Kidman/London
 

Does anyone think that they could have played out the Kidman/London feud better? They started pusing Kidman as a heel, but I haven't seen him on TV in a couple of months. Kidman/London would have been a better CW title match than Chavo/London if they booked the feud right. Maybe they could have a returning Kidman do a run-in during Chavo/London's almost-certain match and help Chavo and make London chase for the CW belt, thus making the division, which has been kinda dull lately, a little more interesting. I'm glad they gave Funaki a title reign, though.

EVERYONE (minus Vince and his cronies) thinks that could have been wrapped up a LOT better.

Tho Chavo vs London is certainly intriguing. If allowed to go all out, these two can be crazy as well, because London is just amazing and Chavo is a fantastic worker.

I forgot kidman even existed. London, Kidman, Yang, Chavo, Kazarian (soon), the WWE needs to get off their ass and show us some good cruiserweight action.

Chavo can take most wrestlers and make them look good. Put London against him, give them 15-20 minutes...WHAMMY

There are way too many feuds that just get dropped after a few weeks. This being a prime example.

but WHY is chavo fighting for the CW title.

IMO, Chavo should up against the likes of Charlie Haas

Charlie Haas VS CHavo Guerrero :drool:

I thought Kidman was a way better heel that time than he was in WCW, not to mention he was in a legit feud.

Yea but if you look at any cruiserweight in WCW they are pretty much > the same cruiserweight in WWE.

I personally think that Chavo should move up to the US title division.