![]() |
Then vs. Now
We talk a lot about how bad or good this era of wrestling is and how it compares or doesn't compare to the Attitude Era, who sucks, who doesn't suck, it's the talent, it's the writing, etc... so I figured it would be interesting to go back to this day 10 & 20 years ago and compare the talent of today with the talent of yesteryear.
I'm using the current and past title holders only because they're people obviously deemed worthy by the company for the push or exposure. In my opinion, this era's crop does come off a little weak in comparison to the other two decades although the WWE championship titleholders and WCW/ WWE Heavyweight Champions could spark in interesting debate. What decade had the best collection of titleholders in your opinion? Who are guys who could have held the same title in either of the other two decades and who are guys who probably wouldn't have been allowed to even think about holding that particular title? Which belt has seen the greatest drop in talent or prestige? How far, if at all, do you think the talent level improved over the decades and/or dropped over the decades? What was the difference from then and now that makes these improvements or drops the way they are. You don't have to answer any of those, just throwing some ideas out for the sake of conversation. WWE Champion October of 1990: Ultimate Warrior October of 2000: The Rock Current: Randy Orton Heavyweight Champion (WCW didn't have its own belt in 1990 so I used the NWA Champion) October of 1990: Sting October of 2000: Booker T Current: Kane Intercontinental Champion October of 1990: Kerry Von Erich October of 2000: Eddie Guerrero Current: Dolph Ziggler United States Champion October of 1990: Lex Luger October of 2000: Lance Storm Current: Daniel Bryan Tag Team Champions October of 1990: Hart Foundation October of 2000: Hardy Boyz Current: McIntyre & Rhodes Women's Champion October of 1990: :nono: October of 2000: Lita Current: Michelle McCool |
|
|
Quote:
|
Funny how Bischoff keeps going to worse and worse companies. From the WWF (apparently) to WCW and now to TNA. The only rung left on this ladder is no company at all :D.
Sorry that this is off topic. |
Quote:
|
Whether you think he is a one trick pony or not, what Bischoff did in WCW up until his first hiatus/ firing changed wrestling for the better. Everything else after that... not so much.
|
Quote:
|
WCW started in 1988 but used the NWA title until '93
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He could probably afford getting a kfc or popeye's in New Orleans though. EDIT - When did NBT change his avatar pic?? |
What are you talking about? That has always been my pic :shifty:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
October 2000 was a great month.
|
Quote:
|
I was busy comparing ultimate warrior to the rock. Honestly this should be considered a tie. Warrior was the most charismatic and energetic guy during his time. The Rock was the most charismatic wrestler of his time. To dig deeper: Ultimate Warrior was also equally as athletic and good in the ring (according to the standards of the times). Ultimate Warrior was considered a good wrestler for his generation where collar and elbow tie ups were key and a splash would pin a guy. The Rock pinned top guys with a shitty elbow drop.
Obviously people would argue that Rocky was a better wrestler than Warrior but consider the wrestling style of the 80s...while considered outdated today, he was one of the top workers of his generation and his energy and charisma could not be topped. Same could be said for Rocky during the 90s. He was one of the top wrestlers for the style of the 90s. So I call stalemate after some serious evaluations. |
WWF not giving Bischoff a chance when he felt he deserved it was one of his primary motivations for trying to put them out of business. He really had a fire under his ass about that
|
I don't like Dolph Ziggler's chances of living past 40.
|
Quote:
For me the biggest question is whether Orton could get over as champ in 2000 and whether Warrior could get over as champ today. I feel like the crazy, painted face, oiled up muscle head who runs to the ring and goes through opponents wouldn't have done well in 2000, but the fans today would eat it up. That DVD they did about Warrior was a hack job. His promos back then, as weird as they were, fit the character and I think would do pretty good in today's environment. I don't think he would have gotten over in 2000 though. Orton has the look and decent enough mic skills to have been a top guy in 2000. The only problem is, with all things being equal, does Orton have enough charisma to be someone you would make champ over Rock, HHH, Angle, Taker, Austin? He definitely wouldn't have fit in the early 90's where promos were a little lighter in nature and you had to be muscled up for Vince to make you champ. |
Good catch by Supreme. The IC belt looks cursed. Plus there's that kid on twitter who seems to not be a fan... not looking good for Nick Nemeth.
|
Quote:
Except for the cursed IC belt, I think the Class of 2000 has it beat slightly for me... I guess I am the only one who did not think highly of the Warrior... I hated that guy... The Rock was SO entertaining, but I think Orton's on his way... |
Quote:
His only issue, like you said, is would he have been able to crack the main event. It's hard to say. Being a 3rd generation wrestler was used to get him over initially, and they did the same with the Rock until he found a connection with the fans. I think Orton would've been given every opportunity to succeed, and maybe a transitional run as champ if the Viper gimmick would have worked back then. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®