TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   entertainment forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   IYO: Which is your favorite digital music format? (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=116493)

GD 01-01-2012 03:15 PM

IYO: Which is your favorite digital music format?
 
In your opinion: Which is your favorite digital music format?

Which digital music format do you prefer to save your music in your respective music library?

Since I use an iPhone, I tend to save my music in either AAC or MP3 (VBR) in my iTunes library. I also burn my CDs to Apple Lossless. Although I can barely tell the difference between 320 Kbps and Lossless.

FakeLaser 01-01-2012 04:56 PM

mp3 though I know it's not the best quality

GD 01-01-2012 07:35 PM

You are a winamp dude, aren't you?

FakeLaser 01-01-2012 07:39 PM

Nah, I was for the longest time though.

XCaliber 01-01-2012 08:53 PM

None of the above the m4a format sounds great and takes up even less space.

GD 01-01-2012 09:32 PM

AAC includes m4a brudda.

Savio 01-01-2012 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FakeLaser (Post 3718205)
mp3 though I know it's not the best quality


Kane Knight 01-01-2012 10:08 PM

Mp3 is played by pretty much everything and has decent sound. I wouldn't mind a better format if it was as universal.

FakeLaser 01-02-2012 01:54 AM

Basically what Kane Knight said

GD 01-02-2012 01:56 AM

All my music got converted to 256 kbps AAC after I got iTunes Match.

#BROKEN Hasney 01-02-2012 02:54 AM

Motherfuckers always be holding Ogg Vorbis down.

#BROKEN Hasney 01-02-2012 02:58 AM

I listen to Real Audio though. It has a warmth you don't get in modern formats.

GD 01-02-2012 03:01 AM

Word. Nothing like clicking your mouse and playing a .rm / .rmvb file on your computer.

Kane Knight 01-02-2012 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru Dave (Post 3718533)
All my music got converted to 256 kbps AAC after I got iTunes Match.

This is a Clox thread, isn't it?

Iop 01-02-2012 09:59 AM

MP3.

Ive never heard of the other ones sot hey are either for pretentious posers or for old grandmothers.

The Destroyer 01-02-2012 10:10 AM

MP3, gets the job done. My hearing is so crap I can't tell the quality difference anyway.

Mike the Metal Ed 01-02-2012 10:45 AM

192kbps MP3 because I'm not an audiophile and can't tell any jump up in quality from that.

Kane Knight 01-02-2012 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike the Metal Ed (Post 3718716)
192kbps MP3 because I'm not an audiophile and can't tell any jump up in quality from that.

Most people can't hear any difference between 160 and 192 anyway.

Note, I did say most. Because I know some douchebag is going to post "but I can tell the difference in a double blind study on standard headphones!"

Most of my Mp3 collection is 192, though, so I can't really talk. It's less because I can hear a clear clarity difference and more because I'm using software that jumps from 128 to 192, and I can hear the difference there.

Lossless is kind of a waste, though. I know there are some people who swear they can hear the difference between lossless and lossy, but far as I'm concerned, they're as legit as psychics.

Anyway, as it is my collection is over 200 GB. Don't know why I'd make it bigger, especially since I mostly listen to them on headphones in noisy environments.

And anyone who has an iProduct and feels the need for high quality files should probably get their meds adjusted.

Kane Knight 01-02-2012 11:29 AM

I shouldn't have called the Mask a douche like that.

GD 01-04-2012 03:45 AM

Vinyl records are like turkey feasts and MP3s are like microwave dinner.

Requiem 01-04-2012 04:33 PM

mp3, but FLAC if it's something I like. I have the extra room on my terabyte HD, and a nice pair of headphones, so why not?

Kane Knight 01-05-2012 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru Dave (Post 3720894)
Vinyl records are like turkey feasts and MP3s are like microwave dinner.

That was retarded enough to be a Clox statement.

GD 01-05-2012 12:45 PM

I stole it.

Kane Knight 01-05-2012 12:49 PM

I believe it.

asphyXy 01-05-2012 01:49 PM

Unless you're listening to high quality stereo speakers and sitting in perfect position, don't kid yourself. Most people are never listening to music in an ideal location to take advantages of (by way of perception) the frequencies that get lost by compression.

Emperor Smeat 01-05-2012 03:13 PM

MP3.

Not much of a music snob to really notice the difference between a 128, 192, and the 300+ quality in bits.

Kane Knight 01-05-2012 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by asphyXy (Post 3722088)
Unless you're listening to high quality stereo speakers and sitting in perfect position, don't kid yourself. Most people are never listening to music in an ideal location to take advantages of (by way of perception) the frequencies that get lost by compression.

You've grown as a person, and it makes me love you all the more.

Pintint 01-06-2012 05:38 PM

MP3, but I havent really listened to any of the others. I doubt I'll notice the difference anyway...


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®