WWE is PISSED at the Undertaker
 

Why? Cause the nigga broke kayfabe, that's why.

http://image3.examiner.com/images/bl...ding_photo.jpg

That don't look like no vegetative state to me.

linx

I heard they're going to drop him from the opening montage because of this.

Rest In Peace.

*rolls eyes in the back of his head*

*gong*

I bet you in 3-6 months, after the newly wed sex is done, Taker will wish he really was in a vegetated state. Maybe he requested this storyline so when that 3-6 month period is over, he can go to the lawyer and say; " How could I have gotten married, when I was in a vegetated state? I want this marriage nulled and void!" :rofl:

This better not effect my roster!

:rofl::rofl:

:|

3-6 months

Taker looks strange in a suit. I have only seen it in like one other picture and I think it was someone's funeral.

Who signed the pre-nup anyway?

NO RESPECT FOR THE DEADMAN?????

At least she's hotter than Sara.

I highly doubt this, but if they are...its 2010 FFS.

Some of those comments from that link are great.

Sheamus and Miz getting pushed is half the reason I watch

why is that so bad if taker gets married? of course he has a couple more years in wrestling i really seriously doubt they'll fire him for that!!! but good for the oldster!!! lol.... he's coming back at summerslam no worries and i am so renting it!!!

yeah its good wwe has nothing against mark(undertaker) but if they were going to cover up his injury they should of used a different story line. Because how may time has undertaker died and came back to life i mean anybody should know that he will come back so i think wwe needs to not be so upset.

Maybe third time's the charm.

I wish The Muppets would host Raw. That would be incredible. Gonzo and Santino skits galore

d'oh@wwe

This sounds like NEWZ at it's NEWZIEST...

(sorry, someone had to bring it up.)

U WILL ALL REST IN PIECES :mad::mad::mad:

Seriously, do they want him to not have wedding photos or have a fucking black wedding?

<object width="500" height="405"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CrNx_VDmn-8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CrNx_VDmn-8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="405"></embed></object>

Jim Cornette and Jim Ross were brilliant on commentary for that.

» WWE officials have told Nexus members to remain in character while in public. They have been ordered to wear armbands everywhere and are prohibited from posing for photos or signing autographs. With that being said, when approached by fans, most treat them nicely and simply say they’re not allowed to sign autographs.

lol yeah that works out well. They keep kayfabe by being courteous and nice. They should trash the surrounding area if anyone asks for an autograph.

I still prefer my idea of Statler and Waldorf heckling bad skits.

I can't believe that the WWE would actually be mad about this. It's not like Jim Cornette is running the company.

He is big liar. I like him before but now hates the him and his new missus.

Big Dog in the Dog House?

So because of this Taker is finally gonna job to Chavo?

If history serves, he will win one or more money in the bank ladder matches, followed by a title run or two. That's what happens when you're in the dog house.

Okay Skwisgaar.

Taker won't have to climb a ladder. The lights will go out, then when they come back on Taker will mysteriously have the briefcase in his hands!

The important thing is, the Undertaker is being punished.

But what's the rule about dropping the title before getting it back. Is it against some rising mid-carder?