Harry Potter And The Goblet of Fire
 

I saw this movie yesterday and I thought it was pretty good. I think the only problem with it is that is was really fast paced and it was like skimming through the book. But I guess they had to do that because the book is so long. I thought it was pretty good though, it had a bunch of LOL parts and it matched the book for what was put it in the movie.

Me likey. I dunno if it was better than Azkaban. Have to think about it a bit more.

Was sold-out last nite here and I don't feel like going tonight. I want to see it pretty bad though.

Did you read the books COE?

Azkaban was painful to sit through. Never read the books but it was terrible

Azkaban should have been longer than the first two were. I understand they want to appeal to younger kids so it isn't gonna be 4 hours long, but they really should start being around that length as the books get longer.

I'm gonna see it while high, should be fun.

As a movie the Goblet of Fire was alright. Just as good as the third movie, but not better ('cept for some of the visual effects)... As part of the Harry Potter story... Spoilers comming up, highlight to read.

<font color=black>I think someone got high when they wrote the screen play. They had an idea of wtf was going on but there were so many things that were left out that NEEDED to be there for the next movie! I wanted to see more of Rita Skeeter and it's just... It was a hardcore let down...</font color=black>

And the thing is I already saw it twice...

CoE... Watch Teen Girl Squad on homestarrunner.com... one line comes to mind...

Skipped school and saw it.. It was pretty sweet

Saw it this afternoon. Good stuff. Brendan Gleason was an excellent choice for Moody.

I didn't know how people would react to watching it without fully understanding it because it was so fast paced.

By not reading the book I mean.

why did barty crouch keep licking his lips and stuff?

Because he's eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeevil!

Great movie, except that it moved a little bit too fast. That's the problem with these fucking adaptations - there's too much material to cover in 500 pages than you can accomplish in 2.5 hours without everything feeling rushed.

Still, good movie. And Hermione is so fuckable.

I have never read or book or seen a Harry Potter movie before this one.. But it was pretty kickass.. And that one biddie is fucking banging.

Which "biddie"

Damb right she is!
and i am only 14 so way hay!:naughty:

it owns

Damn age limits.

Wait...isn't she British? THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING!

I really enjoyed it. I thought they did job considering they had to chop so much out.

Like others I'm not sure how I would of reacted to the movie had I not read the book prior to seeing it.

*Coughi'm 16cough*:naughty:....:shifty:

Well anyway, I don't like Harry Potter. In fact I despise Harry Potter but the only reason I'm posting here is to post this.

http://harrypervert.ytmnd.com/

great movie

Can't you tell? She's what Americans stereotypicalise us British as; posh snobby, (yet fuckable :naughty: ) and stuck up.

A girl in my class was like 3rd choice to be Hermione and told me that Emma Watson is a right stuck-up bitch (although this could be more jealousy than anything). Emma Watson is much more fuckable than this girl, so I'm not complaining :o, she's not a bad actress either (except for the business with the eyebrows).

She's a month older than me. I'll be her toyboy :yes:.

.....Oh lordy.

I agree with penner - the movie missed a lot of the human emotion of the book, it did seem to skip over a lot of detail. but there is only so much tetail you can fit into a movie. As a stand alone it was pretty good, but it's really not fair to judge it next to the book.

As in most cases, the book was better.

Yeah the book was definitely better.

I saw this movie yesterday and I thought it was pretty good. I never read any Harry Potter books.

Saw this a couple of weeks back, really enjoyed it. Probably the best film of the series.