Masters/Big Show feud (spoilers)
 

What happened there? Did I miss something here, I thought Big Show was feuding over the mastlock challenge and now HBK is feuding with him? What gives?

Yeah, it doesn't make much sense. I suppose it is realistic that way. Hey, tension doesn't always result in fists. I kinda like the way they're building up Chris Masters as a slightly cleverer heel. Hey, he's evaded a feud with the biggest man in the WWE, and he's tried capitalising on the heat of a man who jobbed to Hogan at Summerslam. I'm probably the only one reading him like that, though.

The Masters/Big Show feud never materialising doesn't really bother me much. I wouldn't mind it if they kept the tension there though. Shawn Michaels could "Pick Masters' Poison" and have Big Show challenge him one night.

It just feels more real that Chris Masters came out during the Michaels' promo. It just made it feel like "I'm not going to wait for Big Show, I'm coming after you.". I don't think the WWE have as much forgotten about Masters/Show as they have put it on the backburner.

they should have let big show break the masterlock butr of course they wont do whats best right now will they

I guess they didn't want The Big Show to be the one to break the masterlock, HBK on the other hand...

hbk will break some other than the master lock
somewhere along the line of masters jaw

Welcome to RAW...IS...NONSEQUITER!

Honestly, and I brought this up in the Masters thread, I think the writing staff realized that he had such little heat alread, that having Big Show come out and break the Masterlock would kill his character completely.

Also..
Yeah, you are. If they wanted him to come off as "clever" the they would've done more to play up the fact that he avoided a confrontation. Like having him say the Masterlock challenge was for guys under a certain height or something. he ran out of the ring and the WWE dropped it. That's all.

They ended it at the house show I was at.

I thought it was because Masters can't apply a full nelson on Show.

I thought it was non sequitor

too lazy to look it up.

non sequitur
Main Entry: non se·qui·tur
Pronunciation: 'nän-'se-kw&-t&r also -"tur
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin, it does not follow
1 : an inference that does not follow from the premises; specifically : a fallacy resulting from a simple conversion of a universal affirmative proposition or from the transposition of a condition and its consequent
2 : a statement (as a response) that does not follow logically from anything previously said
:lol:

Destor loves his dictionary.

I couldn't help myself.

And that's different from the rest of the roster?

Which dictionary are you using anyway? Webster's? American Heritage? New World Order? :shifty:

Merriam-Webster, though im begining not to trust it compleatly.