Call of Duty: Black Ops
 

Call of Duty: Black Ops set for Nov. 9, 2010

by Ludwig Kietzmann http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.en...writer_rss.gif { Apr 30th 2010 at 7:33AM } http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.jo...reaking001.png http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.jo...001xbox001.png http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.jo...station001.png http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.jo...c-button25.png
<!-- sphereit start -->

I never thought you'd feel that way, G.

I will not stand for racism in the VG forum.

So what they really meant is, this is a Call of Duty exactly the same as the others, but with new backdrops.

Pass.

Pretty sure that's been the case since The Big Red One.

I thought the new game was supposed to be set in 'Nam?

I think I'll pass this one up.

Get ready for it. Was on Gamespot.com earlier and they announced that IW already has Modern Warfare 3 in production

Pfft, who's making it? IW's janitor? Secretary?

Supposedly last level is based on the Iranian Embassy Siege in 1980 and the farthest in time the game goes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_Embassy_Siege

<div style="width: 480px;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=8,0,0,0" id="gtembed" width="480" height="392"> <param name="allowScriptAccess" value="sameDomain" /> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /> <param name="movie" value="http://www.gametrailers.com/remote_wrap.php?mid=64933"/><param name="quality" value="high" /> <embed src="http://www.gametrailers.com/remote_wrap.php?mid=64933" swLiveConnect="true" name="gtembed" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" allowFullScreen="true" quality="high" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="392"></embed> </object><div style="font-size: 10px; font-family: Verdana; text-align: center; width: 480px; padding-top: 2px; padding-bottom: 2px; background-color: black; height: 32px;"><div><a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.gametrailers.com" title="GameTrailers.com">Video Games</a> | <a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.gametrailers.com/game/call-of-duty-black-ops/13099" title="Call of Duty: Black Ops">Call of Duty: Black Ops</a> | <a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.gametrailers.com/video/exclusive-debut-call-of/64933" title="Exclusive Debut Tease Trailer HD">Exclusive Debut Tease Trailer HD</a></div><div style="padding-top: 3px;"><a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://xbox360.gametrailers.com/" title="XBox 360">XBox 360</a> | <a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://ps3.gametrailers.com/" title="PS3">Playstation 3</a> | <a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://wii.gametrailers.com/" title="Wii">Nintendo Wii</a></div></div></div>

Also pass.

Looks kinda fucking awesome.

Yeah I'll probably buy.

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mSfWHD8tZQY&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mSfWHD8tZQY&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

Shows a couple of scenes from Nam. Looks fucking badass.

Sticky explosive shooting crossbow? Yep. I'm in.

Dunno. Looks cool, but Medal of Honor has my attention more.

Depends on whats going to be in the multiplayer for weaponary.

If its anything like MW2, I wouldnt spend over $20 to get the game due to the frustration factor.

There had better be a beta.

There had better be actual fucking playtesting before they launch the game.

Treyarch is more down to earth than IW.

If I hear of One Man Army, Thermal, Juggernaut/Painkiller, Heartbeat Sensor, Danger Close, MLC Knifers I am not touching this game.

I think you would...........................................

I wouldnt pay $70 for a game that frustrates me to the point that MW2 has and continues to do at some points.

Give me real guns, with real scopes and real equipment and I am happy.

As for killstreaks, def need to take some out and nerf the gunner.

Why do you not play Bad Company 2?

Snipers can't go prone. Ill pass

Good show, Treyarch, you have my attention.

ZOMG! That kills it all to hell! :p

lol "real guns" every gun in MW2 is real.

For me yes.

If you couldnt tell Ididnt want just a shooter without all the bullshit like Thermal, HBS and the such you are an idiot.

I was under the impression you liked MW2, FAngel. I have all manner of complaints about the game (series) but you seemed alright with it.

oh you know FA...he bitches to hell and high water about MW2, but plays it religiously, changed his gamertag to form a clan for it, etc etc.

He will buy this, then complain, and still play it.

Also, this game looks pretty sweet, and i wanna see where they take single player. When MW2 was announced, i was more excited about the continuation of the single player over multi.

I had this huge post typed out, but fuck it. Just gonna say, FA would probably burn his card deck if he didn't win at solitaire. Seriously dude, don't like the game, sell it and go buy some ice cream to wallow in.

Sorry man but that's just plain stupid.

Dice's big gamble that prone was hurting gameplay experience and was thus nixed in Battlefield proved successful, imo. You hardly notice it and when you do think about it, you have nothing but joy-joy feelings inside yourself. Fuck prone.

if you even played BC or BC2, you'll realize that prone is not important. There's enough f'n snipers in that game online without prone, and the maps are big and diverse enough that sniping 'spots' are anything but a guarantee visual check list

A true sniper would want it, but a true competitive gamer would want the added balance.