How WWE ranks its wrestlers (IMO)
 

This does not mean I think they are better or worse than people above or below them, this is how I feel WWE views them on who they use to put over another wrestler (1 always beats 2, etc):

1. Brock
2. Cena
3. Orton/Reigns
4. Seth Rollins
5. Sheamus
6. Everyone Else
7. Zack Ryder/Adam Rose

Everybody in "Everyone Else" is pretty much 50/50, no one sticks out, someone might get a push for a few weeks but then is forgotten about. This is awful IMO, I really wish I could see someone rise through the ranks but as soon as they (or if they) get out of Midcard hell they MUST lose to Cena and be sent back down there.

Where would you rank Triple H?

Also, what are you talking about?

Id rank HHH above orton and under cena...

What i mean is i believe this is how WWE ranks its talent. They dont care about the midcard at all so its hard to get behind some one when they just trade wins and loss.

Maybe i should change the thread title

Maybe add Fandango to tier 7.

Lol no joke was thinking of putting Fandango on 7 and Barret above them

haha u fucking dumbass! u really think Orten is rated higher than Rollins, haha. You keep giving me red negative reps on my private message box but we can all see who the real idiot is know. :lol:

Orton doesn't lose to J&J Security.

:'(

Swagger, Axel, Sandow and Slater are all tier 7 guys too :(

10# ARMBAR!

What about R-Truth?

R-truth wins more than you'd expect.

#1 should be Stephanie McMahon

You're right, we have to make Stephanie look strong.