Who's Better?
 

Okay so the other day Powered Toast Man said that Nickelback was better than U2. But what I want to know is out of both Nickleback and U2 who do you guys think is better?

Powered*

Is this even a contest? Like U2 or not, Nickelback is totally worthless shit.

Bono's a pretentious twat, but he makes better music than those retards. :D

It's like asking if you'd rather have sex with Al Roker or Abe Vigoda.

I heard Bono was a 'tard. But I havent seen anything of it, so its not for me to judge, but all thanks to The Edge, U2 gets this one for me.

Nickleback is much worse than U2.

They're both a pile of shite. True, no lie!

Aside from teaming up with Bill Gates to solve poverty issues Gates himself helps create, there is a ton of stuff out there. It's not hard to find.

Yeah they both suck the giant penis

But U2 sucks slightly less

<TABLE class=tborder style="WIDTH: 471px; HEIGHT: 143px" cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=4 width=471 align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=tcat>vBulletin Message</TD></TR><TR><TD class=panelsurround align=middle>
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

U2 makes good music, always have.
Nickelback can lick my balls.

1. I HATE THAT MONKEY :mad:

2. WTF? This isn't even remotely close to being a contest. U2 is considerebly better, although I don't particularly like either.

God it was a piss take clearly. THIS IS HOW YOU REMIND ME