TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   sports forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   E-A-G-L-E-S vs. The Vikings (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=25177)

Rain Man 01-09-2005 09:59 PM

E-A-G-L-E-S vs. The Vikings
 
All you Vikings fans ready for an ass beating... Y2Ant it's on!! :yes:

Gonzo 01-09-2005 09:59 PM

Go Vikings.

MoRcHeEbA 01-09-2005 10:01 PM

I woulnd't put is past the vikings beating the Eagles too, I mean whens the last time Mcnabb even played a game? a month ago? same with their defense, not to mention this will be the Eagles first time really plying when it matters without TO SO WE'LL SEE.

Gonzo 01-09-2005 10:03 PM

Culpepper ---> Moss.

Game. Set. Match.

Rain Man 01-09-2005 10:04 PM

Anyone hear about Moss's ankle? I mean if he plays he will not be 100% which would be huge for the birds

Rain Man 01-09-2005 10:05 PM

Am I the only fucking Eagles supporter on these fucking boards?

Gonzo 01-09-2005 10:06 PM

Moss hasn't been 100% for a while.

/pwnjoo!11one!@eleven!!1

Rain Man 01-09-2005 10:10 PM

I'm trying to rat my way to the Vikings and HOPEFULLY the NFC Championship game with my friend who has club seats

Supreme Olajuwon 01-09-2005 10:15 PM

I dunno I think people are really underestimating Brian Westbrook as a playmaker.

Gonzo 01-09-2005 10:17 PM

Personally, I've know that for a long while Supreme.

I'm a Giants fan and I hate that shithead.

BCWWF 01-09-2005 10:34 PM

Cris Carter seems to think the Vikings will upset. This will be Tice's test right here, see if he is a good coach and have his team ready after a big win today. I would think that the Vikings are capable of winning, but not very likely to. TO being gone is going to let the Vikings stack up against the run, which they are slightly better at defending. The offense will have to be on top of its game though, they can't let up like they did in the third quarter today. The reason the Vikings started 6-0 last season and won the game today so convincingly is because they forced a lot of turnovers. That will be another key, to keep that up, because we all know our d can't stop anything without them.

Jesus Shuttlesworth 01-09-2005 11:56 PM

Kinda hope the Eagles win here, don't like the Vikings at all.

McLegend 01-10-2005 12:00 AM

I'm an Eagles fan and I'm scared. If Moss is hurt though I won't be has worried.

MoRcHeEbA 01-10-2005 12:02 AM

Moss will be there playing next week no matter what... He will then show up TO by wiping his own ass with Mcnabb not just the goal post.

The Outlaw 01-10-2005 12:07 AM

He will then walk off the field after they lose 31-2.5

MoRcHeEbA 01-10-2005 12:09 AM

Get off of the Eagles nuts

MoRcHeEbA 01-10-2005 12:10 AM

if you want sweaty black balls on your chin go see Funky

The Outlaw 01-10-2005 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MoRcHeEbA
Get off of the Eagles nuts

What

Crimson 01-10-2005 12:25 AM

I think if I were the Eagles I woulda preferd the Rams. I think the Vikings have a better chance of winning than the Rams but then again everytime people hop on the Vikings bandwagon they choke. So Falcons and Eagles will still win, but I hope Eagles lose.

Rain Man 01-10-2005 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crimson
I think if I were the Eagles I woulda preferd the Rams. I think the Vikings have a better chance of winning than the Rams but then again everytime people hop on the Vikings bandwagon they choke. So Falcons and Eagles will still win, but I hope Eagles lose.

I would def rather see the Vikings. The Rams have a good running game with Jackson, and a more explosive passing attack.

Rain Man 01-10-2005 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Supreme
I dunno I think people are really underestimating Brian Westbrook as a playmaker.

Personally I would want TO to go down before Westbrooke. I mean it was absolutley terrible when we lost TO, but Westbrooke is so good coming out of the backfield as a reciever. He will be huge in the playoffs watch. Many of you may laugh but Freddie Mitchell I think will be our best wide reciever in the playoffs. It is going to be interesting to say the least what happens.

Nervous Ferret 01-10-2005 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gonzo
Culpepper ---> Moss.

Game. Set. Match.

McNabb ---------> Todd "stone hands" Pinkston :nono:




edit-------------------------------------------------
I woulda put T.O in and crossed him out, but I don't know how to do that. :$

BCWWF 01-10-2005 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man
and a more explosive passing attack.

No

RBM 01-10-2005 05:38 PM

WOOO EAGLES WOOO

Joe Kerr 01-10-2005 08:20 PM

I want to see eagles Vs. Colts

Rain Man 01-10-2005 09:40 PM

Check out the new sig--- :cool:

BCWWF 01-10-2005 11:10 PM

Dream is right

Rain Man 01-11-2005 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCWWF
Dream is right

:foc:

John la Rock 01-11-2005 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gonzo
Culpepper ---> Moss.

Game. Set. Match.

if only TO was playing

McNabb ---> Owens > Culpepper ---> Moss.

Y2Ant 01-11-2005 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MoRcHeEbA
Moss will be there playing next week no matter what... He will then show up TO by wiping his own ass with Mcnabb not just the goal post.

yes

Y2Ant 01-11-2005 06:46 PM

DO THE BIRD BABY, LETS GO T.O

oh wait :(

I think the Eagles are going to win, but I will rub your face in it if you lose :cool:

(that goes for losing in the NFC Championship Game too)

Y2Ant 01-11-2005 06:47 PM

Also, Atlanta will be representing the NFC in the Superbowl :o

BCWWF 01-11-2005 07:43 PM

Lol @ Ant

The Outlaw 01-11-2005 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Y2Ant
Also, Atlanta will be representing the NFC in the Superbowl :o

Negative.

BCWWF 01-11-2005 07:55 PM

To be perfectly honest, of the four teams left I think the Falcons have the least chance of going to the Super Bowl.

1. Eagles
2. Vikings
3. Rams
4. Falcons

Reasoning being, if the Eagles beat the Vikings this weekend, then it proves that they are still in good condition and aren't rusty. If they beat the Vikes I think it proves that they are still the best team in the NFC hands down.

If the Vikings beat the Eagles, it means that they are for real. Early in the season they were on the Power Rankings at 4, so maybe they could be back there after the horrible end to the season. Then if they win at Phily, they would play in either Atlanta or St. Louis, both domes. If they go to Atlanta, there is still the chip on the shoulder from 1998, and St. Louis has never been as good as the Vikings all year really. The Vikings talent was supposed to do a lot better then they did, the Rams talent did about what they were supposed to.

The game in Atlanta is completely up for grabs, but regardless I don't think either team will represent the NFC in the Super Bowl. Atlanta is a defensive team, thats pretty much a fact, but they won't win a big game unless Vick has one of his outstanding games. When Vick is huge, they are huge, when he is not, they are just good. I don't think their record tells their whole story. So basically, if Vick has a big game against St. Louis, I don't think he will have another one in the NFC finals.

St. Louis could easilly come out on top from Atlanta next week, but I don't really think they will. They don't have a super talented team this season, they wouldn't have made the playoffs in any other division. They had the Seahawks number this season, and that is pretty much why they got into the playoffs. They were impressive beating the Jets and Seahawks, but they have a really poor secondary and their whole team is so thin I think they will be pretty beat up going into Atlanta. They are a nice story, but I don't see it lasting much longer.

Odds to represent NFC in Super Bowl:
Philadelphia: 1:4
Minnesota: 1:12
Atlanta: 1:14
St. Louis: 1:24

Y2Ant 01-11-2005 10:06 PM

Before the playoffs started, I picked an Atlanta-Indianapolis superbowl, just in case it happens :o

Gonzo 01-11-2005 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John la Rock
if only TO was playing

McNabb ---> Owens > Culpepper ---> Moss.

What if what if who cares?

Culpepper ---> Moss + Mooning = Game.

RoXer 01-11-2005 10:42 PM

I can't stand that Javon Kearse commercial.

Supreme Olajuwon 01-11-2005 10:53 PM

All you debators in here are forgetting something very important about this game

Eagle's D: 10th
Viking's D: 28th

BCWWF 01-11-2005 11:05 PM

Culpepper and Moss are a better combo then McNabb and Owens. Culpepper is a better passer and Moss is more dynamic.

What it is all going to come down to is if the Eagles can run any sort of an offense without TO, because they haven't really been tested without him yet.

Rain Man 01-11-2005 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joey RoXer
I can't stand that Javon Kearse commercial.

Jevon and it wasn't that bad it is like 10 seconds long?

Rain Man 01-11-2005 11:27 PM

Why do I love Y2Ant so much? Besides that shitty Falcons pick! :foc: He is still my baby :kiss:

Rain Man 01-11-2005 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCWWF
To be perfectly honest, of the four teams left I think the Falcons have the least chance of going to the Super Bowl.

1. Eagles
2. Vikings
3. Rams
4. Falcons

Reasoning being, if the Eagles beat the Vikings this weekend, then it proves that they are still in good condition and aren't rusty. If they beat the Vikes I think it proves that they are still the best team in the NFC hands down.

If the Vikings beat the Eagles, it means that they are for real. Early in the season they were on the Power Rankings at 4, so maybe they could be back there after the horrible end to the season. Then if they win at Phily, they would play in either Atlanta or St. Louis, both domes. If they go to Atlanta, there is still the chip on the shoulder from 1998, and St. Louis has never been as good as the Vikings all year really. The Vikings talent was supposed to do a lot better then they did, the Rams talent did about what they were supposed to.

The game in Atlanta is completely up for grabs, but regardless I don't think either team will represent the NFC in the Super Bowl. Atlanta is a defensive team, thats pretty much a fact, but they won't win a big game unless Vick has one of his outstanding games. When Vick is huge, they are huge, when he is not, they are just good. I don't think their record tells their whole story. So basically, if Vick has a big game against St. Louis, I don't think he will have another one in the NFC finals.

St. Louis could easilly come out on top from Atlanta next week, but I don't really think they will. They don't have a super talented team this season, they wouldn't have made the playoffs in any other division. They had the Seahawks number this season, and that is pretty much why they got into the playoffs. They were impressive beating the Jets and Seahawks, but they have a really poor secondary and their whole team is so thin I think they will be pretty beat up going into Atlanta. They are a nice story, but I don't see it lasting much longer.

Odds to represent NFC in Super Bowl:
Philadelphia: 1:4
Minnesota: 1:12
Atlanta: 1:14
St. Louis: 1:24

What?

The Answer 01-12-2005 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man
Am I the only fucking Eagles supporter on these fucking boards?

I like the Eagles but I also like the Vikings.Im torn

BCWWF 01-12-2005 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man
What?

What are you blind, deaf, or just stupid?

Y2Ant 01-12-2005 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCWWF
What are you blind, deaf, or just stupid?

He's an Eagles fan.

http://www.tpww.net/misc/images/aim/aimwink.gif

RoXer 01-12-2005 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man
Jevon

:roll: Sorry.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man
and it wasn't that bad it is like 10 seconds long?

Which is what makes it aweful. He should at least act like he gives a damn. "This could be you" *points to jet*. It's a useless commercial. He, or any other sports player for that matter, shouldn't be in the commercial at all. What is he endorsing? The Super Bowl?

The only way it would be funny is if the Eagles didn't make the Super Bowl. Then he could be on the jet with them.

BCWWF 01-12-2005 09:15 PM

Well according to my ESPN video game, the Vikings will win the game on a last second field goal. The game will start out really fast on the Vikings part, and the Eagles will have a poor running game but break out huge passing plays to keep them in it. According to my video game at least.

Joe Kerr 01-13-2005 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCWWF
Well according to my ESPN video game, the Vikings will win the game on a last second field goal. The game will start out really fast on the Vikings part, and the Eagles will have a poor running game but break out huge passing plays to keep them in it. According to my video game at least.



ironically I had eagles winning by one on ESPN 2K5...and westbrook kept fumbling :'(

BCWWF 01-14-2005 04:41 AM

I had Pinkston breaking through my secondary for a bunch of really long gains, which ultimately kept the Eagles close :mad:

Rain Man 01-14-2005 03:15 PM

The Eagles better win I just found out some information. I just got two tickets to the NFC CHampionship Game...:y: SCORE!

MoRcHeEbA 01-14-2005 04:00 PM

they just need to make it there :rofl: then they can lose for a fourth time in that game to Atlanta :rofl:

BCWWF 01-14-2005 04:39 PM

IMO if the Eagles make it to the NFC championship game it means they are still hot and will easily beat Atlanta to go to the Superbowl, at which point they will lose.

Jesus Shuttlesworth 01-14-2005 11:35 PM

Just put 30 on the Vikings. Had to bet with that spread.

They better fucking cover, if they don't they are fucking horrible and BCWWF, Y2Ant, and Morcheeba hsould never be allowed to talk shit about anyteam ever again.

The Outlaw 01-16-2005 03:47 AM

True.

BCWWF 01-16-2005 04:13 AM

Hey, the way I look at it is that the Vikings are still a pretty shitty team this year, so if they lose big deal, Phily is damn good, but if we win, then talk starts.

Joe Kerr 01-16-2005 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCWWF
Hey, the way I look at it is that the Vikings are still a pretty shitty team this year, so if they lose big deal, Phily is damn good, but if we win, then talk starts.


Nah, if the Vikings win the only talk will be that Philly cant win with out TO. Not that the Vikings are better.

MoRcHeEbA 01-16-2005 12:10 PM

When do I ever talk shit :shifty:

Joe Kerr 01-16-2005 02:04 PM

OMG that fumble touchdown for the eagles has to be the play of the year!!!!!!!!!!


Eagles -21
Vikings -7

el fregadero 01-16-2005 02:04 PM

The Eagles didn't even do anything on that drive, they just got two pass interference calls and then caught a fumble in the endzone.

Jesus Shuttlesworth 01-16-2005 02:40 PM

I think its hilarious a ton of people give the Eagles fans on the board shit ALL the time..but now that they are about to the beat Vikings nobody has anything to say.

Nice fake FG you ran there, Randy Moss is a dumb motherfucker. What the hell was he thinking?

Supreme Olajuwon 01-16-2005 04:01 PM

no one hates the Eagles though

just their fans

Loose Cannon 01-16-2005 04:09 PM

god, some many bullshit rules in the NFL. You can't do this, you can't do that, you can't come back in, you can't come back up. LOL, SHUT THE FUCK UP AND PLAY.

The Outlaw 01-16-2005 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Supreme
no one hates the Eagles though

just their fans

:y:

Joe Kerr 01-16-2005 04:19 PM

Eagles - 27
Vikings - 14

Savio 01-16-2005 05:56 PM

Good to see eagles won.

MoRcHeEbA 01-16-2005 06:51 PM

lol @ Mitchells fumble... but yeah :(

BCWWF 01-16-2005 07:23 PM

That botched fake field goal WAS NOT RANDY MOSS's FAULT AT ALL! Jesus Cris Collinsworth and Joe Buck will say whatever they can to hate on Moss and the Vikings. It honestly gets rediculous. There was an extra lineman on the field (the one for the real FG), so if Moss stayed on the field they get penalized for 12 men on the field and then Collinsworth can bitch some more. Tice tried calling a time out, but the only thing they could do was tell Moss to get off the field.


There is no doubt in my mind that the Eagles make the Superbowl this year. I said it all along that the winner of this game makes the Superbowl, and my opinion has not changed. The Eagles had to prove that they could win without TO and that they weren't rusty, and they did that. The offense was far from spectacular, but the defense played so well. They just toyed with Pepper in the beginning, he couldn't tell what they were going to do, then they just played real solid all game.

Not only do I still think the Eagles are by far the top team in the NFC, the Falcons are also not very impressive at all if you ask me. Look at their schedule, their conference: Tampa Bay, New Orleans, and Carolina. In non-conference they played the 49ers, Cardinals, Dolphins, all the shittiest teams. They lost to Detroit, New Orleans, and Seattle. Their biggest wins were against the Chargers by one point before they were hot, against the Broncos, and against the surging Panthers. They got absolutely killed by Kansas City. I don't care what you say, they are a one man team. If Michael Vick doesn't run the ball and run it well, they will not win, and the Eagles are good enough to stop him.

Y2Ant 01-16-2005 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Supreme
no one hates the Eagles though

just their fans

yup

Rain Man is a comical little fella though :(

Jesus Shuttlesworth 01-16-2005 10:52 PM

Fucking dicks. I just lost 30 dollars because the piece of shit Vikings couldn't cover the spread.

LOL@Mitchell pretending to pull his pants back up after he scored though, that was fucking great. I love that shit, like last year somebody scored againest the Saints and pretend to talk on the phone. I forget who did that though.

road doggy dogg 01-16-2005 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCWWF
Hey, the way I look at it is that the Vikings are still a pretty shitty team this year, so if they lose big deal, Phily is damn good, but if we win, then talk starts.

That is the weakest cop-out I've ever heard. You cheer on your team all fucking year long, making tons of ridiculous claims, but then, after you're afraid they might lose, you badmouth them and say they're a bad team, so losing "isn't a big deal". Shut the fuck up, you are awful.

Gonzo 01-16-2005 11:30 PM

God damn underachieving Vikings. :mad:

Go Falcons. :yes:

BCWWF 01-16-2005 11:34 PM

Where are all these rediculous claims? I said that they would win the NFC North, and they easilly would have with Moss healthy all season. Find me some more rediculous claims. I don't get it, I can't be satisfied that a medeocre Vikings team got as far as they did? You're just a huge douche bag and the influence you used to have on these boards is gone, maybe if you could have a discussion without bitching about something or somebody people would still like you.

road doggy dogg 01-16-2005 11:44 PM

...what? :wtf:

I'm talking about how you always talk about the Vikings, and you always want them to win and all. That's fine, I wasn't saying that was bad or anything. It's just hella weak for you to all of a sudden change your entire outlook and be totally nonchalant about the team because you think they will lose. It is just like saying "I love the Vikings, but if they lose I don't care, so you guys can't make fun of me!" Weak.

I dunno what the rest of the garbage you just said was but hey good luck with that


BCWWF 01-17-2005 12:12 AM

I barely expected the Vikings to make the playoffs based on the way they ended the season, so I'm not going to complain that they lost to the better team. I did say that if they won they would beat the Falcons though, that should make up for it...they would have though.

Rain Man 01-17-2005 12:49 AM

Fly Eagles Fly... :yes:

Good win today. McNabb looked soid, our D did amazing, and Westbrook is tearing up. Hey Y2Ant :wave:

Jesus Shuttlesworth 01-17-2005 12:56 AM

Andy Reid said they shut down the most explosive offense in the NFL today? I don't know, weren't the Vikings like 8-8 or some shit without any type of a running back?

Eagles did win, but I don't know, Vikings really aren't good at all. I'm not impressed, we'll see what happens againest the Falcons.

BCWWF 01-17-2005 01:06 AM

The Vikings do have the most explosive offense when it is healthy and on. They lost two offensive starters for the season in like week 2 and Michael Bennett was out most the year. We do in fact have a running back, in fact we have four of them and all of them are good, just since we have four none had outstanding stats, and we didn't use them much late in the game. If the Vikings offense is on like it was vs the Packers it is very good, but it can't make up for the shitty defense, and the offense makes too many mistakes this season. So explosive is right, it is either exploding or doing nothing.

Jesus Shuttlesworth 01-17-2005 01:11 AM

Yeah I guess. Culpepper put up huge stats but I think the Colts WERE the most explosive offense this season (Until they came to Foxboro) but shutting down an 8-8 team isn't exactly something to be bragging about.

I'll be going for the Falcons in the NFC Champ game, I like Vick, and seeing the Eagles lose again would be hilarious.

BCWWF 01-17-2005 01:18 AM

Ohhh I see where you are coming from, the Pats shut down the actual most explosive offense, thats true. The Pats did play awesome D, but the Colts game is already slowed down a bunch by that weather, I mean the game was like 6-3 into the third. Yeah you did just kick the ass of the most explosive team in the league, but the weather did help a little in the "shutting down" part. Do you agree?

In a dome I think the Colts would have won, but in normal outdoor weather I think the Patriots still would have won but not as decisively as they did. Regardless though, after that performance they look poised to take another Super Bowl, and I am cheering for them.

The Outlaw 01-17-2005 02:57 AM

Wouldn't they have called Illegal Substitution or breaking the huddle with 12 men then (assuming they did go from huddle, im not real sure I've seen teams do a FG from a huddle at times and at times Ive seen them not)? I didn't see that part, I just saw the replay right afterwards and heard the announcers.

BCWWF 01-17-2005 11:07 AM

Do you remember the fake FG play this year that the Pats did where Vinitieri passed to somebody? It was essentially the same play, but there was another guy on the field so Moss had to get off and nobody got the kicker the message.

I don't think they huddle before a FG really, they just send the team on and go.

Y2Ant 01-17-2005 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man
Fly Eagles Fly... :yes:

Good win today. McNabb looked soid, our D did amazing, and Westbrook is tearing up. Hey Y2Ant :wave:

:wavesad:

Have fun losing in the NFC Championship :shifty:

The Outlaw 01-17-2005 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCWWF
Do you remember the fake FG play this year that the Pats did where Vinitieri passed to somebody? It was essentially the same play, but there was another guy on the field so Moss had to get off and nobody got the kicker the message.

I don't think they huddle before a FG really, they just send the team on and go.

Yeah like I said, I wasn't sure if they did it from a huddle or not. SOme teams do, some don't.

If there were 12 men on the field then no, it wasn't Randy's fault.

Bad Guy 01-17-2005 01:59 PM

I thought Minny would be able to take them without TO, but damn. I think Philly will fall for the 4th straight NFC champ. game.

Rain Man 01-17-2005 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Y2Ant
:wavesad:

Have fun losing in the NFC Championship :shifty:

Atleast Ill be there!!.... :yes: But I don't know I just don't think Atlanta is that good to beat the Eagles we will see. I like cant type right now because I had an eye exam and thye put drops in my eye and im gonna smoke a bowl to make them feel better


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®