24, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">CM Punk showed up at Raw. What is going on? <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/wweraw?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#wweraw</a> <a href="https://t.co/VN5HAPUU10">pic.twitter.com/VN5HAPUU10</a></p>&mdash; Wrestling News (@WrestlingNewsCo) <a href="https://twitter.com/WrestlingNewsCo/status/1650632075123277826?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 24, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

It's one watermark away from being a resurrection of GTV. Honestly, this looks kinda creepy. Almost like somebody was filming the chick without her knowledge, and then CM Punk just showed up, so that became the story which provided the perfect alibi for the potential stalking.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evil Vito (Post 5611414)
This means multiple “World champions” again too

When given the choice between having anything mean anything and not doing that, WWE has again gone for option two.

I understand that "armchair booking" always seems better in your head, but I personally feel like my idea of having a triple threat with Roman, Sami, and Cody where then end up in a perdicament where both Sami and Cody pinned Roman at the same time in a heap would have solved this months ago. You have two guys who beat Roman when they were both white hot, then have "deliberation" and then use whatever current version of Jack Tunney they want to use (Pierce, Hunter, Regal... wait, he can't appear on TV for awhile, not him) to give the obvious decision to resplit the unified titles just in time for the draft that they'll eventually start ignoring again after Survivor Series.

To the larger issue of the brand split and multiple champions, though: I've always been of the mind that if WWE is going to do this, they need to do it. What I mean is, I know that I'm in the minority who actually likes what this is supposed to be doing on paper, it'll only work if WWE stays consistent with it... and they never do.

It was supposed to be helping more guys get over, but constantly devolves into "top half of the card guys on both shows" until they decide to "shake things up" by temporarily making people "exclusive". It's a variation of the Smackdown Six era problem where the supposed flagship show RAW got boring and predictable and Heyman was making guys over on Smackdown... just for RAW to answer by plucking the over talent instead of trying harder or doing something different.

So, if you're going to put both belts on one guy, combine them. If you insist on having two champions, quit going back to unification matches with no idea how to get out if it again.

Hell, it could be as simple as making a rule that one guy can't hold the championship for both shows. Boom, done. Eliminates the unifications, and if they insist on having one guy win both belts for a "moment", he has to relinquish the other like the result of Hogan/Warrior, but with two world titles.

Lock Jaw 04-25-2023 01:23 AM

They should just have Roman win this new title.

xrodmuc316 04-25-2023 02:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lock Jaw (Post 5611450)
They should just have Roman win this new title.

LOL that would be amazing.

Rammsteinmad 04-25-2023 04:08 AM

KInda feels like having a new world title takes away a little from the huge moment that would be Reigns' eventual dethroning.

Mr. Nerfect 04-25-2023 05:08 AM

I kind of get it. There is a story there where there is no Undisputed Champ. It kind of makes Reigns’ dethroning seem *more* important in a backwards kind of way. Like there’s not so much pressure on it. It’s now part of this system that seems to be producing stars people are relevatively interested in without the belt. I feel like a Jey Uso or a Gunther or Bron Breakker could do it now.

It isn’t classic wrestling. It feels like they’re lowering themselves to that in some ways. I get the rejection of the idea. But it does feel kind of…liberating in this modern wrestling way. I dunno. They feel more “in control” of their bullshit than they often do. And as I said earlier—this can kind of be used for stories when it comes to having guys crossover to go for the other belt and eventually unify them.

It probably ties into their global expansion plans too. The new “TV” deals could see expansion to streaming and the like that could justify, hypothetically, having bigger and more unique sandboxes.

I’m curious but overall disempassioned by the idea. But it’s certainly a new “flow” to whatever it is they’re doing.

Mr. Nerfect 04-25-2023 05:15 AM

The nerd in me is curious about whether this is a new title history or an old one, but then I realize that it doesn’t really matter. A new history might encourage me to think that they might go with an unexpected champion from a different cultural background for PR reasons. Like a Bobby Lashley or a Rey Mysterio to tout that.

It seems like it could be all about ticking up guys career accolades. I think the US and IC Titles could be used for that, but there is the modern realization that audiences just don’t care about those belts in the same way and you’re kicking water uphill trying to make them. They’re kind of albatrosses. Not that I think they should bail on Gunther getting the record.

My general prediction would be Cody gets it, LA Knight gets it from him, Cody goes to the other show via Royal Rumble and we get something like Roman/Cody and LA/Sami at Mania. I could also see them getting Sami into Saudi and having him win it in a “big” moment. But I’m not unconvinced it won’t be used as a belt to show off people of color or whatever.

I hope it comes from inspiration and their acknowledgment to see potential stars that they just can’t jam through the “Roman door” at the same time…but we’ll see.

Mr. Nerfect 04-25-2023 05:19 AM

The silly way Triple H turned on Roman made me think there is story in mind. But maybe it’s a forced hand or just Trips trying to imbue the new belt with cred that otherwise doesn’t make sense.

Something about the way he said it could be defended anywhere in the world sounded weird. Almost like they’d worked out international deals or something.

I’ll mark out if Nakamura gets it.

Mr. Nerfect 04-25-2023 05:23 AM

Oh, I can also see Edge winning it. He then drops it to Cena in his retirement later this year for Cena’s 17th.

screech 04-25-2023 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rammsteinmad (Post 5611454)
KInda feels like having a new world title takes away a little from the huge moment that would be Reigns' eventual dethroning.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lock Jaw (Post 5611450)
They should just have Roman win this new title.

Looks like we've solved that problem!

But for real: I think the new title looks really good, but I do not love that we will be back to two champions. Especially since the current champion has had a run like we haven't seen.

#1-norm-fan 04-25-2023 09:32 PM

Lol They seriously unified Reigns’ titles just to create another new world title? Holy shit, that is dumb.

#1-norm-fan 04-25-2023 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rammsteinmad (Post 5611454)
KInda feels like having a new world title takes away a little from the huge moment that would be Reigns' eventual dethroning.

It completely shits on him holding both titles this whole time and being the “final boss” for anyone who wants to call themselves champion. And it retroactively shits on the importance of every challenger. Now suddenly Cody, Sami and these guys who fell short and were devastated by it? No big deal. Just go win the other one.

Cody will probably win it and they’ll expect people to be gullible enough to buy it as his big “finish the story” moment as if it’s not just a consolation prize because they didn’t wanna go so far as to give him the REAL title.

XL 04-26-2023 04:05 AM

The belt itself looks to be the child of Big Goldie and the Cruiserweight Championship and has been designed on WWE 2K23. This feels like a misstep to me. I’d prefer a hard brand split with 1 World/Tag/Women’s champion that are allowed to move between shows at will. There’s stories you can tell with that. For example, when Rey walked away from Raw to get away from Dom, you could have Dom trying to win the Tag belts as his “passport” to SmackDown to further antagonise his father. You can have the champ dodge a challenger by not appearing on their show. Have that challenger try to win MITB as their passport to move between brands.

XL 04-26-2023 04:06 AM

And yeah, if Cody wins this to “finish his story” then fuck.

Ruien 04-26-2023 06:48 AM

Feel like they added the tie so Reigns can be the champ but take a y month vacation. He comeback and goes for the new title.

Mr. Nerfect 04-26-2023 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XL (Post 5611557)
And yeah, if Cody wins this to “finish his story” then fuck.

If he does win it, then it will be part of his own story. It’ll leave the Universal Title (which Dusty also never challenged for) for later.

Stickman 04-26-2023 12:36 PM

They should have figured out a way to split the title's off Roman. Why not do a triple threat ladder match where both belts are hanging separately? Have Roman grab the first one and somehow not the second.

Mr. Nerfect 04-26-2023 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stickman (Post 5611578)
They should have figured out a way to split the title's off Roman. Why not do a triple threat ladder match where both belts are hanging separately? Have Roman grab the first one and somehow not the second.

The problem with that is that there’s no reason to put the belts up separately. And then it’s kind of bullshit to have someone win won and someone win the other. Splitting the titles was always going to be way too cute.

Sepholio 04-26-2023 01:12 PM

I could have seen them announcing that each brands title is to be treated as such at that Roman will no longer just be able to hangout on SD as long as he is RAW champ as well. Reigns comes out and complains about how he's too big, too important to be pushed around and forced to work all the shows. Management then tells him if he wants to stay on SD, thats fine, they have a solution to that and they immediately strip him of the other title and then do the tourny on RAW for a new champ there.

Sepholio 04-26-2023 01:14 PM

No one gets hurt in that scenario. The only issue is that it sets Roman up to have beef with the authority which is typically face turn territory.

Mr. Nerfect 04-26-2023 02:33 PM

That’s basically what they did. Except instead of stripping him of one title randomly (Why the WWE Title? Why not the Universal?) and diluting that, they’ve just created a new one. Whoever wins the WWE/Universal Title in that scenario still doesn’t beat Roman Reigns for anything.

xrodmuc316 04-26-2023 02:47 PM

They should have never Unified them. Yes Roman could have both, but then he can lose one and still keep the other. He could have lost the WWE Championship to Vody, and then still get the 1000/days with the Universal. He has only had the WWE title for like 375 days at this point, and that is the one Cody wants anyways.

Mr. Nerfect 04-26-2023 03:36 PM

Losing one and not the other still diminishes the impact of someone FINALLY beating Roman anyway.

Mr. Nerfect 04-26-2023 04:04 PM

I’m not making fun of anyone’s ideas, but they all have the same problems. You either don’t unify the belts (then you’ve got the two belt problem) or you unify them for good. Going back is always going to be challenging. The best idea I could come up with Reigns being offended by a Raw bid for him in the draft and denying them World Title shots in the future, necessitating a title change or the creation of a new belt. Or both with the drama being the management doesn’t believe there is a challenger that can beat Roman.

Mr. Nerfect 04-26-2023 04:04 PM

I’m not saying it’s “better,” but it doesn’t involve Reigns losing anything.

xrodmuc316 04-26-2023 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Nerfect (Post 5611604)
I’m not making fun of anyone’s ideas, but they all have the same problems. You either don’t unify the belts (then you’ve got the two belt problem) or you unify them for good. Going back is always going to be challenging. The best idea I could come up with Reigns being offended by a Raw bid for him in the draft and denying them World Title shots in the future, necessitating a title change or the creation of a new belt. Or both with the drama being the management doesn’t believe there is a challenger that can beat Roman.

That is exactly how they did it in 2002, where Triple H won a number 1 contender match or tournament, then Stephanie named Undertaker #1 contender, and Brock and the title being Smackdown exclusive.

That is why Bischoff awarded HHH the revived World Championship. It is certainly better than "whoever doesnt get drafted to Roman's show, gets to fight for this jnstead."

#1-norm-fan 04-26-2023 11:03 PM

In 2001 when the WWF and WCW titles were unified we had the “first undisputed world champion in WWE history”.

Since then we’ve had a second world title created, which was then taken out of the company, necessitating a third world title, which was unified with the second world title a month later when it returned to the company, which was then unified with the first world title to make one world title again before another new world title was created which was eventually merged with the other title again before the creation of another new world title.

This creative clusterfuck they keep doubling down on that revolves around what’s supposed to be the ultimate goal for everyone on the show is a perfect example of why nothing in wrestling feels important anymore.

Mr. Nerfect 04-28-2023 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xrodmuc316 (Post 5611630)
That is exactly how they did it in 2002, where Triple H won a number 1 contender match or tournament, then Stephanie named Undertaker #1 contender, and Brock and the title being Smackdown exclusive.

That is why Bischoff awarded HHH the revived World Championship. It is certainly better than "whoever doesnt get drafted to Roman's show, gets to fight for this jnstead."

I wasn’t bothered by Triple H being handed the belt in a heel move by Bischoff. I was annoyed by his actual reign.

I kind of like the drama that Roman can laud over them being the “real champion.” There’s a journey a Triple H/Paul Heyman creative team can tell. Will they? That definitely remains to be seen.

Ol Dirty Dastard 04-29-2023 12:52 PM

They won't tell it. Even if they start to tell it, they won't finish it.

Mr. Nerfect 05-02-2023 12:24 PM

That would be the predictable pattern.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®