TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   How much time off a year does taker have? (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=46361)

Gerard 05-25-2006 07:05 PM

How much time off a year does taker have?
 
Just wondering, how many "returns" did he have last year and how many times has he been on smackdown this year? Im starting to wonder if hes even a part of the active roster any more, seems to disappear for ages then show up the smackdown before a ppv for 2 minutes at the end of the show, either wins or gets his ass handed to him at ppv then disappears again. :wtf:

Kane Knight 05-25-2006 07:49 PM

He's technically on the active roster.

crash99 05-25-2006 07:50 PM

He doesn't get enough time off.

Kane Knight 05-25-2006 08:02 PM

I think they should keep him on the active roster and pay him to NOT go to TNA.

Skippord 05-25-2006 08:04 PM

9 months a year

Kane Knight 05-25-2006 08:12 PM

Isn't it sad he needs more recovery time than Ric Flair?

6to1 05-25-2006 08:42 PM

he is worse then hogan

Kane Knight 05-25-2006 08:51 PM

Mostly because he's alive. Unlike Hogantron 5K.

happylad 05-26-2006 05:18 AM

:shifty: Just you wait till he gets his new gimmick (yes. I have decided he is getting one wether he likes it or not) he'll probably only have about 2 matches a year then :nono:

Rob 05-26-2006 06:40 AM

Dude has more holidays than Thomas Cook.

RVDmark 05-26-2006 09:01 AM

Silly question but why does he have so much time off? I can understand he is old but he could come out and cut a promo or 2, maybe take a bump. but to have teddy long announce that you have challenged Khali just sucked.

Kane Knight 05-26-2006 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RVDmark
Silly question but why does he have so much time off? I can understand he is old but he could come out and cut a promo or 2, maybe take a bump. but to have teddy long announce that you have challenged Khali just sucked.

Taker doesn't want to tour. He wants a huge check, he just doesn't want to actually do work. He doesn't want to be the Undertaker, either.

RVDmark 05-26-2006 09:16 AM

How does Mcmahon legitimise paying him so much to do so little? Is takers merch really worth that much?

6to1 05-26-2006 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight
Taker doesn't want to tour. He wants a huge check, he just doesn't want to actually do work. He doesn't want to be the Undertaker, either.

so he is kevin nash now

Kane Knight 05-26-2006 09:20 AM

Minus the torn Quads.

Rob 05-26-2006 11:16 AM

Plus he can actually have a good match now and then. And he legit puts guys over.

Corkscrewed 05-26-2006 11:24 AM

Although by "Guys" I think Rob meant Great Khali and Brock Lesnar. :lol:

Rob 05-26-2006 11:28 AM

If you think losing means putting people over then Rey Misterio must have been a huge ratings draw after beating Kevin Nash.

Innovator 05-26-2006 01:10 PM

He's rehabbing his back, after trying to carry Khali

Xero 05-26-2006 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob
If you think losing means putting people over then Rey Misterio must have been a huge ratings draw after beating Kurt Angle and Randy Orton.


Rob 05-26-2006 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Innovator
He's rehabbing his back, after trying to carry Khali

He did a far better job than I could have ever imagined.

Kane Knight 05-26-2006 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob
He did a far better job than I could have ever imagined.

I think he outshone everyone's expectations. Given Khali may be the worst hoss I can name, I've got to give him some props. It's just too bad he only seems to put on good amtches when he's "in the mood."

DaveWadding 05-26-2006 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight
Taker doesn't want to tour. He wants a huge check, he just doesn't want to actually do work. He doesn't want to be the Undertaker, either.

So what you're saying is: He's the Roger Clemens of the WWE.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®