|
I Haven't Been This Pissed Since Katie Vick [SmackDown! Spoilers]
Why? Why the fuck do they have to ruin the single greatest all-around wrestler since Bret Hart with a "kinky sex" angle with Booker T's wife, Sharmell.
I didn't read the spoilers so I didn't get to prepare myself for the sting, but not only did the promo have the foul stench of wrestlecrap but it was redundant. He said he wanted perverted sex with but not any kinda perverted sex but BEASTIALITY SEX. Now personally, I never knew beastiality sex was interchangeable with "rough" but apparently the ignorant asses the WWE calls writers think so. If this ruins Kurt Angle, I will lose all faith in the WWE. |
I think he's just trying to mock Sharmell, or that's the idea. HEADGAMES
but yeah it's pretty dumb |
I guess I am not too upset about it...it's piss poor writing, but I don't think this will ruin Kurt...hell he has had a feud with Big Show over condoms.
|
Oh yeah. This is a great angle. And to think I thought this was something all new. But it's not.
Think about it. Replace Booker T with Taker, Sharmell with Sara and Kurt Angle with Lesner. We've seen all this before! |
Kurt wants to have sick perverted sex with Sharmell.
I want to rip her voicebox out so I won't have to hear her voice again. |
We all know we'd hit it with Sharmell.
|
A-men, Mig
|
Quote:
|
Wait, I never saw the Taker/Sara/Lesnar angle...
So someone tell me.. What does Sara look like? :shifty: |
Quote:
|
Meh, figured she'd be at least somewhat hot.
|
Quote:
|
Not sure if you are legit asking what she looks like...but here's a pic..
http://www.obsessedwithwrestling.com...alloway/06.jpg |
Really?
Not that bad, paper-bag fuckable. |
Quote:
|
DDP?
|
Quote:
|
DDP CLEARLY paid more attention to Sara back in 2001...that or DDP cross breaded with Vince McMahon's voice... :shifty:
|
Just saw the promo right now. Weird.
|
and yes this could ruin Kurt Angle.
|
Quote:
|
If you read my post you can clearly see 2001...
|
Yeah...2002. Go me.
|
2001 before Invasion or "InVasion" (yeah that capital V helped that angle a whole lot)
|
The fued I'm talking about was Lesner/Undertaker back in 2002.
|
It wasn't really much of an angle. Brock went into Taker's Locker room where "Sara" was, She was Pregnant at the time, and he got all in her face touching her stomach and such and stated. "Lifes a bitch," or something along those lines. Then Taker came in and ended up getting smacked with a chair.
|
I personally don't think Kurt Angle's comments this week were about Sharmell, but more about Booker T.
Hopefully on the last show before Judgment Day, we hear Angle cut a promo about how Booker T's company sank, so he came over to the WWE, just as Angle was finding himself. Then Booker tried to ruin Angle's career, to which Angle responded by infiltrating the Alliance, and destroying it from the inside. Then Booker T came back, and just as Angle was about to become six-time World Champion, Booker T annihilated that vision before Angle's eyes. Angle then describes the chair shot Booker T gave him like no other, and that it wasn't blunt steel he felt, but a sharp blade which tore up his insides. Angle then says he's making this personal, because Booker T has always made things with Angle personal, so Kurt's going to kick his ass personally, kick his ass professionally, then snap his freakin' ankle. Have Angle close by saying he doesn't want to destroy Booker T, but he has to do it. It is a need. When Angle lost to JBL in that Fatal Fourway Match, it wasn't because he couldn't kick out of the chair shot Booker T gave him, it was because he can't become WWE Champion with Booker T around. I don't know why, but I can see something like this making a really good feud. Angle doesn't hate Booker T personally, he hates him professionally, to the point where he will turn his private-life upside down just for the sake of it. Make it seem like neither guy can win the title with the either guy there. Sort of like opposite powers which cancel each other out. I'm not sure how that would turn out, but this is how I'd have the feud turn heading into Judgment Day. |
I could beat Undertaker.
:shifty: |
that part of the angle was dumb as hell. If they'd just replaced that one bit with him being "obsessed" with her, the angle would be good.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But they won't do that. Instead, next week, we'll see Sharmell reveal that she's pregnant and it could be Kurt's child. Four months later, Mark Henry makes his dramatic comeback.... |
Quote:
|
Hmm...
for a second, when reading the subject line, I thought this was going to be more about the direction the Eddie/Rey feud is now taking, "I'll have your LIFE!!" Damn, the CHILLS.. But anyway, I'm not that concerned about this angle. Kurt can make ANY angle (no pun intended) watchable. But...if he said he wanted to have perverted sex with Maria...THEN I would have problems. :p |
I would ruin Maria. :p
Actually, I think Eddie/Rey is going to a whole new level of "snapped" gimmick and it is really weird. I literally had goosebumps during Eddie's promo. I hope HHH took notes on how to promo while sitting in a chair in the ring. |
Damn that Eddie promo was awesome. Usually while watching promos, my mind ticks off things I'd like to har the wrstlers say to really capture their point, but Eddie Guerrero hit everything on the head so perfectly, I was just in awe of how good it was.
The whole "I'll have your life!" part of it sort of works, as it makes it look like Eddie Guerrero's lost control of his choices. Next week, what would really be awesome is a promo where Eddie Guerrero discusses his past, and how he's been addicted to drugs, and how now he's addicted to another drug. His drug of choice, the drug he has been searching for all these years, is Latino Heat. At Judgment Day, he won't blink, he won't resist, he will endulge his senses in Latino Heat, and he will turn Rey's pain and destruction into pleasure and fulfillment. Eddie can then say part of him wants Rey to turn up, so he can feel what he wants to feel again, but out of the friendship he holds for Rey, he doesn't want him to have to suffer through this again. Eddie then leaves the choice up to Rey. |
Quote:
Yeah, Hunter's gonna need a chair to do his promos from when he's 95 and STILL the Heavyweight champ. |
I enjoyed the Eddie promo, too, don't get me wrong. Gave me a sort of feel that I was watching the reincarnation of Tony Montana there.
|
The Guerrero promo was probably the high point of SmackDown overall..... But, I was shocked with the whole Angle promo. I didn't think the WWE would allow their wrestlers to say the word "sex" on-air, but, they did. And you wonder why Sting doesn't wanna come to the WWE? Just further proof of what he said about the WWE not being a family oriented show. I just hope it doesn't ruin Angle's character by making him look "psycho" as it was clearly said by Angle on SmackDown. He said something along the lines of "people will probably say I have some kind of psychological disorder or something". That's pretty clearcut proof of where they are going with Angle's character. If he's pushed as a "psycho" it won't work. Typical WWE stuff though. Once they run out of material, they try to use something dumb.... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That was the point of the Angle promo dude. To shock and scare you. And it did it's job well. Don't be pissing on what was one of Angle's better promos. |
Guys, NOTHING will ruin Angle as long as WWE keeps letting him showcase his wrestling ability.
|
Quote:
Now go hit OH right on the balls. |
Sorry but I'm the "Red One of Honor" and I have to honor my, uh, honor code...unless provoked.
|
I tuned into SD! just to watch Eddie promo. Seriously... I read the spoilers and was like "this WILL be good."
He didn't disappoint. I <3 Eddie. :love: |
:heart:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Who's Katie Vick?
|
They could bring back Brother Love as a manager.
I LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOVE YOOOOOOOOOOOUUUUUU!!!!!!!! :heart: |
Quote:
Yeah, I wonder where in pro wrestling you will find a "family-oriented" show? Steve supported WCW, was faithful to them when they were having "viagra on a pole" matches and "kiss my ass" matches...But OMG!!!!!!11111 They said "sex" on TV! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Who cares that he said sex? If you don't like it, change the channel.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
"Is she hawt?" [/Pedro]
|
Its nowhere near as bad as the Katie Vick thing.
Angle wants to have perverted sex with Sharmell, I'm sure a lot of guys want to have perverted sex with a lot of WWE Dvias. He'll probably become a face out of it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
However, the topic was "I Haven't Been This Pissed Since Katie Vick" Which still indicates that KV was worse. |
Quote:
Triple H then taunted Kane by getting a mannequin and pretended to have his way with it. At least that's how I think it played out. |
Quote:
|
Why are they doing this? they are not only ruining Kurt Angle, they are ruining Booker T as well.
pfff. Sharmell. sounds like a brand of toilet paper. btw she acts like a white chick-all helpless and screaming WHY while her man's gettin' beat down. i thought her and Book were from the ghetto. |
Quote:
Basically, Booker T. and Kurt Angle are WAY above this kind of bullshit tactic to bring in ratings (which I guarantee it won't). This is nowhere near as bad as Katie Vick but it is still pure shit. |
Quote:
That doesn't mean that they're comparing it line for line. There are many differences between the two, including targets, methodology, and the reults. It's simply evoking the last thing that compared in reaction or intensity. |
:lol:
I suck at this whole discussion thing don't I? |
In a word...
Yes. |
In a word or five...
Shut up you ignorant ass. |
Also Shadow, how about you go cover yourself in glow-in-dark paint and touch yourself inappropriatly.
|
Quote:
And what exactly is so wrong about this angle that you couldn't say about the million or so angles out of the "Attitude" era? What about the thing with Vince McMahon and Sable from 98? The Corperate Ministry? The "Cruifixion" of Austin? The whole X-Pac/Kane/Torrie thing? The Austin/Angle 2001 feud (remember what Austin was going to do to Angle that one night in which he was faking wanting to throw Angle into a river)? And that's to just name a few. There's been so many shocking angles that we can name while we are at it. The concern is HOW they are doing this angle, not IF they are doing it. So far, it seems to be working out quite well. All that Kurt has said is something about perverted sex, and then provoking Booker into a trap by using Sharmell. I didn't see him try to rape her or anything just yet. This, in all due respect, is a point of judging the angle WAY too early to know if the angle is going in that direction. And remember, this is on SmackDown we're talking about, which is on UPN, which has been known to censor things on SD before (John Cena's earlier freestyles, the attack on Zach Gowen by Lesner). Whereas the Katie Vick thing was on TNN/Spike TV, a place where they could've gotten away with much worse than the Vick thing. UPN is still scared because of the FCC and their trigger-happy ways lately coupled with the ever-wary PTC. Don't think that UPN would allow something to slide if it was the Katie Vick distasteful-way. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I want them to get back to a boom period, but when you are dealt piece of shit after piece of shit since 2001, you get kinda numb.
|
What the WWE needs is Kanyon. :shifty:
|
Quote:
To make a long story short, I NEVER said I agreed with Sting. I was just saying it was shocking to see them using Angle as the "psycho" of the angle. There's a difference. There goes people assuming and putting words in my mouth again :roll: And to Shadow: Piss off. I could care less if you agree with what I'm sayin or not. It's a fact that Vince uses "shock TV" when he gets desperate. He's basically trying to do the same now, only it's more obvious. That's where I was goin' with the whole post above. You'd have to be an idiot to say this kinda thing WOULDN'T ruin Angle. That would be like sayin' the whole "Katie Vick" thing and Kane losing his mask didn't affect his character..... |
Ummmmm...it didn't. Internet Smarks remember it, but for the most part all marks remember is tha Kane is now kissing Lita...boy are they in for a shock tomorrow. :p
|
Quote:
And before you go into "putting words in my mouth" again, you replied to a message of mine, so it's safe to assume this panty-wadding of yours is in response to me. Honestly, it looks like you're just going out of your way to take offense. Unless you agree with this statement, you have no reason to get hostile or be offended. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
OH, no one is saying anyone has to agree with you or you have to agree with anyone else. But this attitude of your's needs to stop--NOW!! Wonder why you have those five red bullets next to your posts? Look at how you react to people who piss you off. :yes: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Are you just going to turn into Goldbird and tangentially bitch about your rep every chance you get?
I'll save you the trouble... Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
But nah, not ALL the damn time. In fact, you're probably responsible for 3/4ths of my positive reps I've been getting on here. Just caught me off guard because you usually don't leave a comment as to WHY you repped, and I wanted to know why there, that's all. I did give you a neg rep just so we're even there, so we can stop bitching about the reps. :love: And I can continue getting my heel heat. |
Naw. The controversial topic was by sledge. Goldbird was more the "mock the shit out of some guy" topic. :cool:
|
Quote:
|
:lol:
You are anything but the top heel of TPWW. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®