Rock's thoughts on HBK? Wrestlemania
 

NoDQ.com

- One match that was discussed for Wrestlemania would have pitted The Rock vs. Shawn Michaels. However, The Rock doesn't believe HBK was ever as big of a star as Austin, Hogan, Goldberg or Foley. Apparently, when The Rock broke into the business, Michaels was an ass to him, and he never forget it. The name that would interest The Rock for a Wrestlemania match is Bret Hart.


Credit: The Wrestling Observer Newsletter

thoughts?

Shawn Michaels name drew more the Bret Hart...But Bret was a respectable man, I guess Rock would go with someone who he respects. What an asshole! :p

I would say Bret drew as much as Shawn maybe even more

Rock vs Bret would be sweeeeet. :y:

in 1999 yes

Hart can't step in a ring...seriously guys I know this is hard to realise but if a strong breeze hits Bret's head he is fucked. No more in ring work for Hart. Accept that.

As for the idea that Hart at one point or another could out draw Michaels...I say nay, however I fully admit there is a lot of conversation to be had, and many debates to settle since it would be all but impossible to determine exactly who could out draw who at any point in time.

How about Rock vs Sting in TNA?

I do agree with The Rock, in that Shawn Michaels' is good, but he's not in the same tier as names like Stone Cold Steve Austin and Hulk Hogan.

On an interview with IGN, I read that The Rock would love to face Rey Mysterio in a match in San Diego, with The Rock as a heel, and Mysterio as a face. That would be some good shit right there. Chicago ain't no San Diego, but they may as well run the match.

No. Simply no.

The only remaining "Icon/Legend" match that Rock would fit well into would be against Kevin Nash...and actually if you could JUST have the build up with no actual in ring action, that would be best.

Oh yeah, and you would have to accept Nash as a Legend or Icon... :shifty:

Michaels no on the same "tier" as Austin and Hogan? Since his return in 2002, he has stolen the show on almost every RAW and paper view. Michaels may not have the same recognition and star power as those two, but he's definitly on their level.

SEE! for all you fuckers who constantly say "get over Bret! Bret still draws interest whether it be fans or superstars..Bret the hitman hart is still money!

oh, and FUCK YOU

Shut the fuck up, Mac. For the love of god it was 8 god damn years ago. Bret draws to The Rock only because The Rock and HBK have some bad blood. That, and BRET CAN'T WRESTLE ANYMORE!!!
Thank you, Bill.

Now Mac, please, get cancer.

Chuck Norris VS Teh Rawk!

fourfifty is your brief rash itching again?

Bret Hart never drew a dime.

The match would be over before it began. Pieces of the Rock would be found backstage, spattered about the room in a manner that would suggest a roundhouse kick to the face.

Yeah, it's more like a Canadian Doller.

Wait...Which is worth more?

Trick question, it's neither.

Bret drew more, significantly more

Than a dime or a Canadian dollar?

I didn't know Ric Flair posted here

There is only a small amount of quad-tearing jokes The Rock can do :lol:

Not to take sides, but Bret was a better house show and (if memory serves) PPV draw than Michaels. Even though I'm a massive Shawn fan, I think Bret was a better draw.

LOL paper view

lol

more thank HBK

there's no doubt about it.

Nobody had to paper Webley Stadium, HBK didn't even come close to filling the show in his hometown, and that was HBK biggets drawing show. When your biggest drawing show is considered a major disappointment, its clear where you stand as a draw.

Bret's numbers outside of the US alone make him bigger than HBK as a draw. But the thing is, he was bigger draw int he US as well. So its not even a debate.

I dont care. As long as The Rock makes it to WrestleMania.

HBK treated him like shit. If HBK did the same to you, you wouldn't want to work with him either.

Bret vs. Rock would be great. It won't happen but I'd love to see Rock back for Wrestlemania.

That's kinda dumb though, seeing as they never did a PPV in England before and they did 95% of their shows in America.

why the rock = greatness:
http://youtube.com/w/Rock-does-impre...rch=the%20rock

That promo sucked cock.

:lol:

And I'd say that you're probably a dumbass biased Canadian mark!


As far as this discussion is concerned, I'll give my two cents:

-Shawn Michaels drew far more than Threat Fart. Why else do you think Vince wanted Bret to take the offer that WCW made him in 97'? Is it just a coincidence that WWE ratings went THROUGH THE ROOF shortly after the departure of Threat Fart? No - I'd say no. On the other hand, look what happened to WCW? WCW was DESTROYING the WWE in ratings. Bret Hart shows up, flaunts his ego, and the company ultimately went down the toilet.

WCW had a great thing going with Flair, Hogan, etc. at the top, until Hart started whining about the 'glass ceiling', etc. Hart basically became the spokesman for the non-main-eventers (as to how they were supposedly being 'held back') and this created a huge friction within the company. Bret Hart a respectable man? LOL. Hardly. Like I said in other threads - this guy is still using the 'Montreal' incident (along with Owen's death) to mint in money from his sheep fans.

With the exception of Diesel, Bret was the SMALLEST draw as champion. Vince knew this, and that's why Vince let Diesel and Bret go.


-The Rock is incorrect when he says HBK wasn't as big a star as Foley.....although I understand The Rock's bitterness in this situation. HBK was apparently a dick to The Rock during his formative years, and so I see no reason for The Rock to be gracious back.

Having said that - Goldberg, Austin, and Hogan are far bigger than HBK...so he's right there.

Sorry kid.

The Rock versus Shitman Fart wouldn't be a great match anymore. Shitman Fart is a 48 year old cripple, while The Rock (now known as The Pebble) has about as much muscle mass as Will Smith.

Heel HBK or heel Cena vs. The Rock would be quite a show though....if The Rock beefed up a bit before Mania and worked off the ring rust.

Ok, heel Rock = Greatness:
http://youtube.com/w/The-Rock-disses...rch=the%20rock
(Canada gets pwned)

1. It was a major summerslam PPV (at a time when there were only 4 ppvs during the year)

2. They had never done such an event in England or outside North America

3. He was wrestling DAVEY BOY SMITH...who is from England if you have forgotten....I think that MAY have had something to do with the draw.

So dont give so much praise to Bret for that.

Id also like to add HBK's reigns as champ came after Bret Hart and Diesel (niether who drew much) so he was coming in as champion at a poor time also.

it is, but thats not the point of the thread.

HBK drew less money, look it up if you have to.

You talked about Bret is WCW, yet he ws never in the top position to draw in WCW, so his run there is irrelevant.

Look at HBK's run on top in 96 and compare it Bret's runs, Bret drew more money, bottom line.

After Bret left WCW, it was Austin who was the top guy, and he was the sole reason (well the program with McMahon) the ratings took off like they did. Had nothing to do with Bret.

If you want to use stupid logic like you did before, how about this:

When HBK left in 98 WWE hit the highest levels of any wrestling company in history. When he came back in 02, the business started to go south. Maybe that's HBK's fault (note: it really isn't, but we're using your crazy logic).

You should really do your research before you try to go against what I say.

I would never deny that Bulldog was the bigger draw of the two, but there were plenty of Bret Hart fans in that crowd, so part of the draw of that show was Bret.

And when HBK had a similar chance to draw a crowd like that (in his hometown no less) they barely sodl half the seats.

I guarantee you, at Bret Hart's peak he would have sold 70,000 tickets anywhere in Canada, but especially in Calgary.

and its not that i dont like Bret. I do, he put on some of my favorite matches (vs Mr Perfect, vs HBK, etc)...

but I think the sympathy he got from Montreal lifted him to a level, for some fans, where he is the end all be all of pro wrestling and he can do no wrong. I just dont hold him in that esteem.

Well thats fine, but its not the point of the debate.

Who cares? Doesn't have anything to do with who outdrew the other guy.

You want facts, go email Dave Meltzer and ask him for past copies of the Observer (you'll have to pay so save your allowance) and you'll get all the facts you need.

EXACTLY.

The more Montreal keeps getting spoken about......(something that Bret Hart loves to speak about in length when its brought up by his sheep).....the more that Bret appears to be a bigger legend.

THAT is one reason why Bret chooses NOT to let the subject of Montreal go away. He's a self-centered ego-maniac. Like I said in other threads - I have absolutely no problem with people being like that. HBK and Vince are the same way.

My only beef with Bret, is that he chooses to use the 'morality' card against others.....when its clear that his moral foundation is no better than the people he criticises.


HBK said it best, "Bret pretends to stand for some moral fiber that doesn't exist in his real world.......yet he stands in judgment of me."

EXACTLY.

The more Montreal keeps getting spoken about......(something that Bret Hart loves to speak about in length when its brought up by his sheep).....the more that Bret appears to be a bigger legend.

THAT is one reason why Bret chooses NOT to let the subject of Montreal go away. He's a self-centered ego-maniac. Like I said in other threads - I have absolutely no problem with people being like that. HBK and Vince are the same way.

My only beef with Bret, is that he chooses to use the 'morality' card against others.....when its clear that his moral foundation is no better than the people he criticises.


HBK said it best, "Bret pretends to stand for some moral fiber that doesn't exist in his real world.......yet he stands in judgment of me."

ok, i dont want to go too off topic about montreal, etc etc...

I think if you look at the US drawings, the were very similiar and HBK came out ahead.

Canada is a different story in itself. Canadians have a much greater sense of pride for their heroes, etc etc.

Here's how I see things....

Let's talk about how much Hulk Hogan drew. I'll be my soul that he would have drawn half as much if it weren’t for Andre, The Warrior, Randy Savage, The Million Dollar Man, Sgt Slaughter, or anyone else he had a match with.
Same thing goes for The Rock, The Undertaker, Steve Austin, The LOD, The Dudley Boyz, Tommy Dreamer (in his ECW days), Jeff Jarrett, Frank Gotch, Lou Thez, Ricky Steamboat, Double A, and everyone else who has made a name for themself in this industry.

Now let's book Bret Hart VS Barry Horwitz. Push that to the main event. How about HBK VS a wet dish rag? I know there are some wrestlers out there who can carry an entire match (Eddie, Ric Flair, RVD) but wrestlers like these are few and far between.
<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o =""></o>
When they were in the main event Bret Hart drew just as much as HBK. That takes a lot for me to say because I’m not exactly a Bret Hart fan. If it wasn’t for everyone that helped Bret look good he’d draw just as much as Jambi the Genie.

<img src=http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v176/Chasewaterhouse/jambi.jpg> > <img src=http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/6/60/BretHartProgram.jpg/200px-BretHartProgram.jpg>

Will you shut the fuck up about Finlay? Jesus Christ, it's not like we're going to see Jericho in the ring.

This takes a lot for me to say....
































You're more annoying that MacGyver007.

yes because only Canadians like Bret Hart :roll:

I don't like debating with 11 year olds so i won't bother saying much else. Cynick pretty much said everything there is to say.

next time try to speak from your mouth instead of your ass

Shawn apparently was the worst drawing champion in history.

I believe the worst drawing champion was Big Show. He never could stay in the lines.

Everytime somebody says "Fart" instead of "Hart," I want futuristic contact modules implanted in my monitor so I can punch people over the internet. It's not cute. It's not funny. It's not witty. It's childish and annoying and any point you may have is diminished by how irritating you sound when you do that.

Jesus Christ.

Howabout "Shitman?"

I used to say things like Kevin Rash, Snot Hall, Scott Weiner (or Whiner) Eric Bitchoff and Sulk Hogie when I played WCW/NWO: Revenge on N64.

I lol'd:lol:

Hart has a larger following. I'd say he could outdraw and did outdraw HBK.

I know what you're trying to do buddy, but HBK's main world title run was while he was the top babyface around, and Bret left the company for most of that year.;) HBK just couldnt pull it off all alone, and I dont blame him for that.

Worldwide, Bret was the man drawing for the company.

I'd say both guys were also bigger than Goldberg, HBK and Bret. Goldberg had some wcw popularity for a couple of years. He faded afterwards, HBK and Bret haven't.

^ i agree

I think a good argument can be made that HBK is bigger than Goldberg (for the reasons that you stated), but definitely not Threat Fart. To imply that Bret is as big as Goldberg, is a severe disrespect to Goldberg.

The only reason why Bret continues to have popularity today, is because of Montreal (since his sheep fans won't let 'Montreal' go.....nor will Bret allow it to).

Lets face facts - If 'Montreal' hadn't happened, then Bret Hart would basically be just another Ultimate Warrior or Sgt. Slaughter (i.e. a guy who had his 15 minutes of fame, but was then passed). Just like those two - Bret would have his place in history, but wouldn't belong in the same stratosphere as guys like The Rock, Hulk Hogan, Steve Austin, Ric Flair, and Shawn Michaels.


Also - lets look at this objectively. Outside of CANADA - Bret Hart really wasn't all THAT popular (relative to guys like The Rock, Austin, Hogan, etc.).


As much as Threat Fart and his Canadian marks want to believe otherwise, Bret simply ISN'T an icon outside of Canada.

In fact - The Rock, Austin, and Hogan are even BIGGER in Canada than Bret.


Did Bret have popularity in Britain? YES. Why? Because - British Bulldog was a part of the Fart Foundation back in 97'...and Threat Fart was appreciated as result.



On the subject of Goldberg, Goldberg was REALLY helping ratings for WCW.....even if it was temporary. In terms of star power, Bret can't even hold Goldberg's jockstrap. Other than better technical wrestling ability, the only think Bret has over Goldberg, is extra foreskin.

Whereas Michaels is bigger than Jesus.

And I don't just mean better hung.

Speaking of which, I wonder who delivers better sexual performances in the sack? HBK and Bret are getting up there in age, but can they still deliver 5 star performances?

Who "sells" better? :?:

yes... now fuck off and go watch smackdown

Wow, I read up to here and can't take you seriously anymore on the grounds that you seem to be so ignorant of pro wrestling's past. Not that in life pro wrestling knowledge counts for much, BUT if you're going to discuss something, please have some clue what the fuck you're talking about.

-Regards

look, Bret Hart was a worldwide draw - He drew an entire country (yes, Canada) was a fan faovourite all over Europe, and Africa.

Michaels drew in the U.S well - from 96 onwards. Bret drew big in the U.S from 1990.

BRET = WORLDWIDE DRAW so does the ROCK

Michaels = USA

Is Jesus still in the running here? BEcause I hear he can "Lay on hands" like no other.