![]() |
Something I've noticed about RAW...
I've noticed that Smackdown shows a "Raw Rewind."
RAW does not do the same for SmackDown, and they won't even bother mentioning the other show unless there is a SD superstar on there. So why should the lower rated show have to show what happened on RAW? It's bullshit, imo. |
Because RAW is the flagship and all they really care about.
|
Like it matters.
|
Quote:
Nothing they do really makes much sense anymore though. |
SmackDown! only exists on RAW when they want to pop the ratings.
|
I think they should just choose one direction and go with it.
You can't have a PPV where the 2 brands fight for "Bragging Rights" when there's no real animosity between the brands. Why would the SmackDown GM even allow Raw to have time on their show if the two are supposed to be competing? |
I think they're sloppy because there is no competition. You always run faster when someone is chasing you and without WCW, the WWE can afford to be lax because it's not like their going to lose the ratings war anytime soon.
|
Disnt Raw used to have a recap of Smackdown, or was that just before the brand split?
|
Raw occasionally has a Smackdown recap as well, if they need to fill time or there was something huge on Friday.
|
There's almost always a commercial hyping the Smackdown main event during Raw
|
Smackdown should have a Superstars rewind
|
Things might change now that Smackdown and Raw are both on NBC/Universal networks.
|
RAW is the flagship show. Simple as that.
|
smackdown rebound
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®