E-A-G-L-E-S vs. The Vikings
 

All you Vikings fans ready for an ass beating... Y2Ant it's on!! :yes:

Go Vikings.

I woulnd't put is past the vikings beating the Eagles too, I mean whens the last time Mcnabb even played a game? a month ago? same with their defense, not to mention this will be the Eagles first time really plying when it matters without TO SO WE'LL SEE.

Culpepper ---> Moss.

Game. Set. Match.

Anyone hear about Moss's ankle? I mean if he plays he will not be 100% which would be huge for the birds

Am I the only fucking Eagles supporter on these fucking boards?

Moss hasn't been 100% for a while.

/pwnjoo!11one!@eleven!!1

I'm trying to rat my way to the Vikings and HOPEFULLY the NFC Championship game with my friend who has club seats

I dunno I think people are really underestimating Brian Westbrook as a playmaker.

Personally, I've know that for a long while Supreme.

I'm a Giants fan and I hate that shithead.

Cris Carter seems to think the Vikings will upset. This will be Tice's test right here, see if he is a good coach and have his team ready after a big win today. I would think that the Vikings are capable of winning, but not very likely to. TO being gone is going to let the Vikings stack up against the run, which they are slightly better at defending. The offense will have to be on top of its game though, they can't let up like they did in the third quarter today. The reason the Vikings started 6-0 last season and won the game today so convincingly is because they forced a lot of turnovers. That will be another key, to keep that up, because we all know our d can't stop anything without them.

Kinda hope the Eagles win here, don't like the Vikings at all.

I'm an Eagles fan and I'm scared. If Moss is hurt though I won't be has worried.

Moss will be there playing next week no matter what... He will then show up TO by wiping his own ass with Mcnabb not just the goal post.

He will then walk off the field after they lose 31-2.5

Get off of the Eagles nuts

if you want sweaty black balls on your chin go see Funky

What

I think if I were the Eagles I woulda preferd the Rams. I think the Vikings have a better chance of winning than the Rams but then again everytime people hop on the Vikings bandwagon they choke. So Falcons and Eagles will still win, but I hope Eagles lose.

I would def rather see the Vikings. The Rams have a good running game with Jackson, and a more explosive passing attack.

Personally I would want TO to go down before Westbrooke. I mean it was absolutley terrible when we lost TO, but Westbrooke is so good coming out of the backfield as a reciever. He will be huge in the playoffs watch. Many of you may laugh but Freddie Mitchell I think will be our best wide reciever in the playoffs. It is going to be interesting to say the least what happens.

McNabb ---------> Todd "stone hands" Pinkston :nono:




edit-------------------------------------------------
I woulda put T.O in and crossed him out, but I don't know how to do that. :$

No

WOOO EAGLES WOOO

I want to see eagles Vs. Colts

Check out the new sig--- :cool:

Dream is right

:foc:

if only TO was playing

McNabb ---> Owens > Culpepper ---> Moss.

Lol @ Ant

Negative.

To be perfectly honest, of the four teams left I think the Falcons have the least chance of going to the Super Bowl.

1. Eagles
2. Vikings
3. Rams
4. Falcons

Reasoning being, if the Eagles beat the Vikings this weekend, then it proves that they are still in good condition and aren't rusty. If they beat the Vikes I think it proves that they are still the best team in the NFC hands down.

If the Vikings beat the Eagles, it means that they are for real. Early in the season they were on the Power Rankings at 4, so maybe they could be back there after the horrible end to the season. Then if they win at Phily, they would play in either Atlanta or St. Louis, both domes. If they go to Atlanta, there is still the chip on the shoulder from 1998, and St. Louis has never been as good as the Vikings all year really. The Vikings talent was supposed to do a lot better then they did, the Rams talent did about what they were supposed to.

The game in Atlanta is completely up for grabs, but regardless I don't think either team will represent the NFC in the Super Bowl. Atlanta is a defensive team, thats pretty much a fact, but they won't win a big game unless Vick has one of his outstanding games. When Vick is huge, they are huge, when he is not, they are just good. I don't think their record tells their whole story. So basically, if Vick has a big game against St. Louis, I don't think he will have another one in the NFC finals.

St. Louis could easilly come out on top from Atlanta next week, but I don't really think they will. They don't have a super talented team this season, they wouldn't have made the playoffs in any other division. They had the Seahawks number this season, and that is pretty much why they got into the playoffs. They were impressive beating the Jets and Seahawks, but they have a really poor secondary and their whole team is so thin I think they will be pretty beat up going into Atlanta. They are a nice story, but I don't see it lasting much longer.

Odds to represent NFC in Super Bowl:
Philadelphia: 1:4
Minnesota: 1:12
Atlanta: 1:14
St. Louis: 1:24

What if what if who cares?

Culpepper ---> Moss + Mooning = Game.

I can't stand that Javon Kearse commercial.

All you debators in here are forgetting something very important about this game

Eagle's D: 10th
Viking's D: 28th

Culpepper and Moss are a better combo then McNabb and Owens. Culpepper is a better passer and Moss is more dynamic.

What it is all going to come down to is if the Eagles can run any sort of an offense without TO, because they haven't really been tested without him yet.