Ask me, and i will bless you with my opinion...
 

Ask me anything about the WWE, whether it be problems, issues, pushes, etc. I am feeling a little froggy today because tommorow will be the last day of exams :cool:

I'm pretty sure that KK will be in here somewhere so i guess he can help/debate with me. :)

Ex. "How do you feel about HHH as of now?" "What are your thoughts on John Cena, Kane....whatever."

Are you gay for Jim Ross?

What do you think really happened to Kane on "May 19th"?

Nope.

Jim Ross, IMO, should not be put in the commentary spot once again. I do like Jimmy as a commentator, but nowadays he seems too repetitive and sometimes overreacts to situations. The WWE needs to get a combination going and i would recommend former or current WWE superstars who don't wrestle i.e. SCSA or Mick Foley. Jim Ross will not be around forever for the WWE to just resort to him when they make these "changes" every damn 3 months.

Because Mark Henry is like the Big Show. He is one of those "Monsters that put up and coming stars over" type wrestler. He will NEVER, IMO, hold the WWE title, and probably not the IC title. Just keeping him around probably for personal reasons. (Faithful to the company, good friends with wrestlers, etc.)

D-Lo, from what i've heard, is working in Japan right now. He might be doing some indy circuits down the road if put in that position but IMO, i would like to see him back in the WWE going at the IC title. If he gets over enough, he could probably go for the WWE title, but that is VERY risky as far as monetary status for the WWE. If he can get over that Droz thing, he could have been alot more than what he was when he was released some years back.

I think that might be Katie Vick's birthday or something. Of course it has to do with this movie coming up with him starring in it but the whole "shutting off the lights, hearing voices, thing is starting to become a little cheesy to me IMO. What Michaels did on RAW on Monday was quite funny though.

Two part question:

Do you think that Lita could make the barbwired bat from Wrestlemania disappear without using her hands?

If so, do you think her tetnus shot would come from the same doctor that did HBK's drug test?

I think that they deserve a push, but i don't want another mega, "shove down our throats" push. They should earn the reaction(s) from the fans like they have been for the past month. IMO, they are VERY hilarious and are one of the top reasons why i stay tuned in to RAW. I just don't want them to get stale quick and putting the titles on them was a good start, but getting title shots is too much for me. That is one problem with the WWE, nowadays they are on this "quick-fix" thing.

What's your opinion on this ECW thing they're trying to put together for September?

Dude, lita could take the whole Carolina Panther's offensive line without her hands. Thats why i say she would be a great soccer player.

I hope her doctor turns out to be Matt Hardy. 'Nuff said.

I loved ECW. I loved ECW when it was it's own seperate company and it was competing to be the best, entertaining wrestling company in America. IMO, this will probably end up either: 1.) People will be irritated of ECW because they know it is a part of the WWE and they wont be as competitive. (I'm not saying that ECW has to talk about the WWE to boost ratings, but you know McMahon will not allow people to be talking more about ECW than the WWE.) 2.) ECW will just be a former shell of itself because of sloppy time slots, gay budgets, etc.

Don't you think they should have called Umaga "Samoa Moe" instead?

Should be "Samoa Pedro". I mean c'mon, his manager is mexican for god's sake.

What do you think of a six sided ring?

I dunno. It is something new, but they should put more money on their set, rather than that ring. It just seems like they are trying to be TOO different when all you really need to beat the WWE as far as ratings is 1.)Good talent that is loyal 2.)Good time slot (Mon. 8-10 because 9 is when the WWE tries to get the most people.) 3.) Good writers

WHy does John Cena wear black jean shorts? Didnt those go out of style in 1995?

Yes, along with FuBu. IMO, he should wear basketball shorts or stick to the denims. Maybe have some socks under his shoes like real urban where does, ya know, keep up with the times.

When i say socks, i don't mean ankle socks. I know you've seen black guys where those shin-high black socks with athletic shoes on. Tight. I do it.

Who is the one person on the roster (WWE or OVW) who would benefit from being released the most?

If you were told you had to choose one wrestler, and that wrestler would be involved in every single wrestling match you saw for the rest of time...who would it be?

How come every time this question comes up, Christian just pops into my head? But i think Randy Orton, if that suspension is kayfabe, would benefit the most. He is still new, fresh, at his prime, and has somewhat of a name for himself. I also think, if they don't do something with him in the next months, Eugene a.k.a. Nick should shoot on the WWE about that "mentally challenged" gimmick and do his thing there.

Hands down, Kevin Nash.




Just kidding, but Eddie Guerrero R.I.P.

^^^^^

You are sick mate

Wtinessing some things that are great, sometimes cannot be seen by the human eye ;)

-Johnny Vegas

Who do you think is the greatest wrestler in WWE history to never be WWE Champion, and why?

Without a shadow of a fucking doubt, Curt Henning a.k.a. Mr. Perfect.

The guy had one of THE greatest gimmicks in WWF/E history. I used to love to hate the guy because he was so talented and he was a heel. The man should've held the WWF/E championship when he came back to the federation again for the last time. They should have pushed him and had him put over the likes of Orton, Batista, Cena, etc. C'mon, the guy was great to watch and his pyschology in the ring was in the elite status. It pisses me off, literally, to see this type of wrestler not get his shot. Those type of wrestlers only come once a decade with that all-around ability.

Honorable Mention: Chris Jericho having a SERIOUS title run (meaning RAW around him not McMahons), Jake "The Snake" Roberts (because of how over he was in his prime), Scott Hall a.k.a. Razor Ramon (i don't know WHY they didn't put it on him in '95)

What are your thoughts on William Regal?

William Regal was always been a great asset to the WWE. His fued(s) have always been interesting and when he was the commissioner, it was priceless. Remember when Jericho pissed in his "London Tea" ROFL. But in-ring wise, he is a great technical wrestler and has great in-ring psychology. He always seemd like a tag-partner to me though, probably because the WWE never really pushed him to main-event status. I would have liked to see him become World Champion one day as a heel. Not for a LONG period of time, but it would've been entertaining IMO. Regal v. Cena = LOL. That is basically "rich people" v. "urban people". But with his injuries and illnesses, i don't think we will be seeing that anytime soon, if not, ever.

In your opinion, what was the dumbest angle the WWE ever did.

In recent memory, the "Kane/Katie Vick" angle was the worst. I mean i laughed at it, but only because i felt sorry for the writers. What is ROFL is how the WWE just blows it over like it never happened. That had to be the worst point in the WWE since 1995 i think.

Most significant feud in the History of WWE?

<font color=goldenrod>Two questions, a RAW one and a SmackDown one:

1. What is your thoughts on Matt Striker?

2. Do you think Vito getting a decent sized push would be a good thing?</font>

From a money standpoint: Hulk Hogan v. Andre The Giant in the '80s because that took the WWF to a whole new level as far as a company and a household name. Hogan's name was already big, but when that legendary fued came about, the WWF just sat back in the driver's seat and watched the money pile up.

From a ratings standpoint: Bret Hart v. Shawn Michaels. Just hear me out. During this fued, there was much speculation as to what was going to happen to Bret Hart. When Montreal was over, the WWF was predicted to finally financially lose to WCW. But alas, though the crowd didn't enjoy that following Monday, ratings were alot higher than they were for the WWF at that time. People then began to see the "realism" of it, rather than the comedy, circus aspect. This brought newer fans in who thought that they could pretty much "predict" what would happen next, ala the "you'll never know what will happen in the WWF." This also leads into the next answer i am going to post.

From a(n) entertaining standpoint: Stone Cold Steve Austin v. Vince McMahon. Of course after Bret lost the title, it was inevitable that SCSA was going to become champion some time soon. Though Michaels at first resented the idea, he could not escape the becoming of the Austin era. People just liked Austin. White people, black people, jews, WCW fans, ECW fans, Bill Clinton, you name it. Vince and the writers made it clear and from then on, the rest is history. This fued really sealed the deal as far as WWF being the more entertaining company than WCW. The actually fued itself, well, you guys know what happened. Sheer gold.

From what i hear, Matt Striker is a good performer. I have yet to really SEE him in action, but he's got the look to me to become a GREAT tweener. I could see him doing a "bi-polar" "loose cannon" type gimmick. Not the Snitsky type, like the Pillman type where he is VERY intelligent, but just random and kicks your ass when he is angry. Right now, i can't see him holding the World title, but the IC is not too far from his grasp. As soon as Flair leaves that scene, stick Striker in there. I also vision him and Chris Masters maybe forming a tag team together like "Perfection" or something with these cocky ass attitudes being dicks backstage and stuff like that talking about how they are part of the "beautiful people" in the world and everyone else is ugly, fat, etc.

That wasn't my question and you know it.

I asked if you were gay for Jim Ross. Not your opinion of him.

The first thing he said was the answer to your question.