TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   TNA not moving to Primetime (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=43107)

Boondock Saint 03-14-2006 07:27 PM

TNA not moving to Primetime
 
Source: Wrestling Observer

TNA's iMPACT! move to primetime in April is no more.

Jeff Jarrett apparently told the wrestlers are a pre-show meeting today at the tapings that Spike TV executives have changed their mind and will not be putting the show in a primetime slot.

The new timeslot starting on April 13th will be Thursdays at 11 p.m. This will follow the Ken Shamrock/Tito Ortiz season opener of Ultimate Fighter.

The change was made as Spike made the decision to move the Ultimate Fighter to 10 p.m on Thursdays.

Dave Meltzer reports that on 4/13, the line-up will be CSI at 8 p.m., UFC Unleashed at 9 p.m., Ultimate Fighter at 10 p.m. and TNA Impact at 11 p.m., which is the line-up that by far makes the most sense for everyone.

HaTeR 03-14-2006 07:31 PM

owned

The One 03-14-2006 07:31 PM

Spike TV must have heard that TNA lost Shannon Moore. :shifty:

PureHatred 03-14-2006 07:32 PM

Worst part of this is that with a slot at 11 and with the UFC entrenched on Thursdays, Spike clearly has no plan to expand TNA past one hour even if it gets great ratings.

The Optimist 03-14-2006 07:33 PM

:( when it rains it pours

JH 03-14-2006 07:37 PM

i dont believe this one bit cause meltzer is the same guy who reported that the TNA/WGN deal was done and that they would not be on Spike

Xero 03-14-2006 07:39 PM

lol...

Next you're gonna tell me that Chris Jericho was signed to WWE so TNA can't take him.





















Please? :shifty:

McLegend 03-14-2006 09:09 PM

That sucks, but hopefully it will work out.

94 SVT Cobra 03-14-2006 09:33 PM

The title of this thread should really be "Spike TV exuctives put the crack stem down along with TNA shot at primetime"

Blitz 03-14-2006 09:38 PM

Too bad, but at least it's no longer on Saturday.

DS 03-14-2006 09:41 PM

They should switch the TNA and CSI timeslots and then it would be good.

Kane Knight 03-14-2006 09:41 PM

I still honestly don't believe it yet.

Jordan 03-14-2006 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight
I still honestly don't believe it yet.

:y:

St. Jimmy 03-14-2006 10:02 PM

:rofl: it sounds logical to me.

Pepsi Man 03-14-2006 11:22 PM

Honestly, if I'm Spike TV, I'm not impressed. Say what you want, but there's give and take when it comes to putting wrestling on free (well, cable, but still not PPV) TV, and frankly, I didn't see TNA doing a lot of giving.

If Spike really DID help pay for Sting, I'd be pretty pissed if I were a Spike TV executive, considering the only ACTION appearances he's made after being there nearly three fucking months have been on Pay-Per-View, which doesn't benefit Spike TV in the least.

That's the biggest example, but generally speaking, I don't think TNA cares too much about television ratings and only wants a television show as an infomercial to help sell PPVs (again, I know that's part of the game, but in TNA's case, the give and take that needs to be there isn't there, in my opinion).

PureHatred 03-14-2006 11:26 PM

Nah, Pepis, you have a point. Impact is a squah/jobber show like the old WWF Superstars shows on Saturday mornings. In this era, and with a company that should've been trying to build an audience, that was just stupid.

Londoner 03-15-2006 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pepsi Man
Honestly, if I'm Spike TV, I'm not impressed. Say what you want, but there's give and take when it comes to putting wrestling on free (well, cable, but still not PPV) TV, and frankly, I didn't see TNA doing a lot of giving.

If Spike really DID help pay for Sting, I'd be pretty pissed if I were a Spike TV executive, considering the only ACTION appearances he's made after being there nearly three fucking months have been on Pay-Per-View, which doesn't benefit Spike TV in the least.

That's the biggest example, but generally speaking, I don't think TNA cares too much about television ratings and only wants a television show as an infomercial to help sell PPVs (again, I know that's part of the game, but in TNA's case, the give and take that needs to be there isn't there, in my opinion).


That's a good post.TNA are stupid for thinking that squash/joober shows would be enough.Yeah sure they do put on good PPV's, but that isn't what is going to make me watch Impact.

freerock1.com 03-16-2006 01:28 AM

If it is true, another thing to think about is that by moving both UFC and TNA to after 10PM, Spike may be working to keep the ratings as high as possible for the hot Thursday night properties on that other Viacom-owned network -- namely, Survivor and CSI.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®