![]() |
The only thing wrong with the Hart/Mcmahon fued is...
It's not here in Canada. The American public does not do this fued justice, and should be ashamed of themselves.
http://www.cknw.com/Pics/gold.jpg |
Canada can eat shit.
|
Nices heads of cabbage they are all holding, bunch of faggots.
|
what's all this aboot?
|
Quote:
|
Why are you telling WWE where to book their shows? You some kind of smark?
Just enjoy the show for what it is. |
Oh my gosh...Tyler I have to apologize. This is NOT a product of America's education system. This is a product of American parenting....which is basically nonexistent at this point. BigDaddyCool has obviously been raised as an idiot, regardless of how old he is at this point.
|
It doesn't take a genius to see that the American public doesn't react to the Hitman, in the way the WWE wants them to. It has nothing to do with being a Smark, like yourself, its just common sense. So use a little, thanks.
|
Quote:
You're no better than the rest of us. If you can, please explain to me in a non-smark way (so no talking about crowd reactions, dead crowds etc) why WWE should come to Canada other than "it would be cool". You can't. |
It's called understanding the crowd. Every FAN of the business knows that this fued should have been here in Canada. You know it, I know it, the idiot BidDaddy, whatever the rest of his name is knows it, and so does everyone else on these boards. Not too mention, the American public with their 'What" chants ruin every promo the WWE is trying to do.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Yeah, I'm a retard because the national flower of cananda is a chef salad.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The only thing wrong with the Bret Hart fued is that Bret Hart is in it.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Your a prime example of how this fued should be in Canada. |
Quote:
You want to know why they don't run Canada much? Because the crowds they get tend to be SMARK CROWDS and tend to align with the IWC. They shit on top faces and cheer top heels. WWE doesn't want that. |
Cause Cananda is 10 years behind the times.
|
Quote:
|
They shit on Cena.
|
Maybe if they did this back when Bret Hart was relevent...
|
Quote:
Hmm, kind of being contradictory here. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
lol at Tyler Killer, he has been defeated in the arena of debate so he has to just insult everyone now. Bret Hart is a tool.
|
Hmmm, nice. Going to the old spelling defence. "You can't spell, so your point is moot." You're arguing wrestling, you dumb Canuck.
|
Quote:
Me using "Five Moves of Dooms" shows my disdain for Cena. He doesn't only have five moves. When I say "Botchtista", I show my disdain. Batista doesn't botch all the time. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Cena - In-ring style is not what I enjoy in the majority of his matches. His promos tend to be over-acted and repetitive. And I just don't like the character over-all. He's always the center of attention (even without the title), which, while it is GOOD FOR BUSINESS, I do not particularly enjoy him being featured as prominently as he is. If I LIKED how he's portrayed I wouldn't have a problem. I have vast amounts of respect for the man and think he's great for the company.
Batista - Again, another style I don't particularly enjoy, and up until last night would say I never enjoyed his promos nor cared for his character. Smark response? Fuck yeah. But that doesn't make it invalid. I see both sides of the argument. In the end, both bring in money, and from the business side of things they should be in the spots they are. That doesn't mean I have to enjoy them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I thought you only talked to intellectuals, yet you are still responding to me? God, you are stupid. What's that I hear? Is that a moose raping your mom?
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®