|
Your NFL predictions.
From first to last, what do you think the season records will be this year in the NFL?
|
AFC
East 1. Pats 2. Bills 3. Jets 4. Dolphins North 1. Bengals 2. Ravens 3. Steelers 4. Browns South 1. Colts 2. Jaguars 3. Titans 4. Texans West 1. Chiefs 2. Broncos 3. Raiders 4. Chargers Wildcard 1. Ravens 2. Jags NFC East 1. Eagles 2. Redskins 3. Cowboys 4. Giants North 1. Vikings 2. Packers 3. Lions 4. Bears South 1. Panthers 2. Falcons 3. Saints 4. Bucs West 1. Seahawks 2. Rams 3. Cardinals 4. 49ers Wildcard 1. Rams 2. Packers |
AFC
East 1. Pats 2. Bills 3. Jets 4. Dolphins North 1. Ravens 2. Bengals 3. Steelers 4. Browns South 1. Colts 2. Jaguars 3. Titans 4. Texans West 1. Broncos 2. Chiefs 3. Raiders 4. Chargers Wildcard 1. Chiefs 2. Jags NFC East 1. Eagles 2. Redskins 3. Cowboys 4. Giants North 1. Vikings 2. Packers 3. Lions 4. Bears South 1. Panthers 2. Falcons 3. Saints 4. Bucs West 1. Rams 2. Seahawks 3. 49ers 4. Cardinals Wildcard 1. Seahawks 2. Packers |
AFC
East 1. Pats 2. Bills 3. Jets 4. Dolphins North 1. Ravens 2. Bengals 3. Browns 4. Steelers South 1. Colts 2. Jaguars 3. Texans 4. Titans West 1. Chiefs 2. Broncos 3. Raiders 4. Chargers Wildcard 1. Broncos 2. Jaguars NFC East 1. Eagles 2. Redskins 3. Cowboys 4. Giants North 1. Vikings 2. Packers 3. Lions 4. Bears South 1. Panthers 2. Falcons 3. Saints 4. Bucs West 1. Seahawks 2. Rams 3. 49ers 4. Cardinals Wildcard 1. Falcons 2. Packers |
AFC
East 1. Pats 2. Bills 3. Dolphins 4. Jets North 1. Ravens 2. Bengals 3. Browns 4. Steelers South 1. Jaguars 2. Texans 3. Colts 4. Titans West 1. Chiefs 2. Broncos 3. Raiders 4. Chargers Wildcard 1. Bengals 2. Texans NFC East 1. Eagles 2. Redskins 3. Cowboys 4. Giants North 1. Vikings 2. Lions 3. Packers 4. Bears South 1. Panthers 2. Saints 3. Falcons 4. Bucs West 1. Seahawks 2. Cardinals 3. 49ers 4. Rams Wildcard 1. Lions 2. Saints |
NFC
NFC EAST 1) PHILADELPHIA EAGLES xyz 2) Washington 3) Dallas 4) New York NFC North 1) Green Bay x 2) Minnesota * 3) Detriot 4) Chicago NFC South 1) Carolina x 2) New Orleans 3) Atlanta 4) Tampa Bay NFC West 1) Seattle x 2) Saint Louis * 3) Arizona 4) San Francisco x- Division Champ y- Conference Champ z- Super Bowl Champ *- Wild Card AFC AFC East 1) New England x 2) Buffalo 3) New York 4) Miami AFC North 1) Baltimore xy 2) Cincinnati 3) Cleveland 4) Pittsburgh AFC South 1) Indianapolis x 2) Houston * 3) Jacksonville 4) Tennessee AFC West 1) Denver x 2) Kansas City * 3) Oakland 4) San Diego |
AFC
East 1. Patriots 2. Jets 3. Bills 4. Dolphins North 1. Ravens 2. Bengals 3. Steelers 4. Browns South 1. Colts 2. Texans 3. Titans 4. Jaguars West 1. Chiefs 2. Broncos 3. Chargers 4. Raiders NFC East 1. Eagles 2. Cowboys 3. Redskins 4. Giants North 1. Packers 2. Vikings 3. Lions 4. Bears South 1. Saints 2. Buccaneers 3. Panthers 4. Falcons West 1. Seahawks 2. Rams 3. Cardinals 4. 49ers |
Lions beating out the Packers Cheeba? That would be awesome :love:
|
NFC West
Seattle St. Louis Arizona San Francisco NFC South Carolina Tampa Bay Atlanta New Orleans NFC North Green Bay Detroit Minnesota Chicago NFC East Dallas Philadelphia Washington New York AFC West Kansas City Oakland Denver San Diego AFC South Indianapolis Houston Tennessee Jacksonville AFC North Baltimore Cincinnati Cleveland Pittsburgh AFC East New England New York Buffalo Miami |
Quote:
|
Cool cool...
I was thinking along the lines of Seattle 14-2 Oakland 9-8 Jets 0-16 Those kind of stats. |
Vikings 16-0 :lol: :lol: :lol: [/DaveWadding]
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
...but you get the idea. :$
|
Oh, well in that caseeeee
Arizona (5-11) Atlanta (7-9) Baltimore (9-7) Buffalo (6-10) Carolina (8-8) Chicago (5-11) Cincinnati (10-6) Cleveland (7-9) Dallas (7-9) Denver (8-8) Detroit (7-9) Green Bay (13-3) Houston (7-9) Indianapolis (11-5) Jacksonville (6-10) Kansas City (8-8) Miami (3-13) Minnesota (11-5) New England (12-4) New Orleans (10-6) New York Giants (5-11) New York Jets 9-7) Oakland (4-12) Philadelphia (10-6) Pittsburgh (5-11) San Diego (3-13) San Francisco (4-12) Seattle (12-4) St. Louis (7-9) Tampa Bay (10-6) Tennesee (11-5) Washington (8-8) I don't knowwwwww didn't look at the schedules or do the math or anything, just general projections of AROUND how I think each team will finish :rant: |
Road Doggy Dogg:
You should learn how to read the scheludes BEFORE picking the win/loss records... The Green Bay Packers have NO CHANCE of going 13-3 nor will Tampa Bay hit double digit wins. Your picks suck. Stick to the NHL. |
You are a Philadelphia fan.
gg. |
pwned
|
Quote:
|
Ok well let's see:
Week 1: @ Carolina Favre always pwns on MNF. GB wins Week 2: Chicago ... GB wins Week 3: @ Indianapolis GB loss Week 4: New York Giants KGB will have a field day with their O-line, GB win Week 5: Tennessee No Jevon Kearse gives Ahman Green a much better game. Tennessee's got a lot of young guys on the team this year so eh, I'm not too sold on them. Plus it's another MNF game. GB win Week 6: @ Detroit Even though I hate it, Favre PWNS the Lions. GB win Week 7: Dallas Please. GB win Week 8: @ Washington Washington's secondary will do a good job limiting Favre, but Green will have a good game. GB win Week 9: bye Week 10: Minnesota GB and Minnesota will split... GB wins at home though Week 11: @ Houston Houston will be good this year, but not THAT good. GB win Week 12: St. Louis If Marshall Faulk is healthy and playing like Marshall Faulk at this point in the season, St. Louis has a chance. I don't see that happening, so GB wins this one. Week 13: @ Philadelphia By this point Westbrook will either be the real deal, or they'll have traded for a better back. In either case, Philly should have this one. GB loss Week 14: Detroit Favre > Detroit's secondary. GB win Week 15: Jacksonville I don't know, but Jacksonville hasn't impressed me at all this year. Leftwich needs to prove me wrong. GB win Week 16: @ Minnesota See above, GB loss Week 17: @ Chicago By this point in the season Chicago will just be thankful the end of the season is over. GB win There, 13-3 And if/when I'm way off, doesn't matter because I probably won't even be here for anyone to laugh at me :cool: |
AFC
East 1. Pats 2. Bills 3. Jets 4. Dolphins North 1. Ravens 2. Bengals 3. Browns 4. Steelers South 1. Colts 2. Titans 3. Texans 4. Jags West 1. Chiefs 2. Broncos 3. Raiders 4. Chargers Wildcard 1. Bills 2. Texans NFC East 1. Eagles 2. Redskins 3. Cowboys 4. Giants North 1. Vikings 2. Packers 3. Lions 4. Bears South 1. Panthers 2. Bucs 3. Falcons 4. Saints West 1. Seahawks 2. Rams 3. 49ers 4. Cards Wildcard 1. Rams 2. Packers |
My Picks are:
AFC East Patriots:13-3 Bills: 7-9 Dolphins: 7-9 Jets: 5-11 AFC North Bengals: 8-8 Ravens: 8-8 Steelers: 6-10 Browns: 3-13 AFC South Colts: 11-5 Titans: 9-7 Texans: 7-9 Jaguars: 5-11 AFC West Chiefs: 14-2 Broncos: 8-8 Raiders: 4-12 Chargers: 2-14 NFC East Eagles: 13-3 Redskins: 11-5 Cowboys: 8-8 Giants: 7-9 NFC North Vikings: 12-4 Packers: 7-9 Bears: 6-10 Lions: 5-11 NFC South Falcons: 9-7 Saints: 8-8 Panthers: 7-9 Buccaneers: 5-11 NFC West Seahawks: 10-6 Rams: 8-8 Cardinals: 4-12 49ers: 3-13 Making AFC byes: Chiefs and Pats Colts v. Ravens Bengals v. Titans NFC byes: Eagles and Vikings Seahawks v. Saints Falcons v. Redskins My prognostication skills are well known so if you want lots of money, bet against these picks. |
AFC North:
1. Ravens 2. Bengals 3. Steelers 4. Browns AFC South: 1. Colts 2. Titans 3. Jags 4. Texans AFC East: 1. Patriots 2. Jets 3. Bills 4. Dolphins AFC West: 1. Chiefs 2. Broncos 3. Raiders 4. Chargers NFC North: 1. Packers 2. Vikings 3. Bears 4. Lions NFC South: 1. Panthers 2. Saints 3. Bucs 4. Falcons NFC West: 1. Seahawks 2. Rams 3. Cardinals 4. 49er's NFC East: 1. Eagles 2. Cowboys 3. Redskins 4. Giants :( Green Bay wins the NFC North because Minnesota will go no where with Tice. They always underachieve. Panthers win the NFC South, that is pretty much a gimmie, Saints are just like the Vikings. Pats take the AFC East, after that every division has some pretty good competition. |
AFC
East 1. Pats 2. Bills 3. Dolphins 4. Jets North 1. Ravens 2. Bengals 3. Browns 4. Steelers South 1. Colts 2. Texans 3. Jaguars 4. Titans West 1. Broncos 2. Chiefs 3. Broncos 4. Raiders NFC East 1. Eagles 2. Cowboys 3. Redskins 4. Giants North 1. Packers 2. Lions 3. Vikings 4. Bears South 1. Saints 2. Bucs 3. Panthers 4. Falcons West 1. Rams 2. Seahawks 3. Cardinals 4. 49ers |
AFC
East 1. Pats 2. Bills 3. Jets 4. Dolphins North 1. Ravens 2. Bengals 3. Browns 4. Steelers South 1. Jaguars 2. Colts 3. Titans 4. Texans West 1. Chiefs 2. Broncos 3. Chargers 4. Raiders NFC East 1. Eagles 2. Redskins 3. Cowboys 4. Giants North 1. Packers 2. Lions 3. Vikings 4. Bears South 1. Panthers 2. Falcons 3. Saints 4. Bucs West 1. Seahawks 2. Rams 3. Cardinals 4. 49ers |
I don't think people are realizing how bad the Rams are looking as of right now
|
Quote:
2nd the just re-signed Pace. They have there offense in tact and a rookie RB ready to step in. There defense is "questionable" but it always is w/ a team that can put up points fast and not control the ball, which will tire there defense. Do I see them in the superbowl? No. You're also forgetting the rest of the division. SF is swiss cheese... they have a running back... and everything else is a question mark. Arizona looks like it had a nice offense, then everyone got injured. The only real competition for the divison (right now, on paper) is Seattle... who I just think Hasselback will choke somehow... I wouldn't be shocked if Stl didn't win the division, but on paper (and my feelings on Seattle in the "big game") I have to go w/ them till someone knocks them off. |
I can't see them making the playoffs, but I do think they will still probably end up second in their division. Living outside of St. Louis now I am getting all the St. Louis media and everyday theres something new going wrong for them. Losing Turley was huge, Faulk is real old now, their offence is no longer one of the top in the league and their defense is far from it. They probably won't be totally awful just because they have a few weapons, but they probably will be 9-7 and miss the playoffs. The Seahawks should have that division in the bag.
|
Quote:
Turley does hurt, but w/ Pace back, RT isn't as important as LT. Faulk is old, but they've always had a fill-in for when he goes down, this time it's a rookie who someday soon will replace him. They still have the basis of the offense that got them a SB and a Confrence title. They've always tried to build the defense, but they always won on offense. That being said, if Seattle plays to their full potential, they should take the Division. |
The Patriots should win it again, they'll probably face another surprise team from the NFC like Greenbay, or Minnesota. I don't see Seattle or Philly getting there.
|
The one thing this new playoff system does is limit the teams who can get in there. In the end its probably still going to be the six best teams, but remember when the NFC Central (or something) had four of five teams in? Green Bay, Minnesota, Detroit, Tampa Bay. The good old days
|
Quote:
I do remember the AFC East having 4, I think it was the year before they changed the divisions. What this does allow is a team in a weak division to make the playoffs, sometimes w/ a worse record then a team in another div that didn't make it. |
Quote:
|
I've been talking about this alot with my friends. The pats have the best chance of running the table since the 72 dolphins.
|
Quote:
What the hell. |
Also, the Lions were fighting the Vikings for the last spot in 99, Vikings got it, so it was 3 north teams, but there were always 3 north teams competing; when the Vikings weren't in the running for a few years there, Chicago was.
|
Quote:
|
Yeah, VEL you misread what I said mate :wave:
|
Quote:
But, looks like Bean said it was only 3... Anyway... yeah, the problem w/ more divisions is it can help a weaker team make the playoffs, on the otherhand... we had that before and better teams still missed a wildcard. No matter what, some team will still find a reason to bitch. |
the eagle will probably bitch when they lose the NFC championships again :D
|
eagles*
|
I forget which division it is, it might be the AFC South, that is probably going to have a team get screwed
|
AFC North
Baltimore Cincinnati Pittsburgh Cleveland AFC East NY Jets New England Buffalo Miami AFC South Indianapolis Houston Tennessee Jacksonville AFC West Kansas City Oakland Denver San Diego AFC Wild Card Teams: New England & Cincinnati NFC North Green Bay Chicago Detroit Minnesota NFC East Dallas Philadelphia Washington NY Giants NFC South Carolina Atlanta Tampa Bay New Orleans NFC West Seattle St. Louis Arizona San Francisco NFC Wild Card Teams: Chicago & Atlanta |
Had you up until you picked Chi-Town and ATL for Wild Cards. I'm going to have to disagree.
|
:rofl: Minnesota at the bottom of the NFC NORTH? :wtf:
How is that even possible. Man, if that happens, I'm totally jumping off a building. |
I keep getting the feeling they are going after me
|
Quote:
Oakland will not be better than Denver Minnesota will not be last in the North New York Jets ahead of the Patriots? HA! plus plus plus (Hit Vince McMahon's music) NO CHANCE IN HELL do the Cowboys win the NFC East... You are just hating on the Birds because your jealous. |
My Revised NFC East:
Dallas Washington Giants Philly 2-14 here we comeeeee |
AFC North
Baltimore- 11-5 Cincinnati- 9-7 Pittsburgh- 6-10 Cleveland- 5-11 AFC East New England-16-0 NY Jets- 10-6 Buffalo- 9-7 Miami- 4-12 AFC South Indianapolis- 12-4 Tennesse-10-6 Houston- 7-9 Jacksonville- 5-11 AFC West Kansas City- 13-3 Denver-9-7 Oakland- 5-11 San Diego-4-12 AFC Wild Card Teams: Tennessee and Jets NFC North Minnesota-11-5 Green Bay-10-6 Chicago-7-9 Detroit- 5-11 NFC East Phily- 11-5 Washington- 9-7 Dallas- 8-8 NY Giants-6-10 NFC South Carolina- 12-4 New Orelans-9-7 Atlanta- 7-9 Tampa- 6-10 NFC West Seattle- 12-4 St. Louis- 10-6 Arizona-5-11 San Francisco- 2-14 NFC Wild Card Teams: St.Louis and Washington keep in mind- TPWW Pro Pick Winner <!-- / message --> |
cheeba, the jags to win the south? Are you retarded. Wait, you're a girl. Nevermind. Did you pick the teams with the cutest names? "I picked the Jags, because I like kitties, and bears scare me, so I'll pick them last"
|
Cheeba is a genius if she picked the Jags.
|
Quote:
http://www.tpww.net/forums/showthread.php?t=17369 I guess I could post pretty much any topic you've posted in but that one has the most blatant evidence of retardation scattered throughout the first couple pages. |
Seriously though. I'm calling it... The Bears will be this year's Panthers in that nobody is even discussing the possibility of a good season for them but they will suprise people. Also, I'm predicting they will get 1 win over Green Bay this year.
The Jets too will be a suprise team. They'll fight with New England for the division lead all year before winning out in the end. I have spoken. |
The Bears don't even have any "up and comers" like the Panthers had.
The Bears don't have any WRs, and they have an "ok" HB and an "almost OK" QB, which could work if they had a dominant defense. They got Ogunleye, who was on a team with two shut-down corners, one of the best LB in the game, and the best DE in the game. He will be good, but will he be good playing opposite........................ who? Haynes? And they got rid of all of their depth. They have no depth, they have no Bryan Robinson, they have no depth at corner, they have ONE safety, they have ONE linebacker, and a rookie DT who is looking "pretty good," but how would you reckon he is the next Kris Jenkins? ANd Michael Haynes, next Peppers? They don't even have the talent to be the "next Panthers." Panthers had two good WRs, the Bears have none. The Panthers had a prettttttty good line and an awesome HB. The Bears have an OK line and a guy who sucked on the Cardinals. I don't know, I want to laugh, but I'm afraid that I'll end up eating my words and the Bears will somehow get a lucky season like 01. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I predicted last year that Chicago would win @ Seattle and @ Green Bay (The posts are lurking somewhere on the old boards.) The Seattle game, they took the lead late in the game and then blew it. The Green Bay game they jumped out early 14-0 and then blew it. They just couldn't finish games. The way they were able to go in and not be intimidated and play like the favorite was impressive... It was a start atleast. Defensively last year, they weren't special but they were't bad either. I think they have some decent players who are capable of having a good year. Offensively, I can see Justin Gage becoming a big play reciever. Also, I've been saying for weeks now that Thomas Jones will have a huge season. But above all else... Lovie Smith is gonna be a GREAT head coach. |
Simply put, the Vikings had one of the best offenses in the league last year without Michael Bennett most of the year and with no true second reciever.
There is no way that the Packers will finish any closer than two games behind us. Out already amazing offense adds Bennett the whole year, Marcus Robinson as the first true second reciever since Cris Carter left, a new tight end in Wiggins, not to mention huge depth at both running back (Onterrio Smith, Moe Williams, Jimmy Kliensasser) and Wide Reciever (Nate Burleson, Kelly Campbell, Keenan Howry). So now our offense is better than it has been since probably 98 or 01. Then look at the more important part, the defense. The Vikings have always relied on outscoring opponents and living with a shitty defense. That won't be the case this year. Our D-Line has an amazing rookie in Keneche Udezi who has been real good preseason and second year Kevin Williams who had 8 sacks I think last year. Bring back Hovan who will be at a better weight this season and Kenny Mixon is no stiff. Out defensive line is on its way to being one of the top in the league. Then our secondary. Corey Chavous is already a great safety, he had plenty of interceptions last year and is one of the smartest backs in the league. Brian Russell isn't amazing, but he still had over six interceptions last year, Brian Williams is above average, had a real big game last year against the Lions. Then you add in Antoine Winfield, the first real shut down corner the Vikings have had in years and an extremely hard hitter. The Packers didn't win the Division last year and they know that. They didn't deserve to win based on their play and their record, but the Vikings handed it over by how unbelievably bad they played in the end of the season. It was pure luck for the Packers that they got in the playoffs and they didn't belong. Just because Brett Favre says that he is determined doesn't mean they are going to be amazing, nothing against him he is one of the best qb's of my time, but he is old and doesn't have a dominant offense or defense on his side. The Packers won't be a bad team, but they are not on the same level as the Vikings anymore, and its going to shock you when the Vikings come out strong. As of right now they are in a legitimate position to get a first round bye, fuck the Eagles. Its even more rediculous the third place finishes behind the DETROIT LIONS! The Lions have a young core, but thats all they have. Harrington is not yet good enough and who knows how good Roy Williams is going to be, but the fact remains that they don't have the personnel to compete with the Vikings or Packers. They will be lucky to finish with a 500 record. And don't worry, I'm prepared for people calling me a hometown biased fan, but the fact remains that besides Alphabean nobody has as much access to Minnesota media. Just like CNM knows more about the Colorado teams than anybody else, my daily newspapers and newscasts cover both the Vikings and the Packers quite equally, so I know my bit. Suck me, I'm right. I'm not going crazy here, I'm not going to predict Super Bowl Champions, but I will be surprised if we don't end up in the NFC Championship. |
My god... you've become an Eagles fan. Exxagerating the "depth" @ WR and RB a tad bit, aren't you? The Vikings are more talented than Detroit and Chicago. As we've seen in the NFL in recent years, that doesn't mean they will finish ahead of them. Putting them in last place may have been a bit much... I may go third. You just know that like every year, there are gonna be about 10 spots in the division standings that make you say "Jeez, I would have never expected that at the begining of the year."
Also, I bet your local media didn't didn't tell you after starting 6-0 that you would STILL miss the playoffs. That's how much "expectations" mean. |
I will bet you 100$ using PayPal that the Vikings finish first in the North and the Bears finish last. Its that obvious.
|
I wouldn't bet $100 on the Vikes not ending up first... but since you added the Bears thing, you're on.
|
Now how much do we bet on the Dallas-Minnesota game on Sunday? :shifty:
|
GO JETS
|
Quote:
|
^^Good man. Except NE is going to be a BITCH to take down :mad:
|
NE is gonna run the table.
The jets don't stand a snowballs chance in hell All they needed was a running game and they added Corey Fuckin Dillon. they are impossible to beat at home, and their d is top notch |
Ray Mickens is a true shutdown corner.
|
Quote:
Kelly Campbell is not the most reliable receiver, but what the hell? He's #4 on our depth chart! That means he will be lined up on rookies, and aging veterans. I mean, the Ravens don't even HAVE a #4 receiver, so he'd be lined up on a safety, which would leave the wideouts open most likely, and he has the deep speed to beat out many #1 CBs! If you let him get behind you, you better pray he short-arms it (which he tends to do). I'm not saying our receivers are the best, I'm saying that they're good, and put them next to Randy Moss, we have amazing depth. For Moss alone. As for HB... COME ON! Bennett was a pro bowler before his broken foot, and he's regained his speed (world-class, he could have qualified for the olympic sprinting team), and worked on his conditioning, so if HE stays healthy, he has the ability to, well, destroy opposing teams. Moe in the preseason IMO has looked old, but behind our monstrous line, who knows what he's capable of? Last season he dominated early due to Bennett's injury, and Onterrio Smith came in late and dominated in the stretch. He's going to be out 4 games, and he's looked VERY distracted, but he could start on another team, but he's THIRD STRING. And Mewelde Moore, BCWWF forgot to mention him. He could probably start eventually on another team as well. He's an amazing back, with the best hands in the draft, and the only reason he fell to the 4th round was his size. He can ball. I saw him play, he's our FOURTH. Nobody will exaggerate the depth of the Vikings halfbacks... it's impossible. Our corps is the best in the league, hands down. |
Werd to your mother
|
Buffalo Bills: Henry and McGahee, pretty good. Dunno what comes after that. My favorite 1-2 punch though.
Dolphins: :rofl: Patriots: Dillon is a stud. Faulk is all right. Um, there you go. Jets: Curtis Martin JUST WILL NOT DIE. Lamont Jordan is supposed to be good. Dunno. nice 1-2 punch. Cowboys: lol Giants: THUNDER AND LIGHTNING. I hate Barber, but he's good so whatever. Nice 1-2 punch. Ends there. Eagles: lol. Poor Iggles halfbacks. At least Thomas Tapeh is getting reps at tailback. He's a stud. :love: Redskins: Portis, Betts? Cartwright? Nah. Ravens: Musa Smith? Chester Taylor? Jamal has no backups. Bengals: Rudi Johnson and Chris Perry. Two all-right backs. Nice depth, but no pro bowlers there IMO Browns: 3 quality backups on one team. Amazing. Steelers: It's like Wheatley and Garner all over again. Bears: Two excellent backups. Lions: We'll see how good their starter is. But as of right now, I can say their running game is still shit. Packers: Nice threesome. Ahman Green is a pro bowler, Najeh Davenport could start (since he's a fullback), and Tony Fisher, well, he has earned his money as a third-stringer. They are up there, but Moe Williams never shit in anyone's closet. Texans: Davis and Hollings? Ok. Colts: RICKY WILLIAMS! Dunno, dude. They have that one backup, forget his name, and Mungro, and Edge. Not too deep, but they're not in danger either. Jags: Fred and a rookie. Dunno. Titans: Chris Brown might be a great back in the league... but he is being promoted from backup, so what's that leave? Falcons: Shit, they might have the most depth! Dunn, Duckett, and Vick. Since Vick is just a HB who can throw the ball far. But he's no QB as preseason has proven. :D Panthers: The most-hyped 1-2 punch in the league. I won't argue that. Vikings go 4-deep though. Plus Larry Ned! Who would probably make #2 on a shallow team like Philly. Saints: Kijana Carter. lol. Stud back, but Kijana Carter, man! Bucs: Uh shit, they have depth, but I question the quality of their old-ass backfield. And Pittman blows. Broncos: I guess you could say that as long as the Broncos have 4 HBs on their roster, they have 4 potential 1,000 yard rushers, right? Well Hearst is okay but like 40, Griffin is "the second coming of Barry" lol. They're okay for now. Or are they? I guess that remains to be seen. Chiefs: Priest and LJ. Cool. I hear bad things about LJ though :( Raiders: Who do they even have? I think they have depth, but quality depth? Wheatley is their starter, so the answer is "no." Chargers: I think the team signed Ryan Leaf to be the backup HB to LT this season. LOLZ Cardinals: LOLZ Rams: They have three gre... They have a great, old and injury-prone star, and a rooookie with potential. I'd say that's a good 1-2 punch. Lamar Gordon, though. Tsk. 49ers: LOLZ. I don't even buy Kevan Barlow as a legitimate HB. Seahawks: Who comes after Alexander? That's right, his sister. He knows how to Git-r-Dun. I don't even know who the backup is out there, sooooo... There you have it. Packers are close, Broncos are close, but nobody is as deep as Minnesota. Since I'm sure you want to make some comment about how we make baseless claims. |
Quote:
Anyways, Green Bay's depth @ RB is better than Minnesota's. There's just no question about it. |
ray mickens is injured
the jets signed terrell buckley after the pats cut him. |
Quote:
Answer: 1. NFL cracking down on defensive contact with wide recievers 2. Marcus Robinson is first true second wide reciever since Cris Carter 3. Full health, physically and mentally That my friend, is how Randy Moss is better this year than last year, and I could go on. |
Quote:
|
AFC
East 1. Pats 2. Jets 3. Bills 4. Dolphins North 1. Ravens 2. Bengals 3. Steelers 4. Browns South 1. Titans 2. Colts 3. Jaguars 4. Texans West 1. Chiefs 2. Broncos 3. Raiders 4. Chargers Wildcard 1. Colts 2. Bengals NFC East 1. Eagles 2. Redskins 3. Cowboys 4. Giants North 1. Vikings 2. Packers 3. Lions 4. Bears South 1. Panthers 2. Saints 3. Falcons 4. Bucs West 1. Seahawks 2. Rams 3. 49ers 4. Cardinals Wildcard 1. Saints 2. Packers |
Quote:
|
My NFC East Predictions:
Eagles-12-4 Redskins-10-6 Dallas-9-7 Giants-4-12 :lol: Now The Eagles finally have a team that they can take to the Superbowl. With the additions with 4 new defensive players (Kearse, Trotter, D. Jones, Douglas) that will help the run defense tremendously. The shakiest part of their offense is NOT Donovans throwing accuracy it is the running back situation. With Duce gone, Buckhalter out for the season it just leaves little Brian Westbrooke. Now he was tremendous last year untill he got injured, but they had Duce and Buckhalter right behind him. But with those two gone it is going to be tough to fill those spots. The y brought in Dorsey Levens and cut him a week later, and 2nd year running back Reno Mahi can't cut it what so ever. But the Eagles will easily be led by Donovan and their NOW tremendous recievers (besides pinkston) and 2nd year TE LJ Smith :y: turning out to be something great, the Bird will dominate once again.. AND MARK MY WORDS if they do not win the NFC CHampionship this year.. I WILL HAVE A SEX CHANGE!!!!!! |
remember when the eagles HAD Trotter and Douglas and they still couldn't win then :?:
|
Quote:
|
I still think TO would be cooler on the Ravens
|
Quote:
|
Boller is better than McNabb, McNabb just gets a bunch of media attention because they want a black quarterback to be succeed. HE'S NOT ACTUALLY THAT GOOD! <font color=black>If anybody is too stupid to catch the Rush Limbaugh sarcasm, kill yourself because I am leaving this tag open..
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
yeah but they don't have a pass stopping defense this year, teams will learn to just double up on Owens and that takes away probably 65% of the eagles offense. Teams will just be doing 20 yard passes on the eagles like crazy, I'm not saying the eagles have a bad defense but it's nothing special compared to any other team.
|
Quote:
|
<font color=white><font size=10>BLACK TEXT BLACK TEXT<font>
|
Quote:
|
BYE THE WAY while I was watching Sunday NFL Countdown on Thursday? and my boy Michael Irvin just picked none other than DONOVAN MCNABB to be MVP.. WHAT NOW!
|
Your 2004 MVP will be none other than.......
Chad Pennington. |
:| at all of you.
|
:nono: you
|
Quote:
|
Cowboys will be undefeated this year.
|
There's no official NFL thread?
Anyway, the Pats-Colts game was great last night. The Colts blew their chance to win a couple of times, and they really looked upset from this loss. Tom Brady was awesome. |
The Colts secondary is just terrible, I could have thrown for 300 yards against them.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®