TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   entertainment forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Transformers 2: Revenge Of The Fallen (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=80263)

D Mac 06-09-2008 08:11 AM

Transformers 2: Revenge Of The Fallen
 
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/movies/a...new-title.html

The sequel to last year's summer hit Transformers will be called Transformers 2: Revenge Of The Fallen.

The new title was revealed by producer Don Murphy on his message forum.

Director Michael Bay informed MTV that the sequel will not end on a cliffhanger.

He said: "You know how those sequels they do the second one so you go see the third one? [Transformers 2] is it. First one was just introducing, setting up stuff, so we can go a lot further. Let's just say [this] is not a lame sequel."

Shia LaBeouf, Megan Fox, Josh Duhamel, Tyrese Gibson and John Turturro will star in the sequel, along with franchise newcomers Isabel Lucas, Rainn Wilson and Matthew Marsden.

Transformers 2: Revenge Of The Fallen is scheduled for release on June 26, 2009.

Destor 06-09-2008 09:00 AM

I was going to come in here and complain how the sequel two parter was getting cliché' but the I remembered this was a Micheal Bay vehicle and realized my point was moot.

El Vaquero de Infierno 06-09-2008 09:59 AM

Megan Fox hot, Transformers film shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhite.

ron the dial 06-09-2008 12:20 PM

rainn wilson yessssss

thedamndest 06-09-2008 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destor (Post 2179989)
I was going to come in here and complain how the sequel two parter was getting cliché' but the I remembered this was a Micheal Bay vehicle and realized my point was moot.

Michael Bay movies are really a throwback to the days when movies used to be really long but contain an intermission to get up and stretch a bit, except these contain so much exploding shit that the "intermission" needs to be at least a year for the average person to collect his bearings. Now that's film making!

BigDaddyCool 06-09-2008 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thedamndest (Post 2180094)
Michael Bay movies are really a throwback to the days when movies used to be really long but contain an intermission to get up and stretch a bit, except these contain so much exploding shit that the "intermission" needs to be at least a year for the average person to collect his bearings. Now that's film making!

:rofl:

Destor 06-09-2008 03:51 PM

rofl

Mr. Monday Morning 06-09-2008 04:43 PM

Who the fuck came up with that title. This isn't fucking Star Wars, it's giant robots beating the shit out of each other. THERE IS NO SUBTEXT.

ClockShot 06-09-2008 04:44 PM

Sweet. School Boy from Rambo is gonna be in this.

Kalyx triaD 06-09-2008 05:06 PM

I WAS GONNA POST THE OFFICIAL THREAD TODAY!!!!

Anyway; they're filming now for a Summer 09 release. Autobot Arcee is confirmed as a motorcycle (no surprise there) and there will be a transformers based on an ice-cream truck and a huge Blackbird jet. An Audi R8 was also seen being chased by the good guys, take that as you will. There may be as many as 10 TFs on both sides, and rest assured Soundwave will make it in there with his most popular minions Laserbeak and Ravage. No; he will not be a damn strereo, get over it.

I've been up and up on the news and this thread will be my vent spot. Don't worry, I despise spoilers and if I run into one (like I did two days ago, damn!) I'll spare you the jist.

Roll Out!

Theo Dious 06-09-2008 05:44 PM

If this does not lead to Unicron in some way shape or form I will personally leave flaming poo on the doorstep of everyone involved.

http://www.freewebs.com/fourth_heir/...k/Unicron1.jpg

Till all are one, bitch!

Theo Dious 06-09-2008 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Monday Morning (Post 2180230)
Who the fuck came up with that title. This isn't fucking Star Wars, it's giant robots beating the shit out of each other. THERE IS NO SUBTEXT.

First of all, I object to that. Transformers does in fact have subtext, it's just that sometimes it's paper thin and shitty.

Additionally, The Fallen refers to a rather obscure character in the Transformers universe, and since he does have a connection to Unicron I shall now go and masturbate.

Theo Dious 06-09-2008 05:50 PM

And, I demand that the third installment be called "Transformers: Revenge of Unicron's Beard."

Kalyx triaD 06-09-2008 05:52 PM

I highly doubt the movie will so much as reference Unicron. It just wouldn't work at this stage of the movie franchise. Yes I know about the Fallen, and Hasbro's recent lock of the name. Yes I know about their relation to Unicron. Yes I freakin love the concept of a planet sized TF. But no, I don't think he'll work at all in live action, especially with how Bay set up that universe in... believability (can't believe I said it).

Theo Dious 06-09-2008 06:00 PM

I'm still sporting the "If Unicron no-shows, I riot" sign, and nothing is going to stop me.

Mr. Monday Morning 06-10-2008 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarthTedious (Post 2180289)
First of all, I object to that. Transformers does in fact have subtext, it's just that sometimes it's paper thin and shitty.

In a Michael Bay movie? Ya think?

Quote:

Additionally, The Fallen refers to a rather obscure character in the Transformers universe, and since he does have a connection to Unicron I shall now go and masturbate.
The would revenge would imply that the character would have been introduced by now if that was going to be the case. They're probably just dicking around people who actually know this obscure fact.

Kane Knight 06-10-2008 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarthTedious (Post 2180289)
First of all, I object to that. Transformers does in fact have subtext, it's just that sometimes it's paper thin and shitty.

This is Michael Bay. He aspires to paper thin and shitty subtext.

Anyway, are you sure it's a ref to "the fallen?"

Kane Knight 06-10-2008 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Monday Morning (Post 2181327)
The would revenge would imply that the character would have been introduced by now if that was going to be the case. They're probably just dicking around people who actually know this obscure fact.


Well, he could be out for revenge for something that happened before the movie.

I'm not saying you're wrong, just pointing out the obvious way that it could still make sense. Could, but probably won't.

However, since we're out to make a Trilogy here....

Mr. Monday Morning 06-10-2008 12:37 PM

Unless I hear otherwise I'm just gonna assume it's a reference to Megatron being reborn as Galvatron. And he'll probably resurrect some of the others who got killed, or something.

Hey, maybe we'll get EVIL JAZZ! :eek:

Kane Knight 06-10-2008 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Monday Morning (Post 2181509)
Unless I hear otherwise I'm just gonna assume it's a reference to Megatron being reborn as Galvatron. And he'll probably resurrect some of the others who got killed, or something.

Hey, maybe we'll get EVIL JAZZ! :eek:

Even coming back would make more sense.

Danny Electric 06-10-2008 07:25 PM

Lol Matthew Marsden

Kalyx triaD 06-10-2008 07:39 PM

There's gonna be a lil 'Former, with an RC truck vehicle/toy mode. He's gonna go BIG in merch. Appearently he's Sam's pet or something.

U-Warrior 06-15-2008 11:34 AM

Starscream needs a bigger role in this one.

Kane Knight 06-15-2008 03:08 PM

Oh Good. Marketing.

Shadow 06-15-2008 04:11 PM

I can't wait for this movie. I really can't.

And I really hope they do use the Fallen...he's on fire...all the time. HE'S PERFECT FOR BAY!

Mr Regal 06-15-2008 04:24 PM

Matthew Marsden scores yet another sequel role....legend.

Kane Knight 06-15-2008 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadow (Post 2187306)
I can't wait for this movie. I really can't.

And I really hope they do use the Fallen...he's on fire...all the time. HE'S PERFECT FOR BAY!

He'd be perfect for Bay if he was constantly exploding.

Kalyx triaD 06-15-2008 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by U-Warrior (Post 2187118)
Starscream needs a bigger role in this one.

He will, ye old sock.

RP 06-15-2008 07:58 PM

Transformers 2 : If Its Burnable, Burn It

RP 06-15-2008 08:02 PM

Transformers 3 : Gas, Match, Boom, Rinse and Repeat

RP 06-15-2008 08:06 PM

Transformers 4 : Explosions In The Sky...And Eventually Everywhere Else

RP 06-15-2008 08:08 PM

Transformers 5 : The Making of Bad Boys 3

Kalyx triaD 06-27-2008 12:39 AM

Well I tried to post pics of megan Fox kissing Shia on a motorcycle and a new small transformer attacking a car but the pics came up as those red x's in a box.

Shaggy 06-27-2008 06:20 AM

They announced a few days ago that the title has changed once again....not a huge change but it is a change that many people were hoping for...

Instead of.....

Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen

Its now....

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen

Kalyx triaD 06-27-2008 06:26 AM

Numbers are so last Summer.

Mr. Nerfect 06-29-2008 10:30 PM

I personally think this will be a reference to The Fallen. I mean, it would seem to fit, there will be a trilogy, and the character is apparently pretty cool. But come on, Skywarp! Get your payday! :shifty:

Kalyx triaD 07-01-2008 02:31 PM

I am also a fan of Skywarp.

Going back on my previous thought, it seems that the sequel is indeed about the Fallen - the first Cybertronian. I guess we'll see.

Kalyx triaD 01-09-2009 03:44 AM

http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h2...ers2poster.jpg

Fignuts 01-09-2009 04:03 AM

HOT

Kalyx triaD 01-09-2009 04:11 AM

And that face more than resembles the Decepticon symbol...

G 01-09-2009 04:41 AM

http://cm1.theinsider.com/media/0/34...est-2-9-07.jpg





piitb mos def

Kalyx triaD 01-09-2009 04:44 AM

...Yeah she's in it, too.

El Vaquero de Infierno 01-09-2009 09:55 AM

I thought the first film was a bit naff. I really only went to see the first out of nostalgia, and because Megan Fox is a fox. But can't say I wish to see any more films... or atleast spend money to see them.

Requiem 01-09-2009 10:06 AM

Can't wait for this.

Mr Regal 01-09-2009 09:50 PM

I would sex megan fox until my tally whacker fell off.

G 01-10-2009 02:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by El Vaquero de Infierno (Post 2391545)
I thought the first film was a bit naff. I really only went to see the first out of nostalgia, and because Megan Fox is a fox. But can't say I wish to see any more films... or atleast spend money to see them.


1st was excellent. This should be too.

FearedSanctity 01-10-2009 10:50 AM

A significantly brighter version....

http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-conte...er-440x651.jpg

Mr Regal 01-10-2009 01:12 PM

oooooooooooooooh

94 SVT Cobra 01-10-2009 04:13 PM

is that the fallen?

Gerard 01-10-2009 04:47 PM

As long as he fucks right off with the "superzoomedinblurowtfisgoingonovision" it could be a good movie. I still can't believe the massive balls up they made with barricade in the first movie, on his way to the end battle then never appears. Plenty of people were saying it was a large editing error with others saying they just wanted to keep barricade around for the sequel. If they did why didnt they just cut the scene where he said he was en route with the other decepticons?


The decepticons really need more screen time this time around, last movie you just seen small glimpses of them and nothing more.

But yeah, as long as he cuts back on that zoomed in shit i will enjoy it, too many of the fight scenes in the first it was hard to tell wtf was going on, that and prime geting his ass handed to him in the final battle with barely any offence.

:foc:

Jeritron 01-10-2009 06:00 PM

The first one was easily Michael Bay's best movie, which isn't saying much, but it was good. It wasn't lifechanging or cinematic art, but a lot of fun. I liked it a lot, and I have pretty much always hated Michael Bay movies.

This one looks like it's shaping up to be cool, but it has the potential to suck really bad. If they focus in the wrong direction it could become an overdone or unoriginal sequel, and fall back into the probability of being just another terrible movie.

It also has a chance to be really entertaining, if it takes what worked in the first movie and goes further with it.

I hope the second happens.

Fox 01-10-2009 08:17 PM

The first one, in my opinion, was crap. Great effects, good acting, the transformers themselves were great, but the story just didn't feel right. I hope that this will be one of the rare cases that the sequel is better than the original, but I sincerely doubt it.

Kalyx triaD 01-11-2009 10:41 PM

Autobot, Sideswipe (Chevy Centennial Corvette):

http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h2...2sideswipe.jpg

Just the toy, but a good idea of what he looks like.

Fignuts 01-12-2009 01:18 AM

Wow, what a shitty looking corvette.

Kalyx triaD 01-12-2009 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 94 SVT Cobra (Post 2392992)
is that the fallen?

Yes.

Fignuts 01-12-2009 03:50 AM

Never had a problem with Michael Bay's movies. Frankly, I think they're a lot of fun, and most people take them a lot more serious than they should be.

Jeritron 01-12-2009 05:18 AM

Well it depends on the movie. Pearl Harbor and The Island are meant to be taken seriously. They're not fun. They're fuckin terrible.

I'll agree with you on the rest though. They are meant to be fun and a couple of them are to me.

El Vaquero de Infierno 01-13-2009 11:28 AM

I think we need more, better pics of Megan Fox.

http://blog.celebritymovieblog.com/w...16238/main.jpg

Damn you, nipple pads!

Fignuts 01-13-2009 12:50 PM

Apparently there is going be a trailer for this, and the G.I. Joe movie during the superbowl. Honestly gonna watch it just for that, since none of the teams interest me.

Savio 01-13-2009 06:45 PM

I wonder if it will be a cliche suckfest like the first one

Kalyx triaD 01-13-2009 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savior (Post 2396622)
I wonder if it will be a cliche suckfest like the first one


Kalyx triaD 01-27-2009 07:54 PM

http://moviesmedia.ign.com/movies/im...7015447900.jpg

Vastardikai 01-30-2009 05:16 AM

1. There MUST be a Sgt. Slaughter cameo: AND THAT'S AN ORDER!

2. If they feature the Dreadnaughts, CM Punk has to play Zartan. for 2 reasons:
a. Put black paint on his face, he's a dead ringer.
b. He's already got the Cobra tat.

Kalyx triaD 01-30-2009 05:19 AM

I posted the Snake Eyes pic because I had nowhere else to post it, he won't be in Transformers 2. Sorry if anyone was misinformed. But I got some new TF2 material to drop in a few.

EDIT Update:

Two of the new Autobots. Very expressive!

http://www.tfw2005.com/transformers-...chmentid=13379

A small pic showing the Autobots cruisin the streets. Now that's a convoy. The above Autobots would be the 5th and 4th cars respectively.

http://www.tfw2005.com/transformers-...chmentid=13158

Soundwave (Toy). No shots of his pet, Ravage yet.:

http://www.tfw2005.com/transformers-...chmentid=13349
http://www.tfw2005.com/transformers-...chmentid=13348
  • Devestator is "fucking huge" and will act true to his namesake once the Constructicons form him (he looks like a gorilla!).
  • One of the Autobots from the 80's movie, Springer, is confirmed. He'll be a helicopter again.
  • Megatron might not return afterall.
  • No shots or even description of The Fallen, or even if he'll be on fire or not.

Jeritron 01-30-2009 05:24 AM

DON'T DROP THAT SHIT!

Jeritron 01-30-2009 05:24 AM

the yellow cake I mean. By all means drop the Transformers news

Kalyx triaD 01-30-2009 05:34 AM

From one of the writers:

* With many of the Decepticons being CGI, there is more freedom to add scenes in post-production. Adding extra scenes with Transformers is currently under consideration.
* As a follow-up, Roberto said one extra scene being considered was director Michael Bay's idea with Bay saying, "You and the fans are gonna love this..."
* Starscream's character will be more similar to his Generation One self.
* Roberto states that Producer Lorenzo di Bonaventura's comments in Empire that there are around 40 robots was not an exaggeration.

D Mac 01-30-2009 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kalyx triaD (Post 2396663)

I'm supposed to inform the Noob that posted this that 13gb.com does not allow hot linking.

Kalyx triaD 02-01-2009 09:17 AM

Superbowl Trailer:

<object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lpOUz6nmy-I&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lpOUz6nmy-I&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object>

Ravage, FTW. And the big fucker at the end is not Devastator - just one of the Constructicons.

Fignuts 02-01-2009 12:08 PM

looks hot

Fignuts 02-01-2009 12:12 PM

Also, what the fuck does soundwave transform into?

Pretty sure all the hardcore transformers fans out there are on the verger of a murderous rampage.

Kalyx triaD 02-01-2009 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fignuts (Post 2419685)
Also, what the fuck does soundwave transform into?

Pretty sure all the hardcore transformers fans out there are on the verger of a murderous rampage.

Cybertronian jet from the looks of the toy. I've heard his Earth form is a satellite as well. I'm hardcore TF, and I am stoked.

Fignuts 02-01-2009 05:13 PM

As long as he has that kickass voice from the cartoon, or something like it at least.

G 02-01-2009 05:16 PM

trailer is down

Shaggy 02-01-2009 06:09 PM

Word was that Megatron wasnt going to be in the film but in the new toyline for the movie Megatron makes an appearance as a newly improved tank. Now if thats in the movie or not remains to be seen till the movies release. But untill then I just have a huge problem with soundwave being a jet....but then again I guess he couldnt be a tape recorder in this day in age.

Kalyx triaD 02-02-2009 03:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by G (Post 2419884)
trailer is down

Fixed.

Kalyx triaD 02-02-2009 03:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fignuts (Post 2419881)
As long as he has that kickass voice from the cartoon, or something like it at least.

Yes, the voice is in. Updated, but it's in. His voice, head, and Ravage were things the writers were serious about.

Krimzon7 02-02-2009 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fignuts (Post 2419881)
As long as he has that kickass voice from the cartoon, or something like it at least.

Right Fucking there, brother! I think the voice is just as important, if not more important as him being a casset deck!

BigDaddyCool 02-02-2009 05:08 PM

BDC is going to watch this movie, it is been predestined, but I'm already kinda made that fucking Devastator is a gorilla. What the fuck man.

Also what the hell is Soundwave a jet for, he is a boombox. This angries up my blood.

BigDaddyCool 02-02-2009 05:08 PM

Ah shit, I hit 40,000 post 20 post ago and didn't notice.

Krimzon7 02-02-2009 05:15 PM

congrats anyhow on 40K. I don't get the Devestator/Gorilla thing, but I do agree with making SW more 'modern'. The CGI team goes through great lengths to ensure that these guys aren't shifting mass and all that(I fogot the actual term). An 18 story robot can't become a boom box, unless it's the source.

BigDaddyCool 02-02-2009 05:23 PM

I have no problem with the transformers being updated verision in transformed form, like Starscream can be a new jet, and Bumblebee can be a new VW Beetle (not a fucking Camero, you rat bastards). But Soundwave has to be a boombox, or else being named Soundwave don't make no sence. They could have made that Shockwave.

Krimzon7 02-02-2009 05:31 PM

That is a very good point. I honestly don't care about the accuracy of SOundwave as much as I hope that Starscream gets a bigger better role.

BigDaddyCool 02-02-2009 05:39 PM

Don't talk about Starscream, I'll stab you.

Jeritron 02-02-2009 05:46 PM

Why the fuck would they keep soundwave a boombox int he movie? Maybe if he was supposed to be a little runt, like the guy in the first movie, but this is an action movie. It just doesn't translate to screen.
It's like making bumblebee a fast muscle car, instead of a volkswagen beatle. It just makes sense for heaven's sake. Not everything has to match the children's cartoon from the 80s.

Krimzon7 02-02-2009 05:59 PM

Are you fucking high? Are you happy with the way he was portrayed in the first movie? Starscream needs to have more of a role that is befitting of the second in command of The Decepticons. I will deem TF2 a utter failure if they drop the ball with Starscream.

Krimzon7 02-02-2009 06:03 PM

I liked Soundwave, I LOVED Starscream. I would rather see more of him than an 'accurate' depiciton of Soundwave. Hell, let him be a supersonic jet, or let him have surveilence advantages, just let Starscream rock shit.

BigDaddyCool 02-02-2009 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeritron (Post 2420972)
Why the fuck would they keep soundwave a boombox int he movie? Maybe if he was supposed to be a little runt, like the guy in the first movie, but this is an action movie. It just doesn't translate to screen.
It's like making bumblebee a fast muscle car, instead of a volkswagen beatle. It just makes sense for heaven's sake. Not everything has to match the children's cartoon from the 80s.

Um, shut up, they are robots that transform into shit. I'm sure they could change sizes. Also, with as many plot holes in the first movie, I don't think size discrepancy would matter.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Krimzon7 (Post 2420994)
Are you fucking high? Are you happy with the way he was portrayed in the first movie? Starscream needs to have more of a role that is befitting of the second in command of The Decepticons. I will deem TF2 a utter failure if they drop the ball with Starscream.

Starscream is a little bitch, he should be act like a little bitch. Plus he was never second in command, Soundwave and Shockwave both had higher ranks than Starscream. Soundwave was obviously Megatron's right hand man, while Shockwave was left in control of Cybertron. Starscream was air commander at best, but sometimes he would take cues from Thundercracker and Skywarp.

BigDaddyCool 02-02-2009 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Krimzon7 (Post 2420998)
I liked Soundwave, I LOVED Starscream. I would rather see more of him than an 'accurate' depiciton of Soundwave. Hell, let him be a supersonic jet, or let him have surveilence advantages, just let Starscream rock shit.

What are you talking about? Starscream was a loud mouth back stabbing asshole. I mean the guy was dangerous, but in a sneaky sort of way.

Jeritron 02-02-2009 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2421009)


Um, shut up, they are robots that transform into shit. I'm sure they could change sizes. Also, with as many plot holes in the first movie, I don't think size descrapancy would matter.
and Skywarp.

That's not the issue. You missed the point. Why the fuck would they want a radio to be a character in a movie? Where's the sense in that? Let's have this cumbersome, boring, trivial object be a character in our movie.
Yea, I think people would rather see a jet, seeing as it can get from point A to point B in a manner other than being carried on some gangbangers shoulder.
Again, they're making a movie here. It's not saturday morning cartoons for 6 year olds.

Fignuts 02-02-2009 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2420928)
BDC is going to watch this movie, it is been predestined, but I'm already kinda made that fucking Devastator is a gorilla. What the fuck man.

Also what the hell is Soundwave a jet for, he is a boombox. This angries up my blood.


A kalyx said, that's just his cybertronian form. His earth frm is some sort of satellite thingy. Which I'm ok with, since he still has ravage, and the awesome voice. He would have worked as a casette player 15 years ago, but this is 2009. Some changes have to be made. That combined with the reported old school portrayal of starscream is making me a fan of this already.

Jeritron 02-02-2009 06:11 PM

I'm convinced that the fanboys of the world have gone soft. I just hope the movie has quality. The interesting nature of the robots hasn't been comprimised.

As we were talking about in the GI Joe thread, I don't know why anyone would have a problem with changes as long as the basic ideas are kept in order.

So, when Transformers are new outlandish designs, rather than old outlandish designs: no harm. It's an update, and a freshening for the sake of translation to film.
Let's be honest, jets and fast cars lend themselves to an action movie more than tape recorders and volkswagens.

When what makes the material compelling is utterly ignored, then there's an issue.

I'm pretty sure Transformers still features a range of different cool shit transforming into other cool shit, with colorful and diverse characters.

BigDaddyCool 02-02-2009 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeritron (Post 2421011)
That's not the issue. You missed the point. Why the fuck would they want a radio to be a character in a movie? Where's the sense in that? Let's have this cumbersome, boring, trivial object be a character in our movie.
Yea, I think people would rather see a jet, seeing as it can get from point A to point B in a manner other than being carried on some gangbangers shoulder.
Again, they're making a movie here. It's not saturday morning cartoons for 6 year olds.

You are missing the point, they are pissing on my childhood. That makes me mad. Plus, how badass would it be if they ballsed up and made a Soundwave working boombox toy that transformed into robot mode? Those fuckers would sell like hotcakes, and that is the real point of these movies.

Fignuts 02-02-2009 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2421010)
What are you talking about? Starscream was a loud mouth back stabbing asshole. I mean the guy was dangerous, but in a sneaky sort of way.

What are YOU talking about? Just because he was a loud mouth backstabbing asshole doesn't mean he can't kick ass too. He was powerful enough to be second in command of the decepticons, ffs.

And he was dangerous in a sneaky sort of way, to Megatron. To the autobots, he was dangerous in an ass kicking sort of way.

Most badass scene in the frst movie was when starscream tore the shit out of those jets. It's great if the rumors are true about his personality being like the cartoon, but I hope he doesn't lose that badass factor from the first one, because he should be powerful, as well as an asshole.

Jeritron 02-02-2009 06:24 PM

BDC has gone bye-bye, do you have any thoughts on the matter Figgy?

hint: you're supposed to say "I'm terrified beyond the capacity for rational thought"

BigDaddyCool 02-02-2009 06:24 PM

I hate you all.

Fignuts 02-02-2009 06:25 PM

I mean his name alone is badass. Starscream is the most badass name ever. I even made a thread on this, and no one could come up with a name more badass than starscream. It stands to reason that he would have to be something of a badass, at least in combat.

Jeritron 02-02-2009 06:28 PM

Starscream is such a badass name, and although he had a small role in the first one I thought he was portrayed awesomely.
I also thought his escape, and surivival was so in character, and will be enhanced in this next one.

Again, not everything has to be touched on in the first, or even second film. They're developing a franchise here, and I thought the simple focus of the first movie was the right move. It paid off.
Now, they should ratchet it up another few notches for the second act. It looks like that's what they're doing.

Fignuts 02-02-2009 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2421030)
I hate you all.

Maybe you should change your avatar to like Destro or something, because you clearly know nothing about transformers.

BigDaddyCool 02-02-2009 06:30 PM

Destro? I never watched GI Joe. Starscream is a badass name, just not a badass guy.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®