![]() |
Paul is Dead
I do not believe this; I merely thought would be entertaining to see the boards explanation if it was:
A)Hoax to sell albums B)Made completely by the fans and it all is coincidence C)Paul is Dead HOW IT ALL STARTED It is difficult to pinpoint the exact origin of the 'Paul Is Dead' hoax. Some believe the Beatles and Apple Records started the rumor as a marketing ploy to sell albums. That John Lennon started it out of jealousy. That overzealous fans conjured up the idea. Or that Paul McCartney is actually dead, and this was the way it was announced. We may never know the true origin of the hoax. However, we do know how it was brought into public knowledge. In 1969 Russell Gibb, a radio Disc Jockey in Detroit, announced that Paul McCartney was dead. His proof: evidence strewn throughout the Beatles' songs, movies, and album artwork. Newspaper and television reporters picked up the story and the news quickly spread across America. THE STORY OF PAUL'S DEATH The story states that Paul McCartney was involved in a car accident. Apparently "he hadn't noticed that the lights had changed." The accident occurred at 5 a.m. on a Wednesday morning. Cause of death was massive head trauma. So severe were his wounds that dental records were useless for identifying the body. No accident report was made public due to pending investigation of the occupant. Beatles' insiders learned it was Paul, but kept silent. Understanding the ramifications of such news, the remaining Beatles hatched a cover-up. A Paul McCartney look alike contest was held. William Campbell won first place, but the results were never announced. Campbell's prize was to be made a clone of Paul for photos, videos, movies, etc. Plastic surgery was used to smooth out the minor differences. They failed to fix a scar on Campbell's upper lip - this is how you can tell authentic McCartney photos from the Campbell ones. THE CLUES
Was it a practical joke, a cruel hoax, or simply all coincidence? Most of the clues are very ambiguous. The certainly do not offer concrete evidence as to whether or not they were planted or simply coincidental. Most of the clues can be refuted wither way. Who was behind the whole thing? Nobody knows for sure. I am certain that each Beatle has publicly denied having anything to do with the hoax. I am also certain that Paul is NOT dead - I saw him in person a few years ago. One thing is certain, as long as the Beatles music exits, so will the "Paul is Dead" rumor. http://www.geocities.com/sunsetstrip/3674/pid.html |
Wrote a 10page paper on this thing my freshman year in college. Good times.
|
this shit freaks me out
I dunno why |
yeah, every since I was a kid it has given me weird chill. Never understood why though.
|
Pretty bizarre.
|
Paul is smoking with his right hand. Paul played the bass as a lefty. This shows that an imposter was brought in for the photograph.
Proof they didn't know the Beatles too well. Anyway, as long as there is music, there will be rumours and conspiracies. The real answer is that someone read too much into things, and it caught on. B, in short. |
LOL
Never heard of that before - ridiculous |
Quote:
|
Especially after Revolution 9
|
You have to really work at it to make most of those songs work. Theyre so arbitrary and loose.
|
But not rev 9 (amongst others) that is blatant and clear as day.
|
Bullshit.
|
Nah
|
Really.
There is no intelligent reason to go from "Turn me on, Deadman," to "This is an elaborate hoax staged by the BEatles to indicate Paul is dead." |
I'm not dead
END OF STORY! |
Quote:
And for the record I don't believe that magic bullet theory either. |
Prove it.
|
Prove what? Rev 9 played backwards being a descripton of the car wreck?
|
And it must specifically relate to Paul's death in some meaningful way.
I mean, Bowie wote several songs which describe car wrecks. ZOMG! MICK RONSON DIED IN THE 70S! I suspect "All the Young Dudes" is a memorial to Freddie Mercury, who died in the same car crash. |
|
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=470 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD align=middle bgColor=lightblue>Revolution 9
Turn Me On, Dead Man </TD></TR><TR><TD bgColor=white> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>Revolution 9 is a sound collage, and The Beatles CDography and Steve's Beatles Page provide transcriptions of the intelligible dialog in the "Revolution 9". Early in the track two men are heard talking "I know all about it George. I'm sorry. Will you forgive me? Yes." Supposedly this short recording was John talking with George Martin about the placing of clues on the records. Several parts of Revolution 9 contain audio clues to Paul's death--the most noteworthy of these was from the repeated phrase "Number 9" http://www.turnmeondeadman.net/grfx/listen.gif. When this is played backwards, it sounds like "turn me on, dead man," http://www.turnmeondeadman.net/grfx/listen.gif which darkly recalls the line "I'd love to turn you on" from "A Day in the Life". In the sound collage of "Revolution 9" are the sounds of Paul's fatal accident. At one point you hear car horns, then a car crash, followed by a fire burning. When played backwards you can hear "Let me out! There were two. There are none now." When played normally you can clearly hear the following lines: "he hit a pole. We better get him to see a surgeon. So anyhow he went to a dentist instead. The gave him a pair of teeth that weren't any good at all. So my wings are broken and so is my hair. I'm not in the mood for words. Find the night watchman. A fine natural imbalance. He must have got it in the shoulder blades. Take this brother, may it serve you well" The final line marking Paul's passing of the torch to William Campbell. |
Thats about the best I can do with out putting some sort of effort into it.
|
Most of the backmaked statements are bullshit at best.
|
Did you listen to it though? the first link had a downloadable version backmasked fully.
|
And even forwards it still talking about it.
|
Dunno, still (this song excluded even) there is far too much for it to be all coincidence.
|
And yes, I've listend to "Every second of the song."
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Technology...Amazing. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Forward it has a ton of disparate statements. Backwards it has a ton of disparate statements, many open to interpretation on their best days. Even the conspiracy theorists can't agree what is says specifically. |
Yes, and most of those are wide and loose interpretations that belie your sentiment that they MUST indicate something.
|
Pretty big coincidences.
|
Paul isn't dead ftr. But these were planted. I have little doubts there.
|
Quote:
|
What ever, believe the magic bullet theory. I not trying to sway you, I was only saying my take.
|
<table bgcolor="#ffffff" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="550"><tbody><tr><td>
</td> <td width="522"> http://www.geocities.com/sunsetstrip/3674/pidifcc.gif
It's just too bad it doesn't look the a perspective from the grave, and a heart shape is so meaningless. |
Quote:
|
Good job picking out the worst ones:
|
Quote:
|
No, I'm claiming the conspiracy theory makes no sense and is a stretch at best.
|
Quote:
The theory of the death makes no sense, but if was a publicity stunt, I'm not surprised. Ultimately I think most of this is fabricated by the fanbase, but some of it was probably planted to make sure people would ALWAYS talk about the Beatles, even long past the point the music lost its relevance. |
Quote:
The plants are growing around a drum, so I'm pretty sure it was Ringo who died, anyway. |
"I told you about the Walrus and me - man. We are as close as can be - man. Well here's another CLUE for you all, the WALRUS was PAUL"
http://www.geocities.com/sunsetstrip/3674/yltri.gifJohn tells us the Walrus on the cover of the Magical Mystery Tour was Paul. ...Or, you know, he learned the story which he took the "I am the Walrus" line from in the first place was a tale in which the Walrus was not a good guy. But it makes far more sense to assume otherwise. |
Which makes Paul a bad guy, and only furthers conspiracy.
|
My take on it is that there is far too many things for it all to just be a coincidence. Although a lot of it was just people looking way too deep into things.
I really don't know exactly what to believe but I can't just say "meh, coincidence". It is more than that but some of the clues are laughable. |
|
Definitely B and then perhaps the Beatles played around with it just to get kicks out of all the conspiracy theorists.
|
Quote:
When people look hard enough for something like this, they will find it. Sure, you can argue that every theory with this much "evidence" can't just be coincidence, but that ignores the fact that this is not coincidence. It's things taken out of context, others totally made up, and many many wild assumptions to manufacture a theory. Someone did this deliberately, but I'd bet it was the fans. |
Quote:
Heck, if you play another bites the dust it sounds like it's fun to smoke marjuana |
Quote:
I'm not saying that Lennon didn't put elements in to be listened to backwards and forwards, as the whole point of the song was to be a musical experience, unlike any other. Most of these elements are a stretch at best, though. Rev 9 backwards also sounds like it references suicide. Now I know, if I looked hard enough, I could find suicide lyrics in the Beatles. Hell, I could use some of the same ones they did. Yesterday? Oh, so easy there. |
|
ROFL.
Priceless. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®